Tax Slides 2016
Tax Slides 2016
Tax Slides 2016
B. NRA-ETB
B. NRA-ETB
Meaning of ETB
One who comes to the Philippines for a definite purpose which in its
nature may be promptly accomplished considered a transient; if
extended stay necessary to accomplish purpose not a transient
B. NRA-ETB
B. NRA-ETB
5/27/16
B. NRA-ETB
B. NRA-ETB
B. NRA-ETB
B. NRA-ETB
5/27/16
B. NRA-ETB
B. NRA-ETB
10
Meaning of ETB
The classic examples of a trade or business are situations in
which the TP is engaged in the marketing of goods and
services
Thus the manufacture and sale of automobiles is a trade or
business
But the ownership of shares of a company that
manufactures and sells automobiles is generally not a trade
or business (unless the TP is a dealer in securities)
As applied to NRAs, a Philippine trade or business will be
found to exist if there are REGULAR, CONTINUOUS and
CONSIDERABLE business activities
Therefore, isolated or sporadic transactions will not usually
be construed as the conduct of a trade or business
B. NRA-ETB
B. NRA-ETB
11
12
2. Royalties 20% final tax (10% final tax if royalty arises from
books, literary works and musical compositions)
3. Prizes and other winnings 20% final tax (Category (A) income,
if P10,000 or less; exempt if PCSO and lotto winnings)
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
5/27/16
B. NRA-ETB
B. NRA-ETB
13
14
(C) and (D) Income capital gains from sale of domestic shares
and realty located in the PH held as capital assets subject
to final tax: same as citizens and resident aliens
v Since subsection (B), (C) and (D) income are already subject
to final tax, they will no longer be included in the annual
income tax return filed on April 15
v Only subsection (A) income is included in the annual income
tax return
1. Compensation income
2. Business and professional income
3. Capital gains not subject to final tax (i.e., non-category (C)
and (D) capital gains)
4. Passive income not subject to final tax, and other income (i.e.,
non-category (B) passive income)
v Subsection (A) income is aggregated and reported in the
annual income tax return
v Tax due computed as follows: Gross income (Category A)
deductions personal and addl exemptions = taxable income
(which is then subjected to the 5% - 32% graduated rate
under 24(A))
B. NRA-Not ETB
15
B. NRA-Not ETB
16
The NIRC defines FDAP income subject to the 25% flat tax by
specifically listing a series of income forms that are usually of
a recurring nature, such as interest, dividends, rents and
royalties
The statutory definition adds the encompassing (but not
defined) phrase and other fixed or determinable annual or
periodical income
Question: if the income payment is not annual or periodical,
does it prevent the income payment from being classified as
FDAP income subject to the 25% flat tax?
5/27/16
B. NRA-Not ETB
17
B. NRA-Not ETB
18
CIR v. Wodehouse
The words annual and periodical are merely
generally descriptive of the character of the gains,
profits and income, as distinguished from gains,
profits and income derived from the outright sale of
property
CIR v. Wodehouse
TP, the popular author who created the Jeeves series,
received a lump sum payment from a U.S. publisher for an
exclusive serial or book right throughout the U.S. in relation
to a specified original story . . . ready to be copyrighted.
B. NRA-Not ETB
19
B. NRA-Not ETB
20
CIR v. Wodehouse
5/27/16
A. Definition
22
A. Definition
A. Definition
23
24
What is a GPP?
