Financial Notes
Financial Notes
Financial Notes
The investment decision relates to the selection of assets in which funds will be
invested by a firm.
Capital Budgeting(CB)
Capital budgeting decisions are of paramount importance in financial decision making.
Capital budgeting is the process of evaluating and selecting long-term investments that are
consistent with the goal of shareholders wealth maximization. Capital expenditure is an
outlay of funds that is expected to produce benefits over a period of time exceeding one year.
The system of capital budgeting is employed to evaluate expenditure devisions which
involve current outlays but are likely to produce benefits over a period of tome longer than
one year. These benefits may be either in the form of increased revenues or reduced costs.
Basic Features
Inflexibility
How a firm finances its investments (the capital structure decision) and
How it manages its short-term operations (the working capital decision) are definitely
issues of concern.
But how it allocates its capital (the capital budgeting decision) really reflects its
strategy and its business.
That is why the process of capital budgeting is also referred to as strategic asset
allocation.
Importance of Capital Budgeting (CB)
3. It is not often possible to calculate in strict quantitative terms all the benefits or the
costs relating to a particular investment decision.
BASIC TYPES OF CB DECISIONS
CB decisions can be of two types:
(i) Investment decisions expand revenues: Such investment decisions are expected to
bring in additional revenue, thereby raising the size of the firms total revenue and
(ii) Investment decisions reducing costs: such decisions, by reducing costs, add to the
total earnings of the firm. A classic example of such investment decisions are the
replacement proposals when an asset wears out or becomes outdated.
Steps involved in CB process
(1) Project generation: the investment proposal may fall into on the following categories:
Proposal to add new product to the product line
To expand production capacity in existing product lines
To reduce the costs of the output of the existing products without altering the scale of
production
(2) Project Evaluation
It involves two steps, namely,
(i) Estimation of costs and benefits of different capital budgeting proposals
(ii) Setting up of appropriate criteria to judge the profitability of the project
While evaluating the various investment proposals, the following points must be noted:
(i) The costs and benefits of various proposals should be estimated in terms of cash
flows
(ii) While estimating the cash flows, particularly the cash inflows of different
proposals, the risk associated with the proposals should be properly taken into
consideration
(iii) While estimating the costs and benefits of proposals, the time value of money
should be taken into consideration
(iv) The evaluation of the projects should be done by a group of experts who are
impartial
(v) Proper care should be taken while deciding upon the selection criteria. The
selection criteria should be consistent with the concerns objective of maximizing its
market value.
3
Relevant cash flow: is the incremental after tax cash outflow and resulting
subsequent inflows associated with a proposed capital expenditure
4
Incremental cash flows: are the additional cash flows (outflows as well as inflows)
expected to result from a proposed capital expenditure.
Relevant Cash Outflows
1) Tax effect: Special consideration needs to be given to tax effects on cash flows if the
firm is incurring losses and, therefore, paying no taxes. The tax laws permit carrying
losses forward to be set off against future income.
2) Effect on other projects: Cash flow effects of the project under consideration, if it is
not economically independent, on other existing projects of the firm must be taken
into consideration.
3) Effect of indirect expenses: another factor which merits special consideration in
estimating cash flows is the effect of overheads. The indirect expenses/overheads are
allocated to the different products on the basis of wages paid, materials used, floor
space occupied or some other similar common factor.
4) Working capital effect: Working capital constitutes another important ingredient of
the cash flow stream which is directly related to an investment proposal. If an
investment is expected to increase sales, it is likely that there will be an increase in
current assets in the form of accounts receivable, inventory and cash.
5) Effect of depreciation: Depreciation, although a non-cash item of cost, is deductible
expenditure in determining taxable inome
Effect of Depreciation
5
Block of assets: are assets which fall in the same class and in respect of which the
same depreciation rate is applicable irrespective of their nature.
The sale proceeds of the asset are reduced from the WDV of the block.
Depreciation in the first 4 years would be, Rs. 2,00,000, Rs. 1,60,000, Rs. 1,28,000,
and Rs. 1,02,400 respectively.
As result, the WDV/book value of the machine at the beginning of year 5 would be
Rs.4,09,600.
