Case On Maruti Udyog Accounting Policy
Case On Maruti Udyog Accounting Policy
Case On Maruti Udyog Accounting Policy
www.icmrindia.org
FINA/008
Sales
10000
s
e
r
8000
ro
C
6000
in
s
R
4000
800
s
600
e
r
o
r
400
C
n
i
200
s
R0
2000
-200
-400
1997
1999
2001
1997
2003
1999
2001
2003
Eleventh largest vehicle manufacturer in the world and the fourth largest manufacturer in Japan.
Business India, 26th May 2003. Segment A: cars priced lower than Rs. Three lakhs, Segment B: cars
priced between Rs. three to five lakhs.
This annual study, which began in 1997, assessed customer satisfaction with product quality and dealer
service. The factors used for measurement were problems experienced, quality of service advisor, service
performance, and service timings and facility appearance.
1
License to use for IBS Campuses only. Sem I, Class of 2016-18.
Background Note
In the early -1980s, the Indian government decided to produce a small car, which would be
affordable to the Indian middle class. It procured technology from Japan, which had developed
world-class capabilities in small cars by that time. It was not Toyota or Nissan or Honda, the three
largest players in Japan, with whom the government tied up, but Suzuki, a much smaller company,
with strong capabilities in making small cars.
Maruti was incorporated in 1981 by taking over the assets of the erstwhile Maruti Ltd, (set up in
1971 and wound up in 1978). The assets of Maruti Ltd. were acquired by the government under
the Maruti Ltd. (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980. In 1982, the government
signed a joint venture agreement with Suzuki, which was offered a 26% equity stake in Maruti.
In December 1983, Maruti launched its first car, Maruti 800, targeted at the masses, as the
peoples car with a price tag of Rs.40,000 (ex-show room price). Maruti rapidly consolidated its
competitive position by launching various other models. In 1984, Maruti introduced a utility
vehicle, Omni that could seat up to eight people. In 1985, another utility vehicle Gypsy, designed
for tough road conditions, was launched. In the late 1980s, Suzuki increased its equity stake in
Maruti from 26% to 40% and further to 50% in 1992. This converted Maruti into a nongovernment company and gave Suzuki a much freer hand in managing the affairs of the company.
Exhibit: I
Segment
Brand
Ex-showroom Price of
Base Models in Delhi as
on 31st March 2003
Engine
Capacity
(cc)
Launch
Date
Percentage of Total
Sales Volume in the
Six Months Ended
30th September 2002
Maruti
800
796
Dec-83
71.60%
Omni
796
Nov-84
28.40%
Zen
993
May-93
19.60%
1061
Dec-99
8.90%
Alto
796/1061
Sep-00
7.80%
Esteem
1298
(petrol)
1527
(diesel)
Nov-94
13.30%
Baleno
1590
Dec-99
0.50%
Versa
1298
Oct-01
3.00%
Utility
Vehicle
Gypsy
King
1298
Dec-85
4.40%
Utility
Vehicle
Grand
Vitara
Rs.15, 96,000
(XL7/Standard)
2700
Apr-03
N.A.
In 1990, Maruti introduced a 3-box car, Maruti 1000. In 1993, it introduced a new model, the Zen
with a 1300 cc engine, and Esteem, a variation of Maruti 1000 (which was replaced) with more
power and a new exterior. In the same year, the first sign of conflict between the joint venture
partners surfaced, when Suzuki proposed a Rs.22 billion expansion and modernization plan. The
transfer of gearbox technology was also a bone of contention between the two partners. The
government felt that Suzuki was deliberately withholding this technology so that it could export it
to Maruti and make windfall profits at the cost of Maruti. However, in mid-1996, the government
approved the plan and Suzuki agreed to transfer its technology.
