3 - Lampiran A - Pengenalan Sistem Greenpass
3 - Lampiran A - Pengenalan Sistem Greenpass
3 - Lampiran A - Pengenalan Sistem Greenpass
INTRODUCTION
The Green Building Rating Tool is a designed sustainable building rating system or tool that
aims to quantify, hence reduce, built environments impact in terms of carbon emissions and
environmental implications, while taking into account a more holistic life-cycle view of the
built environment. It also aims to integrate socio-economic considerations relating to the
built environment and urban development.
AIMS
1. To integrate carbon assessment criteria and reduction strategies into the matrix of a
combined sustainable assessment rating system of the built environment.
2. To provide a more holistic rating system by integrating and extending the present
criteria into life cyclelinked performances and issues.
3. To extend the present green building assessment into life-cycle impacts and its
quantification.
4. To combine both carbon emission and sustainable performance factors into a
combined
criterion linked to the design, construction, commissioning and
operations of buildings.
5. To be in line with the aims of Low Carbon City Framework and Assessment System by
KETTHA.
OBJECTIVES
KEY DEFINITIONS
As a working definition list in the system, the definitions are as follows:
1) Certification Phase the three certification awards which have their own scorecards for
the three main phases of the system.
2) Criteria the category or group of points.
3) Sub-criteria the term which means point
4) Scorecard the list of maximum points or sub-criteria in the system (S, CR and CI subcriteria), which an applicant can choose from for any project.
This definition list will be finalised, added to and amended from time to time.
CRITERIAS
There are 9 CRITERIA (or more commonly known as CATEGORY) in the system:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
These criteria are then implemented according to three certification phases: DESIGN,
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS. Depending on which phase, the criteria is adjusted for
different requirements and relevance according to that phase.
3. Energy Performance
Impacts
4. Occupant & Health
5. Embodied Carbon
6. Water Efficiency
7. Social &Cultural
Sustainability
8. Sustainable &Carbon
Initiatives
1. Infrastructure and
Sequestration
2. Energy Performance
Impacts
3. Occupant & Health
4. Embodied Carbon
5. Water Efficiency
6. Social &Cultural
Sustainability
7. Demolition &Disposal
Factors
8. Sustainable &Carbon
Initiatives
2. Infrastructure and
Sequestration
Construction Stage
Design Stage
1. Pre Design
1. Infrastructure and
Sequestration
2. Energy Performance
Impacts
3. Occupant & Health
4. Embodied Carbon
5. Water Efficiency
6. Waste Management &
Reduction
7. Sustainable Facility
Management
8. Sustainable &Carbon
Initiatives
Figure 1: The breakdown of each certification phase into the criteria of points
The following summary and key points attempt to give an overview of the key features,
characteristics and highlights of the system, including its scorecards and calculators.
1. The structure of the system is based on total points accumulation and weightage
between criteria of site, energy and water, Material and Indoor environment are
based on a broad and in-depth study of the weightage given to various international
green systems in the world. These include LEED, CEPAS, HKBEAM, GRIHA, GBI and
GREENMARK. The scoring weightage reflects the average weightage from the
combination of these green building and sustainable rating systems.
2. As Malaysia is yet to have a carbon intensity database or carbon index of buildings
and master plan, the present system converts points to carbon emission values.
However, key points such as energy and water are based on the award of
percentage savings on emissions above a baseline value. These savings are
converted to points and reconverted to carbon emission value in the system total
carbon summation page.
3. Many of the features, ratings and emphasis are taken from a combination of
GreenPASS carbon assessment system developed by the CIDB and pHJKR developed
by the Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia.
RATING CLASSIFICATION
The system rating is divided into five levels starting from one star to highest 5 star. Table
below show between score and the star rating.
MYCREST RATING
Percentage SCORE
(%)
80-100
70 79
60 69
50 59
40 - 49
In the system, every development will have three types of certification awarded at each
stage (Design, Construction and Operation and Maintenance).