How To Prepare For The EDA
How To Prepare For The EDA
How To Prepare For The EDA
INTRODUCTION
What is the purpose of the European Diploma in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care?
Europe needs an international training and assessment structure for specialist recognition
to allow maintenance of professional standards and quality, together with development of
the Speciality. It must also allow free movement of clinicians and integration of European
nationals into other countries health care systems.
At present assessment, training and recognition varies between and within different Europe
countries. Many have individual diplomas and specialist recognition, different periods of
training required and there is variable recognition of other countries qualifications and
accreditation. Europe also has some special and unique problems, namely variations in
language, individual practice, resources and in the supply and demand for doctors.
What is the examination designed to do? The EDA tests knowledge, but not skills or
attitudes at a particular stage of training. It does not replace individual assessment, though
it may contribute to it and it is really a Europe wide examination, which may also be used as
part of an individual countrys training programme. As an examination in its own right, it is
also a qualification and a title of distinction, though the letters DESA after a doctors name
are not universally recognised as yet. It provides a framework of knowledge, an incentive
to learn and to teach and may help in achieving promotion and in raising standards.
1
PART I
b) The Part I examination comprises two multiple choice question (MCQ) papers. Each
paper has sixty questions and is of two hours duration. The MCQ format adopted is that of
a stem with five responses, each of which may be either true or false. Instructions to
candidates on how to answer the MCQs can be found on page 5. The two papers examine
different areas of knowledge:
Paper A - Basic Science (60 MCQs), includes Physiology (20 MCQs), Pharmacology (20
MCQs) and Physics, Clinical Measurement, Statistics (20 MCQs)
c) The candidate enters his/her answers on special, pre-printed answer sheets which
are computer marked. The marking method is that each correct answer earns one positive
mark. Incorrect answers or those left blank score 0 marks. The use of negative marking for
incorrect answers has been withdrawn from the exam with effect from 2008. The computer
assessment produced is then analysed by the Examination Committee. At the discretion of
the examination committee chairman, the MCQ papers may be made available to
candidates after the examination in countries where Part I is mandatory .
d) We are frequently asked questions such as how is the pass mark set and is the pass
mark/percentage of successful candidates always the same? This effectively asks whether
the candidates are in competition with each other, either for that particular sitting of the
exam or from one year to the next? In deciding the pass marks for the two multiple choice
question papers, the Examination Committee take into account two important variables:
i. The use of new and altered MCQs each year can result in slight variations in the
standard of the papers. This may result in higher or lower marks being achieved as a result
of the standard of the paper rather than variation in the quality of the candidates.
ii. The actual standard of candidates entering the examination may also vary between
years. It would be wrong to fail one candidate simply as a result of comparison with others
in a particularly strong year when he/she might have appeared comparatively better in a
weaker group of candidates at another time. Because of these variables, it is inappropriate
to have a fixed pass mark for the examination. In practice, however, the derived pass mark
is usually between 70% and 80% of the possible all-correct score.
2
groups of candidates in different years. This, when combined with an analysis of the
distribution of the marks achieved, is utilised by the examiners in determining the pass mark
in relation to the standard achieved in that particular sitting of the examination in
comparison to that in previous years.
This is a training exercise in which trainees sit the actual diploma paper annually or when
desired. It is designed to allow those with no experience of this type of examination, those
who are uncertain as to whether their level of training is sufficient, and those who wish to
use it as examination preparation. The in-training exam can be sat in any department,
which has been approved for training in Europe. A minimum number of 6 candidates in
each centre is required. Applications have to come from the Head of Department, rather
than from individual trainees. Individual trainees can sit the ITA in one of the Part I centre.
In-training candidates declare their level of experience in terms of years of training and the
exam fee is lower than that for the Diploma. Achieving the equivalent of a pass mark,
however, does not allow a candidate to pass the actual European Diploma. Sponsorship
arrangements for further reduction in fees (possibly paid by individual member states) may
be available in some departments.
