Federation, Japan, and Canada. These Data Include CO
Federation, Japan, and Canada. These Data Include CO
Federation, Japan, and Canada. These Data Include CO
The Finance Commission is a body set up by the President of India every 5 years
under Article 280 of the Constitution. It consists of a Chairman and four
members. The main task of the Commission is to make recommendations about
the distribution of tax revenues between the Centre and states. For doing so, it
consults with various ministries and departments, as well as stake holders and
policy makers at the state and local government level.
2.
3.
(v) Review the state of finances and debt levels of the Union and States and
review the fiscal consolidation process.
Of these recommendations, (i) and (ii) usually receive the most media attention
since they have an important bearing on the Centres fiscal position as well as
the flow of funds to states.
4.
In most federal systems, there are vertical and horizontal fiscal imbalances.
Vertical imbalances occur because the central government has the power to levy
and/or appropriate more taxes than the states. As a result states do not have
sufficient tax revenues to fund their expenditures. This is resolved by allocating
some taxes from a common divisible tax pool to states.
Horizontal imbalances occur because states have different levels of
development, income and expenditure. Some states have high incomes, and can
deliver public services such as roads, schools, and hospitals from their own
revenues. Others may struggle to even pay salaries of civil servants. The aim of
the Finance Commission is to ensure that all states have enough resources to
fund a minimum level of expenditure each year.
5.
How did the Fourteenth Finance Commission allocate union taxes
to states?
The Finance commission transfers funds to states in two ways: (i) through
devolution of taxes from the common divisible pool and (ii) through grants.
Grants form a small part of FC transfers; the bulk is through tax devolution.
FC-14 recommended that the share of states in taxes be increased from the
existing 32 per cent to 42 per cent of the divisible tax pool. This is the highest
increase ever by any finance commission. In 2014-15; states received Rs 3.82
trillion as share of taxes; in 2015-16, they will receive Rs.5.79 trillion. By 201920, their share is expected to rise to over Rs.10 trillion.
The central and state governments have opposing views when it comes to
vertical devolution. The Centre was keen to stick to the old devolution rate of
32% in order to retain more fiscal space. Caught between the conflicting goals of
keeping the fiscal deficit within target and simultaneously increasing capital
expenditure on infrastructure projects, the central government needs all the
resources it can get[2]. On the other hand, most state governments want more
devolution, with some states arguing for a share in those centrally levied
surcharges and cess that are not normally shared with states.
6.
How did the Fourteenth Finance Commission allocate taxes
among states?
The distribution of taxes among states will be based on six criteria, each
appropriately weighted to reflect its importance, as shown below.
7.
So how does the divisible pool of taxes get divided between the
states?
This table shows the share of the tax pool that will devolve to each state
between 2015 and 2020.
The highest share goes to Uttar Pradesh (17.9%), simply because of its
population (highest), and low per capital state domestic product (the lowest was
Bihar, UP was the second from the bottom). Bihar also gets a high portion of
union taxes (9.7%) as its income is quite far from all-states average per capita
income. The north-eastern states receive a very low share of union taxes,
because they are covered by special unconditional central aid that covers their
expenditures.
8.
9.
States are keen that the bulk of transfers from the centre flow as tax devolutions
or untied grants. There has been an increase in grants for Centrally Sponsored
Schemes in recent years. Such grants require states to make matching
contributions and do not give them the autonomy to design or implement the
schemes. They are also one-size-fits-all schemes; as they are not tailored to
the specific ground level requirements of each state. FC-14 strongly recommends
that the centre reduce the number of Centrally Sponsored Schemes, and instead
move the resources directly to the states so that they can design, implement and
monitor the end use of funds at the state and local level.
Co-operative federalism- the aim of the present government- is best served
through formula based, non-discretionary transfers such as tax devolution. The
increase in tax devolution rate, therefore, may be an important step towards
shifting the institutional mechanism towards transfers that promote states fiscal
autonomy.
about 48% of the divisible pool. That leaves just over 51% available to the centre
for its expenditures.
[3] Per capita income is measured as the average over the years 2011-12, 201213, 2013-14
Government of India
Ministry of Commerce& Industry
Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion
Office of the Economic Adviser
Index of Eight Core Industries (Base: 2004-05=100)
June, 2015
1. The summary of the Index of Eight Core Industries (base: 2004-05) is
given at the Annexure.
2. The Eight Core Industries comprise nearly 38 % of the weight of items
included in the Index of Industrial Production (IIP). The combined Index of
Eight Core Industries stands at 171.2 in June, 2015, which was 3.0 % higher
compared to the index of June, 2014. Its cumulative growth during April to
June, 2015-16 was 2.4 %.
