ACI 318M-11 Training by Prof. David Darwin PDF

Building Code Requirements for
St
Structural
t
l Concrete
C
t (ACI 318M-11)
318M 11)
Overview
O
i
off ACI 318M
Design of Prestressed Concrete
Evaluation of Existing Structures
David Darwin
Vietnam Institute for Building Science and
Technology (IBST)
Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City
December 12-16, 2011
This morning
Overview of ACI 318M-11
318M 11
Design of Prestressed Concrete
(Ch t 18)
(Chapter
Strength Evaluation of Existing
Structures (Chapter 20)
This afternoon
Analysis and design of
Flexure
Shear
Torsion
Axial load
Tomorrow morning
Design of slender columns
Design of wall structures
High-strength concrete
Overview of ACI 318M-11

Legall standing
L
t di
Scope
p
Approach to Design
Loads and Load Cases
C
Strength Reduction Factors
Legal standing
Serves as th
S
the llegall structural
t t l concrete
t
building code in the U.S. because it is
adopted
d t d by
b the
th generall building
b ildi code
d (IBC)
(IBC).
Scope
ACI 318M consists of 22 chapters and 6
appendices that cover all aspects of building
design
Chapters
1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Scope, Contract Documents, Inspection,
Approval of Special Systems
2. NOTATION AND DEFINITIONS
Chapters
3. MATERIALS
Cementitious Materials, Water, Aggregates,
Admixtures, Reinforcing Materials
4. DURABILITY REQUIREMENTS
Freezing and Thawing, Sulfates, Permeability,
Corrosion
5 CONCRETE QUALITY,
5.
QUALITY MIXING,
MIXING AND PLACING
6. FORMWORK, EMBEDMENTS,
AND CONSTRUCTION JOINTS
7. DETAILS OF REINFORCEMENT
Hooks and Bends,, Surface Condition,, Tolerances,,
Spacing, Concrete Cover, Columns, Flexural Members,
Shrinkage and Temperature Steel, Structural Integrity
8 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN GENERAL

8.
CONSIDERATIONS
Design Methods; Loading, including Arrangement of
Load; Methods of Analysis; Redistribution of Moments;
Selected Concrete Properties; Requirements for
Modeling Structures (Spans, T-beams, Joists...)
9. STRENGTH AND SERVICEABILITY

REQUIREMENTS
Load Combinations, Strength Reduction Factors,
Deflection Control
10. FLEXURE AND AXIAL LOADS

Beams and One-way Slabs, Columns, Deep Beams,
Bearing
g
11. SHEAR AND TORSION
12. DEVELOPMENT
AND SPLICES OF REINFORCEMENT
13 TWO-WAY
13.
TWO WAY SLAB SYSTEMS
14. WALLS
15 FOOTINGS
15.
16. PRECAST
CONCRETE
17. COMPOSITE CONCRETE FLEXURAL

MEMBERS
18. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
19. SHELLS AND FOLDED PLATE MEMBERS
20. STRENGTH EVALUATION OF EXISTING

STRUCTURES
21. EARTHQUAKE
EARTHQUAKERESISTANT
STRUCTURES
22. STRUCTURAL PLAIN CONCRETE
Appendices
A. STRUT-AND-TIE MODELS*
B. ALTERNATIVE
PROVISIONS FOR REINFORCED AND
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FLEXURAL AND
COMPRESSION MEMBERS
C. ALTERNATIVE LOAD AND STRENGTH
REDUCTION FACTORS
D ANCHORING TO CONCRETE*
D.
CONCRETE
E. STEEL REINFORCEMENT INFORMATION

F EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN SI
F.
SI-METRIC,
METRIC MKSMKS
METRIC, AND U.S. CUSTOMARY UNITS OF
NONHOMOGENOUS EQUATIONS IN THE CODE
Approach to design
Qd = design loads
Sn = nominal strength
Sd = design strength
M = safety
f t margin
i
Design Strength Required Strength

Sd = Sn Q
Qd
Sd
= design strength = Sn
= strength reduction factor
= load factors
Qd
= design loads
and in Chapter 9 of ACI 318M
Loads Qd
specified in ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads
for Buildings and Other Structures
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

Reston, Virginia, USA
Loads
Dead loads (D)*
Live loads (L)*
Roof live loads (Lr))*
Wind loads (W)
full load
E th
Earthquake
k lloads
d (E)
f ll lload
full
d
Rain loads (R)*
Snow loads (S)*
*S
Service-level
i l
l lloads
d
Loads
Impact include in L
Self-straining effects (temperature, creep,
shrinkage,
g , differential settlement,, and
shrinkage compensating concrete) (T)
Fluid loads (F)
Lateral soil pressure (H)
Factored Load = U = Qd
Load cases and load factors

by ASCE 7 and ACI 318M
U = 1.4D
U = 1.2D + 1.6L + + 0.5(Lr or S or R)
U = 1.2D + 1.6(Lr or S or R) + (1.0L or 0.5W)
U = 1.2D + 1.0W + 1.0L + 0.5(Lr or S or R)
U = 1.2
1 2D + 1.0
1 0E + 1.0
1 0L + 0.2
0 2S
Load cases and load factors

f
by ASCE 7 and ACI 318M
U = 0.9
0 9D + 1.0
1 0W
U = 0.9D + 1.0E
L d ffactors
Load
t
by
b ACI 318M
If W based on service-level forces, use 1.6W place of
1.0W
If E based on service-level forces, use 1.4E in place
of 1.0
1 0E
Details of other cases covered in the Code
Strength reduction () factors

Tension-controlled sections
0.90
Compression-controlled
Compression
controlled sections
Members with spiral reinforcement 0.75
Oth members
Other
b
0 65
0.65
Shear and torsion
0.75
Bearing
0.65
Post-tensioning
Post
tensioning anchorages
0 85
0.85
Other cases
0.60 0.90
Tension controlled and compression