Partnerships formed by persons
For the sole purpose of exercising their common
profession
No part of income is derived from engaging in any
trade or business
Place of incorporation/creation rule determines
whether a corporation is domestic or foreign
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
5/27/16
A. Definition
A. Definition
25
26
Pascual v. CIR
TPs bought 5 parcels of land in 1966
TPs sold 2 parcels in 1968; sold the 3 remaining in
1970
TPs realized profit on the sales; paid CGT individually
on the income realized from the sales
CIR assessed the TPs for having formed a taxable PRS
Held: TPs did not form an unregistered PRS subject to
tax as a corporation
A. Definition
A. Definition
27
28
Pascual v. CIR
No evidence that TPs entered into an agreement to
contribute money, property or industry to a common
fund, and that they intended to divide the profits
among themselves
The sales of the parcels of land were merely
isolated transactions
The sharing of returns does not in itself establish a
PRS W/N the persons sharing therein have a joint
or common right or interest in the property
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
Obillos v. CIR
TPs, 4 brothers and sisters, acquired 2 lots from their
father
After having held the 2 lots for more than a year, the
TPs resold them to third parties
TPs derived from the sale a total profit of P134k or
P33k for each of them; they treated the profit as a
capital gain and paid an income tax on one-half
thereof
CIR assessed the TPs corporate income tax on the
P134k profit, and dividend tax on the P33k distributive
shares of the TPs on the P134k profit
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
5/27/16
A. Definition
A. Definition
29
30
Obillos v. CIR
CIR acted on the theory that the TPs had formed an
unregistered PRS or JV taxable as a corporation
Held: it is error to consider the petitioners as having formed
a PRS under art. 1767 of the Civil Code simply because
they allegedly contributed P178k to buy the 2 lots, resold
the same and divided the profit among themselves
TPs had no intention to form PRS; they were co-owners pure
and simple. To consider them as partners would obliterate
the distinction between a co-ownership and a PRS; TPs were
not engaged in any JV by reason of that isolated
transaction
Obillos v. CIR
TPs original purpose was to divide the lots for residential
purposes. If later on they found it not feasible to build
their residences on the lots because of the high cost of
construction, then they had no choice but to resell the
same to dissolve the co-ownership
A. Definition
A. Definition
31
32
Ona v. CIR
TPs, a father and his 5 children, inherited property from
decedent wife consisting of 10 parcels of land and 6 houses
While court approved the partition of the properties, no
attempt was made to actually subdivide the properties
Instead, from 1944 to 1955, the properties remained under
the management of the father who invested and re-invested
the properties and the income derived therefrom (father
invested/re-invested in real property and securities)
As a result the properties and the investments gradually
increased
CIR assessed TPs for deficiency income on the theory that
they formed an unregistered PRS
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
Ona v. CIR
Held: TPs formed a taxable PRS
TPs did not, contrary to their contention, merely limit themselves
to holding the properties inherited by them
From the moment TPs allowed not only the incomes from their
respective shares of the inheritance but even the inherited
properties themselves to be used by the father as a common
fund in undertaking several transactions or in business, with the
intention of deriving profit to be shared by them
proportionally, such act was tantamount to actually contributing
such incomes to a common fund and, in effect, they thereby
formed an unregistered PRS
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
5/27/16
33
34
P xxx
(P xxx)
P xxx
30%
P xxx
1. Business income
2. Capital gains not subject to final tax (i.e., non-category
(C) capital gains)
3. Passive income not subject to final tax, and other income
(i.e., non-category (B) passive income)
v (A) income is aggregated and reported in the annual
income tax return
v
5/27/16
C. MCIT
C. MCIT
37
38
10
5/27/16
41
F. GOCCs
42
GSIS
SSS
PHIC
PCSO
A. Definition
44
11
5/27/16
12
5/27/16
1. Business income
2. Capital gains not subject to final tax (i.e., non-category C
capital gains)
3. Passive income not subject to final tax, and other income
(i.e., non-category B passive income)
v Category A income is aggregated and reported in the
annual income tax return
v
International carriers
What is the rate and base applicable to
international carriers doing business in the
Philippines?
13
5/27/16
International carriers
In the case of international airlines, how is GPB
defined?
International carriers
In the case of international airlines, how is GPB
defined?
International carriers
Examples
Are international carriers entitled to deductions? (No)
In the case of international vessels, how is GPB defined?
Gross revenues from passenger, cargo and mail
Originating from the Philippines up to final destination
Regardless of the place of sale or payments of the
passage or freight documents ( 28(A)(3)(b))
OBUs
How are OBUs taxed?
