Flexible Road Calculation: Orf Expansion and Renovation

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Accomodation Mess Structural Analysis and Foundation
PHE WMO
Project Title
ORF Expansion and
Renovation
Document Number
Contract No.
311-1/TS/OPS/Dec13
WO#311-1-012B
PHEWMO-ORF-C-CAL-0005
Authors Organization
PT Synergy Engineering
Validation
: 2 Years
Expired Date
: 12/18/15
ORF EXPANSION AND RENOVATION
FLEXIBLE ROAD CALCULATION
Approval Sheet
Name
Title
Date
Harfizal
Head Engineering
Farabirazy Alburuni
Head of QA / QC
Dwi Semedi
Project SPA
Aditya Haninditya
Operation Representative
Signature
DOCUMENT CLASS : II
Revision Status
Rev
Issue Date
A
B
0
PT Synergy Engineering
Issue Purpose
Prepared
Checked
Approved
10/30/2015
USH
YO
MB
Issued for Review
11/27/2015
USH
YO
MB
Issued for Approval
12/18/2015
USH
YO
MB
Approved for Design
Owner
Signature
______________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 1 of 44
_______________________________________________________________________________________
PHE WMO
______________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 2 of 44
_______________________________________________________________________________________
PHE WMO
Document Number
PHEWMO-ORF-C-CAL-0005
ROAD CALCULATION
Owner
Signature
______________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 3 of 44
_______________________________________________________________________________________
PHE WMO
______________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 4 of 44
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
Flexible Road Calculation
________
Log Daftar Revisi

Nomor Dokumen
META-UMB-C-KAL-020
Judul Dokumen
Desain Perkerasan Jalan
Revisi
Halaman
Tanggal
Revisi
11/27/2015 Revised logo
11/27/2015 Revised table of content
11/27/2015 Added flow chart at Chapter 4. Method Analysis
18
Peninjau META
11/27/2015 Added explanation
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 5 of 44
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
________
Daftar Isi
Halaman
1.
Umum
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.1 Latar Belakang

1.2 Cakupan
1.3 Definisi dan Singkatan
1.3.1 Pengertian
1.3.2 Singkatan
1.4 Kode, Standar and Referensi
1.5 Satuan
FILOSOFI DESAIN
POTONGAN JALAN
METODE ANALISIS
DESAIN PERKERASAN LENTUR
5.1 Desain Lapisan Perkerasan Lentur
5.2 Data Beban Lalu Lintas
5.3 Lalu Lintas Harian Rata-rata
5.4 Angka Ekivalen ( E ) Beban Sumbu Kendaraan
5.5 Lalu Lintas Ekivalen
5.6 Perhitungan Indeks Tebal Perkerasan (ITP)
5.7 Desain Ketebalan Jalan / Perkerasan
4
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
LAMPIRAN A - ANGKA EKIVALEN (E) BEBAN SUMBU KENDARAAN

LAMPIRAN B - FAKTOR REGIONAL (FR) & KOEFISIEN KEKUATAN RELATIF
LAMPIRAN C - INDEKS PELAYANAN (SI) ;
- INDEKS PERMUKAAN AKHIR (IP)
- INDEKS PERMUKAAN AWAL (IPo)
LAMPIRAN D - JUMLAH JALUR
LAMPIRAN E - DISTRIBUSI EKIVALEN BEBAN SUMBU KENDARAAN
LAMPIRAN F - GRAFIK KORELASI DDT DAN CBR
LAMPIRAN G - GRAFIK ITP
LAMPIRAN H - GAMBAR
12
13
14
14
14
15
16
18
19
20
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 6 of 44
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PT.
META ADYA TIRTA UMBULAN
________
1.
UMUM
1.1
Latar Belakang
Pemerintah telah menetapkan Proyek Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum (SPAM) Umbulan sebagai salah satu
prioritas untuk menuju sasaran Millenium Development Goals (MDG), diharapkan dapat melayani air minum
mencapai 80% jumlah penduduk dan segera dilanjutkan dengan agenda Sustainable Develeopment Goals
(SDG) dengan target pencapaian 100% jumlah penduduk terlayani air minum.
Sebagai perwujudan pelayanan air minum di Propinsi Jawa Timur, Pemerintah Propinsi Jawa Timur akan
menyiapkan pembangunan Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum Umbulan melalui Proyek Kerjasama PemerintahSwasta. Proyek ini direncanakan menghasilkan debit 4000 liter/detik dengan memanfaatkan sumber mata air
Umbulan, Tapak, danKali Rejoso. Distribusi air bersih tersebut untuk melayani sekitar 1,6 juta jiwa atau sekitar
400 ribu sambungan rumah (SR) di lima kabupaten/kota di Jawa Timur, yaitu Kota Surabaya, Kabupaten
Sidoarjo, Kota Pasuruan, Kabupaten Pasuruan, dan Kabupaten Gresik melalui sistem pemompaan dan jaringan
pipa transmisi.
Fasilitas yang akan dibangun dalam menunjang keberhasilan projek Umbulan antara lain Bangunan Intake, Head
Pond, Kolam reservoir, Bangunan Pompa, Bangunan Power, Bangunan Elektrik, akomodasi , bangunan
Perkantoran dan lain-lain yang terdapat di wilayah Pengolah air Umbulan dan Wilayah Segoro madu. Selain itu
juga di bangun pipa tansmisi diameter +/- 2000 m yang terbentang dari pasuruan sampai gresik dengan panjang
pipa transmisi +/- 99 km.
1.2 Cakupan
Dokumen ini menyajikan ketebalan perhitungan dan dimensi dari perkerasan lentur untuk around jalan di sekitar
daerah utilitas
1.3 Definisi dan Symbol
Berikut akan dijelaskan definisi dan singkatan yang berlaku diseluruh perhitungan
1.3.1 Definisi
OWNER
KONSULTAN
PT. META ADYA TIRTA UMBULAN ( META )

