Study Chip Surface Characteristics During The Machining of Steel
Study Chip Surface Characteristics During The Machining of Steel
Study Chip Surface Characteristics During The Machining of Steel
1. INTRODUCTION
a
1
2
... tertiary
shear zone
631
Fig.3 Chip roots t l and 2 are long with MG inserts but are short
with f3, 4, and 5. #4 has the lightest color, golden yellow
The chip rook obtained from the five inserts are shown in Figure
3; the colors for each sre light + dark brown, blue, dark brown +
blue, golden yellow, and brown. With tl and 2, the chip roots are
long due to plain MG chip control. With # 3. 4 and 5, the chip
roots break with only a small stub adhering to the work piece.
The initial part of the chip root is colorless in all five cases, but
with inserts #3,4 and 5 having a MG-MG chip control, it is more
distinct and longer. The lack of color is due to the intimate
contact between chip and tool that prevents oxidation. The chip
root from insert 114 is golden yellow, the lightest color among the
five chip roots, indicating the lowest temperature. Chip roots were
sectioned and micrographs covering the shear zones and beyond
are shown in Figure 4. Shear plane angle, angle of maximum
crystal elongation, contact length, flow zone area, secondary shear
zone thickness a t the exit of contact area were measured. Surface
roughness of the underside of the blue and brown chips were
measured on a Form Talysurfthat has a 10 nanometer capability
and values of 0.072 pm and 0.537 pm were obtained. The
corresponding Ra values for the inserts that produced this chip,
and the machined surface they generated are:
#2: Ra = 0.323 & 1.71 pm and #4: Ra = 0.171 & 1.67 pm
Micrographs of chip roots confirm the findings with t4; there is
no secondary shear formation indicating no seizure in the chip
contact region. This is the result of fine polishing and the surface
properties of Al,O,. The acceleration value for the mechanical
quick stop device used here was found to be 2x10' mds'.
F a
a + FqO,
100.
90
FE3'
1018 CHIP
KC792
'
FE3
--
STYLE CNMG-MG
01
c1
-
01
c1
.......
.....- .,
Fig.6 Golden chip has 276 d, thick FeO/Fe,04 coating
~
632
'
FE3
- GOLDEN YELLOW
+
+
Feio,
F$O, F@,O1
p , o , 0,
Temperature
( "C 1
98 1
937
dark
blue
light
brown
27.2
28.4
Shear strain
(1
2.58
2.51
2.37
Chip ratio
( r, 1
0.54
0.57
0.55
0.68
052
Roughness
1.83
1.72
1.81
1.67
I91
Waviness
( M a pm)
0.73
0.84
0.45
0.38
0.43
Roundness
(P m)
12.6
12.5
11.2
7.5
116
Chip color
Shear angle
900
88 1
829
Fig.7 Black and white picture of the original colored hueintensity-saturation system
32.6
26.4
(Q)
(Ra v)
2.15
244
CNMG-432 tool was used with a 15" lead angle. Tool signature is
-5, -5, 5, 5, 5, -5, 1/32.
The colors of the machined chips were classified by using the hue
and saturation color components of the standard H.I.S. ( hueintensity-saturation ) color space. In this system, the hue
represents the basic color shade(e.g., pink, red, blue, yellow,
brown,etc.), while the saturation represents the amount of the
color present (e.g., fully-saturated pink. 10%saturated pink, ete).
"he hue components are represented on a pol= chart as angular
coordinates from 0 t o 360 degrees, while the saturation is
represented by radial coordinates from 0 (nosaturation) to 1(full
saturation).
Ten post process chips from each "batch" were tested to get 10
images. Each chip was placed in a small holding fmture such that
the surfaces of the individual chips had approximately the same
orientation with respect to the imaging camera. Uniform diffuse
lighting was provided by use of a translucent white diffusion box
illuminated by incandescent light sources. The image of each chip
was then optically-magnified until it filled the camera field
(Hitachi VK-C360 color imaging camera). The image of each chip
was then captured using an ATVista color imaging board and
TIPS imaging software by Truevision, Inc. To obtain an average
color reading of the surface of each chip, a mosaic amalgamation
of each image was created using the TIPS software on each 64x64
block of pixels, Then, the average hue and saturation of the 16
central blocks of the image was obtained as a representation of
overall hue and saturation of the chip surface. These results were
then plotted on hue-saturation polar plots to show color
distributions. This technique was very successfully used to
distinguish chips obtained with tools having side cutting edge
Om, and +15' [6, 81.