14
5/27/16
E. BPRT
59
Effectively connected
Passive (FDAP) income, generally not effectively
connected
To be effectively connected it is not necessary that
the income be derived from the actual operation of
TP-corporations trade or business; sufficient that the
income arises from primary business
X. INCOME TAX ON
NONRESIDENT FOREIGN
CORPORATIONS
15
5/27/16
16
5/27/16
17
5/27/16
Illustration:
If US still taxing the full P85, the Philippines might as well
collect the full P30 tax, to prevent the tax from being
effectively turned over from RP to US
However, if US shall allow a credit against the tax due on
the dividends of at least P15 (which is equal to the P15
tax actually paid in RP), US investors given incentive to
invest in RP
Why should US investors invest here? Because tax rate is
reduced from 30% to 15% and at the same time they are
credited against their US tax an amount equal to taxes
paid in the Philippines
IAET
72
XI. IAET
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
18
5/27/16
IAET
IAET
73
74
IAET
IAET
75
76
19
5/27/16
IAET
IAET
77
78
IAET
IAET
79
80
CIR v. Tuason
Tuason Inc. was held to be liable for improperly
accumulating its earnings of over P3M. Its defense was
that it needed the surplus for future investment.
However, out of that 3M, only P700K was actually used
for the purpose
There was a presumption that Tuason Inc. was only a
holding company because it merely subdivided large
lots and sold them at a profit and most of its income
was derived passively. Tuason failed to rebut this
presumption thus making it liable
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
20
5/27/16
IAET
81
21
5/27/16
CIR v. YMCA
CIR v. YMCA
Held: Yes
The phrase any of their activities conducted from
profit does not qualify the word properties
This makes income from property of the
organization taxable, regardless of how that
income is used whether for profit or for lofty nonprofit purposes
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
22
5/27/16
23
5/27/16
A. Capital Assets
96
24
5/27/16
A. Capital Assets
97
A. Capital Assets
98
A. Capital Assets
99
A. Capital Assets
100
25
5/27/16
A. Capital Assets
101
A. Capital Assets
102
Calasanz v. CIR
Where inherited land is subdivided and improved and the lots
are advertised to the public and sold, the gains realized are not
capital gains but ordinary gains subject to regular income tax.
Though the lots were sold merely to dispose or liquidate an
inheritance, the question to be asked in determining whether what
was realized was capital or ordinary income is: Was the
taxpayer engaged in the business? In this case, the CIR correctly
found that she was
Case were property initially classified as capital (upon
inheritance) became ordinary, after TP engaged in certain
activities that converted the land into one held primarily for
sale
26
5/27/16
C. Ordinary Income/Loss
105
C. Ordinary Income/Loss
106
Tuason v. Lingad
Tuason inherited lots which were occupied by
lessees of the decedent. He then sold the lots to the
lessees and his income was claimed as a capital
gain
The CIR correctly assessed his income as an
ordinary gain because of the following:
The term ordinary income includes any gain from the sale or
exchange of property which is not a capital asset or property
described in 39(A)(1)
Any gain from the sale or exchange of property which is
treated or considered as ordinary income shall be treated
as gain from the sale or exchange of property which is not a
capital asset
The term ordinary loss includes any loss from the sale or
exchange of property which is not a capital asset. Any loss
from the sale or exchange of property which is treated or
considered ordinary loss shall be treated as loss from the
sale or exchange of property which is not a capital asset
C. Ordinary Income/Loss
107
Tuason v. Lingad
Factors considered by the court in concluding that TP was
engaged in the real estate business:
27
5/27/16
v
v
100% if the capital asset has been held for not more than 12
months; and
50% if the capital asset has been held for more than 12 months
Thus if the asset was held long-term, the tax benefit is greater
Note: corporations not entitled to the reduced percentage of
gain to be recognized
28
5/27/16
G. Summary
113
29
5/27/16
Gain (loss) = AR AB
Realization
Recognition or non-recognition
Characterization of gain or loss (capital or ordinary)
v
v
30
5/27/16
121
122
Crane v. CIR
Crane
Buyer
Mortgage
of 262
Crane
Apt. bldg. subject to
mortgage
100% owner
Apt. Bldg.