PT. TGP - CRM - KGTM
1.3.2 Symbol
No. Symbol
1
UR
2
CBR
3
LHR
4
n
5
E
6
LEP
7
LER
8
LET
9
ITP
10 IP
11 FR
12 IPo
13 SI
14 a1
15 a2
16 a3
17 D1
18 D2
19 D3
20 DDT
21 FP
22 HRS
23 ATB
Deskripsi
Umur Rencana (Life time period)
California Bearing Ration
Lalu-lintas Harian Rata-rata (Average Daily Traffic)
Jumlah Tahun
Single Axle Load
Lintas Equivalen Permukaan (Initial Equivalent Traffic)
Lintas Equivalen Rencana (Equivalent Traffic Design)
Lintas Equivalen Trafik (Average Equivalent Traffic)
Indeks Tebal Perkerasan (~ SN = Structural Number)
Indeks Permukaan (Surface Index)
Factor Regional
Indeks Permukaan awal (Initial Surface Index)
Tingkat Pelayanan (Serviceability Index)
Koefisien Kekerasan Relatif Permukaan Jalan
Koefisien Kekuatan Relatif Pondasi Jalan
Koefisien Kekuatan Relatif Pondasi Bawah Jalan
Ketebalan Permukaan Jalan
Ketebalan Pondasi Bawah Jalan
Ketebalan Pondasi Bawah Jalan
Daya Dukung Tanah / CBR (Bearing Capacity)
Faktor Penyesuaian
Hot Rolled Sheet
Asphalt Treated base
____________________________________________________________________________________________
META-UMB-C-KAL-020
Page 7 of 44
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PT.
META ADYA TIRTA UMBULAN
________
1.4
Kode, Standar dan Referensi

No. Deskripsi
1 PHEWMO-PROJ-C-SPE-0009 Rev.0
Keterangan
Spesifikasi Jalan dan Perkerasan
PHEWMO-PROJ-C-DBS-0001 Rev.0
Kriteria Desain Struktur Sipil Onshore
PU Bina Marga
Manual desain-perkerasan-jalan-nomor-02-m-bm-2013
PU Bina Marga
Petunjuk Perencanaan Tebal Perkerasan Lentur Jalan

Raya Dengan Metode Analisa Komponen
Pekerjaan Penyelidikan Geoteknik dan Survey Topografi di ORF PHE WMO Gresik
AASHTO
American Association of State Highway and

Transportation Officials
SKBI-2.3.28.1987
Perencanaan Tebal Perkerasan Lentur Jalan Raya

dengan Metoda Analisa Komponen
ASTM
ASTM D 2940
American Society for Testing and Materials

Spesifikasi standar untuk Graded Agregat Bahan Untuk Jalan Raya atau Bandara,
untuk Penggunaan Evaluasi dan Desain Bandara dan jalan raya
ASTM D 1557-2000
Metode pengujian pemadatan karakteristik tanah menggunakan modified

Upaya (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3))
ASTM D 1556-2000
Cara pengujian untuk Density dan Satuan Berat dari Tanah menggunakan metode kerucut
Cone Method
ASTM D 1883-99
Cara Pengujian CBR (California Bearing Ratio) di laboratorium melalui

pemadatan tanah
ASTM D 4429-93
1.5
Cara Pengujian CBR (California Bearing Ratio) langsung di lapangan
Satuan
Semua satuan dalam SI, kecuali yang seharusnya bukan dalam SI .
____________________________________________________________________________________________
META-UMB-C-KAL-020
Page 8 of 44
___
PHE _________________________________________________________________________________________________
WMO
2.
FILOSOFI DESAIN
Desain jalan menggunkan perkerasan lentur yang disesuaikan dengan ringan atau beratnya suatu kendaraan serta
kondisi tanah yang telah ada . Dasar yang digunakan dalam perhitungan yaitu berdasarkan PU / Bina Marga dan AASHTO
3.
POTONGAN JALAN
Approved for Design
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 9 of 44
PHE _________________________________________________________________________________________________
WMO
4.
METODE ANALISIS
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 10 of 44
PHE _________________________________________________________________________________________________
WMO
5.
Desain Perkerasan Lentur

UR
5.1.
15
Tahun
---->
(PHEWMO-PROJ-C-DBS-0001 Rev.0 ; page 31)
Perkerasan Lentur - Desain Lapisan

a.
b.
c.
d.
Wearing & Binder Co:

Base Course
:
Sub Base Course :
Sub Grade
:
Batu Pecah & Batu

batu pecah kelas B
sirtu kelas B
tanah asli
Aspal Beton (HRS & ATB)

CBR min
80%
CBR min
60%
CBR min
6%
CBR tanah dasar sebesar 6% didapatkan dari PHEWMO-PROJ-C-SPE-0009 Rev.0, page 14

5.2.
Data Beban Lalu Lintas
8.3.1 Desain Struktur Jalan , PHEWMO-PROJ-C-DBS-0001 Rev.0 ; page 31

Mobil (2 ton) :
:
25
kendaraan/hari
Truk 16 t :
:
2
kendaraan/harii
Truk 34 t :
:
2
kendaraan/hari
70 ton hydraulic truck crane
:
2
kendaraan/tahun
LHR =
5.3.
31
kendaraan/hari
Pertumbuhan Kendaraan setiap tahun ( i ) Untuk perencanaan selama 15 tahun, i =3%