angles(SCEA's) of -3,
f =VtA
0 r=
JbC&
-'
'+'
1+1.326Ap,cl
K,
where
633
The chip roots for V SCEA were used to measure shear plane
angle 4, angle of maximum crystal elongation y, and deformed
chip thickness. Merchant's equation for chip strainllll was used:
(3)
c=2cot2g-cot++tan( 4 - y )
Results are shown in Table IT, and indicate that insert t 4 has i
favorable shear plane angle. Chip strain is generally lower with
MG-MG inserts, as is chip ratio. For the given cutting conditions
a MG-MG chip control i s favorable and this profile combined
with the polishing of black Al,O, coated inserts makes them
excellent tools.
3. DRILLING
With carbide inserts, indexable drills (also known a s endrills) not
only work a t high cutting speeds and high feed rates but also
produce holes of gwd quslity[l3,14,15,l61. Under some special
conditions, indexable drills can be used for finishing holesll71.
Unlike turning, drilling requires a cutting fluid, which in turn
should prevent chip oxidation. Indexable drilling was preferred a s
high speeds could be used with carbide inserts, with and without
coatings. The study of chip roots helped in studying the quality
of four indexable drills of varying geometry and/or tool materials.
Fig.9 Two typical commercial indexable drills. (a) Drill A uses two
standard inserts SPMP and CPMP with a T i c CVD coating. (b)
S PVD coating
Drill B has two trigons. Multi-layer A,O, (Bl), T
(B2).and uncoated (B3) inserts were used.
634
Figure 12 shows post process chips obtained from four drills for
both inner and outer inserts. As seen from Table 11,inner chip B1
undergoes the maximum strain and this is evident from the
extended shape of inner chip B1 in Figure 12. Outer chip B2
undergoes the maximum strain and breaks more easily into
smaller pieces as seen in Figure 12. It needs to be emphasized
here that it was next to impossible to get a chip root with drill
B1; all that we got was a very small stub. T h e hole quality of drill
A is excellent judging from Table Vs surface finish, waviness,
E.
tr
00
20
40
80
90
,
100
00
20
(a)
0.0
20
80
I00 1 2 0
60
(b)
4.0
8.0
,
,
I
t o l o o 12.0
RADIUS (mm)
Fig.12 Chip roots from four drills. Drill A produces the smallest
built-up edge and the thinnest chip. The hole quality of A is also
excellent. With Drill B3 (uncoated insert) rough holes and chips
are produced.
40
RADIUS (mm)
RADIUS (mm)
o + ,
o + * ,
120
00
20
4.0
8.0
6.0
,
10.0 12.0
RADIUS (mm)
(C)
(d)
Fig.13 Mean shear temperature (BS) and friction temperature (eF)
and their s u m , tool face temperature S, are shown here for (a)
Drill A; (b) Drill B1; (c) Drill B2; (d) Drill B3.
AES sputter profiles were obtained for chips from the four drills.
635
Typically, all the profiles exhibit only a very superficial iron oxide
layer, no more than about 60 angstroms thick, and absorbed
hydrocarbon. This is characteristic of an iron metal that
undergoes superficial oxidation in air; in other words, the
superficial oxide is typical for any exposed metallic surface.
Figure 14 shows a typical AES profile.
in the last row of table 111. Hole surfaces are better than chip
surfaces because more built-up edge is shed on the chip than on
the holes. In the case of turning it is the other way about because
secondary shear imparts an excellent surface on the chip.
100
90
70
AES
PROFILE
12/04/92
'
F E ~'
FE3
FE3
STEEL CHIP
YU666B
V F
FE3 '
'
FE3
'
UNCOATED CARBIDE
01
01
01
4. CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
1. Klopstock, H., 1925, Recent Investigation in Turning and
Planing and a New form of Cutting Tool, Transactions of ASME,
47:345-377.
2. Venkatesh, V.C. and Philip, P.K., 1973, Investigation on
10.
3. Venkatesh, V.C. and Radhakrishnan, V., 1971, Brightness in
Machining, Annals of the CIRP, 18:433-438.
4. Young, R.D., Vorburger, T.V., and Teague, E.C, 1980, In-
Brightness
Tool
636
Outer
Inner
Ra (pm)
Outer
Inner