Tension-controlled
compressioncontrolled sections
T beam
T-beam
b
hf
dt
As
bw
Strain through depth of beam
Design Strength ( x nominal strength) must

exceed the Required Strength (factored load)
Bending
Mn Mu
Axial load
Pn Pu
Shear
Vn Vu
Torsion
Tn Tu
Load distributions and modeling

requirements
Structure may be analyzed as elastic

using
gp
properties
p
of g
gross sections
Ig = moment of inertia of gross (uncracked)

cross section
3
b
h
Beams: Ib = Ig Iweb = w
12
3
bh
Columns: Ic = Ig =
12
Analysis by subframes
1. The
1
Th live
li lload
d applied
li d only
l tto th
the flfloor or rooff
under consideration, and the far ends of
columns
l
b
built
ilt iintegrally
t
ll with
ith th
the structure
t t
considered fixed
2. The
2
Th arrangementt off load
l d may b
be lilimited
it d tto
combinations of
(a) factored dead load on all spans with full
factored live load on alternate spans, and
(b) factored dead load on all spans with full
factored live load on two adjacent
j
spans
p
(a)
(b)
(c)
Moment and shear envelopes
Columns designed to resist

(a) axial forces from factored loads on all floors
or roof and maximum moment from factored
live loads on a single adjacent span of the
floor or roof under consideration
(b) loading condition giving maximum ratio of
moment to axial load
More on columns
For frames or continuous construction,

construction consider
effect of unbalanced floor or roof loads on both
exterior and interior columns and of eccentric
loading due to other causes
For gravity load, far ends of columns built integrally
with
ith th
the structure
t t
may be
b considered
id d fifixed
d
At any floor or roof level, distribute the moment
between columns immediatelyy above and below
that floor in proportion to the relative column
stiffness
Simplified loading criteria
Beams, two
Beams
or more spans
M factor w u l n 2
Beams, two
spans only
Slabs
Slabs,
spans 3 m
Beams, col stiffnesses
8 beam stiffnesses
ln
Max +ve
Max ve left
Composite
Max ve right
Allowable adjustment in maximum

moments for t 0.0075
Design of prestressed concrete

(Chapter 18)
Behavior of reinforced concrete
Reinforced concrete under service loads
Theory of prestressed concrete

Stresses
Methods of prestressing concrete members

Pretensioning
Post-Tensioning
57
Prestressing steels
Strength of prestressing steels available in

U.S.
Seven-wire strand: fpu 1725, 1860 MPa
fpy (stress at 1% extension) 85% (for stressrelieved strand) or 90% (for low-relaxation
low relaxation
strand) of fpu
fpu = ultimate strength

fpy = yield strength

U.S.
Prestressing wire: fpu 1620 to 1725 MPa
(function of size)
fpy (at
( t 1% extension)
t
i ) 85% off fpu

U.S.
High-strength steel bars: fpu 1035 MPa

fpy 85% (for plain bars) and 80% (for deformed
bars) of fpu
p
fpy based on either 0.2%

0 2% offset or 0.7%
0 7% strain
Maximum permissible stresses in

prestressing steel
Due to prestressing steel jacking force:
0.94
0
9 fpy
0.80fpu
manufacturers recommendation
Post-tensioning
g tendons,, at anchorage
g devices
and couplers, immediately after force transfer:
0.70fpu
Prestressed concrete members are

designed based on both
Elastic flexural analysis
y
Strength
Elastic flexural analysis

Considers stresses under both the
Initial prestress force Pi and the
Effective prestress force Pe
Note:
fc = concrete compressive strength

fci = initial concrete compressive
strength (value at prestress transfer)
Classes of members
U uncracked calculated tensile stress in
precompressed
d ttensile
il zone att service
i
loads = ft 0.62 fc
T transition between uncracked and
cracked 0.62 fc < ft 1.0 fc
C cracked ft > 1.0 fc
fc in MPa
Concrete section properties

e = tendon eccentricity
k1= upper kern point
k2= lower kern point
Ic = moment of inertia
Ac = area
radius of gyration:
r2 = Ic/Ac
section moduli:
S1 = Ic/c1
S2 = Ic/c2
Bending moments
Mo = self-weight
g moment
Md = superimposed dead load moment
Ml = live load moment
Concrete stresses under Pi
Concrete stresses under Pi + Mo
Concrete stresses under Pe + Mo + Md + Ml
Maximum p
permissible stresses in concrete at
transfer
(a) Extreme fiber stress in compression,
compression except as in
(b), 0.60fci
(b) Extreme
E t
fiber
fib stress
t
in
i compression
i att ends
d off
simply supported members 0.70fci
(c) Extreme fiber stress in tension at ends of simply
supported members 0.50 fci *
(d) Extreme fiber stress in tension at other locations
0.25 fcii *
* Add ttensile
il reinforcement
i f
t if exceeded
d d
Maximum permissible compressive

stresses in concrete at service loads
Class U and T members
((a)) Extreme fiber stress in compression
p
due to
prestress plus sustained load 0.45fc
(b) Extreme fiber stress in compression due to
prestress plus total load 0.60
60ffc
Flexural strength
Aps
T = Apsfps
ps
Stress-block
Stress
block parameter 1
1 0.85 for 17 MPa fc 28 MPa
For fc between 28 and 56 MPa, 1
decreases by 0.05 for each 7 MPa
increase in fc
1 0.65 for fc 56 MPa
Stress in prestressing steel at ultimate

Members with bonded tendons:
p = Aps/bdp = reinforcement ratio

b = width of compression face
dp = d (effective
( ff ti depth)
d th) off prestressing
t
i steel
t l
Members with bonded tendons and non-prestressed bars:

p

f pu d
f ps f pu 1 p

f c d p

1
f y / f c and f y / f c
and refer to compression
p
reinforcement,, As
f ppu d
shall be taken 017
. , d 015
. dp
p
f c d p
Members with unbonded tendons with span/depth

ratios 35:
but not greater than fpy or greater than fpe + 420 MPa
Pe
fpe = stress
t
in
i Aps att Pe =
Aps
Members with unbonded tendons with span/depth

ratios > 35:
but not greater than fpy or greater than fpe + 210 MPa
Loss of prestress
(a) Prestessing steel seating at transfer
(b) Elastic shortening of concrete
(c) Creep of concrete
(d) Shrinkage of concrete
( ) Relaxation
(e)
R l
ti off prestressing
t
i steel
t l
(f) Friction loss due to intended or
unintended curvature of post-tensioning
tendons
Limits on reinforcement in flexural

