Onstructing OUR Ourse

CONSTRUCTING
YOUR COURSE
Constructing Your Course
Table of Contents
Contents Page No.

Read This First 1
A Road Map to Powerful Ideas in Physical Science 2
The Five Instructional Phases 4
Institutional Barriers 6
Research on Teaching and Learning 8
Assessment and Evaluation 12
List of References for Constructing Your Course 34
Reading List for Powerful Ideas in Physical Science 35
1
Read This First
This material is consistent with the physical science content needs of

preservice elementary teachers, current research in teaching and
learning, and the reform efforts proposed in national reports such as
Science for All Americans: Project 2061, and the preliminary
summaries of the National Science Standards published by the
National Research Council for the National Academy of Sciences.
Powerful Ideas in Physical Science is probably different from anything you've

previously encountered. It's revolutionary because it's a teaching tool in a new
sense. With this six-volume, CD-ROM learning product, you can build a course
using flexible materials that meet and pace your personal and conceptual needs as
well as those of your students. Written by scientists who collaborated under a
National Science Foundation grant, the course consists of six volumes: Light and
Color, Electricity, Heat and Conservation of Energy, Nature of Matter, Force, and
Motion. They are meant to be used either chronologically or in optional sections
Each volume has Instructor Materials, which are embedded with learning
messages to predict and gauge individual and group response for small or large
classroom settings, and Student Materials which can be copied, eliminating the need
for additional textbooks. Purchasers of Powerful Ideas in Physical Science are granted
an annual site license from the American Association of Physics Teachers to
photocopy the Student Materials and associated text for constructing a course
manual for their exclusive use in classes in their institutions. Participants may
subscribe to the Pips-1 List Serv (on the AAPT website http://www.aapt.org) to
contact others using Powerful Ideas.
Each page in the Instructor Notes and Student Investigations/Activities has a
traditional page number in the upper left or right corner. In addition, there is also a
bold-faced number or footer at the bottom middle of each page [example: L2.4(2)],
indicating the topic, investigation and activity, and page of the specific activity.
These footers are designed to help the user to easily determine their location and to
cross-reference each page in the Instructor Notes with the Student Activities.
Through simple, observable activities of everyday phenomena and intellectually
paced investigations, the instructor of pre-service elementary school teachers can
monitor student progress in developing basic physical science concepts and
understanding the nature of the scientific inquiry.
The Instructor Materials encompass the boldfaced Student Materials.

Boldfacing in the instructor section indicates identical instructor-student text.
Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

2
A Road Map to Powerful Ideas in Physical Science
This course model is comprised of six instructional units: Light and Color,
Electricity, Heat and Conservation of Energy, Nature of Matter, Force, and Motion.
These units are packaged within this self-contained instructor's resource manual.
There is no separate student text; rather, student materials are included herein. This
format provides instructors with flexibility in tailoring a course to the unique needs
of the student audience, to existing institutional constraints, and to personal
preferences for content selection and organization. If desired, instructors can design
and produce their own "student text" by judiciously selecting from among the
materials included or referenced in the manual.
In this format the instructor's resource manual becomes a "living document" that
can continue to be improved and expanded as users find ways to enhance the
materials contained in it and as new information about science teaching and
learning becomes available.
Each instructional unit in the manual contains the following components:
Instructor Materials: Introduction (Overview, Acknowledgments, General Safety
Considerations); Student Notions (Students' Prior Beliefs, Conceptions that Students
Should Develop in the Unit); Cognitive Rationale; and Instructor Notes (Equipment
List, List of Student Investigations/Activities, Student Activities with Embedded
Instructor Notes, Focus on Science, Homework, Sample Assessment, List of
References).
Student Materials: Student Activities; Focus on Science; Homework
The course engages students in several different types of activities. Listed below
are the characteristic features of each.
Laboratory Activities
Characteristic Features:
elicit students' prior knowledge
may be guided by instructor or designed (in whole or in part) by students
equipment needed is minimal
space required for equipment is greater than a desk top
substantial part of class period required
powerful idea(s) developed
Interactive Demonstrations/Discussions
elicit students' prior knowledge
generate valuable interaction among students and between students and
instructor in a large group
3
instructor demonstrates some phenomena

powerful idea(s) developed
not feasible to have multiple sets of equipment
Seat Activities
generate valuable interaction among students and between students and
instructor in a large group
low equipment needs per person, thus feasible to distribute multiple sets
space required for equipment is no greater than a desk top
only a few minutes needed
powerful idea(s) developed or applied
Design Activities
multiple-end results
student creativity utilized
interesting devices or demonstrations by students
usually include application of powerful ideas
Homework Assignments
students given extended time to think about and work with powerful ideas
usually include application of powerful ideas to situations not previously
discussed during class sessions
Focus on Science Readings
summarize powerful ideas after they have been developed during class
sessions
apply powerful ideas to everyday situations
make connections between concepts

4
The Five Instructional Phases
Phase 1. Eliciting and Elaborating the Students Ideas

Objective: To enable students to realize and express their own ideas.
Methods: Present an observable example of the phenomenon that eventually can
be manipulated. Ask for a prediction of what would happen if some particular
change is made and write why the prediction seems reasonable.
Personal Introspection Students write, draw, or describe their own personal
predictions and explain why they seem reasonable to them.
Objective: To discover their own raw ideas. Introverts may draw on their own
internal resources, extroverts must stop and think before they blurt out their ideas.
Methods: Ask each person to write, draw, etc.
Clarification and Exchange Students
Objective: To clarify their own ideas by articulating them to others and to
discover alternative ideas. All ideas presented are critically examined.
Methods: Students engage in small-group discussion, some reporting back to the
whole group (with group-developed posters or other "visual aids" as appropriate
to topic); these are followed by large-group discussion. Students should keep
notes on the ideas presented, the reasons for giving them, and what they
personally think of those ideas. Journal entries during and after class are helpful
at this stage.
Phase 2. Testing and Comparing the Ideas with Nature
Objective: To compare the student's beliefs with nature to discover if they make
sense, or to search for new ideas. To find clues as to where to search for new
proposals.
Methods: Small groups test the predictions, observe and record the results, identify
and record matches and differences with predictions, discuss and check new ideas
that arise, and report back to the group with drawings or other visual aids. If a
number of possibilities have previously been proposed, this can be set up as a critical
test of the ideas and students can generate charts to compare how well each checks
out against the actual behavior of the phenomenon. Students should keep notes on the
ideas presented, the reasons given for them, and what they personally think of those
ideas. Some of this is performed as journal entries during and after class.
Phase 3. Resolving the Discrepancies between Ideas
Objective: To generate and test any new or modified ideas about the phenomena
that make sense in the light of discrepancies that occurred between the predictions
and the actual experiments.
2001 American Association of Physics Teachers Constructing Your Course

5
Constructing New or Modified Ideas

Objective: To generate new ideas or modify existing ideas and to explain the
discrepancies.
Methods: The whole group discussion evolves from reports of small groups on
their experimentation results. Discussions must focus on the ideas and not be
addressed to the instructor for validation or approval. Students should keep
notes on the ideas presented, the reasons for giving them, and what they
personally think of those ideas. Some of this may be performed as journal entries
during and after class.
Evaluating New or Modified Ideas
Purpose: To test whether to believe the newly constructed ideas.
Methods: Experimenting and further discussion continue. Students should keep
notes on the ideas presented, the reasons given for them, and what they
personally think of those ideas. Some of this may be performed as journal entries
during and after class.
Repeating the Previous Two Steps Until Ideas Appear to Stabilize
Comparing Ideas with Established Conventions
Objective: To match the newly developed ideas with the approaches and views
that scientists have toward those same ideas.
Methods: Instructor provides additional reading, filmstrips, videos, etc. Students
should keep notes on the ideas presented, the reasons given for them, and what
they personally think of those ideas. Some of this may be performed as journal
entries during and after class.
Phase 4. Applying the Ideas
Objective: To become more familiar and comfortable with the newly developed
ideas through application to familiar and novel situations.
Methods: Instructor assigns personal writing, problem solving, project work, and
continued journal work.
Phase 5. Reviewing and Summarizing of Ideas
Objective: To become aware of changes in ideas and familiarization with the
learning process. To allow the pupils to reflect upon the extent to which their ideas
have changed, why they decide to change them, and the reasons that the new ideas
are plausible.
Methods: Instructor-assigned group discussion, personal writing, review of
personal journals, presentations based on discussion and review of journals.
Presentations could consist of a variety of visual aids and demonstrations.

