Enticing Online Consumers: An Extended Technology Acceptance Perspective
Enticing Online Consumers: An Extended Technology Acceptance Perspective
Enticing Online Consumers: An Extended Technology Acceptance Perspective
Abstract
The business-to-consumer aspect of electronic commerce (EC) is the most visible business use of the World Wide Web
(WWW). A virtual store allows companies to provide product information and offer direct sales to their customers through an
electronic channel. The fundamental problem motivating this study is that: in order for a virtual store to compete effectively
with both physical stores and other online retailers, there is an urgent need to understand the factors that entice consumers to
use it. This research attempted to provide both theoretical and empirical analyses to explain consumers' use of a virtual store
and its antecedents.
By applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) and innovation diffusion theory (IDT), this research took an extended
perspective to examine consumer behavior in the virtual store context. The data from a survey of online consumers was used
empirically to test the proposed research model. Conrmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to examine the reliability and
validity of the measurement model, and the structural equation modeling (SEM) technique was used to evaluate the causal model.
The implication of the work to both researchers and practitioners is discussed. # 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Electronic markets; Innovation diffusion; Online retailing; Technology acceptance model; Virtual store
1. Introduction
The advantages of using the Internet for business-toconsumer transactions are clear. The openness of the
Internet is creating opportunities for virtually all companies, ranging from small start-ups to Fortune 100
companies. It is widely utilized to establish general
market as well as niche solutions by these organizations. In achieving these objectives, businesses use the
Internet as a communication, transaction or distribution channel [6,20]. The proliferation of business-toconsumer electronic commerce (EC) in recent years
*
0378-7206/02/$ see front matter # 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 3 7 8 - 7 2 0 6 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 1 2 7 - 6
706
707
3. Theoretical model
A virtual store has been viewed as a new business
model; some researchers have provided analogies
between virtual stores and their physical counterparts.
As both the presence and operation of virtual stores
depend heavily on IT, they are often regarded as a type
of IS. To retailers, virtual stores are their strategic IS,
while to consumers, virtual stores are end-user IS. This
view is justied by previous literature (e.g.
[48,56,60]). Hence, when consumers accept and use
virtual stores, they are accepting and using technologies and innovations. The theoretical constructs are
behavior prediction, user acceptance, and innovation
adoption. Theory of reasoned action (TRA), TAM, and
IDT are among the widely supported theories that
focus on these constructs.
3.1. TRA and TAM
Ajzen and Fishbein's [3] TRA is a well-accepted
intention model that has been proven successful in
predicting and explaining behavior across a wide
variety of domains. Based on TRA, Davis [17] introduced TAM for predicting IT usage. While TRA is
``designed to explain virtually any human behavior'',
the goal of TAM was ``to provide an explanation of
the determinants of computer acceptance . . . across
a broad range of end-user computing technologies
and user populations'' [19]. The model posits that
perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use
(PEOU) are the primary determinants of system use.
The model hypothesizes that actual system use is
determined by users' behavioral intention (BI) to
use, which is in turn inuenced by users' attitudes
(A) toward using. Finally, attitude is directly affected
by beliefs about the system, which consists of PU and
PEOU.
TAM is among the most inuential and discussed
theories in predicting and explaining end-user behavior and system use. It is one of the base theories for
this study because of its solid theoretical foundation.
A number of recent studies have successfully adopted
TAM to study the acceptance of Internet related
technologies, such as e-mail [24], the World Wide
Web (WWW) [23], and EC. Therefore, using it as the
basis for studying consumer acceptance of virtual
stores is a highly valid approach.
708
3.2. IDT
One theory associated with research on technology
innovation is IDT. It has been widely applied in
disciplines such as anthropology, sociology, education, communication, marketing, etc. [53,54,55]. Diffusion has been dened as ``the process by which an
innovation is communicated through certain channels
over time among the members of a social system'', and
an innovation is ``an idea, practice, or object that is
perceived as new by an individual or another unit of
adoption''. Diffusion is achieved through user adoption, which is ``the acceptance into use and the continued use of a new idea or thing'' [68]. IDT tries to
explain the innovation decision process, the determining factors of rate of adoption, and different categories
of adopters. It helps in predicting the likelihood and
rate of adoption of an innovation. Most of the innovations studied recently are technology innovations (e.g.
[38,44]).
The main contribution of IDT to our study is the set
of innovation attributes. These help to explain the
different rates of adoption by users. The attributes
include: relative advantage, compatibility, complexity,
trialability, visibility, and observability; these ve
attributes have been said to explain 4987% of the
variance in rate of adoption. Previous studies, including the meta-analysis of 75 diffusion articles conducted by Tornatzky and Klein [62], found that
only relative advantage, compatibility and complexity
were consistently related to innovation adoption. Most
online shoppers are considered early adopters of virtual stores. Virtual stores are innovations, because they
have revamped the traditional retail business model.
They also represent a hybrid of business processes and
modern technologies and are exerting an increasingly
greater impact on people's daily lives.