Meanwhile, in 1994, Maruti had become the first Indian company to reach a cumulative
production of one million vehicles. In 1995, Maruti received ISO 9002 certification. In 1997,
Maruti crossed the two million mark in cumulative vehicle production. In 1997-98, Marutis
overall market share was 83.1%.6
In 1997, Suzuki and the government again faced a series of disputes over management control and
the appointment of Bhargavas successor. It was Bhargava who had played a significant role in
getting Maruti up and running. Bhargava had also managed the relations between Suzuki and the
government well. When the government announced R.S.S.L.N. Bhaskarudu would succeed
Bhargava, Suzuki claimed that the appointment was illegal since a majority (five out of nine) of
the board members had objected. Suzuki even alleged that Bhaskarudu was incompetent and
unsuitable for the post of MD. Later, the two partners decided to settle their differences amicably.
Bhaskarudu indicated he would step down two years ahead of schedule, and Jagdish Khattar would
replace him in January 2000.
This dispute between Suzuki and the government distracted Maruti. Delays in introducing new
models proved costly for Maruti. Hyundai launched the Santro (September 1998), Daewoo, the
Matiz (October 1998) and Tata Motors, the Indica (March 1999). All these models began to offer
stiff competition to Maruti.
After Khattar took charge in August 1999, Maruti went through various restructuring exercises to
strengthen its competitive position. Khattar also embarked upon an aggressive product
development strategy. This was prompted by a decline in Marutis overall market share from 65%
(1999) to 52% (2000). The company realized the profile of the Indian car market had changed.
Leaving the basic 800 model unchanged for over 15 years had been a strategic blunder.
After launching the Baleno and Wagon R in 1999, Maruti finalized plans for a more complete
product range. The company announced it would launch one new model every 6-12 months with
price gaps of about Rs. 25,000. In 2000, Maruti introduced 'Alto' (premium small car) especially
for export market, in two versions -- Alto LX with 800 cc capacity and Alto VX with 1,061 cc
capacity and Altura. The two versions were offered in seven colors. Maruti also launched Versa,
its first Multi Purpose Vehicle, in October 2001.
As competition intensified, Maruti realized the importance of getting closer to its customers. The
company launched various initiatives to improve customer service. In 1999, Maruti established a
chain of model workshops Maruti Service Masters (MSM) across the country. Operated by
franchisees, these one-stop shops met all the vehicle needs of Maruti owners, offered maintenance
service, spares, accessories, insurance related services and took care of warranty claims. Maruti
also set up Customer Call centers in the National Capital Region, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Chennai
and Mumbai. The customers could interact with the company through a toll free telephone number.
In March 2002, Maruti strengthened its interactive web site, www.marutiudyog.com, to provide a
wealth of information and practical help to customers. Maruti also entered four related businessescorporate lease and fleet management (Mid-2001), buying and selling of used cars (October 2001),
auto finance (January 2002), and car insurance (May 2002).
Maruti had started with a weak distribution and service network, compared to players like
Hindustan Motors and Tata Motors, when it started its operations. But by the early 2000s, Maruti
had the largest network of dealers and service stations amongst all car manufacturers in India. In
2003, it had 178 authorized dealers with 243 sales outlets in 161 cities, 342 dealer workshops and
1,545 Maruti Authorized Service Stations (MASS) covering 898 cities, and express service
stations on 30 highways across the country.
In May 2002, the government and Maruti executed a Revised Joint Venture Agreement (RJVA). In
the process, the government offloaded 6.06 lakhs shares to Suzuki at a premium of Rs.1,000
crores. After the issue, Suzukis holding in Maruti rose to 54.2% from 50%, while that of the
government dropped to 45.54% from 49.6%. The government also indicated it would divest its
remaining equity through a public offer in two phases by April 2004.
In 2002, Maruti found itself with a lower market share of 42%. However, in 2003, Maruti
improved its market share through its efficient operations to 54%.7 Maruti launched an AC version
E2 M800, a small Alto Celebration and a sports utility vehicle, Grand Vitara XL.
In early 2003, Maruti made an initial public offer (IPO), comprising 7.2 million equity shares of
Rs.5 each along with a green shoe option8 for 10% of the issue. The IPO opened in June 2003 with
a floor price of Rs.115. The issue was finally priced at Rs.125 per share. After divesting 27.5% of
its holding in Maruti, the government continued to hold an 18% stake in the company.
