Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Harris v. Rader, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Rodney Victor Harris appealed a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Harris's appeal to be frivolous, denying his motion for a continuance. The appeals court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for dismissing the original complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Harris v. Rader, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    Rodney Victor Harris appealed a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Harris's appeal to be frivolous, denying his motion for a continuance. The appeals court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for dismissing the original complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-07-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-2465

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Rodney Victor Harris appealed a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Harris's appeal to be frivolous, denying his motion for a continuance. The appeals court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for dismissing the original complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    Harris v. Rader, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Rodney Victor Harris appealed a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Harris's appeal to be frivolous, denying his motion for a continuance. The appeals court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for dismissing the original complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-2465

    RODNEY VICTOR HARRIS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    BRET RADER, Property Manager, Giles County
    Housing and Development Corporation; ANN
    ANGERT, President of Giles County Housing and
    Development Corporation and President of GPL,
    Inc.; DARREN LIGHT, Vice President of GPL,
    Inc.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-03-572-7)

    Submitted:

    June 16, 2004

    Decided:

    July 1, 2004

    Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rodney Victor Harris, Appellant Pro Se.


    Kenneth John Ries,
    JOHNSON, AYERS & MATTHEWS, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Rodney Victor Harris appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983
    (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is

    frivolous.

    Accordingly, we deny Harriss motion for a continuance

    and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See

    Harris v. Rader, No. CA-03-572-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 13, 2003).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like