members
Classify as tension-controlled, transition, or
compression-controlled
compression
controlled to determine
Total
T
t l amountt off prestressed
t
d and
d nonprestressed
t
d
reinforcement in members with bonded
reinforcement
i f
t mustt be
b able
bl tto carry 1.2
12
cracking load
Minimum bonded reinforcement As in

members with unbonded tendons
Except in two-way slabs, As = 0.004Act
Act = area of that part of cross section
between the flexural tension face and
center of gravity of gross section
Distribute As uniformly over precompressed
t
tension
i zone as close
l
as possible
ibl tto
extreme tensile fiber
Two-wayy slabs:
Positive moment regions:
Bonded reinforcement not required where tensile
stress ft 0.17 fc
Nc
Otherwise, use As =
0.5fy
Nc = resultant tensile force acting on portion of
concrete cross section in tension under effective
prestress and service loads
Distribute As uniformly over precompressed
tension zone as close as possible to extreme
tensile fiber
Two-way slabs:
T
l b
Negative moment areas at column supports:
As = 0.00075Acf
Acff = larger gross cross-sectional
cross sectional area of slabslab
beam strips in two orthogonal equivalent
frames intersecting at the columns
Distribute
Di
t ib t As between
b t
lilines 1.5
1 5h on outside
t id
opposite edges of the column support
Code includes spacing
p
g and length
g requirements
q
Two-way
Two
way slabs
Use Equivalent Frame Design Method
(Section 13.7)
13 7)
Banded tendon distribution
Photo courtesy of Portland Cement Association
Development of prestressing strand
development length
= transfer length
fse fpe
Pe
Aps
Shear for prestressed concrete members is

similar to that for reinforced concrete
members, but it takes advantage of
presence of prestressing force
Post tensioned tendon anchorage zone

Post-tensioned
design
Load factor = 1.2 Ppu = 1.2Pj
Pj = maximum jacking force

= 0.85
Strength evaluation of existing structures

(Chapter 20)
Strength evaluation of existing structures

(Chapter 20)
When it is required
When we use analysis and when perform a load test
When core testing is sufficient
L d ttesting
Load
ti
A strength evaluation is required

when there is a doubt if a part or all of a structure
meets safety requirements of the Code
If the effect of the strength deficiency is well
understood and if it is feasible to measure the
dimensions and material properties required for
analysis, analytical evaluations of strength
based on those measurements can be used
If the effect of the strength deficiency is not well

understood or if it is not feasible to establish the
required dimensions and material properties by
measurement, a load test is required if the
structure is to remain in service
Establishing dimensions and material

properties
1. Dimensions established at critical sections
2. Reinforcement locations established by
measurement (can use drawings if spot
checks confirm information in drawings)
3 Use cylinder and core tests to estimate fc
3.
Core testing
If the deficiency involves only the

compressive strength of the concrete
based on cylinder tests
Strength is considered satisfactory
S
f
if:
f
1. Three cores are taken for each low-strength
test
2. The average
g of the three cores 0.85fc
3. No individual core has a strength < 0.75fc
Steel
Reinforcing and prestressing steel may be
evaluated based on representative material
If analysis is used,
used values of may be
increased
Tension-controlled 0.90 1.0
Compression controlled 0.75 and 0.65
0.90 and 0.80
Shear and torsion 0.75 0.80
Bearing 0.65
0 65 0.80
0 80
Load test procedure

Load arrangement:
Select number and arrangement of spans or
panels loaded to maximize the deflection and
stresses in the critical regions
Use more than one arrangement if needed
((deflection,, rotation,, stress))
Load intensity
Total test load = larger of
(a) 1.15D + 1.5L + 0.4(Lr or S or R)
((b)) 1.15D + 0.9L + 1.5(L
( r or S or R))
(c) 1.3D
In (b), load factor for L may be reduced to 0.45,
exceptt for
f garages, places
l
off assembly,
bl and
d
where L > 4.8 kN/m2
L may be reduced as permitted by general
building code
Age at time of loading 56 days
Loading criteria
Obtain initial measurements (deflection
(deflection,
rotation, strain, slip, crack widths) not more
than 1 hour before application of the first
load increment
Take readings where maximum response is
expected
U att least
Use
l
t four
f
load
l d iincrements
t
Ensure uniform load is uniform no arching
Take measurements after each load

increment and after the total load has been
applied for at least 24 hours
Remove total test load immediately after all
response measurements are made
Take a set of final measurements 24 hours
after
ft the
th test
t t load
l d is
i removed
d
Acceptance criteria
No signs of failure no crushing or spalling
of concrete
g a shear failure is
No cracks indicating
imminent
In regions without transverse reinforcement
reinforcement,
evaluate any inclined cracks with horizontal
projection > depth of member
Evaluate cracks along the line of
reinforcement in regions of anchorage and
lap splices
Acceptance criteria
Measured deflections
2
t
At maximum load: 1
20 ,000h
24 hours after load removed:
1
r
4
t MIN(distance between supports, clear span + h)

2 x span for cantilever
Acceptance criteria
If deflection criteria not met
met, may repeat the
test (at least 72 hours after first test)
2
Satisfactory if: r
5
2 maximum deflection of second test relative to
postion of structure at beginning of second test
Provision for lower loading

If the structure does not satisfy conditions or
criteria based on analysis, deflection, or shear,
it may be permitted for use at a lower load
rating based on the results of the load test or
analysis if approved by the building official
analysis,
Case study
1905 building
Chicago, Illinois
USA
Cinder concrete
floors
Load capacity OK for use
g
as an office building?
Safety shoring
Deflection
measurement
devices
Load through
window
Moving lead ingots through the window
Load stage 14
Findings
Floor could carry uniform load of
2.4 kN/m2
Building satisfactory for both apartments (1.9
kN/m2) and offices ((2.4 kN/m2)
Summary
Overview
Prestressed concrete
St
Strength
th evaluation
l ti off existing
i ti structures
t t
118
Figures copyright 2010 by

M G
McGraw-Hill
Hill C
Companies,
i
IInc.
1221 Avenue of the America
New York,
York NY 10020 USA
American Concrete Institute
38800 Country Club Drive
F
Farmington
i t Hills,
Hill MI 48331 USA
D li ti authorized
Duplication
th i d or use with
ith thi
this presentation
t ti only.
l
The University of Kansas

