Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 27 views

    Johnny Adams v. Dr. Ofought, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Johnny Dwayne Adams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical providers at a jail. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision that Adams failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing suit. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Adams' motion to appoint counsel was also denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Johnny Adams v. Dr. Ofought, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    27 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Johnny Dwayne Adams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical providers at a jail. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision that Adams failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing suit. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Adams' motion to appoint counsel was also denied.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-02-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7234

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Johnny Dwayne Adams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical providers at a jail. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision that Adams failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing suit. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Adams' motion to appoint counsel was also denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    27 views2 pages

    Johnny Adams v. Dr. Ofought, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Johnny Dwayne Adams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical providers at a jail. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision that Adams failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing suit. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Adams' motion to appoint counsel was also denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7234

    JOHNNY DWAYNE ADAMS,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    DR. OFOUGHT; MEDICAL DEPARTMENT AT SOUTHWEST
    REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY; RICK NIECE, Charge Nurse,

    VIRGINIA

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Norman K. Moon, Senior
    District Judge. (7:12-cv-00462-NKM-RSB)

    Submitted:

    January 30, 2015

    Decided:

    February 9, 2015

    Before KEENAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Johnny Dwayne Adams, Appellant Pro Se.


    Elizabeth Kay Dillon,
    Jennifer Dillow Royer, GUYNN & DILLON, P.C., Salem, Virginia,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Johnny Dwayne Adams appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint, finding
    that Adams failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Adams v. Ofought, No. 7:12-cv-00462-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va.

    Aug. 4, 2014).
    dispense

    with

    contentions

    are

    We deny the motion to appoint counsel.


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    We

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like