Gel Electrophoresis Lab Questions

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Analysis and Interpretation of Results Focus

Questions
By: Scarlett Ramos
Life 120L
March 13,2016.

1. What is your genotype for the Alu insert in your PV92 region?

Scarlett: I could not determine the genotype for the Alu insert in my PV92 because the DNA did
not replicate properly. Meaning that it was not able to be seen in the picture after the current was
passed through the agarose.

2. What are the genotypic frequencies of +/+, +/, and / in your class population? Fill in
the table below with your class data.

Table 1. Observed Genotypic Frequencies for the Class


Category

Number

Frequency (# of

Homozygous (+/+)
Heterozygous (+/)

0
1
14

0
.07
.93

Homozygous (/)
Total =

= 1.00

3. Make sure that these equations all line up they arent aligned on my copy
What is the frequency of each allele in your class sample? Fill in the table below with your class
data. Remember, a class of 32 students (N) will have a total of 64 (2N) instances of each locus.

P=

(2*0+1)/(2*15) = .033 ; approx. = .03

Q=

(2*14+1)/(2*15) = .9667 ; approx.= .97

4. The following table presents data from a USA-wide random population study.
Table 3. Genotypic Frequencies for Alu in a USA Sample

Category
Homozygous (+/+)
Heterozygous (+/)
Homozygous (/)

Number
2,422
5,528
2,050
Total = 10,000

Frequency
0.24
0.55
0.21
= 1.00

Now, using the data above, calculate the allelic frequencies for the USA data as you did for
your class population in Table 2.
P= (2*2422+5528)/(2*10,000) = .5186= .52
Q= (2*2050+5528)/(2*10,000) = .48=.48
5. How do your actual class data for genotypic and allelic frequencies compare with those of
the random sampling of the USA population? Would you expect them to match? What
reasons can you think of to explain the differences or similarities?
Our class data for the genotypic and allelic frequencies was very different from the USA
population. Our class P frequency was .03 while our frequency for Q was .97. The USA
population example had P value as .52 while Q was .48. I expected it have variation, but as much

as my results showed me. What I could probably assume happened here was that most in our
class room originate from a similar location and that would lead to a higher amount of people
have similar allele frequency, leaving little amount of the other allele frequency. The USA survey
probably involved many different locations giving it a high probability of different allele
frequency explaining the high variety of allele frequency giving a more balance allele frequency
results.
6. Using the values for p and q that you calculated in Table 2 for your class population,
calculate p2, 2pq, and q2. Do they come out to be the same as the genotype frequencies that
you found in Table 1? If they do, your class resembles a Hardy-Weinberg genetic
equilibrium. If your observed (actual) genotype frequencies are not the same as the
expected values, what might be some of the reason(s) for the difference?
P^2 = 9*10^-4
2pq= .0438
q^2= .5329
My results are not the same as the expected values. It is probably due to misinterpreting the
alleles correctly or error in calculation.
Using the values for p and q that you calculated in Table 4 for the USA population sample,
calculate p2, 2pq, and q2. Do they come out to be the same as the genotype frequencies that
you found in Table 3? Does this USA-wide sample suggest that the population of the USA is in
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium?
P^2= .2704
2pq= .4992
q^2= .2304
They are similar to the results found in table 3. The USA- wide sample does suggest that the
population of the USA is in the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

You might also like