Coal
3. Coal production (weight: 4.38 %) increased by 6.3 % in June, 2015 over
June, 2014. Its cumulative index during April to June, 2015-16 increased by
7.3 % over corresponding period of previous year.
Crude Oil
4. Crude Oil production (weight: 5.22 %) declined by 0.7 % in June, 2015
over June, 2014. Its cumulative index during April to June, 2015-16 declined
by 0.9 % over the corresponding period of previous year.
Natural Gas
5. The Natural Gas production (weight: 1.71 %) declined by 5.9 % in June,
2015. Its cumulative index during April to June, 2015-16 declined by 4.2 %
over the corresponding period of previous year.
Page 2 of 4
Refinery Products (93% of Crude Throughput)
6. Petroleum Refinery production (weight: 5.94%) increased by 7.5 % in
June, 2015. Its cumulative index during April to June, 2015-16 increased by
4.2 % over the corresponding period of previous year.
Fertilizers
7. Fertilizer production (weight: 1.25%) increased by 5.8 % in June, 2015.
Its cumulative index during April to June, 2015-16 increased by 2.4 % over the
corresponding period of previous year.
Steel (Alloy + Non-Alloy)
8. Steel production (weight: 6.68%) increased by 4.9 % in June, 2015. Its
cumulative index during April to June, 2015-16 increased by 2.8 % over the
corresponding period of previous year.
Cement
9. Cement production (weight: 2.41%) increased by 2.6 % in June, 2015.
Its cumulative index during April to June, 2015-16 increased by 0.9 % over the
corresponding period of previous year.
Electricity
10. Electricity generation (weight: 10.32%) increased by 0.2 % in June,
2015. Its cumulative index during April to June, 2015-16 increased by 1.5 %
over the corresponding period of previous year.
Note 1: Data are provisional. Revision has been made based on revised data
received for corresponding month of previous year in respect of Coal, Crude
Oil, Natural Gas, Refinery Product, Steel, Cement and Electricity.
Accordingly, indices for the month June, 2014 have been revised.
Note
The relationship between GVA at Factor Cost and GVA at Basic Prices and GDP at
market prices and GVA at basic prices is shown below:
GVA at factor cost + (Production taxes less Production subsidies) =
GVA at basic prices
GDP at market prices = GVA at basic prices + Product taxes- Product
subsidies
Production taxes or production subsidies are paid or received with relation to
production and are
of actual
land revenues,
stamps and registration fees and tax on profession . Some
production. Some examples of production taxes are
The basic price is the amount receivable by the producer from the
purchaser for a unit of a good or service produced as output minus any tax
payable, and plus any subsidy receivable, by the producer as a
consequence of its production or sale. It excludes any transport charges
invoiced separately by the producer.
The producers price is the amount receivable by the producer from the
purchaser for a unit of a good or service produced as output minus any
VAT, or similar deductible tax, invoiced to the purchaser. It excludes any
transport charges invoiced separately by the producer.
Basic prices exclude any taxes on products the producer receives from the
purchaser and passes on to government but include any subsidies the producer
receives from government and uses to lower the prices charged to purchasers.
Both producers and basic prices are actual transaction prices that can be
directly observed and recorded. The basic price measures the amount retained
by the producer and is, therefore, the price most relevant for the producers
decision-taking. The basic price is obtained from the producers price by
deducting any tax on products payable on a unit of output (other than invoiced
VAT already omitted from the producers price) and adding any subsidy on
products receivable on a unit of output. In consequence, no taxes on products or
subsidies on products are to be recorded as payables or receivables in the
producers generation of income account when value added is measured at basic
prices, the preferred valuation basis in the SNA.
Gross value added at basic prices is defined as output valued at basic prices
less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers prices. Here the GVA is
known by the price with which the output is valued. From the point of view of the
producer, purchasers prices for inputs and basic prices for outputs represent the
prices actually paid and received. Their use leads to a measure of gross value
added that is particularly relevant for the producer.
Gross value added at producers prices is defined as output valued at
producers prices less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers prices. In
the absence of VAT, the total value of the intermediate inputs consumed is the
same whether they are valued at producers or at purchasers prices, in which
case this measure of gross value added is the same as one that uses producers
prices to value both inputs and outputs. It is an economically meaningful
measure that is equivalent to the traditional measure of gross value added at
market prices. However, in the presence of VAT, the producers price excludes
invoiced VAT, and it would be inappropriate to describe this measure as being at
market prices.
By definition, the value of output at producers prices exceeds that at basic
prices by the amount, if any, of the taxes on products, less subsidies on products
so that the two associated measures of gross value added must differ by the
same amount.
