Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 16 views

    Jerome McFadden v. S. Lewis, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Jerome McFadden in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The district court had accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the complaint for McFadden's failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Jerome McFadden v. S. Lewis, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    16 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Jerome McFadden in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The district court had accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the complaint for McFadden's failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-11-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7106

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Jerome McFadden in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The district court had accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the complaint for McFadden's failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    16 views2 pages

    Jerome McFadden v. S. Lewis, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Jerome McFadden in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The district court had accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the complaint for McFadden's failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7106

    JEROME MCFADDEN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    S. B. LEWIS, Associate Warden; FRANK MURSIER, Major McCI;
    LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden at McCI McCormick Correctional
    Institution,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
    Bruce H. Hendricks, District
    Judge. (0:12-cv-01627-BHH)

    Submitted:

    November 17, 2015

    Decided:

    November 20, 2015

    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jerome McFadden, Appellant Pro Se.


    Brandon Paul Jones, Daniel
    Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, PA,
    Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jerome

    McFadden

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to
    exhaust administrative remedies.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record


    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.


    0:12-cv-01627-BHH (D.S.C. June 26, 2015).

    McFadden v. Lewis, No.


    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like