Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 20 views

    United States v. James, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Daniel Demetrius James, Jr.'s motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court also denied James' motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. James, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    20 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Daniel Demetrius James, Jr.'s motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court also denied James' motion for appointment of counsel.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-10-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7268

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Daniel Demetrius James, Jr.'s motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court also denied James' motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    20 views2 pages

    United States v. James, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Daniel Demetrius James, Jr.'s motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court also denied James' motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7268

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    DANIEL DEMETRIUS JAMES, JR., a/k/a Dee,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at New Bern.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    Chief District Judge. (5:04-cr-00262-FL-1)

    Submitted:

    September 29, 2009

    Decided:

    October 8, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Daniel Demetrius James, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Anne Margaret
    Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Daniel
    courts
    (2006)

    order

    Demetrius

    denying

    motion.

    We

    reversible error.

    James,

    relief
    have

    on

    Jr.,
    his

    reviewed

    appeals
    18

    the

    the

    U.S.C.
    record

    district

    3582(c)(2)
    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. James, No. 5:04-cr-

    00262-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. filed June 30, 2009; entered July 1, 2009).


    We further deny James motion for appointment of counsel.
    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like