No depreciation is charged in the 5th year and there is a salvage value of Rs.1,00,000,
there would be short-term capital loss of Rs. 3,09,600.
Thus, the firm does not suffer any loss by not charging depreciation in the terminal
year
Determination of Relevant Cash Flows
The data requirement for capital budgeting are cash flows, that is, outflows and inflows.
Their computation depends on the nature of the proposal.
Capital projects can be categorized into: (i) single proposal, (ii) replacement situations and
(iii) mutually exclusive.
-
(i)
Pay-back period method: Pay-back period is the time period required to get back the
original investment.
When mutually exclusive projects are under consideration, they may be
ranked according to the length of the payback period.
Advantages
Disadvantages
1) It is based on the principle of rule of thumb
2) It does not recognize the importance of time value of money
3) It does not consider the profitability of the project earnings after the payback period
4) It is a measure of projects recovery of capital cost, and not a measure of the
profitability of the project.
In case of Even Cash Flows (Uniform) Pay back period is calculated as follows:
8
Y
250000
6
8000
15000
27000
X X XX
10,000
90,000
1,00,000
6,000
19,000
25,000
75,000
37,500
37,500
Y
15,000
1,20,000
1,35,000
8,000
27,000
35,000
1,00,000
50,000
50,000
Cost of machine
Expected life in years
Cost of indirect materials per annum
Estimated savings in scrap per annum
Additional cost of maintenance per annum
Estimated savings in wages:
Employees not required(Nos.)
150
200
Wages per employee per annum
600
600
Tax is to be regarded as 50% (ignore depreciation for calculating tax). Using payback period
suggest which machine should be purchased.
Ans. Calculation of annual cash inflow
Savings in scrap
Estimated savings in wages
Total savings
Cost of indirect material
Additional maintenance
Total expenditure
EBT
Less: Tax
Annual cash inflow
Payback period
X= 150000/37500=4 Years
Y=250000/50000=5 Years
Illustration (uneven cash flow)
A company is considering an investment proposal to install a new machine. The
project will cost Rs. 50,000 and will have a life of 5 years and no salvage value. The
companys tax rate is 50%. The company uses straight-line method of depreciation.
The estimated net income before depreciation and tax from the proposed investment is
as follows:
Year
PBDT
1
10000
2
11000
3
14000
4
15000
5
25000
PBDT
Dep.
PBT
1
10000 10000 0
2
11000
10000 1000
3
14000 10000 4000
4
15000 10000 5000
5
25000 10000 15000
Payback period=4 years +(5000/17500)
Tax
PAT
Cash
inflow
0
500
2000
2500
7500
0
500
2000
2500
7500
10000
10500
12000
12500
17500
Cumulative
cash
inflow
10000
20500
32500
45000
62500
=4.29 Years
10
Year
1
2
3
4
5
EBT
TAX
EAT
Depr.
Cash
Inflow
1,00,000
50,000
50,000
40,000
90,000
1,00,000
50,000
50,000
40,000
90,000
80,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
80,000
80,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
80,000
40,000
20,000
20,000
40,000
60,000
Pay back period= 2 years+(20,000/80,000) = 2 years 3 months
Cumulative
Cash Inflow
90,000
1,80,000
2,60,000
2,40,000
4,00,000
Rs.
11
40,000
60,000
70,000
50,000
Rs.
30,000
36,000
42,000
48,000
60,000
=12000
=96000
=48000
=48000
12
ARR=9600/60000 x100=16%
If any additional net working capital is required in the initial year which is likely to be
released only at the end of the projects life, the full amount of working capital should be
taken in determining relevant investment for the purpose of calculating ARR.
Average Investment = Initial investment-scrap value/2+Net working capital + scrap
value
Initial investment Rs. 7,50,000, scrap value Rs.1,00,000, working life 5 years,
additional working capital requirement Rs. 50,000. calculate average investment.
Average investment=750000-100000/2 + 50000 + 100000
=475000
Advantages
1) It is easy to understand and simple to operate
2) Takes into account the earnings or profits over the entire economic life of the projects
3) Takes into account the depreciation charges of the project in the computation of the
earnings of the project.
