Revolution of 1848 Euro

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

The Revolutions of 1848

1848 proved one of the most tumultuous year in European history. Uprisings
in countries across the continent, from France and Prussia to Austria and Italy,
erupted from the welling mass of popular discontent and set the stage for the
possibility of cataclysmic change across the European landscape. However, while
these uprisings enjoyed early success, each inevitably collapsed without achieving
significant change. They enjoyed the initial gains as a result of the emerging forces
of liberalism and nationalism, which coupled with the frustrations of the working
class over agricultural and industrial developments to propel large numbers of
people into quick action. The varied aims of the groups, lack of organization and
leadership, and class tensions ultimately doomed the uprisings as they splintered
and were subsequently defeated.
Early success greeted many of the uprisings of 1848, which seemed poised to
push for lasting change in European society, as a result of strong sentiments that
propelled large swathes of the population into action. Liberals, feeling oppressed
and ignored as a result of the political stagnation, and nationalists, upset over
ethnic conflicts due to the Congress of Vienna, successfully rallied many members
of the working and middle class to push towards more democratic forms of
government and rights for citizens. These predominating feelings compelled many
citizens to act, enabling short-term gains. The ubiquity of these ideas across Europe
allowed the people to act quickly, preventing their opposition from effectively
formulating counters to their actions, as many people already harbored
discontented sentiments. When added to the dissatisfaction already smoldering
from the periods of famine in the 1840s and unemployment due to new industry, a
powder keg was lit in Europe. As such, the rapidity of action allowed for early gains

in areas of political and social rights. Austria succeeded in abolishing serfdom


throughout its empire and adopted a new constitution. The Prussian Assembly, as
well, employed the deeds of liberal forces to hold an election granting autonomy to
the Polish minority and enacting the 1850 Constitution, which allowed for political
representation. Additionally, the citizens of France, the birthplace of the revolutions
of 1848, succeeded in gaining universal male suffrage after their revolts forced the
abdication of Louis Philippe. Parisians also gained national workshops designed to
aid the plight of the working class in their economic condition. Yet, many of the
factors which served to allow the uprisings to achieve early successes sowed their
seed of destruction.
While the revolutions achieved varying levels of success, each invariably
deteriorated as time progressed as a result of the lack of leadership, varied aims,
and class tensions, resulting in little change to the status quo in Europe. These
uprisings encompassed very different demographics within each of the nations:
socialists, liberals, nationalists, bourgeoisie, and various radical groups. The
differing agendas of each of these groups served to undermine the overall success
of the revolution, as each pushed for gains in different areas. Nationalism, though a
useful catalyst in beginning the uprisings, impeded the goals of the people as a
result of each nationalist group looking out for its own interests, often to the
detriment of other peoples. Over time, the revolutions fragmented to an even
greater degree due to the lack of concerted effort and allowed for conservative
forces to put each down separately rather than face the entire mass of popular
discontent. Additionally, the lack of overall organization served to hurt the viability
of the revolutions. Although the uprisings emerged within a relatively short
timeframe, no person or group stepped forward to direct the efforts of the people.

Many efforts within the same country did not even communicate, such as those
occurring those within the German states. The lack of organization significantly hurt
the uprisings by removing any chance for a unified effort within the people against
the states, maximizing the power of the revolts. Similarly, with no centralization,
the revolutions possessed no significant armed forces, and often failed to gain the
backing of the army within each of their respective nations. This allowed the armies
within each state to put down many of the revolutions after a short time. Further, in
a manner similar to the French revolution, many citizens withdrew their participation
after minor concessions had been gained, leaving predominantly radical forces
which alienated themselves from the rest of the public. The fear of radicalism
coincided with tensions between the middle and lower classes to diminish the
efficacy of the 1848 uprisings. The members of the middle class feared the
possible usurpation of power by the lower classes as the uprisings progressed.
Violent action subsequently damaged the success of the people by estranging many
moderates to an even greater degree. The withdrawal of support by large groups
within the population allowed conservative forces to easily put down what remained
of the revolutions. Often, more oppressive forces than were present previously
assumed powers to defeat the uprisings, resulting in powerful centralized
governments in France under Louis Napoleon and Austria under Franz Joseph.
The uprisings of 1848, occurring across the European continent, promised to
be a means to social and political change for decades to come. Beginning with the
February Revolution in France, popular discontent swelled during 1848 in what
seemed would inevitably culminate in significant gains for the citizens of Europe. In
reality, the uprisings enjoyed only early success before collapsing sans major
change. The driving forces of liberalism and nationalism allowed for rapid action

among wide numbers of the population as they harnessed their frustrations to


achieve early successes in political and social realms. However, the paucity of
organization and leadership, varied aims within each faction, and tensions between
the classes caused each uprising to, in turn, fail.

You might also like