David Darwin, Ph.D., P.E.
Deane E. Ackers Distinguished Professor

Director, Structural Engineering & Materials Laboratory
Dept. of Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering
2142 Learned Hall
L
Lawrence,
K
Kansas, 66045-7609
66045 7609
(785) 864-3827 Fax: (785) 864-5631
daved@ku.edu

Structural Concrete (ACI 318M-11)
Analysis and Design for Flexure, Shear,
Torsion,, and Compression
p
plus
p
Bending
g
David Darwin
Technology (IBST)
This afternoon
Analysis and design for
Flexure
Shear
Torsion
Compression plus bending
Material properties
Concrete
fc,min 17 MPa, no fc,max -- values up to 140 MPa
Usual fc 28 or 35 MPa
higher strengths used for columns
Reinforcing steel
fy 280, 350, 420, 520, 550 MPa
Usual fy 420 MPa
Reinforcing bars 11 sizes:

Size
No. 10
No. 13
No. 16
No. 19
No. 22
No. 25
No. 29
No. 32
No. 36
Actual diameter
9.5 mm
12.7 mm
15.9 mm
19.1 mm
22.2 mm
25.4 mm
28.7 mm
32.2 mm
35.8 mm
Size
No. 43
No. 57
Actual diameter
43.0 mm
57.3 mm
Flexure
Mn Mu
At working loads
Cracked transformed section
At ultimate load
Equivalent stress block
Concrete stress-block
stress block parameters
Stress-block
Stress
block parameter 1
increase in fc
1 0.65 for fc 56 MPa
Flexural strength
= 0.003
Reinforcement ratio
Tension reinforcement
As
bd
C
Compression
i reinforcement
i f
t
As

bd
Balanced condition and balanced

reinforcement ratio, s = y
Steel yields just
as concrete
crushes
Reinforcement ratio corresponding to

specified values of steel strain s = t
or conservatively
Maximum value of ,
s = 0.004
0 004
Maximum for a tension

tension-controlled
controlled
member, s = 0.005
Thi is
This
i the
th effective
ff ti maximum
i
value
l off
Flexural strength
Mn
Mn As fy d
2
Minimum reinforcement
To ensure that the flexural strength of a
reinforced concrete beam is higher than the
cracking moment:
For statically determinate members with

flange in tension, replace bw by smaller of
2bw or flange
g width b
Exceptions to minimum reinforcement

requirements:
4
As (p
(provided))
As ((required)
q
)
3
Slabs and footings As,min = temperature
and shrinkage reinforcement
Temperature and shrinkage reinforcement
Cover and spacing
Doubly reinforced beams [ > 0.005

0 005]
Doubly reinforced beams

Nominal moment capacity for fs fy
M n M n1 M n 2
As f y d d As As f y d
2

Nominal moment capacity for fs fy
M n M n1 M n 2
M n M n1 M n 2
As f s d d As f y As f s d
2
As f s d d 0.85 f cabb d
2

Minimum reinforcement ratio so that
compression steel yields:
If <
c must be calculated (q
(quadratic equation):
q
)

tension-controlled sections
As
bd
T beams
Effective flange width b

Symmetric T beam:
b 1/4 span length
bw + 16hf
bw + clear distances to next beams
Slab on only one side:
b bw + 1/12 span length
b w + 6h f
bw + clear distance to next beam
Isolated T beam:
hf bw ; b 4bw
Consider two cases based on neutral axis

location
Analyze
A
l
as
rectangular beam
Analyze
A
l
as
T beam
In practice
practice, use depth of stress block a
Nominal capacity
As
Asf
w
; f
bw d
bw d
Limits on reinforcement for tension-controlled
section
w ,0.005 0.005 f
Flexural crack control

Maximum spacing s of
reinforcement closest
tension face
fs by analysis or = 2/3 fy

Distribution of reinforcement when flanges of T
beams are in tension:
1. Distribute reinforcement over smaller of
effective flange width or width equal to 1/10
span
p
2. If the effective flange width exceeds 1/10
span place some longitudinal reinforcement
span,
in outer portions of flange
Skin reinforcement required when h > 900 mm
Shear
Vn Vu
Diagonal tensile stress in concrete

Function of both bending and shear stresses
Shear stress at cracking taken as shear strength
Behavior of diagonally cracked beam
Beams with web reinforcement
Behavior of beams with web reinforcement
Contribution of stirrups
Vs nAv f yt
For a horizontal projection of the crack p
p
and a stirrup spacing s, n
s
d
In most cases, p d . Thus, conservatively, n
s
A v f yt d
giving Vs
s
Total shear capacity
with
Vd
Vc 0.16 f c 17
bw d 0.29 f cbw d
M
Vc may be taken conservatively as
Inclined stirrups
p
Vs nAv f yt sin Av f yt sin cos tan
s
d sin cos
Vs Av f yt
s
ACI provisions summary

Vu Vn Vc Vs
[Note ]
0.75
Lightweight concrete factor

= 1.0 for normalweight concrete
= 0.85 for sand-lightweight concrete
= 0.75 for all-lightweight concrete
Minimum web reinforcement
Required when Vu > 0.5Vc

except for footings and solid slabs; certain
hollow-core slabs; concrete joists; beams with
h < 250 mm; beams integral with slabs with h <
600 mm, 2.5hf, and 0.5bw; beams made of steel
fiber-reinforced concrete with f c 40 MPa, h <
600 mm, and Vu 0.17 f cbw d
Val e of fc is not limited

Value
limited, b
butt the value
al e of fc
is limited to a maximum of 8.3 MPa unless
minimum transverse reinforcement is used
Maximum stirrup spacing s

s d/2 (0.75h for prestressed concrete)
600 mm
These values are reduced by 50% where
Vs 4 fcbw d
Critical section
Maximum Vu for sections closer than d (h/2
for prestressed concrete) from the face of a
support may be taken as the value at d (or
h/2) provided that three conditions are met:
((a)) Support
pp reaction introduces compression
p
into the end region
(b) Loads applied at or near top of member
(c) No concentrated load placed between
critical section at d (or h/2) and the face
of the support
Stirrup design
Prestressed concrete
Vcw
Vci
Vc for prestressed concrete

dp taken as distance from extreme compressive
fiber to centroid of prestressing steel but need
not be taken < 0.8h for shear design
d taken as distance from extreme compressive
fiber to centroid of p
prestressing
g steel and
nonprestressed steel (if any) but need not be
taken < 0.8h for shear design
g
Vc = lesser of Vcii and Vcw