Paper A
Physiology - Cardio-respiratory, General, Neurophysiology
Pharmacology - Cardiovascular, C.N.S., General
General Physics, Clinical measurement, Statistics
Paper B
General anaesthesia, Special anaesthetic techniques, Local / regional anaesthesia,
Intensive care, Internal medicine, Emergency medicine
These reports are only released to individual candidates and the Head of Department, who
is then asked to discuss them with their trainers as they wish. This ensures involvement of
trainers who are also given a complete listing of the average marks of trainees from the
same training group, in that country, Europe-wide and for the actual Diploma examination,
to allow comparison and assessment of a candidates progress year on year. The
composite list does not include statistics from any certified Specialists who may be sitting
3
the in-training examination. Although such assessments may be used to affect promotion,
it must be remembered that the examination is only really a test of knowledge.
When should the candidate sit the Part I exam and are there specific entry requirements?
Although there are no specific requirements in terms of duration of training, the level of
knowledge is appropriate to that of a 4th year trainee. There are a number of common
questions and misconceptions, such as, what preparation do I need, what should I read, is
locally organised teaching sufficient or do I need to attend formal lectures as part of a
course? Preparation for the Part I examination is about first acquiring the knowledge and
this can be done in a number of ways, both by reading, discussion, local tutorials, formal
lectures and courses and practicing examination technique. We are also often asked
whether the Society should publish the MCQ bank? The examination is designed to test
more than just learning hundreds of disjointed facts, and involves reasoning and decision
making too. There are many books of sample questions available, but be sure to use ones
which are in the correct, multiple true/false format.
There are two things that a candidate must do to pass the examinations for the European
Diploma. He/she must reach a certain level of knowledge and must know how to present it
to the examiners. Books of test questions help a candidate assess their level of
knowledge, but they should not be treated as sources of knowledge.
The standard textbooks are the best source books of basic knowledge for the EDA. The
more specialised texts, reviews in the journals, and discussion with others should be used
to build upon this knowledge, to update it, and to find faults in it. The candidate cannot
expect to pass an exam unless he or she works for it. The more clinically orientated is the
exam, then the more importance must be placed on gaining wide experience in clinical
anaesthesia. Candidates must avoid the danger of working too much at the books.
Many people think that the key to these exams is to go on a course, and there is no doubt
that courses can be extremely useful. They should, however, be thought of as a means of
aiming ones studies in the right direction; it is disappointing to find that many people will
attend a course 2-3 months before the hurdle of a major examination apparently without
4
having done any work. This is a waste of time. To get the most out of a course, one should
have covered some of the groundwork beforehand. Having acquired what one hopes to be
sufficient knowledge, then is the time that these books should be of help.
The format of the MCQs in the EDA examination is a stem and five responses. The stem
may be short (Opiates are:), or may be a few lines, for example when presenting a clinical
problem. Each of the five responses that follow may be true or false. The candidate scores
one mark for each correct answer. The is no penalty for incorrect answers or those left
blank. The actual answer sheets are marked by computer, and so the candidate must put
their answers onto special cards that are supplied separately. These cards have the
question numbers printed on them and the preferred answer is indicated by filling in a true
or a false box in pencil.
Candidates should answer all the questions. With the removal of negative marking there is
no advantage to leaving questions unanswered.
The candidate should also think very carefully if they think a response (or a stem) is
ambiguous. Each stem should be read very carefully, watching out for qualifying words
such as commonly, rarely, always, etc. because they can turn what would otherwise be
a false into a true answer and vice versa. Re-read the stem with each response, as it
is all too easy to forget the emphasis and exact wording of the stem as one works down the
five responses. Watch out for negative words - in the heat of the moment it is easy to fail
to see not in a response. May is an awkward word; one can argue that anything may
cause anything else. Try to give the answer relevant to clinical practice. For instance, it is
true that atropine may cause bradycardia, but not that propranolol may relieve
bronchospasm.
There are some subjects about which questions tend to be particularly confusing. The
oxyhaemoglobin dissociation curve is one and the ionic dissociation of drugs is another.