6
Institutional Barriers
Prior to embarking on the development of Powerful Ideas in Physical Science, a

survey was conducted of deans and department chairs across the country to
determine their receptivity to the proposed course model, to elicit their input into
the design of the model, and to determine the kinds of difficulties that might be
encountered in implementing such a model at their respective institutions.
The more than 100 respondents to the survey were in overwhelming agreement as
to the need for physical science courses which are more appropriate for future
elementary teachers. One respondent, a dean from a large research university, replied
with frank surprise, "Why hasn't the College of Education been banging down the door
demanding that changes be made in science course offerings for future teachers?"
Several respondents shared efforts undertaken by their institutions, both successfully
and unsuccessfully, to provide courses more attuned to the needs of future teachers.
There was general concurrence as to the difficulties which must be overcome before
implementing a course such as Powerful Ideas in Physical Science, although the degrees of
difficulty varied with the nature and size of the institution. These barriers to
implementation are identified and described below.
Offering the kind of course that is most helpful for prospective elementary
teachers requires greater time and effort on the part of the instructor than for most
other courses. It is often difficult to find a faculty member who is willing to devote
this time and effort, particularly at major research universities where many
individuals accept faculty appointments primarily to pursue research. Finding a
willing and capable instructor is also made more difficult by traditional faculty
reward systems which recognize research and other scholarly endeavors, but pay
little heed to teaching effectiveness. Consequently, it is often the "low man on the
totem pole" rather than the best qualified individual who is assigned to teach the
course typically taken by prospective elementary teachers. It is also not uncommon
for this course, or at least the laboratory portion of it, to be taught by graduate
teaching assistants.
Additionally, few science faculty have had formal training in the art of teaching,
or have kept abreast of research-based developments in teaching and learning. Thus,
even if a faculty member is enthusiastic about teaching a course such as Powerful
Ideas in Physical Science, he/she may understandably lack the requisite pedagogical
knowledge and skills. To this end, detailed teacher guidance is supplied in the
instructor's resource manual.
Another common obstacle to implementation is that many institutions employ a
traditional format for all introductory science courses which is comprised of large-
lecture classes and separate, multiple-section laboratory classes. The course
described here is designed for use in a class of 20-30 students seated around tables
with access to running water and electrical outlets. Many departments are unwilling
or unable to adopt this more desirable format because it greatly reduces the

7
student-teacher ratio. Consequently, while Powerful Ideas in Physical Science has been
designed for small-size classes, suggestions are provided within each unit for
adapting the course to a large-lecture format.
Many departments also do not have the kinds of equipment required for a course
such as Powerful Ideas in Physical Science or the money to purchase the requisite
consumable materials. College and university budget cuts have drastically curtailed
equipment expenditures and forced departments to set strict priorities for all
spending. This is not a problem that is easy to overcome; however, most of the
equipment and supplies required for Powerful Ideas in Physical Science are relatively
inexpensive or can easily be found.
Finally, the survey revealed that a number of institutions had actually initiated
efforts to reform the science coursework of prospective elementary teachers, but
many of these efforts were short-lived. There were two primary reasons for failure.
First, many reforms were undertaken through external grants and lasted little
beyond expiration of funding. Second, reforms often hinged on the vision and
efforts of a single individual and failed to continue if that individual resigned,
retired or moved to other projects. Both of these cases indicate that to assure long-
term success, there must be a real commitment on the part of both the school
administration and the department faculty.
Effective use of Powerful Ideas in Physical Science works best in the ideal climate
of a committed and qualified instructor, a supportive department chair, small-class
size, appropriate classroom space, and the necessary equipment and supplies.
Absence of one or more of these elements makes it more difficult, but certainly not
impossible, to implement the course model.
The American Association of Physics Teachers is committed to

providing continued training and support for course users through
AAPT meetings and other mechanisms. For further information on
course training, contact: PSI-PET, AAPT, One Physics Ellipse, College
Park MD 20740-3845. Telephone: (301) 2093300; http://www.aapt.org.

8
Research on Teaching and Learning
Theoretical Base
This project provides excellent opportunity to apply much of what has been
gleaned about student ideas in physical science, student learning processes, and the
physics community's beliefs about teaching and learning to the development of
modules used in physics courses for pre-service elementary teachers. The guiding
principles for the design of modules, the filter questions, and the phases and
methods of approach arise from a wide variety of research efforts that have occurred
since the late 1970s. The project has had the luxury of developing modules and
recommending teaching and learning procedures based on these research findings.
The guiding principles for the design of modules are taken from articles by Scott,
Asoko, and Driver (1991) and Richard F. Gunstone (1991). These principles form the
basis for the character of the modules and the kinds of activities designed for the
students. Each of these principles should be accounted for in some way within each
module.
Guiding Principles
Research in teaching and learning strongly suggests that instruction should be
designed around the following principles:
1. Students come to new learning situations with "prior knowledge"beliefs about
the physical world, about the roles of students and teachers, and about the
nature of science. These ideas influence what students learn. It does not matter
what you "say," learners hear what they believe.
Each of us makes sense of what others say and do based on our own existing
understanding of the world. Since it is known that students' comprehension is
different in significant ways than the physicists', it is entirely possible for
students to construct a profoundly different meaning from what we say and do
than we intend and vice versa. This is why assessment and interaction are so
crucial, for the instructor must monitor student thinking while students
continuously check their notions against each other and those of the instructor.
2. Learning requires organizing ideas, making new connections, and building new
ideas. For learning to occur, a recognized need must arise from the learner and
what prompts that need is dissatisfaction with existing ideas. As long as learners
in classroom experiences can construct meanings consistent with their previously
existing beliefs, they will not change those beliefs. Reorganizing ideas requires
"interactive" instruction strategies that occur in a social context where students
are actively involved in the construction of new ideas and explaining physical
phenomena.

9
If the school can a create a setting conducive to the resolution of these differences
and where students have the opportunity to elicit and confront their own beliefs,
then there is a better chance that a significant change will occur in their
understandings about the world.
3. The learner must first recognize the existence and nature of his or her current
conceptions. The learner next decides whether or not to evaluate the utility and
worth of these conceptions. Finally, a learner chooses whether or not to
reconstruct these conceptions according to new information and group
discussion.
PSI-PET Filter Questions

The PSI-PET developers and field testers applied module filter questions during
the initial writing/testing stage. Many of these filter questions will have been
addressed in the final design of the four modules; some will require daily review
within the teaching and learning setting, and all may be used to judge the results of
instruction at the close of the course.
Filter Questions:
1. Are you providing students with opportunities to examine their prior
knowledge? (Prior Knowledge: The learner's beliefs about the physical
world, about the roles of students and teachers, and about the nature of
science.)
2. Do you have mechanisms to monitor students' ideas and beliefs throughout
the learning process?
3. Are opportunities being provided for students inventing and considering
alternate beliefs about how the world works?
4. Are you giving students opportunities to make connections between the new
ideas and their previous ideas and experiences?
5. Are you insuring that students' ideas are being treated as valuable by each
other as well as the instructor in all cases?
Phases and Methods of Approach in Module Development

The phases and methods originated with Needham and Hill (Needham and Hill
1987) in a report of the Children' s Learning in Science Project at the University of Leeds
and have been modified by the developers of this project. While it is recognized that
not all phases are present in individual activities, the general purposeto enable
students to become aware and flesh our their own ideasis the same.

10
General Methods
The general methods used begin with the presentation of a functioning
example of the phenomenon which eventually can be manipulated. Instructors
ask for a prediction of what would happen if some particular change is made and
for the reasons that explain why the prediction seems reasonable. The purpose
of this approach is to give students time for personal introspection and to
discover their own ideas. Introverts have time to draw on their own internal
resources and extroverts can think before they blurt their ideas. Instructors ask
students to write, draw, etc., what their own personal prediction is and explain
why that prediction seems reasonable to them.
During the clarification and exchange process class members clarify their
own ideas by expressing them to others and discovering alternative ideas. All
the ideas presented are critically examined in a small-group discussion (with
group-developed posters or other visual aids as appropriate to topic) followed
by reporting back to the group as a whole and subsequent large-group
discussion. Students will keep notes on the ideas presented, the reasons given
for them, and write what they personally think of those ideas. Some of this can
be done as journal entries during and after class.
In small groups, students can test their predictions, observe and record the
results, identify and record matches and differences with predictions, discuss
and check new ideas that arise, and report back to the whole group. If a number
of possibilities have been proposed, then this can be investigated as a critical test
of the ideas and students can generate experiments to compare how well each
checks out against the actual behavior of the phenomenon. The activities give
students clues regarding where to search for possible answers that will adjust
their thinking regarding these concepts.
To generate and test new or modified ideas about the phenomena that make
sense in the light of any discrepancies that occur between predictions and actual
experimental results, whole-group discussions based on reports from the small
groups focuses students on the ideas rather than instructor validation or
approval. Students should always keep notes on the ideas presented, the reasons
given for them, and what they personally think of those ideas. Some of this
could be done as journal entries during and after class. The instructor may help
students evaluate these newly constructed ideas but should avoid endorsing a
particular formulation or model until students have developed and articulated a
strong supportive case.
The instructor compares the newly developed ideas with those of scientists
who refer to these same ideas. Students should note the correspondence
between the ideas developed in class and the established scientific conventions
for referring to the same ideas. They will become more comfortable with the
newly developed ideas through application to familiar and novel situations as
well as through personal writing, problem solving, project work, and continued
journal work.
11
An awareness of change in ideas and familiarization with the learning

process allows the pupils to reflect upon the extent to which their ideas have
changed, why they decided to change them, and the reasons that the new ideas
are plausible and acceptable in their view of the world.

