Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    United States v. Ronald Barber, JR., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Ronald Barber's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Ronald Barber, JR., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Ronald Barber's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-12-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7567

    Original Title

    United States v. Ronald Barber, Jr., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Ronald Barber's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    17 views2 pages

    United States v. Ronald Barber, JR., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Ronald Barber's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7567

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    RONALD L. BARBER, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Anderson.
    J. Michelle Childs, District
    Judge. (8:12-cr-00949-JMC-9)

    Submitted:

    December 17, 2015

    Decided:

    December 22, 2015

    Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ronald L. Barber, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Leesa
    Washington, Assistant United States Attorneys, Andrew Burke
    Moorman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronald

    Barber,

    Jr.,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence


    reduction

    based

    on

    Guidelines Manual.
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    Amendment

    782

    to

    the

    argument

    adequately

    Sentencing

    We have reviewed the record and find no


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
    court.

    See

    United

    States

    8:12-cr-00949-JMC-9 (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2015).


    oral

    U.S.

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    v.

    Barber,

    No.

    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like