Lalu lintas harian rata-rata
a.
Pada awal rencana (Asumsi masa konstruksi selama 1 tahun), i =

-
Mobil (2 ton) :
Truk 16 t :
Truck 34 t :
70 tons hydraulic truck crane
:
:
:
:
25
2
2
2
LHR awal Proyek

b.
-
5,4
0%
n= 1
Kendaraan
Kendaraan
Kendaraan
Kendaraan
31
Pada akhir periode desain (n=15 tahun)

Truk 16 t :
:
3
Mobil (2 ton) :
:
Truk 16 t :
:
Truck 34 t :
:
:
LHR Akhir Proyek
(1+ i ) ^ n
vehicle
38
3
3
3
47
i = 3%
Kendaraan
Kendaraan
Kendaraan
Kendaraan
n = 15
38.94
3.11
3.11
3.11
Angka Ekivalen (E) Beban Sumbu Kendaraan
Angka ekivalen sumbu

tunggal
Angka ekivalen sumbu

ganda
-
beban satu sumbu

tunggal dalam (Kg)
8160
beban satu sumbu
ganda dalam(Kg)
8160
)4
Truk 16 t : sumbu tunggal
Konfigurasi
1
6
6
35
+
+
+
+
1
10
10
0.086
( Lihat Lampiran A)
Edepan Etengah Ebelakang

--->
--->
18
0.0002
0.292
0.292
35 --->
29.108
2.255
Ej
Mark
0.0002
2.255
0.857
0.0005
2.55
3.41
Everyday
Everyday
29.108
29.11
Reduction 50% while used 4

times a year
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 11 of 44
PHE _________________________________________________________________________________________________
WMO
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 12 of 44
PHE _________________________________________________________________________________________________
WMO
5.5.
Lalu Lintas Ekivalen
a.
Lintas Ekivalen Permulaan (LEP)
LEP = LHRj x Cj x Ej
Data : - Jalan lebar 6 m dengan 2 jalur

Dimana C adalah Koefisien Distribusi Kendaraan
LHR
25
2
2
3
Mobil (2 ton) :
Truk 16 t :
Truck 34 t :
0.5
Cj
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
LEP
(Lampiran D - Tabel 1)
Ej
LEP
0.0005 0.006
2.55
2.5
3.41
3.4
29.11 43.7
49.6
Cj = Koefisien Distribusi Kendaraan

Ej = Angka Ekivalen Jalan
b.
Lintas Ekivaelen Akhir (LEA)
LEA = LHRj (1+ i )^UR x Cj x Ej

LHR
38
3
3
3
Mobil (2 ton) :
Truk 16 t :
Truck 34 t :
Cj
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
LEA
c.
Ej
0.0005
2.55
3.41
29.11
=
LEA
0.01
3.82
5.11
43.66
52.6
Lintas Ekivalen Tengah (LET)

LET = (LEP + LEA)/2
LET =
51.1
d.
Lintas Ekivalen Rencana (LER)
5.6.
LER = LET * FP
FP = UR/10
UR =
FP =
LER =
15 years
1.5
76.6588 ====>
15/10 =
76.66
(Faktor Penyesuaian)
77 (Rounded Up)
Perhitungan Indek Tebal Perkerasan (ITP)

Parameters :
1. Faktor Regional (FR) untuk kelndaian < 6% ; Kendaraan Berat < 30% ; iklim 116.1 mm/dy or 5293 mm/yr) > 900 mm
FR = 1.5 (Lampiran B)
2. Indeks Permukaan (IP) untuk LER > 10, Klasifikasi Jalan : lokal/kolektor
IP = 2.0 (Lampiran B)
3. Indeks Permukaan Pada Awal Umur Rencana (IPo)
(ATTACHMENT C)
IPo =
3.9 - 3.5
for surfaces layers :
4. Kekuatan Tanah Dasar CBR =
6%
DDT =
(As Graphic CBR to DDT/ATTACHMENT-F)
From Parameters 1,2,3,4 see to the chart for find ITP, so :

ITPact = 6.7 (As Graphic DDT to LER to ITP to FR to ITPact/ATTACHMENT-G)
5.7.
Desain ketebalan jalan / Perkerasan

ITP = a1*D1+a2*D2+a3*D3
Dimana :
a adalah koefisien kekuatan relatif
D adalah tebal masing-masing lapis perkerasan
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 13 of 44
PHE _________________________________________________________________________________________________
WMO
Ketebalan minimal dan nilai untuk perkerasan :
-
Angka Untuk :
a.
a1
=
0.35
b.
batu pecah kelas B
a2
=
0.13
c.
sirtu kelas B
a3
=
0.12
(See ATTACHMENT B - FACTOR REGIONAL (FR) & COEFICIENT STRENGHT RELATIVE)
Ketebalan minimal perkerasan Untuk nilai ITP 6.7

a.
b.
batu pecah kelas B (Crushed Stone)
c.
sirtu kelas B
D1
D2
D3
=
=
=
10
20
12
cm
cm
cm
Perhitungan
ITP = a1 D1 + a2 D2 + a3 D3
Penggunaan lapisan :
- Wearing Course
4 cm
- Binder Couse
5 cm
- Crushed Stone
Type B
- Sirtu (Sand Gravel) Type B
D1
cm
D2
D3
=
=
20
10
cm
cm
IT Pact = 6.95
Wearing Course
Binder Course
base course (batu pecah)
CBR min
sub base
CBR min
80%
(sirtu)
60%
4 cm
5 cm
HRS = Hot Rolled Sheet /Laston