12
Assessment and Evaluation
Assessment is gathering information about students' knowledge, skills, abilities,

and attitudes. Assessment may take many forms, for example, tests, problem sets,
essays, term papers, journals, laboratory exercises, demonstrations, projects,
presentations, extended investigations, interviews, concept maps, and portfolios.
Use of computers and other technological tools may be an integral part of producing
and recording the results of assessment activities. Evaluation is making judgments
based on the information gathered. Assessment and evaluation are pivotal elements
of teaching.
If teaching is viewed as synonymous with lecturing, then assessment and
evaluation are seen as intrusive, taking away time from teaching. However, when
teaching involves facilitating learner-centered activities, then teaching, assessment,
and evaluation all blend together and enhance each other. All three are part of
interesting and challenging activities related to important themes in the curriculum.
Assessment and evaluation should be conducted before, during, and after each
instructional unit.
Not only teachers, but also students should be engaged in assessment and
evaluation because acquiring the requisite abilities and habits are a critical part of
becoming a life-long learner. By having students participate in assessment and
evaluation, a teacher can focus on the more substantive aspects of these tasks rather
than be overly concerned with record keeping and simplistic inferences. Students
can help construct tests for the class, can provide feedback to peers, and can respond
on self-assessment sheets.
If evaluations are to be more than opinions, they must be grounded by valid and
reliable assessment tools. Performance assessment measures (which elicit from
students the behaviors targeted in curriculum goals) should be used more than
objective tests (which elicit from students the behavior of choosing the correct
response to multiple choice, true-false, and matching questions). To reduce rewards
for memorization and routine skills and to increase rewards for critical thinking and
complex problem solving, students should have access to books, calculators, and
other sources of information during test taking and other assessment activities.
Assessment should be as authentic as possible (given in complex and realistic
rather than fragmented and contrived contexts). Authenticity needs to be
considered for many facets of assessment including task difficulty, stimuli,
spontaneity, and consequences. In authentic assessment, some locus of control rests
with the student being assessed. Scoring criteria should be related to behaviors
essential to success, not to behaviors easily counted or observed. Some assessment
measures that allow for multiple correct responses or products should be used so
students do not acquire the misconception that science questions, debates, and
controversies always have one right answer. Not all assessment should be done on
an individual basis; instead some assessment should be done for cooperative
learning groups of students.
13
Behaviors assessed should be a representative sample of all the goal behaviors.

Any ability consistently slighted during assessment is regarded as unimportant by
students. Assessment should draw on the strengths of a range of learning styles.
Evaluation should be fair to all groups of students, with no biases due to
characteristics like gender or race.
A teacher's assessment and evaluation should be reported to his/her students in a
clear and meaningful way. Criterion-referenced assessment instruments are better
than norm-referenced ones for providing feedback. Labeling students with letter
grades is not sufficient. Students should acquire a detailed picture of what they do
know, rather than being overwhelmed by a summary of what they do not know.
Through activities designed for assessment and through judgment of their results, a
teacher should help students direct their energies productively. The end result of good
assessment and evaluation should be an increase in students' motivation to learn.
Journals
A journal is a collection of student writings bound together to record the
student's ideas over a period of time. The selections need not be long. Even one-half
page is sufficient. However, writings should be produced on a regular schedule, for
example, every class period or once a week. Each passage should be dated. Length
and content requirements may be made by the instructor. Criteria for journal
passages should be made explicit to students. It is inadvisable to use a complex
scoring rubric for journals because that would focus students' attention on pleasing
the instructor rather than on recording their own thoughts. The same amount of
credit may be given for each acceptable passage, without further delineation of
merit. Rewarding effort and commitment is more important in journal writing than
rewarding recall of facts.
Ideally, the instructor will respond to each student's comments each time a
passage is written. That might simply be a few words of praise or caution next to
the relevant section in a student's journal. It might be a note to see the instructor for
extra help. It might be a paragraph explaining a concept discussed in class. If short
of time, the instructor could read a random sample of journals each day, making
sure all students' journals are read at reasonable intervals. A limitation of this
sampling method is that it does not allow the journals to be used as a record of
attendance.
If the journals are a record of attendance, the instructor should keep all journals
between class sessions. The instructor should make a note in a student's journal
whenever that student is absent to prevent the student from adding an entry later to
get credit for that day. Time saved by not taking attendance offsets the time
required for journal writing.
As an alternative approach, what is written may be owned by the student with
certain passages chosen for sharing with the instructor. For this approach, students
may write in class or at home. Whatever approach is used, procedures need to be
clear to all students before any journal writing is done.

14
At times, the instructor may ask students to discuss their ideas in pairs or small
groups before or after writing those ideas in their journals. Another possibility is for
the instructor to summarize the journal responses during a subsequent class session.
One effective method is to devote the last few minutes of each class period (with
the exception of test days) for journal writing. In large classes, efficiency in passing
out and collecting journals is necessary. Keeping the journals in order of assigned
seats works fine. Students may return them by placing them on the last seat in their
assigned row. The advantage of using the end of the class period for journals is that
students who want to write longer selections can stay a few minutes after class.
Otherwise, these students would keep their peers sitting idle until everyone was
finished writing.
A prime advantage of journals is that the instructor can get responses from
every student during every class period. This advantage is even more important in
large sections than in small sections because so few students will speak out in a large
group. Although students may be hesitant to write much at the beginning of the
course, they will write more substantive passages later on. Students will write in
journals ideas they would never say aloud in class or even tell the instructor face-to-
face. The chance to express their thoughts develops the interest students have in the
course and makes them more open to new knowledge and skills.
The instructor must keep confidential whatever students have shared in writing.
Instructor's comments should be specific and honest. In addition, the instructor,
recognizing students' sensitivities, should not make hurtful remarks. Anxious
students should be given reassurance and encouragement as part of the instructor's
comments to them. Students for whom English is a second language should not be
berated for writing less fluently than others. Sexist and racist remarks are to be
avoided conscientiously. Students need both positive and negative comments, but
the balance should favor the positive ones. This will increase students' motivation to
participate and to learn.
Instructors need to build students' trust. No one should be penalized through
grading or humiliated for expressing ideas in the initial stages of learning about a
topic. Students should not get upset with themselves for writing down thoughts
they later want to change. Learning must be viewed developmentally and not seen as a
task completed.
In their journals, relating present knowledge to prior understanding is to be
encouraged as evidence of growth. Also, students may record successes in learning,
ask questions about material not mastered, request an appointment to get help
outside of class, give preferences for topics, comment on classroom interactions, and
evaluate classroom activities. Students should periodically make affective
responses, such as expressing their frustrations and satisfactions with studying
physical science.
The instructor may ask for a general summary of what was learned that day or
may ask for a more focused response. An example of the first type of request is

15
"Outline what you learned today." An example of the second type is "Describe a
situation with a pair of action and reaction forces." Students may be asked to give
predictions about natural phenomena, too. Another type of prompt is "Watch this
demonstration. What do you observe? What inferences can you make about what
you see?" Recommend to students that they may include drawings and diagrams.
A quotation may be displayed with the instructions to agree or disagree with it.
Instructors may ask self-assessment questions, also, like "How well prepared do you
feel for the exam day after tomorrow?" or "Of the concepts which we have learned
lately, which are you most confident about?" or "For which concept is your
understanding the weakest?" Students may be asked to select their favorite activity
in a unit and explain why they liked it, or they may be asked to select the most
important idea presented in a unit.
Requiring students to put their thoughts in writing makes apparent any gaps in their
thinking. By reading students' journals, the instructor can detect misconceptions and
naive ideas that are held by the students. (Without this kind of feedback, it is
difficult for the instructor to imagine what is in the minds of students.) Based on
their expressed beliefs and understandings, class activities may be structured to help
students move toward more scientifically acceptable ideas. Journals used in this
manner are very good formative evaluation tools to improve courses.
Besides being valuable for assessment, journal writing is a powerful catalyst for
thinking. Journals can give students practice with both inductive and deductive
thinking. Writing does help clarify and organize one's thinking. Writing can even
create ideas that did not exist before the writing began. Also, journals give students
opportunities to apply concepts to practical, everyday situations. Journal writing
improves ability to use scientific words appropriately, focuses attention on the most
important concepts, and improves recall of generalizations.
Writing is learned by writing, so providing opportunities to write is worthwhile
even if instruction in writing is not given. Journal writing can be a useful rehearsal
that improves performance on essay exams. Because articulation is an asset in
nearly all occupations and other activities, journal writing is also valued for long-
term growth.
Journal entries are tangible records of once amorphous concepts. In this way,
journals aid understanding, preserve insight, and bring order to confusion. Students
are empowered when they perceive how much they know and what they need to
learn.
Sample Journal Prompts
What previous science courses have you taken? What did you like about them?
What did you dislike about them?
What science topics are you confident that you understand?
Summarize what you learned today.

16
The large (completely filled) helium balloon that you saw in class today floated
in air. Why doesn't the small (partially filled) helium balloon that you saw in
class today also float in air?
Explain what density is in as many ways as you can.
Why does a ship float?
What happens when water boils?
Are temperature and heat the same thing? If not, how are they different?
Why do the metal parts of a bicycle's handles feel colder than the plastic grips
after the bicycle has been outside during a chilly night?
Would you rather have a drink cooled with ice or with ice-cold water? Why?
Will you be burned more from water vapor at 100! C or from water at 100! C?
Why?
How are the images formed by using a pinhole and a converging lens alike?
How are they different?
Where is the image formed by a plane mirror? What evidence do you have to
support your answer?
Draw a diagram showing how light bends as it goes through a prism.
What is the difference between a real and a virtual image?
How does a flashlight work?
Draw diagrams showing the ways you tried today to connect a light bulb to a
battery. Explain why each circuit did or did not cause the bulb to light.
Will a battery run down sooner if it has more or fewer light bulbs connected to it
in series? Why? Will a battery run down sooner if it has more or fewer light
bulbs connected to it in parallel? Why?
Are static electricity and current electricity the same thing? If not, how are they
different?
How well prepared do you feel for the exam being given during the next class
period?
What is the most important thing you learned in this unit?
What did you like most about this course? What did you like least about this
course?
Concept Maps
One of the goals of assessment is to gain insight into students' understanding of
conceptual linkages. Concept maps, as first developed by D. Bob Gowin and Joseph
D. Novak, are diagrams indicating perceived hierarchical relationships among
concepts in an activity, an investigation, or a unit.

