Thurston v. Louisa Cty School BD, 4th Cir. (1999)

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1521

LEROY THURSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LOUISA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (CA-97-109-3-C)

Submitted:

August 24, 1999

Decided:

October 22, 1999

Before WIDENER, ERVIN,* and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Leroy Thurston, Appellant Pro Se.
David Zev Izakowitz, Donald
Dixon Long, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZELGROVE, Charlottesville, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Judge Ervin participated in the consideration of this case


but died prior to the time the decision was filed. The decision is
filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 46(d).

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
Leroy Thurston appeals from the district courts order granting summary judgment in favor of the Louisa County School Board in
his case arising under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a)(1) (1994),
and Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. 215(a)(3) (West 1998).
On appeal, Thurston claims that his attorney did not properly
conduct discovery, and he disputes the amount of money that he owes
to counsel.

Our review is limited to the issues raised by Thurston

in his informal brief.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because there is no

right to counsel in a civil case, Thurstons claims regarding his


attorneys alleged errors are not cognizable in this appeal.

See

Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th
Cir. 1986) (holding that there is no right to effective assistance
of counsel in civil cases).
the district court.

Accordingly, we affirm the order of

We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like