ATB = Asphalt Treated Base
20 cm
10 cm
subgrade
CBR min 6%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 14 of 44
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
LAMPIRAN A - ANGKA EKIVALEN (E) BEBAN SUMBU________
KENDARAAN
Angka Ekivalen Sumbu Tunggal
Angka Ekivalen Sumbu Ganda
(
(
Angka Ekivalen Sumbu

Tunggal dalam(Kg)
8160
Angka Ekivalen Sumbu
Ganda (Kg)
8160
)0.086
Angka Ekivalen ( E ) Beban Sumbu Kendaraan

Beban Sumbu
Angka Ekivalen
Kg
Lb
Sumbu Tunggal
Sumbu Ganda
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
8160
9000
10000
11000
12000
13000
14000
15000
16000
2205
4409
6614
8818
11023
13228
15432
17637
18000
19841
22046
24251
26455
28660
30864
33069
35276
0.0002
0.0036
0.0183
0.0577
0.1410
0.2933
0.5415
0.9328
1.0000
1.4798
2.2555
3.3022
4.6770
6.4419
8.6447
11.4184
14.7815
0.0003
0.0016
0.0050
0.0121
0.0251
0.0466
0.0794
0.0860
0.1273
0.1940
0.2840
0.4022
0.5540
0.7452
0.9820
1.2712
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 15 of 44
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 16 of 44
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
___
LAMPIRAN B - FAKTOR REGIONAL (FR) & KOEFISIEN KEKUATAN
RELATIF
Faktor Regional (FR)

Kelandaian
(<6%)
% Kendaraan Berat
< 30 %
> 30 %
Kelandaian
( 6 - 10 % )
% Kendaraan Berat
< 30 %
> 30 %
Kelandaian
( > 10 % )
% Kendaraan Berat
< 30 %
> 30 %
Iklim
< 900 mm/thn
0.5
1.0 - 1.5
1.0
1.5 - 2.0
1.5
2.0 - 2.5
Iklim
> 900 mm/thn
1.5
2.0 - 2.5
2.0
2.5 - 3.0
2.5
3.0 - 3.5
Ambil FR =
1.5
Approved for Design
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 17 of 44
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 18 of 44
___
Doc. Status : IFR
Revision : A1
Document type : CL
Discipline : CI
Rev. Date : 26-Jun-15
SE Job No. : 229
A1.7
A1.7.1
KE Contract No.: KE/BUL/15/0001
FOUNDATION DESIGN
Foundation Dimension
L
ELV
hp
Lp
FGL
hf
hs
Bp
BOF
Figure B.2 - Foundation Front View
Figure B.1 - Foundation Plan

Pedestal Size :
Symbol
FGL
Bp
Lp
hp
Z
hs
Description
Finish Grade Level
Pedestal width
Pedestal length
Pedestal height
Pedestal height above ground level
height of soil above footing
Value
0.00
300
300
600
300
300
Unit
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
Value
-550
1000
1000
250
Unit
mm
mm
mm
mm
EL. +
= FGL - ELV
Footing Size :
Symbol
Description
BOF
Foundation base elevation
B
Foundation width
L
Footing length
hf
Footing height
Footing and Pedestal weight :
Wf
= (L * B * h * c) + (Bp * Lp * hp * c))
Soil weight
Ws
= (Af - Ap) * hs * s
Bearing Capacity
AF
= Area of Footing Plan
S
SX
SZ
= BxL
= Section Modulus of Footing Plan

= 1/6 L B^2
= 1/6 x 1 x 1^2
1/6
B
L
^2
=
= 1/6 x 1 x 1^2
6.43 kN
1.00
m2
0.17
m3
0.17
m3
min
max
mid
min
mid
max
7.15 kN
Axial Load
Moment
Load
Axial Load
Moment Load
= 1x1
A1.7.2
EL.
Doc. Status : IFR
Revision : A1
Document type : CL
Discipline : CI
SE Job No. : 229
Figure B.3 -Stress Distribution Condition 1

Figure B.4 - Stress Distribution Condition 2
Assuming soil has no tension resistance, the following two condition fit with loading condition shall be
applied :
Stress distribution condition 1 :
if moment excentricity < L/6
soil pressure (s) = (V / Af) + (Mx / S) + (Mz / S)
Stress distribution condition 2 :
if moment excentricity > B/6
soil pressure (s) = 2 * V / (L * x)
where :
effective width (x) = 3 * ((B/2) - e)
moment excentricity (e) = M / V
for Temporary condition, Maximum Reaction Unfactored Load Combination (absolute value):
Fy
Axial force
=
102.3 kN STAAD Pro Output
Fx
X-dir force
=
Fz
Z-dir force
=
Mx
X-dir moment
=
0.000 kNm STAAD Pro Output
Mz
Z-dir moment
=
V
Axial force total
= Wf + Ws + Fy
=
115.9 kN
Mox
Moz
ex
ez
Moment critical by X-dir force

= Fx * (hf + hp) + Mx
Moment critical by Z-dir force
= Fz * (hf + hp) + Mz
moment excentricity by axial force at X-dir
= Mx / V
moment excentricity by axial force at Z-dir
= Mz / V
Condition 1
s
Soil pressure
= (V / Af) + (Mx / S) + (Mz / S)
s
= (V / Af) + (Mx / S) + (Mz/S)
s
= (V / Af) + (Mx / S) - (Mz/S)
s
= (V / Af) - (Mx / S) + (Mz/S)
s
= (V / Af) - (Mx / S) - (Mz/S)
A1.7.3
=
=
=
=
5.15
kNm
6.39
kNm
0.04
< L/6, (condition 1)
0.06
< B/6, (condition 1)
185.2
108.5
123.4
46.7
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
>
>
>
>
Overturning Stability
for Temporary condition, Maximum Reaction Factored Load Combination (absolute value):
Fy
Axial force
=
Fx
X-dir force
=
Fz
Z-dir force
=
Mx
X-dir moment
=
Mz
Z-dir moment
=
V
Axial force total
= Wf + Ws + Fy
=
37.71 kN
Mo = Overturning moment
=
Moment Load
Mox
= Fx * (hf + hp) + Mx
=
0.63 kNm
Moz
= Fz * (hf + hp) + Mz
=
0.20 kNm
Doc. Status : IFR
Revision : A1
Document type : CL
Discipline : CI
SE Job No. : 229
MrX
MrZ
SFM
= Moment resistant about x axis

