Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Gregory Jones v. Robert McKay, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Gregory H. Jones appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Gregory Jones v. Robert McKay, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Gregory H. Jones appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-02-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7302

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a court case in which Gregory H. Jones appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Gregory Jones v. Robert McKay, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Gregory H. Jones appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7302

    GREGORY H. JONES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    ROBERT MCKAY; ANTHONY E. RAND; WILLIS J. FOWLER; DERRICK E.
    WADSWORTH,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:12-ct-03213-BO)

    Submitted:

    February 25, 2016

    Decided:

    February 29, 2016

    Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Gregory H. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.


    Joseph Finarelli, Special
    Deputy Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Gregory H. Jones appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.


    5:12-ct-03213-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 2015).

    We have reviewed

    Jones v. McKay, No.

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like