Electronic Journal of Biotechnology: Ying Yu, Xiaoyu Zhou, Sheng Wu, Tiantian Wei, Long Yu
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology: Ying Yu, Xiaoyu Zhou, Sheng Wu, Tiantian Wei, Long Yu
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology: Ying Yu, Xiaoyu Zhou, Sheng Wu, Tiantian Wei, Long Yu
State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 28 February 2014
Accepted 27 September 2014
Available online 13 October 2014
Keywords:
Expression optimization
LYZ
PlackettBurman design
RSM
a b s t r a c t
Background: Lysozyme plays a crucial role in innate immunity with its well-recognized bacteriolytic activity. In
this study, the inuence of expression parameters (inoculation volume, culture volume, growth time,
induction temperature and time, initial pH and methanol concentration) on human lysozyme (HLZ)
production in recombinant P. pastoris SMD1168 was investigated through PlackettBurman (PB) design and
response surface methodology (RSM).
Results: It was revealed that induction temperature, induction time and culture volume had signicant inuence
(P b 0.01) on HLZ expression level, which were elected for further optimization with three-dimensional
response surface designs for enhanced HLZ production. The highest lysozyme activity reached 3301 U/mL
under optimized conditions (at 23.5C for 90 h with culture volume of 48 mL) in shake ask, which increased
2.2 fold compared with that achieved with the standard protocol (Invitrogen). When high-cell-density
fermentation of the recombinant Pichia pastoris was performed in a 15 L fermenter under optimized
conditions, the extracellular lysozyme activity reached 47,680 U/mL. SDS-PAGE analysis of the product
demonstrated that HLZ was produced as a single major protein with a molecular weight of approximately
14.7 kDa, consistent with its expected size.
Conclusions: The results indicated that the optimized culture conditions using PB design and RSM signicantly
enhanced the expression level of HLZ, and the Pichia expression system for HLZ production was successful and
industrially promising.
2014 Ponticia Universidad Catlica de Valparaso. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Traditional antibiotics are facing escalating challenges as the
emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Lysozyme has gained
much attention as an antimicrobial agent due to its ability to cleave the
-(1,4)-glycosidic bond between N-acetylmuramic acid and
N-acetylglucosamine in peptidoglycan of bacterial cell wall, thus
damaging cell wall and causing bacterial cell lysis [1]. Lysozyme plays
an important role in nonspecic immunity and has a direct effect on
gram-positive bacteria [2]. The human lysozyme (HLZ) gene is located
on chromosome 12 and is widely expressed in a variety of tissues and
body uids [3,4]. In addition to its well-characterized antimicrobial
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: longyu@fudan.edu.cn (L. Yu).
Peer review under responsibility of Ponticia Universidad Catlica de Valparaso.
Contributed equally.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2014.09.006
0717-3458/ 2014 Ponticia Universidad Catlica de Valparaso. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
312
Y 0 i Xi i j Xi X j ii Xi :
Equation 1
Factors
X1
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
X7
Levels
-1
+1
5
40
24
24
72
5
1
6.25
50
30
30
90
6.25
1.25
Table 4
BBD and RSM model predicted values of lysozyme activity.
Factors
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
X1
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
X7
-1
1
-1
1
-1
1
1
1
-1
-1
-1
1
1
1
-1
1
-1
-1
-1
-1
1
-1
1
1
1
-1
-1
1
-1
-1
1
1
-1
1
1
-1
-1
1
-1
-1
1
-1
1
1
1
-1
1
-1
1
1
-1
-1
-1
1
1
-1
1
1
-1
-1
-1
1
-1
1
1
-1
-1
1
1
1
-1
-1
1
-1
-1
1
1
1
-1
1
1
-1
-1
-1
Lysozyme activity
Y (U/mL)
2631
2039
3066
2095
1808
2979
2279
1519
2172
3229
1630
2431
Equation 2
368:13AB309:25 AC
2
313
F value
P value (Prob N F)
Signicant
X1
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
X7
9.93
24.66
8.61
151.26
53.81
6.37E-05
13.14
0.0345
0.0077
0.0426
0.0003
0.0018
0.9940
0.0222
5
3
6
1
2
7
4
Run
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Factors
Lysozyme activity
Y (U/mL)
A: Induction
temperature (C)
B: Induction
time (h)
C: Culture
volume (mL)
Actual
value
Predicted
value
23 (0)
26 (1)
23 (0)
23 (0)
26 (1)
26 (1)
20 (-1)
23 (0)
23 (0)
20 (-1)
23 (0)
23 (0)
26 (1)
23 (0)
20 (-1)
20 (-1)
23 (0)
84 (0)
72 (-1)
84 (0)
84 (0)
96 (1)
84 (0)
72 (-1)
84 (0)
72 (-1)
84 (0)
72 (-1)
84 (0)
84 (0)
96 (1)
96 (1)
84 (0)
96 (1)
40 (0)
40 (0)
40 (0)
40 (0)
40 (0)
30 (-1)
40 (0)
40 (0)
50 (1)
50 (1)
30 (-1)
40 (0)
50 (1)
30 (-1)
40 (0)
30 (-1)
50 (1)
3021
1665
3194
3227
2716
2708
1944
2540
3302
2512
2462
3227
2350
1941
1522
1633
3224
3194
1664
3194
3194
2716
2663
1943
2457
3194
2557
2509
3194
2396
1985
1524
1587
3177
Sum of squares
df
Mean square
F value
P value
(Prob N F)
Model
A
B
C
AB
AC
BC
A2
B2
C3
Residual
Lack of t
Pure error
Cor total
6.25E+06
4.18E+05
2.01E+05
2.47E+05
5.42E+05
3.83E+05
7.06E+05
1.93E+06
1.30E+06
1.97E+05
60,279.56
16,574.06
43,705.5
6.31E+06
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
3
4
16
6.94E+05
4.18E+05
2.01E+05
2.47E+05
5.42E+05
3.83E+05
7.06E+05
1.93E+06
1.30E+06
1.97E+05
8611.37
5524.69
10,926.38
80.58
48.53
23.36
28.70
62.95
44.42
82.04
224.22
150.71
22.83
0.51
b0.0001
0.0002
0.0019
0.0011
b0.0001
0.0003
b0.0001
b0.0001
b0.0001
0.0020
0.6990
314
Fig. 1. 2D contour plot and 3D response surface for the effect of cross-interaction between A (induction phase temperature) and B (induction time) on the lysozyme activity.