= Moment resistant about Z axis
=
=
Axial Force x B/2

Axial Force x L/2
= Overturning moment safety factor

=
SFM shall be
>
2 for permanent load contition
>
1.5 for temporary load contition
for Temporary condition (absolute value):
Mox
=
Moz
=
Mrx
= Axial Force x B/2
=
Mrz
= Axial Force x L/2
=
SFM
= Overturning moment safety factor
= MrX/MoX + MrZ/MoZ
A1.7.4
Sliding Stability
Hs
= Sliding horizontal load
Hr
= Sliding resistance
= Coefficient of friction
SFH
= Sliding safety factor
SFH shall be
>
>
MrX/MoX + MrZ/MoZ
0.63
0.20
18.86
18.86
=
=
=
=
Horizontal load resultante

Axial x m
0.3
(ref. 1 sect. 6)
Hr/Hs
126.27
kNm
kNm
kNm
kNm
> 1.5 OK!
2 for permanent load contition

1.5 for temporary load contition
for Temporary condition, Maximum Reaction Factored Load Combination (absolute value):
Fx
= x-dir force
=
Fz
= Z-dir force
=
V
= Axial force
=
37.71 kN
Hs
= horizontal load resultante
=
0.78 kN
Hr
= Axial x
=
11.31 kN
SFH
= Hr/Hs
=
14.53 > 1.5 OK!
A1.7.5
Settlement
for Temporary condition, Maximum Reaction Unfactored Load Combination (absolute value):
Fy
Axial force
=
Wf
Footing & Pedestal weight
=
7.15 kN
=
V
Wf + Fy
109.50 kN
1.
Immediate Settlement (Se)
Assumed settlement occurred uniformly at the bottom of foundation:
Revision : A1
Document type : CL
Discipline : CI
Doc. Status : IFR
SE Job No. : 229
ar
V
L/B
Af
qo
N
Es
ms
=
=
=
=
=
=
0.920
109.50
1.00
LxB
V / Af
4
(from graphic)
(unfactored load combinaton Wf + Fy)
=
=
=
=
Modulus elasticity of soil

=
54
kg/cm2
5295.591
kN/m2
0.45
(for most clay soils)
kN
=
=
1
109.5
m2
kN/m2
6*(N+5)
Table is taken from Foundation analysis and Design Book fifth Edition, by J Bowles
the elastic settlement is as below:
Se
=
1 * 109.5/5295.591 * (1 - 0.45^2)*0.92
=
0.0151711395 m
=
15.17
mm
2.
Consolidation Settlement (Sc)

Sc =
q
0.00 m
hs
hf
Df
HL
-2.00 m
H
-4.00 m
Revision : A1
Document type : CL
Discipline : CI
Doc. Status : IFR
SE Job No. : 229
Where :
hs
hf
Df
HL
z
H
Cc
eo
Po
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
height of soil above foo=

0.30 m
Footing height
=
0.25 m
hs + hf
=
0.55 m
Height of Layer
=
4.00 m
Depth influence
=
(HL - Df) / 2
=
1.73
m
Thick. of the clay layer under foundation
HL - Df
=
3.45
m
Load (kN/m2)
=
(Wf + Fy) / (B x L)
109.50
kN/m2 =
1.117
kg/cm2
Width of Footing
=
1.00 m
Length of Footing
=
1.00 m
Density of Clay
=
16.16
kN/m3 (Soil Investigation)
Compression Index
=
0.15
(Soil Investigation)
Initial Void Ratio
=
1.29
(Soil Investigation)
(Df + z) x clay
Eff.Overburden Layer =
Increase eff. Press.
Sc
Cons. Settlement
q
B
L
gclay
Total Settlement =
Se + Sc
=
=
=
=
=
=
36.77
kPa
(q x B x L) / (B + z) (L + z)
14.7 kPa
0.033095491 m
33.10
mm
48.3 mm
< 25.4 mm (OK)
Doc. Status : IFR
Revision : A1
Document type : CL
Discipline : CI
SE Job No. : 229
A1.8
REINFORCEMENT DESIGN
A1.8.1
Foundation Specification
Concrete
fc'
fc'
Compressive strength for structural concrete

Compressive strength for leveling concrete
=
=
21 MPa
14 MPa
Reinforcing Steel Bar

ASTM A615 or JIS G3112 SR 390/40 or SII 0136-84 BJTD 40
A1.8.2
Footing Flexural Reinforcement

Maximum Reaction Factored Load Combination (absolute value):
Fy
Axial force
=
Fx
X-dir force
=
Fz
Z-dir force
=
Mx
X-dir moment
=
Mz
Z-dir moment
=
V
Axial force total
= Wf + Ws + Fy
=
= Fx * (hf + hp) + Mx
Moz
= Fz * (hf + hp) + Mz
ex
moment excentricity by axial force at X-dir
= Mx / V
ez
moment excentricity by axial force at Z-dir
= Mz / V
Condition 1:
s
Soil pressure
= (V / Af) + (Mx / S) + (Mz / S)
s
= (V / Af) + (Mx / S) + (Mz / S)
s
= (V / Af) + (Mx / S) - (Mz / S)
s
= (V / Af) - (Mx / S) + (Mz / S)
s
= (V / Af) - (Mx / S) - (Mz / S)
400 MPa
24.133
0.744
0.230
0.000
0.000
37.71
kN
kN
kN
kNm
kNm
kN
0.63
kNm
0.20
kNm
STD Pro Output