17
Each student should draw his/her own concept maps, rather than being
provided with maps prepared by the instructor. An exception to this rule may be
made when an instructor shows an example of how a concept map is constructed
before suggesting or requiring that students construct maps on other topics. The
instructor may give one word or several related words to start students on an
assigned concept map. Minimum competency is shown by using all the words
supplied by the instructor with all the obvious connections written by the student.
More understanding is shown by a student who adds appropriate words and forms
creative connections in his/her concept map.
There is no one right way to draw a concept map for a particular topic. Concept
maps reveal the propositions (two or more words used to represent concepts along
with words connecting these concepts) held by students. Concept maps allow
teachers and learners to recognize that some linkages may be inappropriate or
missing, a situation that suggests the need for more learning. Creating one's own
schema facilitates conceptual change.
Because the preconceptions held by any naive learner are complex, it is
impossible to fully assess a learner's initial levels of understanding. However,
concept maps (used in conjunction with other methods like interviews) can be useful
in this difficult task. Concept maps can also show growth in understanding as a
student progresses through investigations.
Sample Topics for Concept Maps
Light Reflection Refraction Image Heat Temperature Energy
Change of State Characteristic Properties of Matter Density Viscosity
Chemical Change Electrical Circuit Static Electricity Current Electricity
Electrical Resistance

18
Interviews
An interview is a structured conversation between the interviewer and one or
more students for the purpose of establishing what the students think. A record of
an interview is made with written notes, audio tape, or videotape.
An instructor should not interview students he or she is responsible for
teaching. Instead, students in a colleague's class should be interviewed to discern
patterns in students' thinking about the planned instruction topics for which
instruction is being planned. If interviews are needed during a course for diagnostic
purposes, the instructor should ask a colleague to conduct the interviews so that the
instructor avoids trying to fill two incompatible roles. While teaching, the instructor
guides students toward commonly accepted scientific views.
Results from previous research studies may be used to make hypotheses, before
and during interviews, about what students think. However, caution must be used
whenever students' responses are made to fit into a preconceived framework.
Scoring or making any other judgment about students' responses is usually not done.
A planned sequence of questions should be used with impromptu follow-up
questions inserted as the situation warrants because of inconsistencies or obscure
points in the students' thinking. A variety of questions should be used; for example,
those that ask for predictions, descriptions, or explanations. A balance of closed and
open questions most quickly puts students at ease. Simple and difficult questions

19
should be alternated to keep students talking. Questions should not allow students
simply to agree with the interviewer, but should elicit richer answers. Questions
should not (by design or inadvertently) lead students to the correct responses.
During an interview, students may be asked to draw pictures, diagrams, graphs,
or concept maps. They may also be asked to classify pictures. Three-dimensional
models or other hands-on materials may be provided for students' use. No matter
what the task, students should explain their reasoning orally. Drawing, pointing,
and manipulating objects all supplement and complement (but do not replace)
verbal responses.
The interviewer needs to develop and maintain the students' confidence by
being friendly and relaxed. Students should be told that their perspective is
important to the interviewer. Waiting time must be generous enough (20 to 30
seconds long) to encourage thoughtful responses. However, embarrassing silences
should be avoided. The interviewer should rephrase a question when a student is
hesitant to answer. Yet, even the most skillful interviewing cannot make an
articulate student out of a taciturn one. A student's right to refuse to answer must
be respected with patience, empathy, and kindness.
Understanding is needed, also, when students express doubt about their own
statements. Students should be given ample opportunities to justify, explain, and
elaborate upon their previous answers. Interrupting a student is never appropriate.
Mastery of a generalization may be checked by asking the students to apply it to
several common situations.
The interviewer must listen carefully, pondering the students' responses and
formulating follow-up questions to clarify points not made clear initially by the
students. Students' terminology, rather than formal scientific terminology, should
be used in follow-up questions. A student's response may be repeated exactly by
the interviewer if necessary to confirm what was said, but a response should not be
interpreted and rephrased. The interviewer should explore with sensitivity any
unanticipated response and any possible misinterpretations of questions asked. If
the interviewer doubts the stability or authenticity of an answer, the question that
elicited that answer should be asked again later in the interview with some minor
changes. As the interview progresses, the interviewer needs to remember all
responses made in order to spot contradictions. Questions should be asked to lead
students toward an awareness of their own inconsistencies and to give them a
chance to sort out what they really believe about natural phenomena.
The interviewer should refrain from teaching during the interview. Any
instructional interventions needed should occur in a different setting on a later day.
During an interview, feedback to the students should be kept to a minimum so as
not to cue responses to acceptable scientific thinking. The interviewer should
monitor carefully his or her own body language, facial expressions, tone of voice,
and oral statements that might indicate students' answers are correct or incorrect.

20
The strength of interviews is that they can provide a detailed assessment of a

student's thinking and also can measure a student's confidence in his or her own
ideas. Interviewers can distinguish between parroting of information and
responding with deep meaning. Interviewers can determine whether a student
lacks understanding of a concept or whether a student understands the concept but
has labeled it with nonstandard terminology. Interviewers can ascertain if a student
holds isolated ideas or if a student has made complex connections between ideas.
Interviews are very useful in formative evaluation to decide upon instructional
activities. Interviews may be used, also, to diagnose a particular student's
difficulties in learning physical science. Although interviews are time consuming
for the interviewer, the amount of information gathered justifies their use.
Sample Interview Questions
How can you arrange this light bulb, battery, and wire so that the bulb glows?
Why do the bulbs burn less brightly when more bulbs are added to this circuit in
series?
If you could invent a microscope to magnify this block of wood more than is now
possible, what would you see looking through your invention?
In what ways could you classify these household chemicals?
Why can you see an image of yourself in a mirror?
How does a magnifying glass work?
Why does the house get colder if someone leaves the front door open on a brisk
autumn day?
If two objects are at the same temperature, do they have the same amount of heat
to give off to their surroundings?
Written Explanations
Writing explanations on appropriate topics is an excellent way for students to
clarify, organize, and make connections between science concepts. Through this
process, students practice applying to situations not previously discussed in class
the models and powerful ideas developed throughout the units. Thus students
recognize the fruitfulness of these models and powerful ideas.
The text of written explanations generally will not be longer than three typed
pages. Explanations should be logically organized. Main ideas should be clearly
identified, and useful diagrams should be carefully drawn. No inappropriate
information should be included. Well-written explanations will be relatively easy to
understand when compared to disorganized, vague, or inconsistent explanations.
Before beginning work on an assigned explanation, students should know the
criteria that will be used to evaluate their work.
Samples may be provided to students to give them detailed guidance
concerning what constitutes a fine explanation. If a sample is on a topic not

21
assigned during the course, the sample may be discussed in class prior to the
students completing any explanations. After an instructor collects students'
explanations on a particular topic, he/she may distribute a sample on that topic.
Explanations may be evaluated on writing mechanics, neatness, creativity, style,
and substance. The amount of substance (correct details, ideas, models, and logic
incorporated into both text and diagrams) should determine more than half of the
score or letter grade. A rubric may be written for assigning points based on whether
criteria are fully met, mostly met, slightly met, or not met at all. The most common
practice is evaluation by the instructor, but a peer review system increases the
number of opportunities students have to think about the material studied, to
evaluate written work, and to enhance group decision-making skills.
One method includes forming committees of three students and making each
committee responsible for the evaluation of three other students' anonymous papers
(labeled with a student identification number assigned for that course). Students
turn in three copies of their explanations, and those are distributed to committees.
Each student is then responsible for reading the three explanations given to
him/her, preparing to discuss these explanations, and filling out preliminary
evaluation forms. Each student may be designated a chief evaluator for one other
student's explanation.
During a subsequent class period, each committee meets for approximately one-
half hour to discuss and score the three explanations distributed to that committee.
Each member provides the group's scores and writes comments on a summary
evaluation form for one of the authors read by that committee. Later, every student
in the class receives his/her own explanation with summary comments and scores
attached.
Each student may be required to make a response to the completed summary
evaluation form concerning his/her own work. Students should decide if scoring on
the form was fair and was justified by specific constructive comments. Additional
points for quality summary evaluation forms may be given to chief evaluators or
groups. With good reasons, any student may appeal to the instructor for a review of
committee work concerning that student's written explanation.
Sample Written Explanation Tasks

A person starts an experiment with a water bath at a temperature elevated
above the temperature of the room. Into the water bath is inserted a test tube
containing another substance in the molten state at the same temperature as the
water bath. Because the water bath is in contact with the surrounding air, its
temperature decreases as time goes on. Ten minutes after inserting the test tube into
the water bath, the substance in the test tube begins to freeze. Twenty minutes later,
the substance is completely solidified. At this time, a burner is placed under the
water bath to heat the water (which is not frozen). Draw a temperature versus time
graph showing curves for both the water and the other substance. Extend the time
22
to 90 minutes. Also, describe in words the variations in the temperatures of the