1.7 fcbw d
Mmax and Vi computed from load combination of

ffactored
t d superimposed
i
dd
dead
d and
d lilive lload
d
causing maximum factored moment at section
Vc = lesser of Vcii and Vcw

1.7 fcbw d
Vd = shear due to unfactored self weight of beam

yt = distance from centroid to tension face
fpe = compression at tension face due to Pe alone
fd = stress due to unfactored beam self weight
g at
extreme fiber of section where tensile stress is
cause byy external load
fpc = compressive stress at concrete centroid

under Pe
Vp = vertical component of effective
prestress
t
force
f
Pe
Simplified design
11.3.4 and 11.3.5 address conditions near

the ends of p
pretensioned beams
Other provisions (not covered today)

Effect of axial loads
Torsion
Tn Tu
Equilibrium torsion
Equilibrium torsion
Compatibility torsion
Compatibility torsion
Ed b
Edge
beam:
Torsionallyy stiff
Torsionallyy flexible
Stresses caused
by torsion
Thin-walled
Thin
walled tube under torsion
Shear flow q, N/m
q
T

t aAot
principal
i i l tensile
te ile stress
t e
ft 0.33 f c
cr cracking shear stress 0.33 f c
Tcr 0.33 f c 2 Aot
Acp area inside full outside perimeter pcp
t
T
cr
Acp
pcp
2
; Ao Acp
3
0.33 f c
Acp2
pcp
kN-m
Torsion in reinforced concrete member
Torque vs. twist
After cracking, area enclosed by shear path is defined

by xo and yo measured to centerline of outermost
closed transverse reinforcement
Aohh = xoyo
ph = 2(xo + yo)
Torque
q supplied
pp
by
y side 4:
Force in axial direction
Longitudinal steel to resist torsion
Torsion plus shear
Hollow section
Solid section
ACI provisions
= 0.75
Tu Tn
where
h Ao = 0.85
0 85Aoh
= 30 to 60, 45 recommended
Minimal torsion
Neglect torsional effects if Tu cracking
torque =
Equilibrium vs
vs. Compatibility Torsion
For members subjected to compatibility torsion,
member is assumed to crack in torsion, reducing
its rotational stiffness, and Tu may be reduced to
cracking torque =
Redistributed bending moments and resulting

shears must be used to design adjoining members
Limitations on shear stress

Under combined shear and torsion, total shear
stress v is limited to
Limitations on shear stress

Hollow sections
Solid sections
Reinforcement for Shear and Torsion
for single leg, fyt 420 MPa
Combined shear and torsion
Minimum transverse reinforcement
Maximum spacing of transverse

reinforcement
s ph/8, 300 mm
Spacing requirements for shear also apply
Longitudinal reinforcement for torsion
Use longitudinal bars at perimeter of section

spaced at 300 mm,
mm at every corner of
stirrups, and no smaller than No. 10 bar. Must
be anchored to develop fy at face of supports
supports.

Effect of axial loads
Some details of hollow sections
Compression plus bending
Pn Pu
Mn Mu
= 0.75 for spiral columns
= 0.65
0 65 for
f tied
ti d columns
l
Theoretical maximum axial capacity

Po 0.85 f c Ag Ast f y Ast
Ag = gross (total) area of concrete
Ast = total area of steel reinforcement
Maximum axial loads permitted by ACI 318

Spirally reinforced columns
Tied columns
Transverse reinforcement - ties

At least No. 10 for longitudinal
g
bars up
p to No. 32
and at least No. 13 for No. 36, 43, and 57
Spacing s along the length of the column
16 diameter
di
t off longitudinal
l
it di l b
bars
48 diameter of tie bars
least dimension of column
Transverse reinforcement - ties

Every corner and alternate longitudinal bar
shall
h ll h
have llateral
t l supportt provided
id d b
by th
the
corner of a tie with an included angle 135
d
degrees
and
d no b
bar shall
h ll b
be ffarther
th th
than
150 mm clear on each side along the tie
f
from
such
h a llaterally
t ll supported
t db
bar
Transverse reinforcement ties
Transverse reinforcement spirals
Transverse reinforcement spirals

Volumetric reinforcing ratio
Ag = gross area off column

l
Ach = core area of column measured to the outside
diameter of the spiral
fyt = yyield strength
g of spiral
p
reinforcement 700 MPa
Strain compatibility analysis and

interaction diagrams
Eccentricity e
Example
Example
Interaction diagrams
Balanced failure
Design aids and generalized interaction

diagrams
e /h
Pu
Pn
Kn
fcAg fcAg
Pu e
Mn
Pn e
Rn
fcAg h fcAg h fcAg h
Applying -factors
factors and limits on maximum
loads

Slenderness
Summary
A l i and
Analysis
dd
design
i ffor
Flexure
Fl
Shear
Sh
T i
Torsion
C
Compression
i plus
l b
bending
di
Tomorrow morning
Design of slender columns
Design of wall structures
High-strength concrete
112

M G
McGraw-Hill
Hill C
Companies,
i
IInc.
New York,
York NY 10020 USA
Duplication authorized for use with this presentation only.


2142 Learned Hall
L
Lawrence,
K
Kansas, 66045-7609
66045 7609
(785) 864-3827 Fax: (785) 864-5631
daved@ku.edu

Design of Slender Columns by ACI 318
David Darwin
Technology (IBST)
This morning
Slender columns
Walls
High strength concrete
High-strength
Slender columns
Notation
Effective length factors and effect of
slenderness on strength
g
Moment magnification
ACI design criteria
Design procedures
Nonlinear second order analysis
y
Linear second order analysis
Moment magnification procedure
Notation
I = moment of inertia
A = area of cross section
r = radius of gyration = I A
, l = column length
k = slenderness ratio = k/r
Pc critical
iti l b
buckling
kli lload
d
Et I
2
Et = tangential
t
ti l modulus
d l off elasticity
l ti it
Braced columns: effective length factor k 1
Unbraced columns: effective length factor k 1
Effect of slenderness on column strength