2.5 cash
Mortgage is non-recourse
with regard to Crane
Bank
55
207
262
Apt. Bldg.
Mortgage
of 255
Bank
Cranes
Position
Equity
FMV =257.5
Debt =
Equity =
IRS
Position
(IRS wins)
255.0
2.5
Cash paid = 0
Cash recvd = 2.5
Net gain =
2.5
31
5/27/16
125
126
127
128
P20 million
10 million
P10 million
P10 million
10 million
Gain (loss)
NIL
P50 million
10 million
P40 million
10 million
50 years
P1 million/yr.
P50 million
P0
P40 million
(P40 million)
32
5/27/16
B. Exchange of Property
129
B. Exchange of Property
130
General rule:
B. Exchange of Property
131
B. Exchange of Property
132
Example: A Corp. owns a piece of land with AB of P1M and FMV of P5M (i.e.,
P4M B.I.G.).
Step 1: A transfers the land to B Corp. in exchange for B stock with total
par value of P5M in a transaction qualifying as a tax-free exchange
Step 2: A subsequently sells the B stock for P5M cash in a taxable
transaction
Questions:
How much is As realized gain in Step 1?
How much gain should A recognize in Step 1?
P5,000,000
Amount realized
(Amt. of cash)
1,000,000 Basis
P4,000,000 Realized gain
NIL
Recognized gain
P5,000,000
5,000,000?
NIL
NIL
P5,000,000
Basis
1,000,000
Realized gain
Recognized gain
4,000,000
4,000,000
33
5/27/16
133
134
Transferor(s)
Property
135
Transferee
Transferee
Transferor(s)
Stock
Transferee
Property
136
Property
34
5/27/16
137
138
139
140
Initial structure
Transferor
Purchaser
(Wilson)
(Shook)
Sawmill
Logs to be
processed
Agreement to sell
shares after
corporation was
formed
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
35
5/27/16
141
142
Formation of Newco
Sale of shares
Promissory Note
Purchaser
Transferor
Transferor
(Wilson)
(Shook)
100% of
transferee shares
Sawmill
50% of transferee
shares
Transferee
Transferee
(S&W Corp.)
(S&W Corp.)
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
143
Ending point
Transferor
Purchaser
(Wilson)
(Shook)
50%
Purchaser
(Wilson)
(Shook)
50%
Transferee
(S&W Corp.)
Sawmill
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
36
5/27/16
T and A
A Stock
Target
Shareholders
Target
Acquiror
Shareholders
Acquiror
Shareholders
A
Merge
Target
Assets
Target
T Assets
T1
T2
Shareholders
Shareholders
T1
T1
Shareholders
T2
T2
A Stock
Shareholders
T1
T1 Assets
T2 Assets
T2
37
5/27/16
T1
T1
Shareholders
Shareholders
CIR v. Rufino
TPs majority owners of A corp.; TPs also majority
owners of B corp.
As the corporate life of A was about to end, it
merged into B (with B surviving) for the purpose of
continuing the business of A
CIR argued that the merger was not undertaken for a
bona fide business purpose but merely to avoid CGT
on the liquidation of A (assessed TPs deficiency CGT)
T1 and T2
Assets
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
CIR v. Rufino
Held: that B will continue the business of A is a bona fide
business purpose
The govt is not left entirely w/out recourse; merger merely
deferred taxes, w/c may be asserted by the govt later, when
gains are realized and benefits are distributed to the S/Hs as
a result of the merger
CIR v. Rufino
Rationale for tax-free treatment: the exemption . . .