water and the other substance. Explain what causes these temperature variations.
A boat sails from saltwater into freshwater. Will the boat float lower, higher, or
at the same level in the fresh water as compared to the saltwater? Explain your
answer, using both macroscopic and microscopic concepts. Sketch the boat in
saltwater and in freshwater. Make diagrams showing particles of saltwater and of
freshwater.
A sharp image from a concave curved mirror is formed on a screen located at a
smaller distance from the mirror compared to the distance the object is from the
mirror. Draw a diagram that shows the arrangement of the object, the mirror, and
the image. Explain how the image is formed using powerful ideas from the unit
about light.
A circuit is formed by two bulbs (labeled A and B) in series with each other and
two more bulbs (labeled C and D) in series with each other. The two pairs of bulbs
are wired in parallel with a set of three dry cells. Draw a diagram of this circuit
using standard symbols. Bulbs A, B, and C are identical, but Bulb D has more
resistance than the other three bulbs. Describe how the electric current is distributed
around the circuit. Represent the electric current on your diagram with arrows
whose length is proportional to the amount of current and whose direction matches
the direction of current. Place an arrow beside each bulb. Also place an arrow
beside each wire attached to the set of dry cells. How do Bulbs A and B compare in
brightness? How do Bulbs A and C compare in brightness? How do Bulbs C and D
compare in brightness? Explain these similarities and differences in brightness.
Questions
Assessment, whether in conventional or alternative forms, should give evidence
of students' notions about phenomena studied and should provide insight into
students' logic for analyzing the world around them. Distracters for multiple-choice
questions should offer choices that fit frameworks often used by naive students. The
answer that is counted as correct should make sense only in the context of
scientifically acceptable frameworks. Likewise, free response and other types of
questions should detect whether students are holding onto old ideas or moving
toward the powerful ideas presented in the units studied. Questions constructed in
this manner may be used for diagnostic purposes as well as for formative and
summative evaluation.
Questions should ask about concepts discussed or skills developed in the units
studied. Higher-order thinking should be required rather than memorization.
Open book and/or open notes during testing are one method to eliminate the need
for memorization. The best questions not only elicit correct answers, but also elicit
reasoning for students to arrive at their own answers.
Open-ended questions have several avenues of access and more than one correct
answer. They are excellent for generating higher-level thinking. Simply allowing
students to supply answers, rather than identify answers, does not make questions
23
open-ended. If nearly identical answers are the only ones counted correct, then the
question is free-response (also called open-response), but not open-ended. The
practical, demonstration, and free-response word problems discussed below may be
open-ended.
When an instructor gives certain numbers of points for various aspects of a
student's answer, the instructor is using analytical scoring techniques. This method
provides specific feedback for students. Besides that, analytical scoring has more
reliability than holistic scoring. However, for many open-ended questions, holistic
scoring is less time-consuming and more fair. Often the total answer is more than
the sum of its parts, and, therefore, the answer should be judged accordingly.
Model answers can be given to students to offset the lack of feedback in holistic
scoring.
For either holistic or analytical scoring, a rubric should be written. Rubrics are
descriptions of standards or criteria. Usually points are associated with gradations
of each standard or criteria. A rubric may be written before evaluating any
responses or after looking at a representative sample. Reading all students'
responses to a particular question as a set (rather than reading each student's test
straight though) can improve the reliability. This procedure can increase the pace of
grading in addition to improving the quality of grading. Another helpful technique
is to randomly rearrange the order of students' tests before going on to reading the
next question in order to minimize the effect of one student's grade on the next
student's. In particular, an instructor should be cognizant of the tendency for an
excellent answer to make the next answer seem worse than it normally would.
Questions may take many forms, each with its own set of advantages and
disadvantages. Over reliance on one type of question should be avoided. Judicious
use of several types can give more information about the knowledge and reasoning
of various types of learners.
Practical laboratory questions ask students to perform for assessment purposes
the manipulation of physical objects (the same as or similar to those already used
during class sessions). In addition, the instructor may expect students to apply
processes and concepts to new situations. In that case, the instructor may want to
provide more apparatus than is necessary to answer the question. That method tests
whether or not students can choose appropriate apparatus. Allowing students to
request additional supplies and apparatus increases their creativity. Making
diagrams and drawings should be encouraged. The instructor may want students to
work together or alone for this hands-on work. Sometimes, these exercises are
called performance assessment. Scoring can give points for extent of science
knowledge, sophistication of laboratory procedure, and ratio of systematic to
random problem-solving approaches.
Demonstration questions are another effective way to learn if students can apply
concepts. Demonstrations used during tests should be based on the same concepts
that students developed during class work. An instructor should seldom speak
during a demonstration performed as part of a test. Upon a student's request, the
24
demonstrations should be repeated to ensure that everyone has an adequate chance

to see the phenomena. Students should be instructed to write down both
observations and inferences. As with practical questions, making diagrams and
drawings should be encouraged. Detailed observations with few inferences should
correspond to a passing grade. More numerous and complex inferences should earn
students higher grades. Demonstration questions are valuable for testing ability to
communicate concepts and their interconnections.
Answering free-response word problems may be practiced with patterns
already learned by applying concepts to new situations, or extending the
construction of familiar concepts. Word problems may require some mathematical
calculations and/or graphs. Usually students should be allowed to use calculators
or computers for performing calculations and drawing graphs. As with practical
and demonstration questions, making diagrams and drawings should be
encouraged. Extraneous information should be included in some word problems to
test students' abilities to discriminate useful from unuseful information. Data-poor
problems should be used, but students need to be told to consider stating
assumptions before proceeding to solve the problem. Some students may not have
previously seen problems for which students are required to supply reasonable
values for some quantities.
Completion questions should be written so that only one important word or
phrase completes the sentence given. Deletions should be limited to the central
thought of the sentence and should be placed near the end of the sentence. Even
when sentences in the reading material assigned to students are paraphrased, lower-
level thinking is all that is required to answer most completion questions.
A multiple-choice question consists of a stem in the form of a question or an
incomplete sentence followed by several choices, one of which is correct. The other
choices are called distracters or foils or decoys. All the choices should be
grammatically correct and logically consistent when combined with the stem. For
any question, they should be similar in length, parallel in construction, and equally
precise in expression. Keyed responses (the correct choices) should be equally
frequent at all response positions. If possible, a logical sequence should be followed
in placement of the choices for a particular stem. One example of this is placing
numerical choices in ascending order. For any multiple-choice question, the choices
must be mutually exclusive and unambiguous. Avoid using "more than one of the
above," "all of the above," and "none of the above" as choices for answers.
Distracters should contain commonly believed misinformation or widely used
erroneous conclusions. Although the distracters must appear plausible to a student
with a vague or incomplete understanding of the topic studied, those same
distracters must appear obviously wrong to a student with an adequate
comprehension of that topic. After a question has been used in a course, the
instructor can tally the number of students choosing each option. Distracters chosen
by few or no students should be subsequently replaced. The difficulty of a question
can be increased by making the choices more numerically or semantically similar.

25
Multiple-choice questions can be improved by requesting that students give the

reasons for their choices. The knowledge of a fact, application of a principle,
solution of a problem, and interpretation of a situation can all be tested with
multiple-choice questions.
Because true-false items must be judged unequivocally, they tend to test trivia.
Sometimes students are required to correct any statement he/she marks false. This
method does not increase the amount of knowledge tested because students may
simply insert the word "not" into each false statement. Another limitation for true-
false items is that guessing can result in a high proportion of correct answers. Scores
may be calculated as the number of correct responses minus the number of incorrect
responses, but this formula does not totally eliminate the effects of guessing. If true-
false questions are used, a disproportionate number of either true or false statements
should be avoided. Quantitative expressions should be used instead of qualitative
expressions like "few," "large," and "cold." Do not use double negatives either.
Compound sentences that are partly true and partly false are not appropriate true-
false items. For complex sentences, the main clause should be true so that the
subordinate clause determines the truth or falsity of the entire sentence.
Sample Questions
What is the volume of the larger piece of wood? (Provide students with a
graduated cylinder, a balance, a ruler, a beaker of water, and graph paper. Also
provide two pieces of wood of the same type. The first piece of wood should be
regularly shapedso its volume can be calculated by a formulaand small enough
to fit into the graduated cylinder. The second piece of wood should be irregularly
shaped and too large to fit into the graduated cylinder.)
Take a culture tube full of water. Hold it over an index card so that the culture
tube covers the writing "CHOICE MATERIALS BOOK." Slowly raise the test tube
approximately six inches, keeping the culture tube itself horizontal. Repeat using
the card with the writing "CHECK OUT THE CODE." What do you observe? Using
powerful ideas from this unit, what can you infer about the phenomena you saw?
(Words with all letters symmetrical about an axis through the middle of the line of
writing are written in one color. Other words are written in another color.)
What do you observe as your instructor performs today's demonstration? Using
powerful ideas from the units just studied, what can you infer about the phenomena
you saw? (Using four identical bottles with flat rims, fill two with hot water colored
yellow and two with cold water colored blue. Invert one bottle with hot water over
one bottle with cold water. Then invert the other bottle with cold water over the
other bottle with hot water. Place a piece of plastic like a credit card over the mouth
of the bottle before inverting it to minimize spills. When the bottles are properly
aligned, remove the piece of plastic.)
What do you observe as your instructor performs today's demonstration? Using
powerful ideas from the units just studied, what can you infer about the phenomena
you saw? (Put a stopper into one end of a piece of glass tubing about 120 cm long