Accounting Policies
Marutis financial statements were prepared in accordance with historical cost convention, the
applicable accounting standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI)
and the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The consolidated financial statements of
Maruti included accounts of the company and its subsidiary undertakings. Subsidiary undertakings
were those companies in which Maruti had more than 50% of voting power or otherwise had the
power to exercise control over the operations. Subsidiaries were consolidated from the date on
which effective control was transferred to the group till the date such control existed.
Revenue Recognition
Marutis revenue consisted of two main componentstotal sales and other revenue. Total sales
comprised sales of products manufactured by Maruti and sales of products manufactured for its
vehicles by vendors and sold by Maruti. The revenue was recognised as and when the ownership
of the goods was transferred to the buyer. Other revenue consisted primarily of the sale of scrap,
interest on investments and receivables, net gains from sale of investments, sale of power 9, sales
tax incentives granted under the Haryana Sales Tax law for a period of 14 years beginning August
2001 and revenue from new business initiatives.
Exhibit: II
Maruti: Revenue
Rs. Millions
2002
2001
Sales:
Of products manufactured by the company
Vehicles
8
9
Anupama Arora & Soumya K Ghosh, ICRA Industry Watch Series, The Indian Automotive Industry,
September 2003.
An option that allows additional shares to be sold to the public if the demand is high.
Sale of power is discontinued in April 2002, after natural gas became unavailable as a fuel for generating
power in its captive power plant.
4
License to use for IBS Campuses only. Sem I, Class of 2016-18.
Rs. Millions
2002
2001
Domestic
81881
80830
Exports
2379
2766
893
803
85153
84399
4227
3635
1429
1253
5656
4888
90809
89287
Other revenue
3294
3246
Revenue
94103
92533
Other revenue or revenue from new business initiatives comprised revenue from services provided
by Maruti in connection with automobile finance, leasing and fleet management and sale of preowned cars. Domestic and export sales were recognized on dispatch of goods from the
factory/stock yard and port respectively. Agency commission was recognized, based on the total
net premium collected/handed over to the principal.
Fixed Assets
Fixed assets (except freehold land) were carried at the cost of acquisition or construction or at
manufacturing cost (in case of own manufactured assets) in the year of capitalization less
accumulated depreciation.
In respect of the various project related activities, carried on concurrently with production, the
expenses on administration and supervision incurred, whose bifurcation between production and
construction activities was not ascertainable, were charged to revenue.
Exhibit: III
2002
2001
252.10
238.90
4083.50
3581.00
49.10
46.80
Capital WIP
72.40
368.40
4457.10
4235.10
1954.60
1619.60
2502.50
2615.50
5
License to use for IBS Campuses only. Sem I, Class of 2016-18.
Depreciation
Maruti depreciated fixed assets except for leasehold land on straight-line method on a pro rata
basis from the month in which the asset was put to use. Depreciation for assets capitalized before
1987, was provided at the rates computed in terms of section 205 (2) (b) of the Companies Act,
195610, in terms of circular No. 1/86 dated 21st May 1986, of the Government of India.
Depreciation for assets capitalized on or after 2nd April 1987, was provided at the rates prescribed
in Schedule XIV of the Companies Act, 1956, except for certain fixed assets where higher
depreciation based on managements estimate of the useful life of the assets was changed.
Exhibit: IV
07.31%
Double shift
11.88%
Triple shift
15.83%
19.00%
Leasehold land was amortized over the period of lease. Plant and Machinery whose written down
value at the beginning of the year was Rs. 5000 or less and other assets whose written down value
at the beginning of the year was Rs. 1000 or less were depreciated at the rate of 100%.
In case the historical cost of an asset underwent a change due to an increase or decrease in longterm liability on account of foreign exchange fluctuation, change in duties, etc., the depreciation on
revised, unamortized, depreciable amount was provided prospectively over the residual useful life
of the asset.