Pc
2E t I
2E t A
k r
Frames
k(braced) < k(unbraced)
Braced frame
Unbraced frame
Pc2 << Pc1
Moment magnification the P-

effect
For a column in single curvature:
1
y y0
1 P Pc
and
Mmax
1
M0
1 P Pc
For a column in double curvature with
equal end moments:
1
y y0
1 P 4Pc
More generally, when the end moments
are nott equal:l
Cm
Mmax M0
1 P Pc
where
h
M1
0.4,
Cm 0.6 0.4
4 M2 M1
M2
Define: M1 M2 0 for single curvature
0 for double curvature
ACI design criteria

Braced (nonsway):
(
y)
Neglect slenderness when
ku/r 34 12M1/M2
40
where u = unsupported length (clear distance)
Unbraced (sway):
Neglect slenderness when
ku/r 22
Alignment charts to determine k
Alignment charts to determine k

= ratio of (EI/c) of compression members to
((EI/)) of flexural members in a p
plane at one
end of a compression member
c, = span length of column or flexural

member
b center-to-center
t t
t off joints
j i t
Design procedures
Nonlinear second-order analysis
Linear second-order
second order analysis
M
Moment
t magnifier
ifi procedure
d
Nonlinear second-order
second order analysis
Section properties
Moments of inertia:
Beams
Columns
Walls uncracked
cracked
Flat plates and flat slabs
0.35Ig
0.70Ig
0.70Ig
0 35Ig
0.35
0.25Ig
Area
1.0Ag
Modulus of elasticity Ec next slide
Modulus of elasticity Ec
Sustained load
For members
F
b
under
d sustained
t i d llateral
t l lload,
d
divide I by (1 + ds), where
ds
maximum factored sustained shear within story
1 .0
maximum factored shear within story
Mmax = M0
Nonsway versus sway structures

Nonsway
y if
Pu o
Q
0.05
Vus c
where
Pu sum of factored vertical loads in a story
Vus factored
f t d horizontal
h i
t l shear
h
iin a story
t
o 1st-order relative storyy deflection
c column length, center-to-center of joints
Note:
Q P Pc
Thus, for Q 0.05, Mmax 1.05M0
Nonsway frames
Mc ns M2 ;
ns
M2,min Pu 15 0.03h
Cm
1 .0
1 Pu 0.75Pc
Pc
2EI
ku
M1
Cm 0.6 0.4
0 .4
M2
Stiffness reduction
factor
EI
0 .2
2E
EI
EI
c g
EsIse
1 dns
or
EI
dns
0 .4
4E
Ec I g
1 dns
maximum factored axial sustained load
1.0
maximum factored axial load for same load combination
Sway frames
Moments M1 and M2 at ends of member
M1 M1ns s M1s
M2 M2ns s M2s
1
s
1; if s 1.5, use second-order
1 Q
elastic analysis or
1
s
1
1 Pu 0.75Pc
When calculating s
k 1.0
ds
d is substituted for dns
d when calculating EI
ds
maximum factored sustained shear within story

1 .0
maximum factored shear within story
ds is most often = 0
Pu and Pc summed for all columns on floor
Summary
Notation
Effective length factors and effect of
slenderness on strength
g
ACI design criteria
Design procedures
Nonlinear second order analysis
y
29

M G
McGraw-Hill
Hill C
Companies,
i
IInc.
New York,
York NY 10020 USA
F
Farmington
i t Hills,
Hill MI 48331 USA
D li ti authorized
Duplication
th i d ffor use with
ith thi
this presentation
t ti only.
l


2142 Learned Hall
L
Lawrence,
K
Kansas, 66045-7609
66045 7609
(785) 864-3827 Fax: (785) 864-5631
daved@ku.edu
Slender columns

Design of Wall Structures by ACI 318
David Darwin
Technology (IBST)
This morning
Slender columns
Walls
High-strength
W ll (Ch
Walls
(Chapters
t
14 10,
14,
10 and
d 11)
Outline
Overview
O
e e
Notation
General design requirements
Reinforcement around openings
p
g
Design of bearing walls (3 methods)
Design of shear walls
Walls can be categorized based on

Construction
method
Cast-in-place
C
ti l
Precast
Tilt-up
Design
g
loading
Axial
A
i l lload,
d flflexure,
and out-of-plane shear
In-plane shear
Types of Walls
Cast-in-place
p
Precast
Tilt up
Tilt-up
Walls can be categorized based on

Construction
method
Cast-in-place
C
ti l
Precast
Tilt-up
Design
g
loading
Axial
A
i l lload,
d flflexure,
and out-of-plane shear
In-plane shear
Bearing walls*
Shear walls*
alls*
Notation and Abbreviation

l = Vertical reinforcement ratio
t = Horizontal reinforcement ratio
c = Height of wall measured center-to-center
center to center of
supports
h = Wall thickness
hw = Total height of wall
w = Length of wall
Mcr = Cracking
g moment
WWR = welded wire reinforcement
General design requirements in ACI 318

Design for axial, eccentric, lateral, shear and
other loads to which the wall is subjected
Walls must be anchored to intersecting
structural elements (floors
(floors, roofs
roofs, columns
columns))
Horizontal
H
i
t l llength
th off a wallll considered
id d effective
ff ti
for each concentrated load
center-to center spacing of loads
bearing
g width + 4 wall thickness h
Outer limits of compression member built

integrally with a wall 40 mm from outside
of spiral or ties
Minimum reinforcement and reinforcement
based on the Empirical Method may be
waived if analysis shows adequate strength
and
d stability
bili
Transfer force to footing at base of wall in
accordance with Chapter
p 15 ((Footings)
g )
Vertical reinforcement ratio l 0.0015
Reduce to 0.0012 for bar sizes No. 16 and
fy 420 MPa
or for WWR reinforcement sizes 16 mm
Horizontal reinforcement ratio t 0.0025
0 0025
Reduce to 0.0020 for bar sizes No. 16 and
fy 420 MPa
MP
or for WWR reinforcement sizes 16 mm
Walls more than 250 mm thick (except

basement walls):
Mustt have
M
h
two
t
layers
l
off reinforcement
i f
t parallel
ll l
with the faces
((a)) 1/2 to 2/3 of reinforcement in each direction
located between 50 mm and 1/3 of wall
thickness from exterior surface
(b) balance of reinforcement in each direction
located between 20 mm and 1/3 of wall
thickness from interior surface
Vertical and horizontal reinforcement spaced