[is] intended to encourage corporations in pooling,
combining or expanding their resources conducive to
the economic development of the country
38
5/27/16
E. De Facto Merger
153
E. De Facto Merger
154
Transferor
Property
Sub All
Transferor
Stock
Transferee
Property
Sub all
E. De Facto Merger
155
Transferee
E. De Facto Merger
156
Transferor
Transferee
Property
Sub all
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
39
5/27/16
158
XVI.SITUS OF TAXATION
Interest
Dividends
159
160
Without:
40
5/27/16
Personal Services
161
Personal Services
162
CIR v. BOAC
Personal Services
163
Personal Services
164
CIR v. BOAC
Feliciano, J. dissenting
For purposes of income taxation, the source of income
relates not to the physical sourcing of a flow of money
or the physical situs of payment but rather to the
property, activity or service which produced the
income
Applicable source rule is performance of service
(contract of carriage) not sale of personal property
(sale of airline tickets)
Since services were performed outside the Philippines,
compensation derived therefrom foreign source
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
41
5/27/16
Personal Services
165
Personal Services
166
Stemkowski v. CIR
TP professional hockey player in NHL; Canadian citizen who played for the
New York Rangers
NHL players year divided into four periods: (1) training camp, including
exhibition games; (2) regular season; (3) play-offs; and (4) off-season
For taxable year 1971, TP lived in Canada during all of the off-season
and most of training camp. Played in Canada 15 days out of 179 during
regular season and five out of 28 days in the play-offs
TP return position: total no. of days for which TP was compensated was 234
days (all but off-season)
IRS and Tax Court position: TP compensation covers only 179 days (regular
season); therefore TP could not use days spent in Canada during training
camp, play-offs and off-season in calculating foreign-source exclusion
The case required the determination of the source of payments from a U.S. company to
a German company (Zorn) and a nonresident German citizen (Stoessel) under contracts
in which, among other things, they had agreed not to compete in the U.S. and Canada
TP contention: income was paid for agreements to refrain from doing specific things
negative acts. Negative performance is based on continuous exercise of will, a mental
exertion that occurred in Germany (hence foreign source income)
Held: the rights of Stoessel and Zorn to do business in the U.S. in competition with the TP,
were interests in property in the U.S. They might have received amounts here for
services or information, but were willing to forego that right and possibility for a limited
period for a consideration
What they received was in lieu of what they might have received
The situs of the right was in the U.S., not elsewhere, and the income that flowed from the
privileges was necessarily earned and produced here
Personal Services
167
Stemkowski v. CIR
42
5/27/16
There is a need to distinguish between the two because the situs rules are
different
Situs rule for compensation for services is the place of performance rule
Situs rule for royalties is the place where the right or privilege is exercised
The need to distinguish between the two sometimes gives rise to practical
difficulties
Issue: By the contract entered into between Boulez and CBS, did the parties
agree that Boulez was licensing or conveying to CBS a property interest in
the recordings which he was retained to make, and in return for which he
was to receive royalties?
Held: No. Boulez derived U.S. source compensation from services income
Before a person can derive income from royalties, it is fundamental that he
must have an ownership interest in the property whose licensing or sale
gives rise to the income
Royalty defined as a share of the product or profit reserved by the
owner for permitting another to use the property
Also, for a payment to constitute a royalty, the payee must have an
ownership interest in the property whose use generates the payment
43
5/27/16
44
5/27/16
180
Under CIF Manila terms, the buyer of the goods accepts delivery at the ships rail at
the port of shipment, and a negotiable bill of lading deliverable to the order of the
buyer evidencing possession and control of the goods is given to him
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
179
45
5/27/16
General Rule
182
General Rule
183
184
46
5/27/16
Percentage of Completion
186
Installment Method
187
Installment Method
188
47
5/27/16
A. Individuals
190
XVIII.RETURNS AND
PAYMENT OF TAXES
Resident citizens
NRA-ETB. 51(A)(1)
Individual whose G/I does not exceed total personal and additional exemptions
However, citizens and aliens engaged in a Philippine trade or business or
exercising a profession shall file an ITR, irrespective of G/I
Individuals exempt from income tax (e.g., minimum wage earners) . 51(A)(2)
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
A. Individuals
A. Individuals
191
192
When the transfer of such property is exempt from donors tax. 51(E)
Pay-as-you-file
Thus, the last day for the payment of income tax coincides with the last day
for the filing of the return
The tax is paid at the place where the return is filed. 56(A)(1)
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
48
5/27/16
A. Individuals
A. Individuals
193
194
A. Individuals
A. Individuals
195
196
49
5/27/16
B. Corporations
197
B. Corporations
198
B. Corporations
199
B. Corporations
200
What options are available to the corporation in case the sum of the
quarterly tax payments/withholding tax credits during the year exceeds
the income tax due for the entire taxable income of that year?
