Evaluation of Coal Bed Methane Through Wire Line Logs
Evaluation of Coal Bed Methane Through Wire Line Logs
Evaluation of Coal Bed Methane Through Wire Line Logs
ABSTRACT : Methane produced from coal beds was for years a nightmare for the mining industry. Coal bed constitutes a new
type of reservoir for the oil and gas industry to explore. This new reservoir does not lend itself readily to conventional well log
analysis. However, new log analysis techniques have developed which increases the chance for a successful well. This study is
summarized with a procedure to evaluate the parameters of proximate analysis using wire line logs of Barakar formation of Jharia
Block in the State of Jharkhand. Methane produced from coal beds is a developing resource in the States of W. Bengal & Jharkhand.
The evaluation of this resource is done by coring and testing. Core analysis and production tests are essential information to use
with log analysis to make meaningful evaluation from wire line logs. The objective of this case study was to establish a relation of
the wire line log value to evaluate the parameters of proximate analysis and to match with the laboratory evaluated values. Further,
a model has been designed to evaluate the values as quick look interpretation technique. The proximate analysis data from the wells
of Jharia field in which coal core was cut was used to calibrate the log analysis in this case study. Barakar formation in this area has
predominantly high to medium volatile bituminous coal. The evaluation technique required to be tested for their accuracy before
being used for coal beds of different rank.
LOGGING
PROCEDURE
CHARACTERIZATION
INTRODUCTION
The evaluation of coal bed methane wells are being
done by coring and testing. The method requires a well to be
drilled, cored, completed and tested to know the reserve
potential. Thus evaluating a well is quite expensive. Log
analysis methods have been suggested to evaluate a coal bed
methane potential using wire line logs. The information
provided by log analysis includes the parameters of proximate
analysis, i.e. ash, moisture, fixed carbon & volatile matter.
Nothing can replace the physical core data to evaluate the
well. Still in areas where no core data is available, an approach
to determine the quality of the coal for the production of coal
bed methane reserves through wire line data has been
attempted.
AND
LOG
910
EVALUATION PROCEDURE
911
Figure 2
Figure 4
Density (Log & Empirical) vs Ash (Lab)
40
35
ity
ns
De
Ash(Lab) (in %)
30
g)
(Lo
(E
ity
ns
De
a
iric
mp
l)
25
20
100
15
10
5
0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
Fig: 3
Figure 5
Figure 3
912
i)
ii)
iii)
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS
The data derived from proximate analysis in Table 1
was plotted and the analysis can be summarized as follows:
Density Ash
(Log) in (Lab)
gm/cc
in %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
1.31
1.42
1.39
1.42
1.43
1.37
1.49
1.45
1.405
1.405
1.45
1.45
1.44
1.45
1.59
1.60
8.1
22.38
19.8
22.99
23.79
16.57
27.03
24.03
21.07
21.96
24.27
24.34
24.63
24.88
34.32
35.12
Density
(Empirical)
in gm/cc
1.16
1.386
1.34
1.39
1.40
1.298
1.457
1.41
1.366
1.378
1.415
1.416
1.40
1.42
1.52
1.58
Corr.
Factor
Density
(Corr)
in gm/cc
Ash
(Log)
in %
FC(daf)
(Log)
in %
Corr.
Factor
0.9
0.98
0.966
0.98
0.98
0.95
0.98
0.98
0.978
0.979
0.98
0.98
0.98
0.98
0.98
0.98
1.18
1.392
1.34
1.392
1.401
1.302
1.46
1.421
1.379
1.379
1.421
1.42
1.41
1.42
1.53
1.57
8.77
22.72
19.3
22.72
23.31
16.8
27.19
24.63
21.86
21.86
24.63
24.56
23.9
31.8
34.43
34.42
64.83
62.18
62.83
62.18
62.07
63.31
61.33
61.82
62.35
62.35
61.82
61.83
61.96
61.83
60.46
59.96
1.26
1.26
1.26
1.26
1.23
1.20
1.23
1.20
1.19
1.19
1.19
1.155
1.14
1.14
1.12
1.12
913
81.9
79.78
79.2
78.74
76.92
75.99
75.00
74.63
74.6
74.26
73.52
71.66
70.57
70.50
67.78
67.60
18.1
20.22
20.8
21.26
23.08
24.01
25.0
25.37
25.4
25.74
26.48
28.34
29.43
29.5
32.22
32.40
VM(daf)
(Log)
Corr in %
18.32
21.65
20.83
23.65
23.65
24.03
24.57
25.82
25.80
25.81
26.53
28.59
29.37
29.52
32.29
32.85
REFERENCES
Fassett, J.E. and Hinds, J.S. 1971, Geology and fuel resources of
the Fruitland and Kirtland Shale of the SanJuan Basin,
New Mexico & Colorado: U.S. Gelogical Survey
Professional Paper 676, p76.
Formation Evaluation Report of Jharia Field, Logging Services
Kolkata.
Kim, A.G. 1977, Estimating methane content of bituminous coal
beds from absorption data , U.S. Bureau of Mines Report
of Investigations 8245
Mullen M. J. (1988) Log evaluation in well drilled for Coal Bed
Methane Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists,
pp 113-124.
Peeters, M. , and Kampten, N. H. , 1977, Wireline logging for coal
exploration in Australia: Society of professional Well Log
Analysts, The Log Analyst, v.17, no.3, p.24-29
CONCLUSION
This study has shown that the log analysis can be a
useful tool in evaluating unconventional reservoirs such as
coal beds. Different logging procedures using high resolution
processing with spectral density log are being suggested to
improve the vertical resolution of the density measurement
and thereby improve the accuracy of the bed thickness
determination and coal quality analysis in new wells.
Log analysis using this technique can be very helpful
by using existing well logs where no core data exists. With the
more input data the correction factor chart presented can be
refined to make the analysis through wire line more accurate
in coal beds.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are thankful to RGL, Kolkata for
providing lab evaluated results for further processing. The
914