These are both subjects in which the wording of stem and response are crucial. If an
option states, The saturated vapour pressure of halothane is 243 mm Hg, then the answer
is clear (if the candidate happens to know!), but the concept and consequences of The
oxyhaemoglobin dissociation curve is shifted to the left by hypercarbia can be expressed in
a number of different ways and, even then, the wording of the stem may alter the answer.
It is impossible to write an MCQ paper without some of the questions being ambiguous, or
seeming ambiguous to some people. Some of the other questions may be ambiguous
without one having realised or intended it and in the examination the candidate must learn
how to deal with them. The examiners try to ensure that questions are not ambiguous.
Candidates should appreciate that an ambiguous leaf affects all those taking the exam.
It is often more difficult to think of false responses than true responses when compiling
MCQ questions. Questions tend to fall into two basic types: the straightforward factual type,
and the deductive type. Many pharmacology questions present facts, for example a drug
and five effects that may or may not be properties of that drug. A false response must
appear to some candidates to be true or else the question will not discriminate between the
good and poor candidate. The false responsees are likely to be: the exact opposite of the
true answer (e.g. hyperkalaemia for hypokalaemia), an association with another similar or
5
similar-sounding drug (e.g. a property of chlorpropamide appended to a question on
chlorpromazine), or a complete red herring. These last can be very difficult to answer, and
the candidate may not be able to find the correct answer in the literature because the
connection does not exist. False answers in the deductive type of question include these
types, although they may not be so obvious, but also include answers of false logic.
The candidate should have a general strategy for answering an MCQ paper. For those who
do not, one is suggested below. While it is certainly not the only one, it should allow
efficient use of the time spent answering the paper.
First, read through the questions from the first to the last answering quickly those of which
one is certain of the answers. Mark the options T or F on the question paper; it is not a
good idea to mark the computer marking answer card as you progress because it is then
not as easy to check your answers.
The candidate will probably find that he/she can tell from the stem whether or not they will
be able to answer a question. If you cannot answer a question immediately on this first
read-through, put a question mark by it if you will need to think about it (and also by any
answers that you do make, but about which you are still a little uncertain). Similarly put a
cross against those that you think you will probably not be able to answer at all. It is very
important not to dwell on doubtful questions at all, in you first read-through or you may find
yourself short of time before you have answered all the questions that you DO know.
On the second read-through, tackle those that you marked with a question mark. Dont be
afraid to scribble formulae or graphs on scrap paper to help with confusing questions.
After this second read-through, it is worth going back and rechecking the answers, but dont
dwell on those that you answered on the first read-through or you will find yourself doubting
even your most cast-iron certainties. At this stage, transfer the answers that you have
made so far, to the computer cards and make sure that you mark the cards correctly - it
is easy to get out of phase between the question numbers and answer numbers. You
should now regard these answers as final and unchangeable: dont look at the questions
again and get on with answering those that you marked with a cross. You can transfer
your answers to these questions to the computer marking cards right away because you will
have had plenty of time to think around the subject.
When you have answered all you can, check that you have written your name in every
place that you should have done, and then it may be better to leave the examination hall.
With essay questions, you should always be able to add more to your answers, and you
should stay for every precious minute; staying and staring at MCQ answers induces
neurosis!
The format of each of the two EDA MCQ papers in the exam is 60 questions in 2 hours and
the best way to test yourself is to try a whole paper from an appropriate book of questions,
under examination conditions, unseen, in under two hours (say 1 hour 45 mins). If you take
longer than this you may run out of time in the actual exam when transferring your answers
to the computer cards. The index at the back of most books of MCQs allows access to the
questions under broad subject headings so that one could, if one wanted, answer a number
6
of questions from different papers on, say, endocrine physiology. The candidate will,
however, gain nothing if he/she looks at the answers without trying the questions; and there
is little to gain from trying a question if one has not done the work on the subject.
For each response, score + 1 if you marked correctly True or False, and 0 if you marked
incorrectly True or False or for any response for which you gave no answer. The maximum
for each question is thus + 5, and the minimum is 0.
Your overall score on a paper will give some idea of your general level of knowledge.