26
with an outside diameter of about 1 cm. Fill the tube approximately half-full of
blue-colored water. Being careful not to invert the tube, nearly fill the rest of it with
alcohol colored red. Proceed slowly and carefully so that the water and alcohol do
not mix. Put another stopper in the top end. Mark the upper level of the alcohol
with a glass marker or tape on the glass tubing. During the examination period,
invert the tubing several times. Allow students to notice the height of the liquids in
the tubing each time you invert the tubing and return it to its original orientation.)
How much heat is given off when 15 grams of water cools from 90!C to 50!C?
What is "used up" when a dry cell no longer works to produce electricity?
What is the equilibrium temperature after 45 mL of water at 65!C is mixed with
30 mL of water at 20!C? Include a temperature/volume diagram with your answer.
Assume that no heat is lost or gained from the surroundings of this water mixture.
How could you distinguish between unlabeled identical pint cartons of milk and
cream without breaking the seals?
Draw a detailed sketch showing a piece of cardboard, a light bulb (with a single
vertical filament), and a screen set up so the shadow of the cardboard appears on the
screen. Show on your sketch how you would move only the cardboard to increase
the size of the shadow. Can you increase the size of the shadow by moving only the
light bulb? Why or why not?
Three U.S. coins minted with the dates of 1873 through 1964 were 90% silver
and 10% copper. They were the half-dollar (mass of 12.500 g), the quarter (mass of
6.250 g), and the dime (mass of 2.500 g). On the basis of this information, how much
mass do you think a silver dollar had then? These three coins with 1965 or later
dates are made of a 19% to 21% silver core and two 80% silver outer layers, and all
three have slightly less mass than the equivalent coins dated prior to 1965. Five-cent
pieces and one-cent pieces were not changed by the Coinage Act of 1965. Nickels
are made of 75% copper and 25% nickel; pennies are made of 95% copper and 5%
zinc. What additional information would you need to calculate the mass of a nickel?
How would you do this calculation? (Its mass is 5 g.)
On the left side of your paper, draw a detailed sketch of an arrangement of one
wire, one bulb, and one dry cell that will allow the bulb to light. Label all objects.
On the right side of your paper, draw a circuit diagram for the same situation. Use
appropriate standard symbols. Why will your circuit allow the bulb to light?
What word completes correctly the following sentence? If resistance is constant,
current would increase when there is an increase in ____________.
What words complete correctly the following sentence? The 80 calories
required to change one gram of ice into one gram of water is called the
________________________ of ____________.
Where must a person be to observe a partial solar eclipse?
a) only in the umbra

27
b) only in the penumbra

c) only in the region of no shadow
d) in either the umbra or the penumbra
If a person is standing waist-deep in a swimming pool, what will be the

appearance of that person's legs to another person standing on the grass next to the
pool?
a) shorter than the actual legs
b) the same length as the actual legs
c) a few inches longer than the actual legs
d) more than a foot longer than the actual legs
Is the following sentence true or false? There is more current in the wire going
into a toaster than in the wire going out of that toaster.
Is the following sentence true or false? A life jacket helps a person float because
the life jacket makes him/her weigh less.
Portfolios
A portfolio is a collection of student work that records the student's efforts,
progress, plans, insight, and achievement. A student should participate in the
selection and organization of documents for the portfolio, following guidelines
stated by the instructor (for example, particular categories of evidence required).
Portfolios are rich in detail about a student's learning. What is seen as important
learning is more encompassing in portfolios than in narrow forms of assessment
such as objective tests. Therefore, assessment with portfolios is appropriate for all
types of learners.
Instructors find portfolios useful in formative evaluation of the courses they
teach and can help both instructors and students identify and meet instructional
goals. Before they begin to assemble their portfolios, students should know the
criteria that will be used to judge the merit of their efforts. Criteria may address the
following aspects of portfolios:
the amount of evidence included

the level of organization used
the quality of the pieces selected
the variety in the learning substantiated
the amount of growth in knowledge documented
the connections between topics made
the increase in skills established
the changes in attitudes displayed
the creativity in compiling shown, and,
the depth of the reflection statements written

28
Holistic scoring is recommended for portfolios. Rubrics for scoring will vary
according to the instructional goals for the course. Obviously, the scoring must be
consistent and unbiased.
Portfolios may begin with a goal statement written by the instructor, whole
class, or individual students. Each document put into a portfolio should be labeled
with the date it was produced. For group work, all members of the group should be
listed on the document. If it is not obvious what the document is, a caption should
be provided.
An essential element of portfolios are the reflections written by students. Each
document included in a portfolio should be accompanied by a statement giving the
reasons for the selection of this document. Students should reflect upon how they
produced a document and what knowledge and skills they developed while
producing it. They should comment on salient characteristics of the document,
aspects that changed as they produced the document, and things they would still
like to modify in the document. Students may suggest logical extensions of the
work they did to produce the document, possibly with a timeline for accomplishing
that supplemental work.
In addition, students need to state what they learned about learning as they
produced the document. They should give an appraisal of their own strengths as
learners. Also, they need to articulate any changes in their own attitudes that
occurred during the learning. Metacognitive and affective awareness regarding
both process and product are important. Instructors may want to give students
examples of good reflection statements to help students write their own. Reflection
statements should be specific, thorough, accurate, and thoughtful. Support of ideas
stated should be made by referring to evidence in the portfolio.
Selecting documents and writing reflection statements are valuable instruction
activities besides being assessment activities. Students practice higher-order
thinking like analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Self-assessment is a valuable skill
throughout one's lifetime.
A prime advantage of portfolios is that they give the students responsibility for
their own learning. Portfolios motivate and empower students by making them
aware of how much they have accomplished. Portfolios assist students in
identifying for themselves which practices improve performance.
Evidence in portfolios may be classified into four categories. Artifacts are
samples of usual work such as laboratory reports. Reproductions, like a list of books
read, capture situations that are not permanent. Attestations are commendations by
someone other than the student compiling the portfolio and include, letters of
gratitude, prizes, and acknowledgments of individual effort in group activities.
Productions, including the reflection statements, are prepared especially for the
portfolio.
Inserting between five and seven documents into a portfolio usually provides
enough evidence for the instructor to feel confident in making a judgment about
29
how well a student has met the goals of the course. A student who chooses too
many documents for inclusion into a portfolio does not show ability to discriminate.
Students should ask themselves, "What additional knowledge, skill, or attitude will I
have evidence of by including this piece into my portfolio?" If they cannot supply a
concrete answer to this question, then they should omit the document.
Portfolios may be organized in a number of ways. Documents may be put in
chronological order. They may be grouped by content themes. Learning goals may
be the organizational schema. Another option is to order documents from strongest
evidence of learning to weakest evidence or vice versa.
Portfolios may vary in their focus, also. Some are a record of best work, some
are a record of a project from beginning to end, some are a record of work in
progress, and some are a record of personal favorites. Whatever its focus, a
portfolio should portray the student's learning as an adventure that highlights the
student's successes along the way and should help the student prioritize his or her
efforts on the path ahead.
Sample Items to Include in Portfolios
Charts and graphs
data gathered from hands-on activities
data gathered from survey questionnaires
data taken from published sources
data taken from computer documents
Drawings
observations of natural phenomena
diagrams used for solving problems
two-dimensional models
enrichment activities
Photographs
three-dimensional models
bulletin boards
cooperative learning activities
Audio tapes/videotapes
oral presentations
skill contests
project tasks
songs
Written work
homework assignments
classroom notes
outlines of textbook chapters
essays/explanations
term papers

30
book reports
laboratory reports
extended investigations
autobiographies
concept maps
letters
poems
test answers
Group Assessment and Evaluation

Group assessment involves a teacher determining the performance level of a
small group of two to six students completing a short assignment, an extended
project, or a test. Groups consisting of three to four individuals seem to work best.
Usually the same number of points, the same grade, or the same descriptor is earned
by each member of a group.
Group assessment cannot happen when students are working individually
and/or competing with one another. Interaction and communication are restricted
when any student views work with others as a waste of time or believes their group
effort will lower his/her own norm-referenced grade by raising others' grades. In
cooperative situations, students perceive that they can reach their learning goals if,
and only if, the other students in their group succeed also.
Cooperative learning involves more than students sitting at a table together
and/or sharing laboratory equipment. David W. Johnson and Roger T. Johnson
have determined that the following five elements are essential for a cooperative
group lesson: positive interdependence, face-to-face interaction, individual
accountability, small group and interpersonal skills, and processing about group
effectiveness. Robert E. Slavin has formulated cooperative methods around team
rewards, individual accountability, and equal opportunities for success.
In cooperative groups, students discuss material with each other, assist one
another in understanding concepts, and encourage one another to work diligently.
Structuring groups well ensures that no student opts out of or is excluded from class
work. Students improve their abilities to articulate generalizations, question
assumptions, produce convincing arguments, evaluate ideas, and tolerate
ambiguity. Students increase their sensitivity to group dynamics and their respect
for others' opinions. Cooperative groups are heterogeneous in verbal and
mathematical abilities.
Research studies have shown that cooperative situations are better than
individual and competitive situations for producing various outcomes. These
include raising academic achievement, creating positive relationships between
individuals (both students and faculty), fostering psychological well-being, and
forming favorable attitudes toward science.

31
Several assessment methods work well with cooperative groups. Observations

of students interacting as they work through activities can give much information
about their reasoning skills, problem-solving abilities, and metacognitive strategies.
Group processes may also be observed, for example, speaking unambiguously,
asking appropriate questions, listening carefully, synthesizing information,
identifying points of disagreement, and facilitating their resolution. Checklists and
rating scales may be used to systematize observations.
Grading one activity or laboratory report per group is another useful
assessment method. Each student may be required to produce his/her own report
before working on the group report. An instructor may grade group reports more
thoroughly than individual reports in a given amount of time because there are
fewer group reports. If the level of thoroughness is not changed, an instructor will
spend less time grading groups reports compared to individual reports.
A third method is oral tests. After the entire group has prepared, the instructor
may choose a student at random to answer a question about the topic being studied.
Other students in that group may be chosen for other questions. All members of the
group pass or don't pass the oral test together.
Written tests are a fourth method of group assessment. They may be given
individually with students keeping one copy of their answers and turning the other
copy into the instructor. Then a small group of students goes over their answers
together and agrees on one revised set of answers that is turned in for additional
credit. The reverse procedure is fine, also, with the group test coming first and the
individual test following. In either order, the individual test may be closed book
and the group test may be open book if that combination fits the instructor's
objectives for students' learning.
One potential problem with group assessment is that an ambitious and talented
student may take on a very large portion of the group task and then resent the other
group members who made only minor contributions but received the same amount
of credit as the one who did most of the work. The students who neglected their
responsibilities may develop cynicism toward a system that rewards them in spite of
lack of effort. Another problematic situation occurs when a student with strong
leadership skills overwhelms the rest of the group with his/her ideas even though
other members of the group have more extensive science backgrounds or more
developed intellectual capacities. The instructor should monitor all groups and
intervene if these situations start to develop. Obviously, it is nearly impossible to
monitor groups when most of the assigned work is done outside of class periods.
Therefore, most group assessment should be done in class.
Each student may be required to sign a statement that he/she individually has
accomplished the learning outcomes for a group task. Each may also have to attest
to his/her belief that all other members of the group have successfully completed
the assignment. These statements should be supplied by the instructor. Varying
them periodically helps keep students from signing the statements automatically.