STD Pro Output
STD Pro Output
STD Pro Output
STD Pro Output
Mox
s-max
s-min
s-mid
L
B
Mu
h
c
Drebar
=
=
=
=
0.02
< L/6, (condition 1)
0.01
< B/6, (condition 1)
42.68
40.33
35.09
32.75
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
=
=
82.01
32.75
kN/m2
=
=
=
57.38
1.00
1.00
kN/m2
m
m
Footing depth
Concrete cover
=
=
=
15.38
0.25
50.00
kNm
m
mm
Rebar diameter designed
13
mm
Maximum soil pressure (s)

Minimum soil pressure (s)
Soil pressure at middle of footing
(s-max + s-min) / 2
Footing length
Footing width
Maximum critical factored actual moment
= L * [1/2 * s-mid * (B/2)2 + 2/3 *(s-max - s-mid) * (B/2)2]
kN/m2
Doc. Status : IFR
Revision : A1
Document type : CL
Discipline : CI
SE Job No. : 229
d
1
Ru
m
req
0.19
0.85
0.46
22.41
Required reinforcement ratio

= (1/m) * [1 - (1 - 2m * Ru / Fy)]
0.12
Fy in MPa
Balanced reinforcement ratio

= (1 * 0.85 * fc' / Fy) * (600 / (600 + Fy))
2.28
fc' and Fy in MPa
max
Maximum reinforcement ratio
1.71
min
Minimum reinforcement ratio

= 1.4 / Fy if 1.33 * req > 1.4 / Fy or
= 0.18 % if 1.33 * req < 1.4 / Fy
0.18
Fy in MPa
Needed reinforcement ratio

= req if req > 1.4 / Fy or
= 1.33 * req < 1.4 / Fy if req < 1.4 / Fy
0.15
Fy in MPa
used
Largest value between min and need
0.18
< max
As req
As
nr
s
Total area of rebar required

= used * L * d
Total area of rebar
= 0.25 * * rebar2
Number of rebar
= As req / As
Rebar spacing
= (L - 2 * c) / (nr - 1)
=
=
=
=
=
348.30
132.73
3
450.00
200.00
Use
D13 - 200 mm
need
Footing effective depth

Block stress depth factor
Coefficient of resistance
= Fy / (0.85 * fc')
= h - c - 0.5 * rebar
=
=
=
=
A1.8.3
= Mu / ( * L * d2)
= 0.75 * b
m
MPa where = 0.9
fc' and Fy in MPa
OK
mm2
mm2
ea
mm
mm Used
for top & bottom flexural reinf.
Footing Shear Reinforcement

1. Punching Shear (Two Way Action Shear)
d/2
Pseudocritical section
d/2
Bp
Lp
L
= s-max
qu
Lp
Bp
Uniform load
Pedestal length
Pedestal width
d
Vu
bo
= h - c - 0.5 * rebar
Footing effective depth
Ultimate factored axial force
Pseudocritical section
= 2 * {[Lp + (2 * d/2)] + [Bp + (2 * d/2)]}
kN/m2
m
m
=
=
=
82.01
0.30
0.30
=
=
0.19
37.71
m
kN
1.97
Doc. Status : IFR
Revision : A1
Document type : CL
Discipline : CI
SE Job No. : 229
Vc
Vc
Slab allowable punching shear without reinforcement

= 0.333 * fc' * bo * d
= 0.75* Vc
=
437.16
kN
>
Vu
582.88
kN
No Shear Reinforcement Required
note :
Vu<0.5 *s*Vc
No reinforcement required
0,5*s*Vc<Vu<s*Vc
(Vu - s*Vc )< 0.67*bw*d*fc'
use minimum reinforcement

pedestal dimension ok, if not, dimension need to be made
larger
2. Footing Shear (One Way Action Shear)
Vc
d/2
Vc
Bp
Vu
= Ultimate factored axial force

=
37.71
kN
= Slab allowable shear without reinforcement
= 0.166 * fc' * L * d
147.20
kN
=
= 0.75 * Vc
=
110.40
kN
> Vu
No Shear Reinforcement Required
Lp
L
3. Maximum Crack
Maximum crack width on tension area shall be calculated based on Gergery-Lutz
expression as follow:
3
w=1 . 11106 fs dc A
where
w
=
=
fs
=
dc
ds
Ae
=
=
=
N
A
w
=
=
=
=
=
crack width (mm)

height factor (1.2 for beam, 1.35 for slab)
=
reinforcement calculated stress at service load (MPa),
shall be 0.6 Fy for maximum crack
=
thickness of concrete cover (mm)
=
cover concrete + 1.5 diameter of rebar
=
effective tension area of concrete around
rebar layment
2*ds*
=
1000/s
=
Ae/N
=
1.11e-6 x 1.35 x 240 x (50 x 27)^(1/3)
0.004 mm
< 0.4 mm .. OK
1.35
240 MPa
50 mm
50 mm
135
5.00
27
mm2
mm2
#REF!
#REF!
Reference for Water Tank
334487549.xls
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attachment F Page 2
________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
___
LAMPIRAN C - C
LAMPIRAN - C1
Tingkat Pelayanan (SI)

