Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 29 views

    United States v. Bledsoe, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by June Dale Norris Bledsoe for a writ of error coram nobis. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Bledsoe's petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Bledsoe, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    29 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by June Dale Norris Bledsoe for a writ of error coram nobis. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Bledsoe's petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-08-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6593

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by June Dale Norris Bledsoe for a writ of error coram nobis. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Bledsoe's petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    29 views2 pages

    United States v. Bledsoe, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by June Dale Norris Bledsoe for a writ of error coram nobis. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Bledsoe's petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6593

    JUNE DALE NORRIS BLEDSOE,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
    Judge. (CR-90-42-5)

    Submitted:

    July 26, 2001

    Decided:

    August 2, 2001

    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    June Dale Norris Bledsoe, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    June Dale Norris Bledsoe appeals the district courts order
    denying her petition for writ of error coram nobis.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.
    district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    See United States v. Bledsoe, No. CR-90-42-5

    (E.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like