32
Students may be allowed to turn in a minority report if they cannot reach

consensus within their group. When this happens, the instructor should help the
group change its style of working together to avoid frequent minority reports.
Group assessment has many positive features. The intellectual discussion and
disagreement that occur during group assessment stimulate meaningful learning,
cognitive reasoning, divergent thinking, creativity, and long-term retention.
Students have chances to get immediate feedback on their ideas. Social skills are
practiced and improved during group assessments. Because working cooperatively
with classmates is very satisfying to most students, the ratio of intrinsic rewards to
extrinsic rewards is higher for group assessment tasks than for individual
assessment tasks.

34
List of References for Constructing Your Course

P.W. Airasian, Classroom Assessment (McGraw-Hill, NY, 1994).
Assessment Alternatives in Mathematics: An Overview of Assessment Techniques that

Promote Learning, edited by J.K. Stenmark (EQUALS, Lawrence Hall of Science,
Berkeley, CA, 1989).
The Assessment of Hands-on Elementary Science Programs, edited by G. Hein (Center for
Teaching and Learning, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, 1990).
Assessment Standards for School Mathematics: Working Draft. (National Council of

Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, 1993).
B. Burron, M.L. James, and A.L. Ambrosio, "The effects of cooperative learning in a
physical science course for elementary/middle level pre-service teachers," J. of
Res. in Sci. Teach. 30 (7), 697-707 (1993).
A.B. Champagne and S.T. Newell, "Directions for research and development:
Alternative methods of assessing scientific literacy," J. of Res. in Sci. Teach. 29
(8), 841-860 (1992).
A. Collins, "Portfolios for assessing student learning in science: A new name for a
familiar idea?" edited by A.B. Champagne, B.E. Lovitts, and B.J. Calinger in
This year in school science 1990: Assessment in the service of instruction (American
Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, 1990), pp. 157-
166.
Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (National Council of

D.B. Gowin and J.D. Novak, Learning How to Learn (Cambridge University Press, NY
1984).
M. Hamm and D. Adams, "Portfolio assessment: It's not just for artists anymore,"
Sci. Teach. 58 (5), 18-21 (1991).
D.W. Johnson and R.T. Johnson, "Encouraging student/student interaction," Research

Matters to the Science Teacher. (National Association for Research in Science
Teaching, Manhattan, KS, 1986).

34
D.W. Johnson and R.T. Johnson, "Group assessment as an aid to science instruction,"
edited by A.B. Champagne, B.E. Lovitts, and B.J. Calinger inThis Year in School
Science 1990: Assessment in the Service of Instruction (American Association for
the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, 1990) pp. 149-156.
D.W. Johnson, R.T. Johnson, E.J. Holubec, and P. Roy, Circles of Learning: Cooperation
in the Classroom (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,
Alexandria, VA, 1984).
F. Lawrenz, "Authentic assessment," Research Matters to the Science Teacher.

(National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Manhattan, KS, 1991).
R.A. Lonning, "Effect of cooperative learning strategies on student verbal

interactions and achievement during conceptual change instruction in 10th
grade general science," J. of Res. in Sci.Teach. 30 (9), 1087-1101 (1993).
K.M. Markham and J.J. Mintzes, "The concept map as a research and evaluation tool:
Further evidence of validity," J. of Res. in Sci. Teach. 31 (1), 91-101 (1994).
Mathematics assessment: Myths, Models, Good Questions, and Practical Suggestions,

edited by J.K. Stenmark (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston,
VA, 1991).
Measuring What Counts: A Conceptual Guide for Mathematics Assessment,

(Mathematical Sciences Education Board, National Research Council, National
Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1993).
J.D. Novak, "Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education,"J. of Res. in Sci.
Teach. 27 (10), 937-949 (1990).
Wolff-Michael Roth and A. Roychoudhury, "The concept map as a tool for the
collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school
physics students," J. of Res. in Sci. Teach. 30 (5), 503-534 (1993).
R.E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning: Student Teams (National Education Association,

Washington, DC, 1987).
J.H. Wandersee, "Concept mapping and the cartography of cognition," J. of Res. in

Sci. Teach. 27 (10), 923-936 (1990).

35
Reading List for Powerful Ideas in Physical Science
P.W. Airasian, Classroom Assessment (McGraw-Hill, NY, 1994).
B. Andersson, "Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 1216)," in

The Proceedings of the Second Jerusalem Convention on Education, 149 (1989).
B. Andersson, "Pupils' explanations of some aspects of chemical reactions," Sci. Edu.

70, 549563 (1986).
Assessment Alternatives in Mathematics: An Overview of Assessment Techniques that

Promote Learning, edited by J.K. Stenmark (EQUALS, Lawrence Hall of Science,
Berkeley, CA, 1989).
The Assessment of Hands-on Elementary Science Programs, edited by G. Hein (Center for
Teaching and Learning, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, 1990).
Assessment Standards for School Mathematics: Working Draft. (National Council of

J. Barber, "Chemical reactions," in Great Explorations in Math and Science (GEMS),

Lawrence Hall of Science (University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA,
1986).
S. Bendall, F. Goldberg, and I. Galili, "Prospective elementary school teachers' prior

knowledge about light," J. Res. Sci. Teach. 30 (9), 11691187 (1993).
G. Berkheimer, Matter and Molecules Teacher's Guide: Science Book, Occasional Paper
No. 121, Institute for Research on Teaching (Michigan State University, East
Lansing, MI, 1988).
C.L. Borgford and L.R. Summerlin, Chemical Activities (American Chemical Society,
A. Brook, H. Briggs, B. Bell, and R. Driver, Aspects of Secondary Students'

Understanding of Heat, Children's Learning in Science Project (Center for Studies
in Science and Mathematics Education, Leeds, UK, 1984).
M.E. Buegler, "Discovering density," in Great Explorations in Math and Science

(GEMS), Lawrence Hall of Science (University of California Berkeley, Berkeley,
CA, 1988).

36
B. Burron, M.L. James, and A.L. Ambrosio, "The effects of cooperative learning in a
physical science course for elementary/middle level pre-service teachers," J. of
Res. in Sci. Teach. 30 (7), 697-707 (1993).
A.B. Champagne and S.T. Newell, "Directions for research and development:
Alternative methods of assessing scientific literacy," J. of Res. in Sci. Teach. 29
(8), 841-860 (1992).
Chemsource, Episode 2, videotape produced by Sourceview Videotapes (distributed

by American Chemical Society, 1155 Sixteenth Street, NW, Washington, DC
20036; released 1993), :, 11 min.
Children's Ideas in Science, edited by R. Driver, E. Guesne, and A. Tiberghien (Open

University Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1985).
A. Collins, "Portfolios for assessing student learning in science: A new name for a
familiar idea?" edited by A.B. Champagne, B.E. Lovitts, and B.J. Calinger in
This year in school science 1990: Assessment in the service of instruction (American
Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, 1990), pp. 157-
166.
C. Conery, "The reality of an image," Phys. Teach. 21 (9), 589 (1983).
R. Driver, "Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies,"

in International Workshop on Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and
Empirical Studies in University of Bremen, edited by R. Duit, F. Goldberg, and H.
Niedderer (Institute for Science Education [IPN] 1991), p. 403.
R. Driver and B. Bell, "Students' thinking and the learning of science: a constructivist
view," School Science Review 67 (240), 433456 (1986).
R. Driver and T. Russell, An Investigation of Ideas of Heat, Temperature and Change of

State of Children Aged Between 8 and 14 Years (University of Leeds and Chelsea
College, London, UK, 1982).
R. Duit, W. Jung, and von C. Rhoneck, Aspects of Understanding Electricity. (Institute

for Science Education (IPN), University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany, 1985).
N.H. Fredette, and J.J. Clement, "Student misconceptions of an electric circuit: What
do they mean?" J. College Sci. Teach. 280285 (March, 1981).
D.L. Gabel, Introductory Science Skills (Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL, 1993).