IP = 1.0
IP = 1.5
IP = 2.0
IP = 2.5
=
=
=
=
Tingkat Pelayanan Buruk

Tingkat pelayanan rendah tetapi jalan masih mungkin dilewati
Tingkat Pelayanan Rendah tetapi Jalan masih mantap
Permukaan jalan masih cukup stabil dan baik
LAMPIRAN - C.2
Indeks Permukaan Pada Akhir Umur Rencan(IP)

LER = Lintas Ekivalen Rencana
Lokal
Klasifikasi Jalan
Kolektor
Arteri
Tol
< 10
1.0 - 1.5
1.5
1.5 - 2.0
10 -100
1.5
1.5 - 2.0
100 - 1000
1.5 - 2.0
2.0
2.0 - 2.5
> 1000
2.0 -2.5
2.5
2.5
LAMPIRAN - C.3
Indeks Permukaan Pada Awal Umur Rencana (IPo)

Jenis Lapis Perkerasan
LASTON
LASBUTAG
HRA
BURDA
BURTU
LAPEN
LATASBUM
BURAS
LATASIR
JALAN TANAH
JALAN KERIKIL
IPo
>4
3.9 - 3.5
3.9 - 3.5
3.4 - 3.0
3.9 - 3.5
3.4 - 3.0
3.9 - 3.5
3.4 - 3.0
3.4 - 3.0
2.9 - 2.5
2.9 - 2.5
2.9 - 2.5
2.9 - 2.5
< 24
< 24
ROUGHNESS *)
< 1000
> 1000
< 2000
> 2000
< 2000
> 2000
< 2000
< 2000
< 3000
> 3000
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 3 of 44
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
___
LAMPIRAN - D
Jumlah Jalur Berdasarkan Lebar Perkerasan

Lebar Perkerasan (L)
Jumlah Jalur (n)
L < 5.50 m
5.50 m < L < 8.25 m
8.25 m < L < 11.25 m
11.25 m < L < 15.00 m
15.00 m < L < 18.75 m
18.75 m < L < 22.00 m
1 Jalur
2 Jalur
3 Jalur
4 Jalur
5 Jalur
6 Jalur
Koefisien Distribusi Kendaraan (c)

Kendaraan Ringan
Kendaraan Berat
Jumlah
Jalur
1 Arah
2 Arah
3 Arah
4 Arah
1 Jalur
2 Jalur
3 Jalur
4 Jalur
5 Jalur
6 Jalur
1.00
0.60
0.40
-
1.00
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.25
0.20
1.00
0.70
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.48
0.45
0.43
0.40
Approved for Design
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 4 of 44
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
___
LAMPIRAN - E
Konfigurasi Beban Sumbu Kendaraan
a. Mobil
1 ton
1 ton
b.Truck 16 Ton
c. Truck 34 Ton
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 5 of 44
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
___
c. Hydraulic 70 ton
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 6 of 44
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 7 of 44
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
___
LAMPIRAN - F
Grafik korelasi antara CBR dan DDT=Daya Dukung Tanah
DDT = 5 ton/m2
CBR = 6 %
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 8 of 44
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
___
LAMPIRAN - G
ITP = 6.7
DDT = 5 ton/m2
LER = 77
FR = 1.5
ITPo = 6.1
Approved for Design
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 9 of 44
___
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PHE
WMO
___
LAMPIRAN-H
____________________________________________________________________________________________
334487549.xls
Page 10 of 44
___
_______________________________________________________________________________________
PHE WMO
Structural Analysis and Foundation Accomodation Mess
__________
ATTACHMENT - A
Equivalent Single Axle Load Number
Weight Single Axle (Kg)

)
= (
8160
Equivalent Double Axle Load Number
( Weight Double Axle (Kg) )4 0.086

8160
Equivalent Axle Load Number ( E )

Axle Load
Equivalent Number
Kg
Lb
Single Axle
Double Axle
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
8160
9000
10000
11000
12000
13000
14000
15000
2205
4409
6614
8818
11023
13228
15432
17637
18000
19841
22046
24251
26455
28660
30864
33069
0.0002
0.0036
0.0183
0.0577
0.1410
0.2933
0.5415
0.9328
1.0000
1.4798
2.2555
3.3022
4.6770
6.4419
8.6447
11.4184
0.0003
0.0016
0.0050
0.0121
0.0251
0.0466
0.0794
0.0860
0.1273
0.1940
0.2840
0.4022
0.5540
0.7452
0.9820
16000
35276
14.7815
1.2712
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Att. A - 1
334487549.xls
_________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
PHE WMO
__________
ATTACHMENT - B
Factor Regional (FR)
Slope
(<6%)
% Heavy vehicle
Slope
( 6 - 10 % )
% Heavy vehicle
Slope
( > 10 % )
% Heavy vehicle
< 30 %
> 30 %
< 30 %
> 30 %
< 30 %
> 30 %
Weather
< 900 mm/thn
0.5
1.0 - 1.5
1.0
1.5 - 2.0
1.5
2.0 - 2.5
Weather
> 900 mm/thn
1.5
2.0 - 2.5
2.0
2.5 - 3.0
2.5
3.0 - 3.5
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Att. A - 2
334487549.xls
_________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
PHE WMO
__________
ATTACHMENT - C
ATTACHMENT - C1
Serviceability Index (SI)

IP = 1.0
IP = 1.5
IP = 2.0
IP = 2.5
=
=
=
=
Bad Serviceability
Low Serviceability but Road Still Possible to passed
Low Serviceability but Road Still Stable
Surface of Road is Stable and Good Enough
ATTACHMENT - C.2
Final Serviceability Index (IP)

