Lab Report 2
Lab Report 2
Lab Report 2
Objectives
1- To know how to use and refine Bernoullis equation by
introducing the frictional head loss, hf, and analyze the
equations restrictions.
2- To analyze pressure loss due to friction, elbows, bends,
and fittings.
3- To estimate friction losses using the energy equation.
4- To understand head loss.
5- To compare the calculated friction factor to the
estimated friction factor from Moodys diagram.
Equipment
1- Cussons Hydraulic Bench.
Introduction
To start off, there are three types of fluid flow: laminar,
turbulent, and transitional. Laminar flow (or streamline
flow) occurs when a fluid flows in layers parallel to the
walls of the pipe where the layers slide past one another
without mixing laterally. This typically occurs at low
velocities. Turbulent flow, on the other hand, is when the
fluid flows in an erratic motion with swirls and irregular
motions in a manner that is more likely to resemble the
mixing of the fluid. In between the laminar and turbulent
flow is the transitional flow
which from its name, shows
that it is similar to a
transitional phase between
the laminar and the turbulent
flow. In other words, it is a
mix of both flows. The flows
are clarified in following
drawing as laminar flow,
transitional flow, and
turbulent flow, respectively.
In this experiment, we will try to prove/disprove
Bernoullis equation that states that energy should be
Variable
outlet
volume
Volume
35
30
25
20
15
(L)
Time (s)
Volumetri
c flow
rate (L/s)
Inlet head
(h1)
Outlet
head (h2)
h1-h2
60
1/12
48
5/48
43
5/43
40
1/8
35
1/7
230
214
205
192
185
298
214
205
192
185
-68
-28
48
89
Volumet
ric flow
rate Q
(m3/s)
1
2
3
4
5
8.30x10-5
1.04x10-4
1.16x10-4
1.25x10-4
1.43x10-4
Avera
ge
veloci
ty V
(m/s)
1.06
1.32
1.48
1.59
1.82
Re
(dimension
less)
11977
14915
16384
17966
20565
Fracti
on
head
loss
hf (m)
0.068
0.028
0.009
0.048
0.089
Friction
factor f
(dimension
less)
Log
(hf/L
)
Log(V
)
0.025
0.008
0.002
0.012
0.019
-0.72
-1.11
-1.60
-0.88
-0.61
0.025
0.12
0.17
0.20
0.26
Log(hf/L) vs Log(V)
0
-0.2 0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
-1.2
-1.4
-1.6
-1.8
Log(hf/L) vs Log(V)
35
30
25
20
15
Time (s)
Volumetri
c flow
rate (L/s)
Inlet head
(h1)
Outlet
head (h2)
h1-h2
146
5/146
121
5/121
105
5/105
99
5/99
90
5/90
395
375
355
335
315
215
202
192
184
179
180
173
163
151
136
Volumet
ric flow
rate Q
(m3/s)
1
2
3
4
5
3.42x10-5
4.13x10-5
4.76x10-5
5.05x10-5
5.56x10-5
Avera
ge
veloci
ty V
(m/s)
0.89
1.07
1.24
1.31
1.44
Re
(dimension
less)
7040
8463
9808
10362
11390
Fracti
on
head
loss
hf (m)
0.180
0.173
0.163
0.151
0.136
Friction
factor f
(dimension
less)
Log
(hf/L
)
Log(V
)
0.077
0.062
0.050
0.044
0.036
-0.30
-0.32
-0.34
-0.38
-0.42
-0.051
0.029
0.093
0.117
0.158
Log(hf/L) vs Log(V)
0
-0.1
-0.05
-0.05
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
-0.1
-0.15
-0.2
-0.25
-0.3
-0.35
-0.4
-0.45
Log(hf/L) vs Log(V)
35
30
25
20
15
68
5/66
57
5/57
52
5/52
46
5/46
43
5/43
380
360
335
310
290
296
246
190
139
84
84
114
145
171
206
35
30
25
20
15
118
5/118
98
5/98
87
5/87
79
5/79
72
5/72
428
420
412
404
396
300
252
200
150
96
128
168
212
254
300
V = Q/A
Q = (L/1000) / seconds
A = (3.14/4) x D2
f = 2gDhf / V2 (L+N(30D))
h f = h1 h 2
hL = LV2f / 2gD
hB = hf hL / N
KB = hB / (V2 / 2g)
Volumet
ric flow
rate Q
(m3/s)
1
2
3
4
5
7.35x10-5
8.77x10-5
9.62x10-5
1.09x10-4
1.16x10-4
Averag
e
velocit
yV
(m/s)
0.94
1.12
1.22
1.39
1.48
Fractio
n head
loss
hf (m)
hL
hB
KB
0.024
0.023
0.025
0.023
0.024
0.084
0.114
0.145
0.171
0.206
0.050
0.068
0.088
0.105
0.124
1.68
0.046
0.057
0.066
0.082
0.390
0.007
0.008
0.007
0.008
Volumet
ric flow
rate Q
(m3/s)
1
2
3
4
5
4.24x10-7
5.10x10-5
5.75x10-5
6.33x10-5
6.94x10-5
Averag
e
velocit
yV
(m/s)
0.525
0.649
0.732
0.806
0.884
Fractio
n head
loss
hf (m)
hL
hB
KB
0.160
0.158
0.157
0.155
0.152
0.128
0.168
0.212
0.254
0.300
0.040
0.159
0.269
0.390
0.554
0.088
0.009
-0.057
-0.136
-0.254
0.065
0.004
-0.022
-0.043
-0.066
Discussion
Starting by comparing the first two pipes (straight 10 mm
diameter and straight 7 mm diameter), one can see that
in both pipes, there is a general pattern of decreasing
friction and increasing velocity, thus, increasing
volumetric rate. We had turbulent flow in both pipes since
the beginning because reynolds number > 4000. Since
the smaller pipe allows less fluid to flow at a time, it is
clear from the results that reynolds number is smaller
which is logical since the fluid has less room for irregular
flows. Comparing the times of both pipes, it can be easily
perceived that the pipe with 10 mm diameter requires
less time, obviously, than the pipe with 7 mm diameter.
Comparing the elbow and the bent pipes (both with 10
mm diameter), one can see that the bent pipe required
less time in general than the elbow and this can be easily
inferred by looking at the fraction head loss and friction
factor which are both less in the bent pipe than the elbow
pipe, hence, the velocity was also bigger in the bent pipe.
Due to the bent pipe having a smoother inner conduit
than that of the elbow, it can be seen that the head loss
is less there.
Now, comparing the 3 pipes with 10 mm diameter, it is
clear that the straight pipe has the highest velocity of
flow and the bends become sharper, the velocity
decreases sharply.
In both cases of the bent pipe and the elbow pipe, KB
constant keeps decreasing and this is due to both hB and
the velocity having a general decreasing trend.
Conclusion
In this experiment, we came to observe and understand
the three different types of flow namely laminar,
Recommendation
1- Ensure the pipes are securely tightened so no leakage
will take place and give wrong readings.
2- Ensure you turn off the machine before each pipe
change.
3- Ensure the manometer is bubble-free to avoid getting
wrong readings.
References
1. Lab Manual
2. Heat Transfer (Hallman)
3. efm.leeds.ac.uk
4. hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu
5.engineeringtoolbox.com