37
D.L. Gabel and D.M. Bunce, "Research on chemistry problem solving," in Handbook of
Research in Science Teaching and Learning, edited by D.L. Gabel (National Science
Teachers Association, Washington, DC, 1994).
C. Gale and J. Layman, "The influence of microcomputer-based labs on intuitive

conceptions of temperature and temperature changes," dissertation, University
of Maryland, College Park, MD, 1992.
I. Galili, S. Bendall, and F. Goldberg, "The effects of prior knowledge and instruction
on understanding image formation," J. Res. Sci. Teach. 30 (3), 271301 (1993).
I. Galili, F. Goldberg, and S. Bendall, "Some reflections on plane mirrors and

images," Phys. Teach. 29 (7), 471477 (1991).
F. Goldberg, S. Bendall, and I. Galili, "Lenses, pinholes, screens and the eye," Phys.
Teach. 29 (4), 221224 (1991).
F. Goldberg and I. Galili, "Left-right conversions in a plane mirror," Phys. Teach. 31

(8), 463466 (1993).
F. Goldberg and L.C. McDermott, "An investigation of student understanding of the

real image formed by a converging lens or concave mirror," Am. J. Phys. 55, 108
119 (1987).
F. Goldberg and L.C. McDermott, "Student difficulties in understanding image

formation by a plane mirror," Phys. Teach. 24 (8), 472480 (1986).
D.B. Gowin and J.D. Novak, Learning How to Learn (Cambridge University Press, NY
1984).
R.F. Gunstone, "Constructivism and metacognition: Theoretical issues and classroom

studies," in International Workshop on Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical
Issues and Empirical Studies in University of Bremen, edited by R. Duit, F.
Goldberg, and H. Niedderer (Institute for Science Education [IPN] 1991), pp.
129140.
U. Haber-Scham, J.D. Cross, G.L.Abegg, J.H. Dodge, J.A. Walters, Introductory

Physical Science (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1972).
M. Hamm and D. Adams, "Portfolio assessment: It's not just for artists anymore,"
Sci. Teach. 58 (5), 18-21 (1991).
D. Hestenes, Role of Models in Introductory Physics, (1993).

38
D. Hestenes, "Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction," Am. J. Phys. 55 (5),

440454 (1987).
D.W. Johnson and R.T. Johnson, "Encouraging student/student interaction," Research

Matters to the Science Teacher. (National Association for Research in Science
Teaching, Manhattan, KS, 1986).
D.W. Johnson and R.T. Johnson, "Group assessment as an aid to science instruction,"
edited by A.B. Champagne, B.E. Lovitts, and B.J. Calinger inThis Year in School
Science 1990: Assessment in the Service of Instruction (American Association for
the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, 1990) pp. 149-156.
D.W. Johnson, R.T. Johnson, E.J. Holubec, and P. Roy, Circles of Learning: Cooperation
in the Classroom (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,
Alexandria, VA, 1984).
A.H. Johnstone, "Fashions, fads and facts in chemistry education," Paper presented
at the American Chemical Society Meeting, Washington, DC, 1990.
S. Joshua and J.J. Dupin, "Taking into account student conceptions in instructional
strategy: An example of physics," Cognition and Instruction, 4 (2), 117135 (1987).
S. Kesidou and R. Duit, "Student's conceptions of the second law of

thermodynamicsan interpretive study," J. Res. Sci. Teach. 30 (1), 85106 (1993).
J.S. Krajcik, "Developing student's understanding of chemical concepts," in The

Psychology of Learning Science, edited by S.M. Glyn, R.H. Yeany, and B.K. Britton
(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991) pp. 117147.
J. Krajcik and J. Layman, "Middle school teachers' conceptions of heat and

temperature: Personal and teaching knowledge," National Association for Research
in Science Teaching, 62nd Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, March 30
April 1, 1989.
F. Lawrenz, "Authentic assessment," Research Matters to the Science Teacher.

(National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Manhattan, KS, 1991).
R.A. Lonning, "Effect of cooperative learning strategies on student verbal

interactions and achievement during conceptual change instruction in 10th
grade general science," J. of Res. in Sci.Teach., 30 (9), 1087-1101 (1993).
K.M. Markham and J.J. Mintzes, "The concept map as a research and evaluation tool:
Further evidence of validity," J. of Res. in Sci. Teach. 31 (1), 91-101 (1994).

39
Mathematics assessment: Myths, Models, Good Questions, and Practical Suggestions,

edited by J.K. Stenmark (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston,
VA, 1991).
L.C. McDermott and P.S. Shaffer, "Research as a guide for curriculum development:
An example from introductory electricity, Part I: Investigation of student
understanding," Am. J. Phys. 60 (11), 9941003 (1992).
Measuring What Counts: A Conceptual Guide for Mathematics Assessment,

(Mathematical Sciences Education Board, National Research Council, National
Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1993).
Modes and Conditions of Learning. An Example: The Learning of Some Aspects of the
Concepts of Heat, edited by A. Tiberghien, Cognitive Development Research in
Science and Mathematics (University of Leeds Printing Service, Leeds, UK,
1980).
S. Morkin, "Cabbage juice pictures," Science and Children 30 (2), 9 (1992).
S. Morris and J. D. Barnard, "Conceptually Oriented Program in Elementary Science

(COPES)," (New York University, NY, 1965).
R. Needham and P. Hill, "Teaching strategies for developing understanding in

science," Center for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education (The
University of Leeds, UK, 1987), pp. 139.
J.D. Novak, "Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education,"J. of Res. in Sci.
Teach. 27 (10), 937-949 (1990).
Operation Physics, Heat, (American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD, 1990).
Operation Physics, Matter and Its Changes, (American Institute of Physics,

M.O. Pella, R.A. Green, R.L. Doran, and R. Roy, Classroom Materials for Teaching "the
particle nature of matter," Practical Paper No. 173, Wisconsin Research and
Development Center for Cognitive Learning (University of Wisconsin, Madison,
WI, 1971).
M.O. Pella, R.A. Green, R.L. Doran, and R. Roy, Teaching the Conceptual Scheme "the
particle nature of matter" in the Elementary School, Technical Report No. 173,
Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning
(University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 1971).

40
R.W. Peterson, Teaching Physics Safely: Some Practical Guidelines in Seven Areas of
Common Concern in Physics Classrooms (American Association of Physics
Teachers, College Park, MD, 1979).
Wolff-Michael Roth and A. Roychoudhury, "The concept map as a tool for the
collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school
physics students," J. of Res. in Sci. Teach. 30 (5), 503-534 (1993).
B.A. Sawrey, "Concept learning versus problem solving: revisited,"J. Chem. Edu. 67,
253254 (1990).
Science Curriculum Improvement Study, (SCIS) (Rand McNally & Co., Chicago, IL,
1970).
P.H. Scott, H.M. Asoko, and R.H. Driver, "Teaching for conceptual change: A
review of strategies," in International Workshop on Research in Physics Learning:
Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies in University of Bremen, edited by R. Duit,
F. Goldberg, and H. Niedderer (Institute for Science Education [IPN] 1991), pp.
310329.
P.S. Shaffer and L.C. McDermott, "Research as a guide for curriculum development:
An example from introductory electricity, Part II: Design of instructional
strategies," Am. J. Phys. 60 (11), 10031013 (1992).
D.M. Shipstone, "A study of childrens understanding of electricity in simple DC

circuits," European Journal of Science Education, 6 (2), 185198 (1984).
D. Singer, "The location of virtual images in plane and curved mirrors," Phys. Teach.
17 (8), 534535 (1979).
R.E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning: Student Teams (National Education Association,

J.R. Taylor, "Firewalking: A lesson in physics," Phys. Teach. 27 (3), 166168 (1989).
J.H. Wandersee, "Concept mapping and the cartography of cognition," J. of Res. in

Sci. Teach. 27 (10), 923-936 (1990).
J. Wessner and L. Ukens, Activities in Physical Science: A Nontext (Towson State

University, Towson, MD, 1993).

Onstructing OUR Ourse

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Onstructing OUR Ourse

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Onstructing OUR Ourse

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CONSTRUCTING

Contents Page No.

Read This First

This material is consistent with the physical science content needs of

Powerful Ideas in Physical Science is probably different from anything you've

The Instructor Materials encompass the boldfaced Student Materials.

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

A Road Map to Powerful Ideas in Physical Science

instructor demonstrates some phenomena

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

The Five Instructional Phases

Phase 1. Eliciting and Elaborating the Students Ideas

2001 American Association of Physics Teachers Constructing Your Course

Constructing New or Modified Ideas

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

Prior to embarking on the development of Powerful Ideas in Physical Science, a

2001 American Association of Physics Teachers Constructing Your Course

The American Association of Physics Teachers is committed to

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

Research on Teaching and Learning

2001 American Association of Physics Teachers Constructing Your Course

PSI-PET Filter Questions

Phases and Methods of Approach in Module Development

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

An awareness of change in ideas and familiarization with the learning

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

Assessment and Evaluation

Assessment is gathering information about students' knowledge, skills, abilities,

Behaviors assessed should be a representative sample of all the goal behaviors.

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

2001 American Association of Physics Teachers Constructing Your Course

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

2001 American Association of Physics Teachers Constructing Your Course

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

2001 American Association of Physics Teachers Constructing Your Course

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

The strength of interviews is that they can provide a detailed assessment of a

2001 American Association of Physics Teachers Constructing Your Course

Sample Written Explanation Tasks

to 90 minutes. Also, describe in words the variations in the temperatures of the

demonstrations should be repeated to ensure that everyone has an adequate chance

2001 American Association of Physics Teachers Constructing Your Course

Multiple-choice questions can be improved by requesting that students give the

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

2001 American Association of Physics Teachers Constructing Your Course

b) only in the penumbra

If a person is standing waist-deep in a swimming pool, what will be the

the amount of evidence included

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

Group Assessment and Evaluation

2001 American Association of Physics Teachers Constructing Your Course

Several assessment methods work well with cooperative groups. Observations

Constructing Your Course 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers

Students may be allowed to turn in a minority report if they cannot reach

2001 American Association of Physics Teachers Constructing Your Course

List of References for Constructing Your Course

Assessment Alternatives in Mathematics: An Overview of Assessment Techniques that

Assessment Standards for School Mathematics: Working Draft. (National Council of