3h
450 mm
Ties not required around vertical reinforcement
when l 0.01

At least 2 No. 16 bars
i walls
in
ll with
ith 2 layers
l
of reinforcement in
b th di
both
directions
ti
At least
l
t 1 No.
N 16 bar
b
in walls with 1 layer of
reinforcement
i f
t in
i b
both
th
directions
Anchored to develop fy
Design of bearing walls

Axial load and flexure
Shear perpendicular to the wall
Design of walls for axial load and flexure

Design options:
Wall Designed as Compression Members
(subjected to P & M design as columns)
Empirical Design Method (some limitations)
Alternative
Alt
ti D
Design
i
off Sl
Slender
d Walls
W ll (some
(
limitations)
Walls designed as compression members

Design as column, including slenderness
requirements
Also meet general and minimum reinforcement
requirements for walls
Empirical Design Method

Limitations
Thickness of solid rectangular cross section
h (c or w between
b t
supports)/25
t )/25
100 mm for bearing walls

190 mm for exterior basement and foundation
walls
Resultant of all factored loads

must be located within the
middle third of the overall
wall thickness
Pu
e h/6
h/6
Wall cross section
Design axial strength
k c 2
Pn 0.55 fcAg 1
Pu
32h
= 0.65
0 65
Effective length factor

factor, k
Walls braced at top and bottom against lateral
t
translation
l ti
Restrained against rotation at one or both
ends
d
k = 0.8
U
Unrestrained
t i d against
i t rotation
t ti att b
both
th ends
d
k = 1.0
Walls not braced against lateral translation
k = 2.0
Alternative Design of Slender Walls
Late
eral Lo
oad
When flexural tension controls the out-of-plane

design, the requirements of this procedure are
considered to satisfy the slenderness requirements
for compression members
P Pu/Ag 0.06fc at
midheight
Wall must be
tension-controlled
Mn Mcr
Distribution of load within wall
Provisions cover
Factored moment Mu
Out-of-plane service load deflection s
Factored moment Mu
By iteration
B direct
By
di t solution
l ti
wu
Factored moment Mu by iteration

e
Pu
Mu Mua Pu u
w u 2c
Mu
Pe Pu u
8
Mua
Puu
2
u c
5M
u
0.75 48EcIcr
Solve by iteration
Icr = moment of inertia of cracked

section
Es
Pu h
wc
2
Icr
As
d c
Ec
fy 2d
3
Es
not taken < 6
Ec
Factored moment Mu by direct solution

e
Pu
Mua
Puu
Mua
Mu
2
5Pu c
1
0.75 48EcIcr
Out-of-plane
Out
of plane service load deflection
P
Service Deflection Limit
s c / 150
50
Loading
g
D + 0.5L + Wa or
D + 0.5L + 0.7E
(per ACI Commentary and
ASCE 7-10)
Service Load Deflections

Mn
Ma
Mcr
(2/3)Mcr
Ma
cr
(2/3)cr
n
35
Service load deflections for Ma (2/3)Mcr

P
Ma = Service
load moment
at midheight
including P-
Ma
s
cr
Mcr
5Mcr 2c
cr
48EcIcr
Service deflection
Find Ma by iteration
Service load deflections for Ma > (2/3)Mcr

P
s 2 / 3 cr
M 2 / 3 M
2 / 3
M 2 / 3 M
a
cr
cr
5Mn 2c
n
48Ec Icr
Service deflection
Fi d Ma and
Find
d Icr by
b it
iteration
ti
cr

Shear parallel to the wall in-plane
in plane shear
Shear wall
Design loading
Design for bending, axial load, and in-plane
shear
Bending and axial load: design as
beam or column
If hw 2w, design
d i iis permitted
itt d using
i a
strut-and-tie model (Appendix A)
Shear design
Vu Vn
Vn Vc Vs
Vn 0.83 fchd
Effective depth d
d 0.8hw
Larger value equal to the distance from
extreme compression fiber to center of
force of all reinforcement in tension permitted
when determined by strain compatibility
For walls subject to vertical compression,

compression
Vc 0.17 fchd
For walls subject to vertical tension Nu ,
0.29Nu
Vc 0.17 1
Ag
fchd
Nu is negative for tension
lightweight concrete factor
Alternatively use the lesser of

Alternatively,
Nu d
Vc 0.27 fchd
4 w
or
w 0.1 fc 0.2Nu w h
hd
Vc 0.05 fc
Mu Vu w 2
Wh
When
Mu Vu w 2 iis negative,
ti
second
d
equation
q
is not applicable
pp
First equation corresponds to a principal tensile

stress of about 0.33 fc at centroid of shear-wall
cross section
section.
Second equation corresponds to a flexural tensile
stress
t
off about
b t 0.50 fc att a section
ti
w 2 above
b
the section being
g investigated
g
Horizontal sections closer to the wall base

than w /2 or hw/2,
/2 whichever is less
less, may
be designed for the same Vc as
computed at w /2 or hw/2
Where Vu Vc/2, minimum wall
reinforcement may be used
Where Vu Vc/2, wall reinforcement
must meet the requirements described
next
Horizontal shear reinforcement

Vs
Av fy d
s
Av
Vu Vc s
fy d
Av
t
0.0025
hs
s w 5, 3h, 450 mm
Vertical shear reinforcement
Ah
hw

0.0025 0.5 2.5
t 0.0025
hs1
w
0.0025
s1 w 3, 3h, 450 mm
Summary
Design
es g o
of walls
a s
Notation
General design requirements
p
g
Design of bearing walls (3 methods)
50

McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
New York,
York NY 10020 USA
D plication a
Duplication
authorized
thori ed for use
se with
ith this presentation onl
only.
Photographs and figures on bearing wall design provided
courtesy of the Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois,
USA