Inventory
Maruti valued inventory at lower of cost, and determined on weighted average basis, and net
realisable value11. When there was a decline in the price of a material and it was estimated that the
cost of the finished product would exceed net realisable value, the material was written down to
net realisable value. In such circumstances, the replacement cost of the material was the best
available measure of their net realisable value.
Exhibit: V
Maruti: Inventories
Rs. Crores
Raw materials
Stores and spares
Raw materials and stores
Finished goods
Semi finished goods
10
11
2002
2001
371.50
582.50
74.90
180.70
446.40
763.20
219.20
69.60
24.90
32.70
Depreciation shall be provided in respect of each item of depreciable asset, for such an amount as is
arrived at by dividing 95% of the original cost thereof to the company by the specified period in respect
of such asset.
Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated
costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
6
License to use for IBS Campuses only. Sem I, Class of 2016-18.
Rs. Crores
2002
2001
244.10
102.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Other stock
0.00
0.00
Inventories
690.50
865.50
Tools were written off over a period of three years except for those valuing Rs. 5000 or less
individually, which were charged off to revenue in the year of purchase. Machinery spares (other
than those supplied along with main plant and machinery, which were capitalized and depreciated
accordingly) were charged off to revenue on consumption, except those valuing Rs. 5000 or less
individually, which were charged off to revenue in the year of purchase. Those whose values were
not individually ascertainable were written off over a period of three years.
Investments
Investments were assets held by an enterprise for earning income by way of dividends, interest,
and rentals, for capital appreciation, or for other benefits to the investing enterprise. Current
investments were by nature readily realizable and were intended to be held for not more than one
year. Such investments were valued at lower of cost or at fair value. Investments other than current
investments were classified as long-term investments. Long-term investments were valued at cost,
except in case of permanent diminution in their value, for which the necessary provision had
already been made.
Exhibit: VI
Maruti: Investments
Rs. Crores
2002
2001
0.10
0.00
In mutual funds
0.00
0.00
Other investments
105.70
105.50
Total investments
105.80
105.50
14.50
14.50
0.00
0.00
Quoted investments
14.50
14.50
42.80
27.60
Marketable investments
In group/associate companies
Exhibit: VII
2002
2001
199.50
218.40
Services rendered
0.00
0.00
Dividend received
0.00
0.00
Interest received
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.20
199.70
218.60
1005.80
1193.20
6.40
96.50
0.00
0.00
103.60
303.00
138.30
110.10
13.00
15.60
Dividends
0.00
16.50
Travel
2.70
3.20
Others
64.90
45.20
1334.70
1783.30
(1135.00)
(564.70)
Interest Remittances
On the balance sheet date, all assets other than fixed assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currency but not covered by forward contracts were reported at the exchange rate prevailing as on
the balance sheet date. The cost of the respective fixed assets was adjusted for increase or decrease
in liabilities, incurred for the purpose of acquiring such fixed assets due to application of exchange
rates prevailing on the balance sheet date.
Foreign currency transactions covered by forward contracts 12 were recorded at the exchange rate
prevailing at the inception date of forward contracts. On the balance sheet date, all assets and
liabilities covered by forward contracts were stated at the forward contract rates.
The difference between the forward rate and the exchange rate at the inception of a forward
contract was recognized as income or expense over the life of the contract except in case of
liabilities incurred for acquiring fixed assets in which case, such difference was adjusted in the cost
of the respective fixed assets.
12
A contract in which a seller agrees to deliver foreign currency to a buyer sometime in the future at a price
which is fixed at the time of agreement.
8
License to use for IBS Campuses only. Sem I, Class of 2016-18.
Profit or loss arising on cancellation or renewal of a forward contract was recognized as income or
expense in the year in which such cancellation or renewal had been made except in case of a
forward contract relating to liabilities incurred for acquiring fixed assets, where profit or loss was
adjusted in the cost of the respective fixed assets.