Gross value added at factor cost is not a concept used explicitly in the SNA.
However, it can easily be derived from either of GVA at basic prices or GVA at
producer's price by subtracting the value of any taxes on production and adding
subsidies on production, payable out of gross value added as defined. For
example, the only taxes on production remaining to be paid out of gross value
added at basic prices consist of other taxes on production which are not
charged per unit. These consist mostly of current taxes (or subsidies) on the
= Factor Costs
Deriving GDP from the GVA
From these various concepts of GVA, one can arrive at an estimate of GDP in the
following manner:
a. GDP = the sum of the gross value added at producers prices, plus taxes
on imports, less subsidies on imports, plus non-deductible VAT.
b. GDP = the sum of the gross value added at basic prices, plus all taxes on
products, less all subsidies on products.
c. GDP = the sum of the gross value added at factor cost plus all taxes on
products, less all subsidies on products, plus all other taxes on production,
less all other subsidies on production.
In cases (b) and (c), the items taxes on products and subsidies on products
includes taxes and subsidies on imports as well as on outputs.
Also See
GDP / National Accounts Revised Series with 2011-12 as base year
http://mmpindia.in/Fifth_Schedule.htm
Scheduled Areas
The Fifth Schedule covers Tribal areas in 9 states of India namely Andhra
Pradesh, Jharkhand, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh,
Chattisgarh, Orissa and Rajasthan.
Areas
Visakhapatnam, East Godavari, West Godavari, Adilabad,Srikakulam,
Pradesh
Jharkhand
Chattisgarh
Himachal
Pradesh
Lahaul and Spiti districts, Kinnaur, Pangi tehsil and Bharmour subtehsil in Chamba district
Madhya
Pradesh
Gujarat
Orissa
Rajasthan
on-account? > Vote-on-account deals only with the expenditure side of the
government's budget. The government gives an estimate of funds it requires to
meet the expenditure that it incurs during the first three to four months of an
election financial year until a new government is in place. >The present
government will have to obtain the sanction of the Parliament for an amount
sufficient to incur expenditure on various items for a part of the year. This
approval by the Parliament to withdraw money from the Consolidated Fund of
India is known as Vote-on-Account. Also Read: Vote-On-Account countdown
begins: What next govt will inherit? How vote-on-account is different from
Budget? > A vote-on-account is different from an interim Budget as the former is
a statement of only expendiatures while the latter is a complete set of accounts,
including both expenditure and receipts. However, a vote-on-account is practised
every budget. Unlike a full Budget, the vote-on-account does not tweak the
prevailing tax rates. Also, it cannot announce any new schemes. Why vote-onaccount and not a full Budget? > In an election year (like the present one), the
ruling government generally opts for a vote-on-account instead of a full budget.
While technically, it is not mandatory for the government to present a vote-onaccount, but it would be inappropriate to impose policies that may or may not be
acceptable to the incoming government taking over in the same year. Who
approves it? > In an election year, the Budgets may be presented twicefirst to
secure a vote-on-account for a few months and later in full. As a convention, a
vote-on-account is treated as a formal matter and passed by Lok Sabha without
discussion. It is passed by Lok Sabha after the general discussion on the Budget
(General and Railway) is over and before the discussion on demands for grants is
taken up. For how long is vote-on-account valid? > The vote-on-account is
normally valid for for two months and is in operation till the full Budget is passed.
But during an election year, it may be extended for a period more than two
months if it is anticipated that the main demands and the Appropriation Bill will
take longer than two months to be passed by the House. The Parliament will
extend its winter session that would open between February 5 and 21. The
session is likely to take up key pending legislations such as the Andhra Pradesh
bifurcation bill. Finance Minister P Chidambaram will hold the vote-on-account on
February 17.
Read more at: http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/economy/faqs-differencebetween-full-budgetvote-on-account_1026672.html?utm_source=ref_article
IMPORTANT TOPICS FOR PRELIMS 2015
NITI AAYOG VIS A VIS PLANNING COMMISSION
GREXIT & ASSOCIATED ISSUES (HOW ECB FUNCTIONS ETC.)
INTERNATIONAL YOGA DAY (YOGA AS PHILOSOPHY BRANCH)
AIIB DEBATE (TPP + TPIP + RCEP + FTAP)
DEBATE ON SECTION 66A OF IT ACT
BANGLADESH TRIP OF MODI LINE OF CREDIT
INDO US DEFENCE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT
MAGGI CONTROVERSY ( MSG, LEAD ISSUE, FSSAI)
ABOUT 14TH FINANCE COMMISSION