4) Makes it clear that no profit will arise till the payback period is over. This helps a
company in deciding when it should start paying dividend
Disadvantages
1) It ignores time value of money
2) It does not consider the length of life of the projects
3) It is not consistent with the firms objective of maximizing the market value of shares.
13
Aggregating of discounted cash inflows and comparing the total with the discounted
cash outflows.
Rs.
20000
40000
60000
90000
14
NPV calculation
YEAR
CASH FLOW
1
2
3
4
5
20000
40000
60000
90000
120000
Total PV
Less: Initial
Investment
PV
FACTOR@10%
0.909
0.826
0.751
0.683
0.621
PV OF
CASHFLOW
18180
33040
45060
61470
74520
232270
140000
NPV
92270
100000
80000
Annual PBT
Less: Tax
20000
8000
Annual PAT
Add: Depreciation
12000
80000
92000
15
Calculation of NPV
NPV= Annual Cash inflow x PV Annuity@12% for 10 years
= 92000 x 5.650
=519800
=800000
NPV
=(280200)
Cash inflow
Cumulative cash
inflow
100000
500000
1100000
1700000
1900000
1
100000
2
400000
3
600000
4
600000
5
200000
Payback period=2 years +500000/600000
=2.83 years
Discounted Payback period
Year
Cash inflow
PV factor
PV
1
2
3
4
5
100000
400000
600000
600000
200000
0.909
0.826
0.751
0.683
0.621
90900
330400
450600
409800
124200
Cumulative
PV
90900
421300
871900
1281700
1405900
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
Cash Outflows
150000
30000
Cash Inflows
20000
30000
60000
80000
30000
Cash outflow
150000
30000
PV factor
1
0.909
Total PV of cash
outflow
PV
150000
27270
177270
Calculation of NPV
Year
1
2
3
4
5
5
Cash inflow
20000
30000
60000
80000
30000
40000
PV factor
0.909
0.826
0.751
0.683
0.621
0.621
Total PV
Less: PV of outflow
NPV
PV
18180
24780
45060
54640
18630
24840
186130
177270
8860
17
2) In the case of NPV method, the discount rate is required rate of return and being
predetermined rate, usually the cost of capital, its determinants are external to the
proposal under consideration.
3) The IRR, on the other hand, is based on the facts, which are internal to the proposal.
Merits
1) It considers the time value of money
2) Calculation of cost of capital is not a prerequisite for adopting IRR
3) IRR attempts to find the maximum rate of interest at which funds invested in the
projects could be repaid out of the cash inflows arising from the project
4) It is not in conflict with the concept of maximizing the welfare of the equity
shareholders
5) It considers cash inflows throughout the life of the project
Demerits
1) Computation of IRR is tedious and difficult to understand
2) Both NPV and IRR assume that the cash can be reinvested at the discounting rate in
new projects.
3) However, reinvestment of funds at the cut off rate is more appropriate that at the IRR.
4) Hence, NPV method is more reliable than IRR for ranking two or more projects
5) It may give the results, which are inconsistent with NPV. This is especially true in
case of mutually exclusive projects
6) IRR = Lower Discount rate + (PV of cash inflows at lower rate Initial investment) /
(PV of cash inflows at lower rate - PV of cash inflows at higher rate) x Difference in
discount rates
IRR Calculations
Example, A project is estimated to cost Rs. 16,300. it is expected to have a life of 3 years and
generate cash inflows of Rs. 8,000, Rs. 7,000 and Rs. 6,000. Calculate IRR
YEAR
CASH
INFLOW
PV @14%
1
2
3
8000
7000
6000
.877
.769
.675
PV OF
CASH
INFLOW
7016
5383
4050
16449
PV@15%
.870
.756
.658
PV OF
CASH
INFLOW
6960
5292
3948
16200
18
IRR = LR + (HPV-I)
X(HR-LR)
(HPV-LPV)
= 14 + (16449-16300)
X1
(16449-16200)
= 14 + 149
X1
249
= 14.60%
Modified IRR (MIRR): The source of conflict between IRR and NPV method of appraising
the project is the assumption of reinvestment rate of the cash flows implied in the DCF
techniques.
