Price Discrimination
Price Discrimination
Price Discrimination
These coupons are often highly targeted to your spending habits. This is an indirect
way of segmenting the market.
TYPES OF MARKET
Perfect Competition
Large number of buyers and sellers no individual seller can influence price.Free
entry and exit to industry, Homogenous product identical so no consumer
preference. Sellers are price takers have to accept the market price.Perfect
information available to buyers and sellers. Examples -Financial market stock
exchange, parts of agriculture.
Monopolistic
Many buyers and sellers, Products differentiated, Relatively free entry and exit,Firm
has some control over price.Examples restaurants, professions ,Retail trade etc.
Oligopoly
Oligopoly is the form of market which has few sellers dealing with either
homogenous or differentiated products. Here there are small number of competing
firms. Every firm in the particular market has a belief that its actions will lead to
some or other form of non-negligible reaction from the other firms. It exists when
transportation cost limits the market area. For example, even though there are
many cement producers in India, competition is limited to the few local producers in
a particular area. The actions in each firm affects the other firm in the industry and
vice versa. For example, when General Motors introduced price rebates in the sale
of its automobiles, Ford and Maruti immediately followed with price rebates oftheir
own. The two contrasting behaviours of oligopoists arise that is cooperative
oligopolists where an oligopolist follows the pattern followed by rival firms and the
non-cooperative oligopolists where the firm does not follow the pattern followed by
rival firms. For example, A firm raises price of its product, the other firms may keep
their prices low so as to attract the sales away from the firm, which has raised its
price.
Conclusion
Price discrimination is good where there is a genuine need of it. It may be
unpleasant for certain consumer groups but in a more utilitarian sense it is still
beneficial because it allows certain suppliers to keep running their firm and provide
necessary service important for standard of kiving of life. Thus it improves overall
economic welfare. However, it gives room for exploitation of different elasticities,
e.g. cons not being able to obtain life-saving treatment because it is simply too
expensive. Therefore overall argument is that it should be utilized where necessary
and this may enforced through gov regulation.