Road Classification
LER = Equivalent Traffic

Design
Local
Collector
Arteri
Highway
< 10
1.0 - 1.5
1.5
1.5 - 2.0
10 -100
1.5
1.5 - 2.0
100 - 1000
1.5 - 2.0
2.0
2.0 - 2.5
> 1000
2.0 -2.5
2.5
2.5
Initial Serviceability Index

(IPo)
IPo
TYPE OF ROAD
LASTON
LASBUTAG
HRA
BURDA
BURTU
LAPEN
LATASBUM
BURAS
LATASIR
ROUGHNESS *)
( mm/km )
>4
3.9 - 3.5
3.9 - 3.5
3.4 - 3.0
3.9 - 3.5
3.4 - 3.0
3.9 - 3.5
3.4 - 3.0
3.4 - 3.0
2.9 - 2.5
2.9 - 2.5
2.9 - 2.5
2.9 - 2.5
< 1000
> 1000
< 2000
> 2000
< 2000
> 2000
< 2000
< 2000
< 3000
> 3000
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Att. A - 3
334487549.xls
_________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
PHE WMO
__________
JALAN TANAH
JALAN KERIKIL
< 24
< 24
ATTACHMENT - D
Lane Number Based on Widht of Road

Road Width (L)
Lane Number
L < 5.50 m
5.50 m < L < 8.25 m
8.25 m < L < 11.25 m
11.25 m < L < 15.00 m
1 Lane
2 Lane
3 Lane
4 Lane
15.00 m < L < 18.75 m

18.75 m < L < 22.00 m
5 Lane
6 Lane
Lane Number Based on Widht of Road

Light Vehicle
Lane
Heavy Vehicle
Number
1 Direction
2 Direction
3 Direction
4 Direction
1 Lane
2 Lane
3 Lane
4 Lane
5 Lane
6 Lane
1.00
0.60
0.40
-
1.00
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.25
0.20
1.00
0.70
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.48
0.45
0.43
0.40
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Att. A - 4
334487549.xls
_________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
PHE WMO
__________
ATTACHMENT - E
Distribution of Equivalent Single Axle Load
a. Light Truck
P3=5 ton
P1=5 ton
b. Heavy Truck
P1=3.75 ton
P2=15 ton
P3=15 ton
c. Crane 300 ton
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Att. A - 5
334487549.xls
_________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
PHE WMO
__________
d. Crane 150 ton
ATTACHMENT - F
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Att. A - 6
334487549.xls
_________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
PHE WMO
__________
ATTACHMENT - G
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Att. A - 7
334487549.xls
_________

Flexible Road Calculation: Orf Expansion and Renovation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Flexible Road Calculation: Orf Expansion and Renovation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Flexible Road Calculation: Orf Expansion and Renovation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Accomodation Mess Structural Analysis and Foundation

ORF EXPANSION AND RENOVATION

FLEXIBLE ROAD CALCULATION

Issued for Review

Issued for Approval

Approved for Design

Log Daftar Revisi

Desain Perkerasan Jalan

11/27/2015 Revised logo

11/27/2015 Revised table of content

11/27/2015 Added flow chart at Chapter 4. Method Analysis

11/27/2015 Added explanation

1.1 Latar Belakang

LAMPIRAN A - ANGKA EKIVALEN (E) BEBAN SUMBU KENDARAAN

PT. META ADYA TIRTA UMBULAN ( META )

Kode, Standar dan Referensi

Kriteria Desain Struktur Sipil Onshore

Petunjuk Perencanaan Tebal Perkerasan Lentur Jalan

American Association of State Highway and

Perencanaan Tebal Perkerasan Lentur Jalan Raya

American Society for Testing and Materials

Metode pengujian pemadatan karakteristik tanah menggunakan modified

Cara Pengujian CBR (California Bearing Ratio) di laboratorium melalui

Cara Pengujian CBR (California Bearing Ratio) langsung di lapangan

Approved for Design

Desain Perkerasan Lentur

(PHEWMO-PROJ-C-DBS-0001 Rev.0 ; page 31)

Perkerasan Lentur - Desain Lapisan

Wearing & Binder Co:

Batu Pecah & Batu

Aspal Beton (HRS & ATB)

CBR tanah dasar sebesar 6% didapatkan dari PHEWMO-PROJ-C-SPE-0009 Rev.0, page 14

Data Beban Lalu Lintas

8.3.1 Desain Struktur Jalan , PHEWMO-PROJ-C-DBS-0001 Rev.0 ; page 31

(PHEWMO-PROJ-C-DBS-0001 Rev.0 ; page 31)

Pertumbuhan Kendaraan setiap tahun ( i ) Untuk perencanaan selama 15 tahun, i =3%

Lalu lintas harian rata-rata

Pada awal rencana (Asumsi masa konstruksi selama 1 tahun), i =

LHR awal Proyek

Pada akhir periode desain (n=15 tahun)

Angka Ekivalen (E) Beban Sumbu Kendaraan

Angka ekivalen sumbu

Angka ekivalen sumbu

beban satu sumbu

Truk 16 t : sumbu tunggal

Edepan Etengah Ebelakang

Reduction 50% while used 4

Lalu Lintas Ekivalen

Lintas Ekivalen Permulaan (LEP)

Data : - Jalan lebar 6 m dengan 2 jalur

Cj = Koefisien Distribusi Kendaraan

Lintas Ekivaelen Akhir (LEA)

LEA = LHRj (1+ i )^UR x Cj x Ej

Lintas Ekivalen Tengah (LET)

Lintas Ekivalen Rencana (LER)

Perhitungan Indek Tebal Perkerasan (ITP)

(As Graphic CBR to DDT/ATTACHMENT-F)