United States v. Vincent Williams, 4th Cir. (2014)
United States v. Vincent Williams, 4th Cir. (2014)
United States v. Vincent Williams, 4th Cir. (2014)
No. 13-4331
No. 13-4467
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:12-cr-00047-HEH-10; 3:12-cr-00047-HEH-5)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Vincent
A.
Williams
(Vincent)
(collectively,
Appellants)
conspiracy
possess
to
with
appeal
the
and
their
intent
to
Torry
Von
Zenon
convictions
distribute
for
five
Finding no
error, we affirm.
I.
Appellants
indictment.
were
both
indicted
in
first
superseding
the
convictions.
sufficiency
of
the
evidence
They now
supporting
their
stepfather
Dion
Williams
(Dion)
was
drug
Alvarez,
in
turn,
contacted
man
known
to
him
by
the
name
Jose.
would set up the transaction, even though the drugs would never
actually be delivered.
On that basis, Urias undertook to set up the deal.
Dion
to
the
East
Coast
and
make
the
transaction
with
Dion.
Accordingly,
into
Richmond,
Virginia
on
January
26,
2012.
Upon
met
with
Dion
approximately
9:30
apartment
in
in
the
a.m.,
gated
early
Dion
complex.
morning
led
the
The
of
January
group
apartment
to
was
27.
a
At
nearby
leased
to
Zenon.
The fact that the apartment was in a gated community made
it
difficult
for
law
enforcement
to
conduct
surveillance.
the
apartment,
DEA
Special
Agent
Jason
Alznauer
observed
cap
and
black
puffy
jacket.
Zenon
was
observed
soon
Within
few
minutes,
man
matching
Zenons
which
time
Dion
showed
the
confidential
informants
puffy
jacket,
reflective
vest,
and
hardhat.
He
of the garage, then moved the truck out of the garage and parked
it in a parking space nearby.
Santana,
Dion,
and
the
informants
arrived
few
minutes later, they parked in the same garage and entered the
apartment through stairs from the garage.
in the garage when the men arrived.
Santana
spent
about
two
and
half
hours
counting
already
knew
how
to
operate
the
J.A. 100.
machines,
the
Vincent,
was
helping
In Vincents presence,
Dion proceeded to discuss the drug deal and the future dealings
that Dion anticipated.
thing
he
did
like
was
counting
kilos
and
counting
J.A.
101.
Urias
testified
that
he
also
had
J.A. 102.
Urias further testified that Dion had told him at this time that
it would be Vincent who would be coming to the apartment to
receive future cocaine purchases.
advised him that they were safe and secure because Dion had
people outside guarding and to make sure no police came.
J.A.
104.
As the amount of money the men had counted approached $1.5
million, Urias told Dion that they would begin the process of
retrieving and bringing up the 100 kilograms of cocaine, and
Urias,
Santana,
Shortly
and
thereafter,
the
a
other
informant
S.W.A.T.
team
left
made
the
entry
apartment.
into
the
flee
the
living
to
the
back
of
the
apartment
Officers
plain
view
on
the
carpet
in
the
living
room;
two
money
argues
that
the
evidence
was
insufficient
to
We disagree.
1996)
banc)
(emphasis
and
internal
quotation
marks
omitted).
finder
fact
of
could
accept
as
adequate
and
sufficient
to
prove
distribute,
the
conspiracy
to
Government
possess
must
cocaine
establish
with
intent
that:
(1)
to
an
two
conspiracy;
or
more
and
(3)
persons;
the
(2)
defendant
291,
omitted).
306
(4th
Proof
of
Cir.
a
1998)
the
defendant
knowingly
and
knew
of
the
voluntarily
conspiracy
may
of
quotation
course
marks
be
by
direct evidence.
Once it
has been shown that a conspiracy exists, the evidence need only
establish
slight
connection
between
1138,
1147
(4th
Cir.
the
defendant
and
the
1992).
To
prove
the
crime
of
reasonable
inference
that
he
knew
the
particular
testified
regarding
Dions
We disagree.
discussions
with
him
during the approximately two and a half hours that Dion, Urias,
and Vincent spent counting the currency in the apartment.
Urias
testified
that
Dion
told
Urias,
in
front
of
Vincent,
that
the
only
counting
thing
paquetes,
Vincent
which
liked
Urias
J.A. 101.
was
counting
explained
referred
kilos
to
and
money
discussions at that time with Dion about the cocaine that Urias
was going to give Dion in exchange for the money as well as the
fact
that
apartment
light
of
it
to
would
pick
those
up
be
Vincent
future
discussions,
who
drug
a
would
be
coming
deliveries.
jury
could
to
Especially
have
the
in
reasonably
concluded that Vincent was well aware of the purpose for which
the currency was to be used.
B.
Zenon also maintains that the evidence was insufficient to
support his involvement in the charged crimes.
We disagree.
Additionally, a jury
the
afternoon
meeting
when
10
he
arrived
at
the
apartment
minutes before the informants and backed the truck out of the
garage and parked it in a nearby parking space.
III.
For
affirmed.
legal
before
the
foregoing
reasons,
Appellants
convictions
are
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process. 2
AFFIRMED
11