2142 Learned Hall
L
Lawrence,
K
Kansas, 66045-7609
66045 7609
(785) 864-3827 Fax: (785) 864-5631
daved@ku.edu

Design of Structures with High-Strength
Concrete by
y ACI 318
David Darwin
Technology (IBST)
This morning
Slender columns
Walls
High-strength
High-strength
High
strength concrete
Background
ACI 318 provisions that apply to high-strength
concrete
Background
High
g sstrength
e g co
concrete
cee=?
1920s
fc > 20 MPa
1950s
> 35 MPa
1990s
> 60 MPa
> 70 MPa
100 135 MPa
High-strength
High
strength concrete
Small %
Important
Columns in high-rise buildings
The tallest building in the world is

constructed of reinforced concrete
Compressive behavior
cylinder size
100 x 200 mm vs.
150 x 300 mm molds
f'c((4x8
8 in.)) = 1.016
0 6f'c(6
(6x12 in.))
f'c(100x200 mm) = 1.016f'c(150x300 mm)
End condition
Stress-strain
Stress
strain curves
Behavior in compression tests
Strength versus age
Strength gain - example

28 days
y
91 days
y
%g
gain absolute
gain
20 MPa
35 MPa
75 %
15 MPa
64 MPa
92 MPa
44 %
28 MPa
Tensile and fracture behavior
Relationship between tensile and compressive

strength
fc vs. fc2 3
Fracture
The energy required to open a crack once

the tensile strength has been reached
Fracture energy vs
vs. compressive strength
250
Frracture Energy (N
N/m)
225
200
175
150
Basalt
Basalt
Limestone
125
Linear (Limestone)
Linear (Basalt)
100
75
Limestone
50
25
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Compressive
p
Strength
g (MPa)
(
)
90
100
Structural behavior
Bond
Shear
Bond
1.83 m
4.88 m
Splices w/o confining reinforcement
Splices w/ confining reinforcement
Asfs/fc11/2 (Tes
st), in.2
Asfs/ffc1/2 (Prediction), in.2
Asfs/fc11/4 (Tes
st), in.2
Asfs/ffc1/4 (Prediction),
(Prediction) in.
in 2
Shear
Creep and shrinkage
Specific creep
Creep coefficient
Shrinkage
ACI 318 provisions that apply to highhigh

strength concrete
Required average strength
Evaluation and acceptance of concrete
Stress block parameter
Limits that apply
pp y to shear,, torsion,, and bond
Transmission of column loads through floor
systems
t
Required average strength
fcr required average strength

ss standard deviation of test results
Evaluation and acceptance of concrete

(a) Arithmetic average of all sets of three
consecutive strength tests* equals or
exceeds fc
(b) No strength test* falls below fc by more than
3.5 MPa when fc is 35 MPa or less; or by
more than 0.10fc when fc is more than 35
MPa
*Test = average strength of three 100 200 mm
cylinders or of two 150 300 mm cylinders
Stress-block
Stress
block parameter 1
increase in fc
1 0.65
0 65 ffor fc 56 MP
MPa
Limits that apply to shear

shear, torsion
torsion, and
bond
Shear and torsion
The
e value
a ue o
of fc is
s limited
ted to a maximum
a
u
of 8.3 MPa unless minimum transverse
reinforcement
i f
t is
i used
d
Bond
Development and lap splice lengths of
bars are inverselyy proportional to fc
The value off fc is limited to a maximum
of 8.3 MPa
Transmission of column loads through

g floor
systems
Concrete in a floor system

y
often has a compressive strength
b l
below
th
thatt th
thatt off the
th columns,
l
especially
p
y for high-rise
g
buildings
g
If fc for column 1
1.4
4fc for floor system
(fcc 1.4fcs )), one of three requirements
must be satisfied:
1. Place concrete with fcc in the floor out to 600 mm
from column faces and integrate with floor concrete
2. Treat column as if its strength fcs within the
depth of the floor
3. Treat column strength as 0.75fcc 0.35fcs

fcc fcs must not be taken 2.5
Summary
Background
ACI 318 provisions that apply to high-strength
concrete
51

Pearson Education
Education, Inc
Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ USA
Figures copyright
Fi
i ht 2010 by
b
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
New York, NY 10020 USA
Figures
g
copyright
py g 2011 by
y
Farmington Hills,
Hills MI 48331 USA
Duplication authorized for use with this presentation only.


2142 Learned Hall
L
Lawrence,
K
Kansas, 66045-7609
66045 7609
(785) 864-3827 Fax: (785) 864-5631
daved@ku.edu

ACI 318M-11 Training by Prof. David Darwin PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ACI 318M-11 Training by Prof. David Darwin PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ACI 318M-11 Training by Prof. David Darwin PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the main chapters covered in ACI 318M?

What are the main chapters covered in ACI 318M?

What are some of the provisions related to high-strength concrete according to ACI 318?

What are some of the provisions related to high-strength concrete according to ACI 318?

Building Code Requirements for

Overview of ACI 318M-11

2. NOTATION AND DEFINITIONS

8 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN GENERAL

9. STRENGTH AND SERVICEABILITY

10. FLEXURE AND AXIAL LOADS

11. SHEAR AND TORSION

17. COMPOSITE CONCRETE FLEXURAL

18. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

19. SHELLS AND FOLDED PLATE MEMBERS

20. STRENGTH EVALUATION OF EXISTING

22. STRUCTURAL PLAIN CONCRETE

E. STEEL REINFORCEMENT INFORMATION

Design Strength Required Strength

= strength reduction factor

and in Chapter 9 of ACI 318M

for Buildings and Other Structures

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

Load cases and load factors

Load cases and load factors

Details of other cases covered in the Code

Strength reduction () factors

Tension controlled and compression

Strain through depth of beam

Design Strength ( x nominal strength) must

Load distributions and modeling

Structure may be analyzed as elastic

Ig = moment of inertia of gross (uncracked)

Moment and shear envelopes

Columns designed to resist

For frames or continuous construction,

Simplified loading criteria

Allowable adjustment in maximum

Design of prestressed concrete

Behavior of reinforced concrete

Reinforced concrete under service loads

Theory of prestressed concrete

Methods of prestressing concrete members

Strength of prestressing steels available in

fpu = ultimate strength

Strength of prestressing steels available in

Strength of prestressing steels available in

High-strength steel bars: fpu 1035 MPa

fpy based on either 0.2%

Maximum permissible stresses in

Prestressed concrete members are

Elastic flexural analysis

fc = concrete compressive strength

strength (value at prestress transfer)

Concrete section properties

Concrete stresses under Pi

Concrete stresses under Pi + Mo

Concrete stresses under Pe + Mo + Md + Ml

Maximum permissible compressive

1 0.65 for fc 56 MPa