Carry-over the excess credit (to be credited against est. quarterly
income tax liabilities for the taxable quarters of the succeeding taxable
years)
Be credited or refunded with the excess amount paid (cash refund or
TCC). 76
n These 2 options are alternative in nature; choice of one precludes
the other
What is the irrevocability rule?
Once the carry-over option is exercised, such option shall be
irrevocable for that taxable period and no application for cash refund
or issuance of a TCC shall be allowed. 76
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
50
5/27/16
B. Corporations
201
B. Corporations
202
Case
Philam Asset Mgt., Inc. v. CIR
For taxable year 1997, TP unable to utilize its P522k CWT due to net
loss position; TP filed a written refund claim with the BIR in Sept. 1998
For taxable year 1998, TP similarly was unable to utilize its P459k
CWT due to net loss position; in April 2000, TP filed its 1999 ITR
showing an income tax due of P80k; in its 1999 ITR, TP reflected the
1998 CWT of P459k as prior years excess credit; in Nov. 2000, TP
filed a refund claim for the P459k excess CWT
In its ITRs for both 1997 and 1998, TP did not indicate its option to
have the excess CWT either refunded or carried-over and applied to
the succeeding year
Both CTA and CA denied the TPs 1997 and 1998 refund claims
B. Corporations
203
B. Corporations
204
Case
Philam Asset Mgt., Inc. v. CIR
Held: 1997 claim granted; 1998 claim denied
TP has 2 options in case the sum of tax credits/payments during the
year exceeds the income tax due: (i) tax refund or (ii) carry-over excess
credits
2 options are alternative in nature; choice of one precludes the other
Case
Philam Asset Mgt., Inc. v. CIR
For the 1997 claim, despite the TPs failure to make the
appropriate marking in the ITR, the filing of its written claim
effectively serves an expression of its choice to request a
tax refund, instead of a carry-over credit
Although the TP did not mark the refund box in its 1997
FAR, neither did it perform any act indicating that it chose a
carry-over credit; on the contrary it filed on Sept. 11, 1998
an administrative refund claim of its 1997 excess tax
credits; in none of its quarterly returns in 1998 did it apply
the excess CWTs
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
51
5/27/16
B. Corporations
205
Case
Philam Asset Mgt., Inc. v. CIR
For the 1998 claim, the subsequent acts of the TP
reveal that it has effectively chosen the carry-over
option (TP reflected in its 1999 FAR the 1998 excess
credits as prior years excess credits)
Once the carry-over option is taken, actually or
constructively, it becomes irrevocable
Withholding Tax
207
Withholding Tax
208
52
5/27/16
Withholding Tax
209
Withholding Tax
210
Gross income
2,000,000
Taxable income
3,000,000
900,000
P50,000
Excess MCIT
1,000,000
500,000
(1,550,000)
(650,000)
Withholding Tax
211
P5,000,000
Withholding Tax
212
Yes.
However, the payor is still liable for applicable
surcharges, penalties and interest arising from the failure to
withhold
53
5/27/16
Withholding Tax
213
Withholding Tax
214
Cases --
Withholding Tax
215
54
5/27/16
55
5/27/16
Exceptions:
Revocable trusts -- income taxed to grantor
Trusts where the income may be held or
distributed for the benefit of the grantor -income taxed to grantor
Trust administered in a foreign country income
undiminished by any amounts distributed to
beneficiaries will be taxed to the trustee/s
Atty. Terence Conrad H. Bello
56