Since the pass mark is not fixed (see above) one cannot say what score corresponds to a
pass in the MCQ of the actual exam.
The pass mark in 2008 will be considerably higher than in previous years due to the change
in the marking system and removal of negative marking.
As well as your overall score it is worth calculating your efficiency ratio, which is the
number of your correct answers expressed as a percentage of your total number of
attempted answers. Thus you can get an overall score of 50% by answering 150 responses
correctly (an efficiency of 100%) or by answering 170 but getting 20 of them wrong: A low
total score with a high efficiency implies that you are certain of what you do know but that
your overall knowledge is not enough, while a low efficiency ratio means that your
knowledge is faulty, or that you are guessing.
Often, candidates presenting for the exam ask how many responses they should aim to
answer. It is important that candidates realise that they should answer all the questions as
there is no penalty for incorrect answers or those left blank..
Your overall score will indicate the level of your knowledge, while your efficiency ratio will
point out gross faults in technique of answering. You should also look very carefully at
those individual questions at which you scored badly. Think carefully why you did poorly on
a particular question. The usual reason is simply lack of knowledge and occasionally you
will find a complete gap such that you are unable to answer any of the responses to a
question
It is very easy to become side-tracked and obsessed when one gets a particular response
wrong which one feels one marked correctly and you may find a source which shows that
you are indeed correct. However, nobody fails the MCQ paper because of one response
that, according to the correct answer, they answered incorrectly. You must concentrate
instead on those questions in which you did badly overall. If you get 3 or 4 incorrect
answers on a question about acid-base balance it would be more valuable to go and read a
good account of acid-base balance, and to seek help from others, than to feel aggrieved
that you think the answer is wrong on one particular point and waste time laboriously
checking each particular response.
7
THE LAST WORD
The examiners try to set questions on sensible, mainstream, subjects that are clear and
unambiguous. They are not trying to be devious and trick you into giving incorrect answers.
Remember that the level of knowledge required is that of a trainee at the end of their 3rd
year of training and the examiners are constantly reminded of this. The safe way is to
accept that conventional answers are correct and that thinking too deeply is dangerous!
It is often said that MCQs are unfair because they penalise the candidate who has read
very widely and who can always find a reason why true is actually sometimes true or
maybe true. MCQs have to have black-or-white answers. When testing basic knowledge
or general principles, what the examiner wants to know is whether you can distinguish the
wood from the trees.
INTRODUCTION
The Part II examinations are held annually between March and September in several
centres as listed in the examination calendar. Candidates may be examined in English,
French, German or Spanish provided there is sufficient demand. In the Scandinavian
centre(s), Norwegian, Swedish, Danish and English are the languages used and it is hoped
to offer Russian again soon.
b) The examination of each candidate is held in a single day during which there are four
separate 25-minute oral examinations (vivas). In each of these, the candidate is examined
by a pair of examiners (each of different nationality), thereby meeting eight examiners in all.
As far as possible, candidates are not examined by examiners to whom they are known.
c) The oral examination embraces the same range of basic science and clinical
subjects as is covered by the Part I.
d) In the oral examinations, Guided Questions are used in which candidates will be
given a brief written basic science or clinical scenario (10 minutes) before meeting the
examiners. The subsequent examination will then begin by concentrating on the problems
arising from the scenario. Two of the oral examinations will concentrate on the basic
sciences and two on clinical topics. In the clinical orals, X-rays and ECGs are also used.
e) Part II examiners use a marking system, which is divided into four grades. The
grades are good pass, pass, narrow fail and bad fail. Since there are four separate oral
examinations, the candidate obtains four marks, agreed by each pair of examiners. Ideally,
four passes or better should be obtained. The candidate who obtains three passes and
one narrow fail may be reconsidered and the examiners have the authority to recommend
8
a pass overall. Candidates who obtain two or more narrow fails or who obtain one or more
bad fails, fail the whole examination. It is therefore, most important that candidates should
try to achieve a consistent and broad range of knowledge, rather than become experts in
narrow fields.
f) At the end of each day, the examiners meet and the marks are declared and
summated. Until this time, no examiner knows how the candidate has fared in other parts of
the examination. Following this meeting, the results are handed to the candidates and a
recommendation is made to the Examination Committee that, once all the regulations have
been met, the successful candidates should receive their Diploma.