Deferred Taxation
Maruti followed the Accounting Standard 22, for calculation of tax expense for the period,
comprising current tax13 and deferred tax.14
Deferred tax assets15 and liabilities16 were recognized for all timing differences 17 subject to
consideration of prudence with respect to deferred tax assets. The accumulated deferred tax
liability at the beginning of the year was recognized with a corresponding charge to the general
reserve in the year of transition. Deferred tax assets were recognized for all deductible timing
differences. They were carried forward to the extent that future taxable profits would be available,
against which such deferred tax assets could be realized. Deferred tax assets were reviewed on
each balance sheet date and written down to reflect the amount that was reasonably certain to be
realized.
Unrecognized deferred tax assets were reassessed on each balance sheet date and were recognized
to the extent that it was certain that such previously unrecognized deferred tax assets would be
realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities were measured using tax rates that had been enacted or
substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
2002
2001
R&D Capital
16.80
19.50
R&D Current
29.90
26.10
46.70
45.60
14
15
16
17
The amount of income tax determined to be payable (recoverable) in respect of the taxable income (tax
loss) for a period.
The tax attributable to timing differences or a liability that has resulted from income already earned that
has been recognized for accounting purposes, but not for tax purposes and that is recorded on the balance
sheet.
Amounts of income taxes recoverable in future periods in respect of deductible temporary differences,
the carry forward of unused tax losses and the carry forward of unused tax credits.
Amounts of income taxes payable in future periods in respect of taxable temporary differences.
Differences between profits or losses as computed for tax purposes and results as stated in financial
statements, which arise from the inclusion of items of income and expenditure in tax computation in
periods different from those in which they are dealt with in the financial statements.
9
License to use for IBS Campuses only. Sem I, Class of 2016-18.
Contingent liabilities
Maruti accounted for contingent liabilities as per Accounting Standard 4, on Contingencies and
Events occurring after balance sheet date issued by the ICAI. The accounting treatment of a
contingent loss was determined by the expected outcome of the contingency. Contingent loss that
arose from tax disputes and other claims was provided for, when it was probable that, a liability
was incurred as on the balance sheet date and an amount could be reasonably estimated. This
required significant management judgments, which might be based on the opinions of legal experts
wherever necessary.
Exhibit: IX
Maruti: Contingent Liabilities
Rs. Crores
Bills Discounted
2002
2001
0.00
0.00
Disputed Taxes
1414.30
675.50
Letter of Credit
67.70
147.60
418.80
389.50
0.00
0.00
84.50
126.80
Total Guarantees
Future lease rent payable
Liabilities on Capital Account
Source: Prowess Database.
Contingent gains were not recognised in financial statements since their recognition might result in
the recognition of revenue, which might never be realised. However, when the realisation of a gain
was virtually certain, then such gain was not a contingency and accounting for the gain was
appropriate.
10
License to use for IBS Campuses only. Sem I, Class of 2016-18.
Bibliography
1. Driving out of Maruti, Business India, 13th May 2002.
2. Maruti poised for growth after Suzuki takeover, www.indiainfo.com, 15th May 2002.
3. Nandini Sen Gupta, Managing Maruti, The Economic Times, 19th May 2002.
4. S. Muralidharan, Maruti disinvestment -- Releasing the clutch, Business Line, 19th May 2002.
5. Corporate Reports The race begins, Business India, 11th November 2002, pg. 64-72.
6. Draft Red Herring Prospectus, Maruti Udyog Limited, May 2003.
7. Joseph Lancelot, First in class, Business India, 26th May 2003.
8. Compendium of Accounting Standards, The Institute of Chartered Accounts of India, 1st
July 2003.
9. Mitra Kushan, Maruti: Ace Driving, Business Today, 17th August 2003, pg. 118-121.
10. Anupama Arora & Soumya K Ghosh, ICRA Industry Watch Series, The Indian
Automotive Industry, September 2003.
11. CMIE Prowess Database.
12. CMIE Industry Analysis Service.
13. www.marutiudyog.com.
14. www.icai.org.
15. www.investopedia.com.
16. www.agencyfaqs.com
17. www.5paisa.com
11
License to use for IBS Campuses only. Sem I, Class of 2016-18.