Fig. 2. 2D contour plot and 3D response surface for the effect of cross-interaction between A (induction phase temperature) and C (culture volume) on the lysozyme activity.
Fig. 3. 2D contour plot and 3D response surface for the effect of cross-interaction between B (induction time) and C (culture volume) on the lysozyme activity.
50000
45000
40000
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
16
24
32
40
48
56
64
72
80
88
96
Time(h)
pH 4.5
pH 5.0
pH 5.5
Fig. 4. Time-course prole of lysozyme production with different pH during fed batch
fermentation.
Fig. 5. SDS-PAGE analysis of the culture supernatants of the recombinant P. pastoris. Lane 1,
protein marker; lane 2, positive control: HLZ standard (Sigma-Aldrich Trading Co., Ltd.,
Shanghai, China); lane 3, HLZ expressed under optimized conditions in ask; lines 46,
HLZ production in 15 L fermenter under induction pH of 5.5, 5.0 and 4.5, respectively.
315
316
[13] Tschopp JF, Brust PF, Cregg JM, Stillman CA, Gingeras TR. Expression of the lacZ gene
from two methanol-regulated promoters in Pichia pastoris. Nucleic Acids Res 1987;
15:385976.
[14] Wu D, Hao YY, Chu J, Zhuang YP, Zhang SL. Inhibition of degradation and aggregation
of recombinant human consensus interferon- mutant expressed in Pichia pastoris
with complex medium in bioreactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2008;80:106371.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1629-5.
[15] Olmo R, Teijn C, Muiz E, Beneit JV, Villarino AL, Blanco MD. Modulation
of lysozyme activity by lead administered by different routes. In vitro study
and analysis in blood, kidney, and lung. Biol Trace Elem Res 2012;149:40511.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-012-9446-1.
[16] Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of
bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970;227:6805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/227680a0.
[17] Plackett RL, Burman JP. The design of optimum multifactorial experiments.
Biometrika 1946;33:30525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/33.4.305.
[18] Ahuja SK, Ferreira GM, Moreira AR. Application of PlackettBurman design and
response surface methodology to achieve exponential growth for aggregated
shipworm bacterium. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004;85:66675.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.10880.
[19] Bas D, Boyaci IH, Bas D, Boyaci IH. Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response
surface methodology. J Food Eng 2007;78:83645.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024.
[20] Ahmad AL, Ismail S, Bhatia S. Optimization of coagulationocculation process for
palm oil mill efuent using response surface methodology. Environ Sci Technol
2005;39:282834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0498080.
[21] Higgins DR, Cregg JM. Introduction to Pichia pastoris. Methods Mol Biol 1998;103:
115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-421-6:1.
[22] Wei JT, Tang CD, Wu MC, Liu GL, Shi HL, Li JF. Cloning and functional expression of a
human lysozyme gene (hly) from human leukocytes in Pichia pastoris. Mol Med Rep
2012;6:1738. http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2012.878.
[23] Ercan D, Demirci A. Production of human lysozyme in biolm reactor and optimization
of growth parameters of Kluyveromyces lactis K7. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013;97:
621121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4944-4.
[24] Sato R, Matsumoto T, Hidaka N, Imai Y, Abe K, Takahashi S, et al. Cloning and
expression of carp acetylcholinesterase gene in Pichia pastoris and characterization
of the recombinant enzyme. Protein Expr Purif 2009;64:20512.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2008.12.003.
[25] Jin H, Liu GQ, Ye XF, Duan ZY, Li Z, Shi ZP. Enhanced porcine interferon- production
by recombinant Pichia pastoris with a combinational control strategy of low
induction temperature and high dissolved oxygen concentration. Biochem Eng J
2010;52:918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2010.07.009.
[26] Huang EL, Demirci A. Enhanced human lysozyme production by Kluyveromyces
lactis. Food Bioprocess Technol 2009;2:2228.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11947-008-0062-1.
[27] Wang YH, Feng JT, Zhang Q, Zhang X. Optimization of fermentation condition
for antibiotic production by Xenorhabdus nematophila with response surface
methodology. J Appl Microbiol 2008;104:73544.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03599.x.
[28] Jahic M, Gustavsson M, Jansen AK, Martinelle M, Enfors SO. Analysis and control of
proteolysis of a fusion protein in Pichia pastoris fed-batch processes. J Biotechnol
2003;102:4553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(03)00003-8.
[29] Jahic M, Wallberg F, Bollok M, Garcia P, Enfors SO. Temperature limited fed-batch
technique for control of proteolysis in Pichia pastoris bioreactor cultures. Microb
Cell Factories 2003;2:6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-2-6.