Performance Review - Superintendent

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

OXFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT

PERFORMANCE REVIEW
PROCESS FOR THE
SUPERINTENDENT
OF SCHOOLS
PROCESS
The Superintendent’s evaluation process aligns with the Connecticut State Department of Education:
Standards For School Leaders. An annual evaluation of all administrative personnel must occur, and
competence will be determined in the following ways:

 On-going collaboration and interactions with the Board of Education and District Personnel.
Observations by and consultation with appropriate Board Members will be included.

 Examination of sources of data: artifacts mutually agreed upon, which will include, but are not
necessarily limited to logs and/or agendas of meetings with Board Members, School Administrators,
Teaching Staff, Parents, and students. Staff assessments, instructional leadership activities and other
data to support measurable district accomplishments and student achievement will also be utilized.

 By October 15th, during an initial conference, the Superintendent of Schools and the Board of Education
will agree upon two (2) annual goals that are based on district-wide initiatives and a comprehensive
district plan.

 By February 15th, a mid-year conference will be held, and by June 30th a final or end-of-year conference
will be held. A report of progress based on assessment of performance by the Board will be completed
by the Board as well as a self-assessment of progress completed by the Superintendent.

 A plan designed by the Superintendent and submitted to the Board of Education for the purpose of
self-growth may be accomplished through peer collaboration, independent study, and staff
development activities. If the need arises, the Board may specify a plan for self-improvement. In this
case, the Board will provide support and guidance in addressing the areas identified as needing
improvement.

A summation based on the yearlong activities will be shared with the Superintendent and placed in the
Superintendent’s personnel file.
OXFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS
Performance Review Document
Initial Goal Setting Conference
School Year 2009-2010

COMPREHENSIVE DISTRICT PLAN, MEASURABLE GOAL #1:


_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________

OBJECTIVES STRATEGIES, ACTIVITIES METHOD OF EVALUATION*


BENCHMARKS TO ACHIEVE GOALS RESOURCES, MATERIALS, PERSONNEL
RESPONSIBLE DUE DATE

BOARD’S COMMENTS REGARDING PROPOSED GOAL, OBJECTIVES, STRATEGIES, METHOD OF EVALUATION

Proposed Proposed:
Mid Year Conference Date: _____________ Final Conference Date: ___________

___________________________________ ______________________________
Signature of Board Chair Date Signature of Superintendent Date

*Methods of Evaluation of Objective/Goal are to be included in portfolio


OXFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS
Performance Review Document
Initial Goal Setting Conference
School Year 2009-2010

COMPREHENSIVE DISTRICT PLAN, MEASURABLE GOAL #2:


_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________

OBJECTIVES STRATEGIES, ACTIVITIES METHOD OF EVALUATION*


BENCHMARKS TO ACHIEVE GOALS RESOURCES, MATERIALS, PERSONNEL
RESPONSIBLE DUE DATE

BOARD’S COMMENTS REGARDING PROPOSED GOAL, OBJECTIVES, STRATEGIES, METHOD OF EVALUATION

Proposed Proposed:
Mid Year Conference Date: _____________ Final Conference Date: ___________

___________________________________ ______________________________
Signature of Board Chair Date Signature of Superintendent Date

*Methods of Evaluation of Objective/Goal are to be included in portfolio


OXFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS
SUPERINTENDENT’S FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

MEASURABLE GOAL #1: __________________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATIONS/
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE MODIFICATIONS
MIDYEAR CONFERENCE
DATE____________________

PROGRESS _______________*

FINAL CONFERENCE
DATE: ___________________

PROGRESS _______________*

*PROGRESS KEY: A = ACHIEVED S= SATISFACTORY PROGRESS NP= NO PROGRESS


Likely to Achieve

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

BOARD’S SUMMATIVE EVALUATION

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

SUPERINTENDENT’S SELF-ASSESSMENT

===============================================================================================

___________________________________ ______________________________
Signature of Board Chair Date Signature of Superintendent Date
OXFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS
SUPERINTENDENT’S FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