Anatomy: The anatomy of the head, neck, thorax, spine and spinal canal. The anatomy of
the peripheral nervous and vascular systems, together with surface markings of relevant
structures.
9
Statistics: Basic principles of data handling, probability theory, population distribution and
the application of both parametric and non-parametric tests of significance.
Preoperative assessment of the patient, their presenting condition and any intercurrent
disease. Interpretation of relevant X-rays, ECGs, lung function tests, cardiac
catheterisation data and biochemical results. Use of scoring systems (e.g. ASA grade).
Management of:
Circulatory and respiratory insufficiency including artificial ventilation.
Infection, sepsis and use of antimicrobial agents.
Fluid and electrolyte balance. Administration of crystalloids and colloids including
blood and blood products. Parenteral and enteral nutrition.
Biochemical disturbances such as acid base imbalance, diabetic keto-acidosis,
hyperosmolar syndrome and acute poisoning.
Renal failure including dialysis.
Acute neurosurgical/neurological conditions.
Patients with multiple injury, burns and/or multi-organ failure.
10
MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN AS FOLLOWS:
CURRENT LITERATURE
The Part II EDA is an oral examination. Not all candidates are familiar with this type of
examination and the following notes are intended to provide some guidance with regard both
to preparation and to performance on the day.
The examination of each candidate is held in a single day during which there are four 25-
minute oral examinations - (or vivas, as they are known) - two in the morning and two in the
afternoon. In each of these, the candidate is examined by a pair of examiners, thereby
meeting eight examiners in all. As far as possible, candidates are not examined by examiners
from their own training hospital. The two morning vivas concentrate on applied basic sciences
and the afternoon vivas relate to clinical topics.
Usually, but not invariably, each pair of examiners comprise one whose mother tongue is that
of the language in which the candidate has chosen to be examined and the other who has a
good working knowledge of the language. It is accepted that candidates may not be using
their mother tongue and some allowance for linguistic difficulties is made.
In the vivas, the examiners use "Guided Questions" (GQ's) which have been set in advance
by the examination committee. Each GQ opens with a brief scenario. Ten minutes before the
viva, the scenario is handed to the candidate. It is written in his/her chosen language. This
gives the candidate time to collect his/her thoughts and prepare to answer questions on the
topic presented. These opening questions are then followed by questions on the other topics
listed in the examiner's GQ. The first examiner asks questions for the first 12 minutes after
which a bell rings and the second examiner takes over.
11
Note that, whereas the Part I EDA basic science MCQ's are designed to test factual recall of
relevant basic science knowledge, the Part II basic science vivas are designed to test that the
candidate understands the relevance of basic science knowledge applied to the practice of
anaesthesia and critical care. Thus pharmacology, physiology, anatomy and relevant clinical
measurement and instrumentation will always be tested. Similarly, the Part I EDA clinical MCQ
papers are mainly concerned with testing the candidate's factual clinical knowledge whereas
the Part II clinical vivas are concerned with testing the understanding and application of that
knowledge
The GQ's with which the examiners are supplied list topics to be discussed with indications as
to the detail required. The general format of the exam is as set out below.
MORNING
AFTERNOON
MARKING
At the end of each viva, the examiners compare the mark that each has awarded and judge
whether the candidate has:
been tested in the required minimum number of topics as set by the examination
committee.
12
displayed an adequate knowledge and understanding of the principles and practice of
anaesthesia & critical care.
The standard expected is that of a specialist anaesthesiologist who has completed his/her
training. Examiners are looking as much to the candidate's approach to problems, based upon
experience and understanding, as well as factual knowledge. Although this judgement will
inevitably have a subjective element to it, long experience has shown that examiners, who
come from completely different traditions of anaesthesia, seldom if ever have any difficulty in
agreeing that a candidate has or has not reached the required standard.