3.3. Relationship between the two theories and this
research
Although they originated in different disciplines,
TAM and IDT have some obvious similarities. The
relative advantage construct in IDT is often considered to be the PU construct in TAM, and the complexity construct in IDT is extremely similar to the
PEOU concept in TAM [43]. This suggests that TAM
and IDT reconrm each other's ndings, which raises
709
4. Research methodology
Survey research was the predominant methodology
used in this study. The sampling units are individual
online consumers. A questionnaire was developed to
measure the relevant constructs.
4.1. Measurement development
The constructs and their measures are presented in
Table 1, and the list of the items is displayed in
Appendix A. In the last few years, a number of articles
developed and validated instruments for measuring
TAM constructs (e.g. [2,18,57]); therefore, the majority of the items in the instrument were derived from
existing literature. Self-reported measures of behavior
rather than direct observations were used to determine
the actual use of virtual stores, because they are more
convenient to obtain and are free of specic targets,
contexts, or time frames. Moreover, self-reported
measures have been found appropriate for relative
measures and are highly consistent with the objective
measures [4,12].
As the attitude (A) construct is subject-specic, the
items measuring it were developed using the recommendation of Ajzen and Fishbein [3]. They suggested
that attitude be predicted from a person's salient
beliefs. The procedure they proposed was used and
proven successful in many studies. Hence, the present
research implemented the same procedure to measure
a consumer's attitude toward using a virtual store. A
message asking people to participate in a study about
710
Table 1
Constructs and measures
Construct
Definition
Source/reference
Compatibility
The compatibility of using a virtual store with existing values and beliefs,
previously introduced ideas, and potential adopters' needs
The user's subjective probability that using a specific virtual store will
increase his or her performance in purchasing and information searching
The degree to which a user expects the use of the target virtual store
to be free of effort
The user's attitude toward using a virtual store
The user's likelihood to use a virtual store
The frequency of using a virtual store and the approximate number of
times the user uses the virtual store in a given time period
[43]
Perceived usefulness
Perceived ease of use
Attitude
Behavioral intention to use
Actual use
[18]
[18]
Survey on salient beliefs [3]
[3]
[3]
Percent
(%)
Cumulative
(%)
Gender
Male
Female
121
132
47.8
52.2
47.8
100
Age
Less than 20
2029
3039
4049
Over 50
32
126
75
13
7
12.6
49.8
29.6
5.1
2.8
12.6
62.5
92.1
97.2
100
26.1
20.2
30.0
13.8
9.9
26.1
46.2
76.3
90.1
100
Residence
Urban
Suburban
57.3
42.7
57.3
100
19.0
37.5
25.3
18.2
19.0
56.5
81.8
100
145
108
2.4
25.7
59.7
87.0
100
Shopping online
Never shopped
Have shopped
20.6
100
52
201
20.6
79.4
711
Table 3
Descriptive statistics of attitude
Attitude item
Mean
S.D.
Rangea
4.365
4.287
3.612
3.096
0.635
0.746
1.079
1.192
35
25
15
15
2.635
1.133
15
712
Table 4
Fit indices for the measurement model for the research model
Root mean square
error of approximation
Root mean
square residual
Normed fit
index
Non-normed
fit index
Comparative
fit index
0.061
0.044
0.91
0.95
0.96
Composite
reliabilitya
Average variance
extractedb
0.78
0.64
0.84
0.51
0.83
0.56
0.74
0.42
1.00
1.00
0.87
0.77
P 2
P
a
Composite reliability: li varG= li 2 varG
P
yii .
P 2
P 2
b
P Average variance extracted: li varG= li varG
yii .
reliability of the data existed. Along with the coefcients of composite reliability, the coefcients of
average variance extracted are also displayed. The
average variance extracted indicates what percentage
of the variance of the construct is explained by any
individual item. The great majority of the constructs
have average variance extracted higher than the benchmark of 0.5 recommended by Bagozzi and Yi; therefore, it was concluded that the items adequately
explained the variance. Table 6 displays the factor
loadings of the retained items on the constructs that
they were designed to measure.
In summary, the great majority of the retained items
loaded highly on the constructs that they were
designed to measure. The t indices demonstrated
good overall t of the measurement model to the data.
Average variance extracted coefcients suggested that
the items were able to explain the variance in the
constructs, and the composite reliability coefcients
suggested that a high internal reliability existed in the
constructs. The statistical results indicated that the
measurement model has high reliability and validity,
and the retained items were able to measure the
constructs under study.
5.2. Structural model
The causal structure of the proposed research model
was tested using structural equation modeling (SEM).
The authors used the modeling generating (MG) strategy for altering the structural equation model suggested by Joreskog [36]. When employing this, a
researcher modies the model based on the results
of the data analysis. The model is modied until it is
both theoretically meaningful and statistically well
tting.