MEASURABLE GOAL #2: __________________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATIONS/
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE MODIFICATIONS
MIDYEAR CONFERENCE
DATE____________________

PROGRESS _______________*

FINAL CONFERENCE
DATE: ___________________

PROGRESS _______________*

*PROGRESS KEY: A = ACHIEVED S= SATISFACTORY PROGRESS NP= NO PROGRESS


Likely to Achieve

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

BOARD’S SUMMATIVE EVALUATION

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

SUPERINTENDENT’S SELF-ASSESSMENT

===============================================================================================

___________________________________ ______________________________
Signature of Board Chair Date Signature of Superintendent Date

OXFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS


SUPERINTENDENT’S FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

PLANNING, MANGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION

SUPPORTING
PROMOTES A SAFE AND ORDERLY SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT
Y N * EVIDENCE
Implements a systematic plan that promotes safety and order
Applies legal and District Policy Requirements regarding discipline
and Safety
Applies and monitors special education and 504 disciplinary
regulations
Oversees the implementation and monitors District-wide discipline
plan based on date and the District’s needs
Oversees the development and continually modifies a District-Wide
Crisis intervention Plan

ESTABLISHES AND SUSTAINS A PROFESSIONAL CULTURE TO SUPPORTING


ENCHANCE TEACHING AND SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
Y N * EVIDENCE
Promotes and models life-long learning
Develops a District-Wide atmosphere of personal responsibility,
trust and collaboration
Guarantees equitable treatment to staff and students
Develops a collaborative plan for professional development based
on results driven data/comprehensive district plan
Articulates the content of the comprehensive district plan to the
entire school community

DIRECTS THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPEMENTATION OF A SUPPORTING


DATA DRIVEN DISTRICT PLAN TO IMPROVE STUDENT
ACHIEVEMENT
Y N * EVIDENCE
Mobilizes the entire school community in the implementation of the
Comprehensive District Plan
Accesses student data continually and analyzes data to assess the
effectiveness of the Comprehensive District Plan
Monitors and Modifies the Comprehensive District Plan

MANAGES HUMAN AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO IMPROVE SUPPORTING


STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
Y N * EVIDENCE
Involves the entire school community in developing the budget
Gathers, Analyzes, and uses data to create, evaluate, and oversee
the management of the budget
Focuses school financial and human resources on teaching and
student learning
Recruits and secures best applicants for school positions
CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION – CONTENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES
SUPPORTING
ALIGNS CURRICULUM INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT WITH
STATE AND DISTRICT GOALS
Y N * EVIDENCE
Oversees the use of assessment data to diagnose learner needs and
to design appropriate instruction
Focuses entire school community on student learning
Guides staff in the curriculum alignment process
Guides District personnel through the change process while
maintaining a focus on learning
Informs staff of best practices in instruction and assessment
Engages in frequent dialogue and reflection about student learning
Ensures and promotes instruction in the least restrictive
environment
Ensures equitable access to District resources for all students
Oversees the implementation of District staff supervision, coaching,
and termination policies
Monitors staff in the implementation of the Comprehensive District
and School-Based Plans
Assists staff in self-evaluation, leading to effective practices
Uses a variety of monitoring structures: Informal observations,
assessment analysis, formal observation
Ensures effective implementation of best practices for instruction
and assessment
Develops Collaborative peer and mentoring for district personnel
Utilizes student assessment data as an integral component of the
staff performance review process

SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS

SUPPORTING
BENCHMARK Y N * EVIDENCE
Markets the School District to enlist community support
Resolves conflicts among individuals and groups
Builds a common focus and district-wide collaboration to enhance
student learning
Collaborates and partners with the administration leadership team
Uses a variety of vehicles and tools to communicate about student
learning with constituents, both within and outside the school
community
Gathers and uses relevant data regarding community responses to
student learning and their attitudes about the school community
Demonstrates knowledge and sensitivity to issues of diversity
Assesses areas of strength and potential areas of conflict to guide
decision making

You might also like