Each pair of examiners can award one of three marks, which indicate respectively:
Pass There will be a wide range of excellence in this group and the examiners may indicate
that a candidate is of outstanding merit.
Narrow fail The candidate has not quite reached the required standard in that viva.
Provided the candidate obtains a pass in the other three vivas, he/she will pass the
examination as a whole, otherwise he/she will fail.
Bad fail The candidate has been found so deficient in one or more important subjects
examined in this viva that even if he/she is outstanding in the other three vivas, it is the opinion
of the examiners that he/she requires a period of further study or training, before presenting
themselves for a future examination.
Thus it can be seen that, at the meeting of examiners at the end of the day, in the majority of
cases there need be no further discussion of individual candidates. If however a candidate has
obtained a solitary "bad fail" and has otherwise reached an adequate standard in the other
vivas, the examiners concerned would be asked to justify the mark.
a) Does the candidate have a good foundation of knowledge? Can the candidate apply
that knowledge and understand its relevance to the practice of anaesthesia and intensive
care?
b) How does the candidate approach a problem? Is the approach logical and well thought
out?
c) Have alternative options been explored and understood? Is the candidate dangerous?
The Part ll examination may only be taken after the candidate has completed his/her training
for specialist accreditation in their respective country. A wide general knowledge in
anaesthesia, intensive care and subjects allied to anaesthesia is therefore expected.
13
Background Reading
Which books shall I read? How much detail is required? These are common questions. There
is no simple answer particularly since the EDA is an international exam, and the examiners
and candidates come from different backgrounds. A basis for reading is the standard text
book(s) of anaesthesia favoured in the candidates country. Familiarity with current topics
from international and national journals is also be required. Access to journals may vary in
different departments but the Internet now provides a wealth of new opportunities. In addition,
a recommended reading is also at your disposal.
Physiology
It is obvious that the physiology of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems will be
examined in some detail. A good knowledge of neuro, renal and hepatic physiology as applied
to anaesthesia and intensive care will also be expected. Other areas relevant to anaesthesia
will also be covered but great detail is not expected.
Pharmacology
The principles of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics will be examined in some detail.
An intimate knowledge of the pharmacology and toxicology of drugs used in anaesthesia is
expected as well as many of the drugs in common use in intensive care. An informed
anaesthetist who reads journals must have some understanding of research protocols and the
relevance of statistical methods employed, in order to judge the value of articles.
Applied Anatomy
It is expected that anaesthetists will know the essential anatomy of areas into which they may
insert needles cannulae and endotracheal and endo-bronchial tubes. Applied anatomy of the
heart and lung is also examined.
Clinical Anaesthesia
As candidates will have completed their training to the standard required for specialist
registration they should have experience in all types of anaesthesia and intensive care.
These vivas will include questions on both general, regional and special anaesthetic
techniques as applied to neuro-, cardiac and paediatric surgery, obstetric anaesthesia and the
management of acute and chronic pain.
14
EXAMINATION TECHNIQUE
Sound knowledge and comprehensive training are the main pre-requisites for success in the
Part ll EDA but many candidates do not do themselves justice by having a poor exam
technique.
Clinical scenario
An example of the clinical scenario given in advance to a candidate would be as follows: A 67-
year-old man weighing 100kg, 1.67m in height is scheduled for an elective repair of a 10cm
abdominal aortic aneurysm. He had myocardial infarction 6 months previously and has been a
non-insulin dependent diabetic for over 10 years. Discuss your anaesthetic management of
this case.
The initial discussion on this sort of opening scenario will reveal much about the candidate's
approach to the problem and an awareness of the potential dangers. Remember that the
anaesthetic management starts in the ward!
Definition of problems: Clearly, the primary problem is the presenting aneurysm and its
repair. What will it involve?
Secondly the patient is obese and has, as yet unquantified, cardiovascular problems and
diabetes.
This would lead to a full medical history with emphasis on the above with appropriate
examination and investigation of potential complications. The anaesthetic management would
involve choice of technique, appropriate monitoring, management of complications and post-
operative pain relief.