The test demonstrated reasonable t between the
data and the proposed structural model. The chisquare was calculated to be 497.2 (P 0:00) with
158 d.f. The CFI provides evidence of a reasonably
tting model (CFI 0:87). However, the root mean
713
Table 6
LAMBDA-X (factor loadings)
Item
Measure
Factor loading
C2
C3
0.80
0.80
PU2
0.75
PU5
PU6
Using (name of the virtual store) would improve my performance in shopping or information seeking
(e.g. save time or money)
Using (name of the virtual store) would increase my productivity in shopping or information seeking
(e.g. make purchase decisions or find product information within the shortest time frame)
Using (name of the virtual store) would enhance my effectiveness in shopping or information seeking
(e.g. get the best deal or find the most information about a product)
Using (name of the virtual store) would make it easier for me to shop or find information
I find (name of the virtual store) very useful in my shopping or information seeking
0.74
0.75
PEOU3
PEOU4
PEOU5
PEOU6
0.81
0.76
0.67
0.74
A1
A2
A3
A4
Using (name
Using (name
The fact that
Using (name
0.68
0.74
0.56
0.60
BI1
I intend to use (name of the virtual store) (e.g. purchase a product or seek product information)
1.00
USE1
USE2
How often do you use (name of the virtual store) (for purchase or information seeking)?
How many times have you used (name of the virtual store) (for purchase or information seeking) in the
last 6 months?
0.95
0.80
PU3
PU4
C
34.74
1.64
0.89
0.80
1.98
0.69
0.63
714
Table 8
Fit indices for the structural model for the revised model
Root mean square
error of approximation
Root mean
square residual
Normed fit
index
Non-normed
fit index
Comparative
fit index
0.069
0.048
0.87
0.93
0.93
Table 9
Hypothesis-testing results
Hypotheses
Hypothesis
Hypothesis
Hypothesis
Hypothesis
Hypothesis
Hypothesis
Hypothesis
Effects
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Structural coefficient
S.E.
Remarks
0.99
0.64
0.16
0.30
0.32
0.40
0.28
0.07
0.10
0.10
0.09
0.07
0.08
0.08
Supported
Supported
Not supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Fig. 2. The revised model (coefcients associated with structural paths represent standardized estimates; parenthesized values represent
standard errors; a: not signicant).
715
716
PU6:
USE2:
717
718
[35] L. Jin, D. Robey, Explaining cybermediation: an organizational analysis of electronic retailing, International Journal of
Electronic Commerce 3 (4), 1999, pp. 4765.
[36] K.G. Joreskog, Testing structural equation models, in: K.A.
Bollen, J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models,
Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1993, pp. 294316.
[37] J.S. Kakalik, M.A. Wright, Responding to privacy concerns
of consumers, Review of Business 18 (1), 1996, pp. 1518.
[38] E. Karahanna, D.W. Straub, N.L. Chervany, Information
technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs, MIS Quarterly
23 (2), 1999, pp. 183213.
[39] C. Liu, K.P. Arnett, Exploring the factors associated with
Web site success in the context of electronic commerce,
Information & Management 38 (1), 2000, pp. 2333.
[40] G.L. Lohse, P. Spiller, Electronic shopping, Communications
of the ACM 41 (7), 1998, pp. 8187.
[41] R.C. MacCallum, M.W. Browne, H.W. Sugawara, Power
analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling, Psychological Methods 1, 1996, pp. 130149.
[42] I. Maignan, B.A. Lukas, The nature and social uses of the
Internet: a qualitative investigation, Journal of Consumer
Affairs 31 (2), 1997, pp. 346371.
[43] G.C. Moore, I. Benbasat, Development of an instrument to
measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation, Information System Research 2 (3), 1991, pp.
192222.
[44] G.C. Moore, I. Benbasat, Integrating diffusion of innovations
and theory of reasoned action models to predict utilization of
information technology by end-users, in: K. Kautz, J. PriesHeje (Eds.), Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology, Chapman & Hall, London, 1996, pp. 132146.
[45] J. Muller, Attention, K-Mart clickers, Business Week 3681
(2000) EB120.
[46] J. Nielsen, How users read on the Web? Useit.com, May,
available at http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9605.html, 1996.
[47] J. Nielsen, The Web usage paradox: why do people use
something this bad? Useit.com, available at http://
www.useit.com/alertbox/980809.html, 1998.
[48] S. Pant, C. Hsu, Business on the Web: strategies and
economics, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 28
(711), 1996, pp. 14811492.
[49] J. Papows, Enterprise.com, Harper Collins Publishers, New
York, 1998, p. 151.
[50] W.H. Peters, N.M. Ford, A prole of urban in-home shoppers:
the other half, Journal of Marketing 36, 1972, pp. 6264.
[51] R.A. Peterson, S. Balasubramanian, B.J. Bronnenberg,
Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer
marketing, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25
(4), 1997, pp. 329346.
[52] S. Poon, P.M.C. Swatman, An exploratory study of small
business Internet commerce issues, Information & Management 35 (1), 1999, pp. 918.
[53] E.M. Rogers, The Diffusion of Innovation, 1st Edition, Free
Press, New York, 1962.
[54] E.M. Rogers, The Diffusion of Innovation, 3rd Edition, Free
Press, New York, 1983.
719