To overcome the drawback of the IRR method and to make it consistent with the NPV rule, a
modified method is developed known as MIRR.
MIRR
The method works as follows:
1) Find out the terminal values of all the cash flows assuming the reinvestment rate at
cost of capital
2) The total of terminal value is treated as single cash inflow at the end of the project
3) With only two cash flows (initial investment and terminal value at the end of the
project) recomputed the IRR. This new IRR is the modified IRR.
Profitability Index method
It is the ratio of the present value of cash inflows, at the required rate of return, to the initial
cash outflow of the investment.
The PI approach measures the present value of returns per rupee invested, while the
NPV is based on the difference between the present value of future cash inflows and the
present value of cash outlays.
19
Illustration: Beta Ltd.is considering the purchase of a new machine. Two alternative
machines A and B are suggested each costing Rs.1,00,000. Assume 10% rate of discount.
Calculate PI. Earnings after taxation are expected to be as follows:
YEARS
A
B
1
40000
60000
YEAR
CF-A
1
2
3
4
40000
30000
50000
20000
2
30000
30000
3
50000
30000
PV@10% PV OF
CF
0.909
36360
0.826
24780
0.751
37550
0.683
13660
TOTAL
112350
PV
CF-B
60000
30000
30000
20000
4
20000
20000
PV OF
CF
54540
24780
22530
13660
115510
Initial outlay
100000
70000
30000
50000
50000
Life of project
10
8
20
10
20
Cash
inflow
25000
20000
6000
15000
PV factor
Total PV
5.019
4.487
6.259
5.019
125475
89740
37554
75285
Initial
investment
100000
70000
30000
50000
NPV
Rank
25475
19740
7554
25285
1
4
5
2
20
12000
6.259
75108
50000
25108
CALCULATION OF PI
PROJECT
TOTAL PV OF CF
A
B
C
D
E
125475
89740
37554
75285
75108
INITIAL
INVESTMENT
100000
70000
30000
50000
50000
PI
RANK
1.255
1.282
1.252
1.506
1.502
4
3
5
1
2
1
10000
2
10692
3
12769
4
13462
5
20385
CFBT
10000
10692
12769
13462
20385
Depr.
10000
10000
10000
10000
10000
PBT
0
692
2769
3462
10385
Tax
0
242
969
1212
3635
EAT
0
450
1800
2250
6750
11250
CFAT
10000
10450
11800
12250
16750
61250
Payback period
year
CFAT
1
10000
2
10450
3
11800
4
12250
5
16750
Payback period=4 years+5500/16750=4.328
Cumulative CFAT
10000
20450
32250
44500
61250
ARR=11250/5
21
50000/2
=2250/25000x100= 9%
NPV
Year
1
2
3
4
5
CFAT
10000
10450
11800
12250
16750
PV Factor@10%
0.909
0.826
0.751
0.683
0.621
Total PV
Initial investment
NPV
Total PV
9090
8632
8862
8367
10401
45352
50000
(4648)
IRR
year
1
2
3
4
5
CFAT
10000
10450
11800
12250
16750
IRR = LR + (HPV-I)
X(HR-LR)
PV@6%
0.943
0.890
0.840
0.792
0.747
Total PV@6%
9430
9300
9912
9702
12512
50856
50000
856
(HPV-LPV)
=6+ (50856-50000) x (10-6)
(50856-45352)
=6+856 x4
5504
=6+0.622= 6.62%
PI = Total PV of cash inflows
Initial Investment
=45352/50000=0.907
Inflation and Capital Budgeting
22
The capital budgeting results would be unrealistic if the impact of inflation is not correctly
factored in the analysis.
The cash flow estimates will not reflect the real purchasing power.
Therefore, cash flows should be adjusted to accommodate the inflation factor so that the CB
decisions reflect the true picture.
Real Cash Flows
Real cash flows are cash flows discounted/deflated to reflect effect of inflation on nominal
cash flows.
In case of inflation real cash flows are substantially lower than nominal cash flows.
This is due to the fact that increased income (as depreciation charges do not change) is
subject to higher amount of taxes.
23