A candidate who presents a logical well structured answer, explaining the reasons behind the
proposed course of action, is more likely to find that the examiner says very little and does not
have to interject continually. It cannot be emphasised enough that practice in presentation is
essential and candidates should practice this skill with their trainers or fellow trainees. This is
even more important for candidates not using their mother tongue
This topic alone, could take up more than the allotted time and so examiners may suddenly
curtail discussion on a given subject and move on to something else. This is a necessary part
of the examination process and does not indicate displeasure with the answers given.
.
Candidates should appreciate that the intention of the examiners is to enter into a dialogue
with them regarding whatever topic is under discussion. The intention is not simply to find the
candidate's areas of ignorance although, inevitably, these may become apparent - if they
exist. Bearing this in mind, the candidate should try to discuss the topic knowledgeably and
should not be afraid to say when the topic is completely outside his/her experience. The EDA
being an international exam and not a collection of national exams, means inevitably, that a
wide range of views will be held both by the candidates and examiners.
15
It is assumed that candidates have been trained in standard mainstream anaesthetic
techniques. They would be wise therefore to base their answers on methods with which they
are familiar and would be normal in their institution, rather than straying into unfamiliar territory
in the mistaken belief that this might be the answer the examiners require. Examiners will
sometimes query an answer to see whether the candidate is confident in their answer or can
be swayed from their course of action. There will often be no right or wrong answer to a
question and examiners will accept an answer or opinion that is based on sound evidence and
justifies the proposed course of action.
ECG's: Candidates are expected to have a system for reading ECG's and to be able to
describe their system to the examiner as well as recognising major abnormalities of
morphology and of rhythm.
X-Rays: These are mostly radiographs of the thorax. Candidates are expected to have a
systematic and logical approach to reading X-rays and should be able to describe their system
to the examiner. A typical system would be:
Markings: Look at writing on the film: name/age of the patient and projection of the
radiograph.
Film Quality: Penetration, rotation and inspiration (on a chest film)
Review Areas: Lungs, diaphragm, pleura, upper abdomen, heart and mediastinum,
bones of thoracic cage and soft tissues should be checked in turn.
Artifacts: Note the presence of any equipment placed in the chest by anaesthetists
or surgeons!
One common cause for failure in the exam is a haphazard approach to dealing with critical
situations that are posed and not following Advanced Life Support protocols. Airway,
Breathing and Circulation should be the foundation of all resuscitation.
Use of diagrams, graphs and other material to present answers. Pencils and paper are
provided at all times during the Part II vivas. Candidates can use them to advantage in making
presentations and explaining points. A typical scenario given in advance in the applied basic
science exam might be: Discuss the factors that influence carriage of oxygen in the blood. A
diagram of the various oxy-haemoglobin dissociation curves with some relevant values would
create a good impression at the commencement of the exam and help the candidate settle
into a structured answer. In pharmacology, the value of diagrams and graphs in explaining
the principles of pharmacodynamics or pharmacokinetics is obvious .
At present, the possession of the EDA is not a necessary qualification for career progression
in many countries. Nevertheless, the candidate has had the courage to submit him/herself to a
16
comprehensive examination and may have not quite reached the required standard. It must
be understood that the possession of the EDA is only one step in a lifetime of learning and
lack of success in the exam should serve as an encouragement to further study and/or
training. While this may not be readily appreciated by the unsuccessful candidates at the
time, when they subsequently pass the exam, they will readily admit to the benefits of further
study.
Although there are at present no specific courses for the EDA exam, other courses of
preparation for basic science and clinical exams, which are based on vivas will probably be
perfectly appropriate. After all, the content of the EDA is based upon basic science and
clinical practice applied to anaesthesia and intensive care, which does not vary greatly
between different countries in Europe. Comprehensive practical experience of anaesthesia
supported by wide background reading is the best preparation for the exam.
More specifically, practice the presentation and discussion of cases and viva questions
with your tutors, colleagues and mentors.
17