Insurance Laws Commercial Law: (Sec. 2, Par.2, Insurance Code)
Insurance Laws Commercial Law: (Sec. 2, Par.2, Insurance Code)
Insurance Laws Commercial Law: (Sec. 2, Par.2, Insurance Code)
contract or pledge for the payment of endowments or separate or direct consideration is received therefor, shall
annuities (Sec. 179 & Sec. 180). NOT be deemed conclusive to show that the making
thereof does not constitute the doing or transacting of an
Non-Life Insurance insurance business (Sec.2, par.4, Insurance Code).
Marine Insurance
An insurance against risks connected with navigation, Requisites of an Insurance Contract
to which a ship, cargo, freightage, profits, or other 1. Consent of the contracting parties;
insurable interest in movable property, may be 2. Object certain which is the subject matter of the
exposed during a certain voyage or a fixed period of contract;
time (Sec. 99, Ibid). 3. Cause of the obligation which is established; and
Fire insurance Insurable Interest - Relation between the insured and
A contract by which the insurer for a consideration the thing insured, to such extent that its loss thru the
agrees to indemnify the insured against loss of, or risk insured against shall directly damnify the insured
damage to, property by hostile fire, including loss by (Dizon, supra).
lightning, windstorm, tornado or earthquake and other
allied risks, when such risks are covered by extension Cardinal Principles in Insurance: (GIAS)
to fire insurance policies or under separate policies Principle of utmost Good faith (uberrimae fidae)
(Sec. 167, Ibid). Each party takes into consideration the character,
Casualty Insurance conduct and/or credit of the other and in making the
Insurance covering loss or liability arising from contract, each is enjoined by law to deal with the other
accident or mishap, excluding those falling under in utmost good faith. A violation of this duty gives the
other types of insurance such as fire or marine (Sec. aggrieved party the right to rescind the contract. Thus,
174, Ibid). both must not only perform their obligations in good
Compulsory Motor Vehicle Liability Insurance faith but they must also avoid material concealment or
(CMVLI) misrepresentations. The caveat emptor rule is generally
A specie of compulsory insurance that provides for inapplicable.
protection coverage that will answer for legal liability Contract of Indemnity The insured who has insurable
for losses and damages for bodily injuries or property interest over a property is only entitled to recover the
damage that may be sustained by another arising amount of actual loss sustained and the burden is upon
from the use and operation of motor vehicle by its him to establish the amount of such loss. Otherwise, the
owner. contract becomes an instrument of unjust enrichment
Suretyship (Solutio Indebiti, Art. 2154, NCC).
A contract of suretyship shall be deemed to be an Contract of Adhesion (Fine Print Rule) The policy is
insurance contract, within the meaning of the Code, presented to the insured already in its printed form, so
only if made by a surety who or which, as such, is that he either takes it or leaves it. Most of the terms of
doing an insurance business (Sec. 2, Insurance the contract do not result from mutual negotiations
Code). between the parties as they are prescribed by the
insurer in final printed form to which the insured may
Doing an Insurance Business: adhere if he chooses but which he cannot change
1. Making or proposing to make, as insurer, any (Rizal Surety & Insurance Co. v. CA, G.R. No. 112360,
insurance contract; July 18, 2000). It is for this reason that any ambiguity
2. Making or proposing to make, as surety, any contract therein is resolved in favor of the insured and against
of suretyship as a vocation and not as merely incidental the insurer.
to any legitimate business or activity of the surety;
3. Doing any kind of business, including reinsurance Note: Under Art. 1377, NCC, the interpretation of
business, specifically recognized as constituting the obscure words or stipulations in a contract shall not
doing of an insurance business within the meaning of favor the party who caused the obscurity. Thus, the
the code; insurer is under the obligation to make the meaning of
4. Doing or proposing to do any business in substance the contract clear if it desires to limit or restrict the
equivalent to any of the foregoing in a manner designed operation of the general provision of the contract.
to evade the provisions of this Code.
Principle of Subrogation It is the process of legal
Note: The fact that NO profit is derived from the making of substitution where the insurer steps into the shoes of
insurance contracts, agreements or transactions or that no the insured, when he paid the indemnity for the injury or
loss, and he avails of the latters rights against the 3. Where the insurer PAYS the insured for a loss or risk
wrongdoer. not covered by the policy (Pan Malayan Insurance
Company v. CA, G.R. No. 77397, April 3, 1990);
If the amount paid by the insurance company does not 4. In life insurance;
fully cover the injury or loss, the aggrieved party shall 5. For recovery of LOSS IN EXCESS of insurance
be entitled to recover the deficiency from the person coverage;
causing the loss or injury (Art. 2207, NCC).
What may be Insured Against/ Risk:
Note: The principle of subrogation is a normal incident 1. Any contingent or unknown event, whether past or
of indemnity insurance as a legal effect of payment; it future, which may damnify a person having an insurable
inures to the insurer without any formal assignment or interest or creates a liability against him may be insured
any express stipulation to that effect in the policy. Said against (Sec. 3, Insurance Code);
right is not dependent upon nor does it grow out of any 2. A past event may be insured provided the loss is
private contract. Payment to the insured makes the unknown to both parties and they expressly stipulated
insurer a subrogee in equity (Malayan Insurance Co., that prior loss is insured by the policy. A past event that
Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. L-36413, September 26, 1988). may be insured against is peculiar to Marine Insurance.
Under Sec. 109 of the Insurance Code, a person
Incapacity of the insured will not affect the capacity of insured by a contract of marine insurance is presumed
the subrogee because capacity is personal to the holder to have knowledge, at the time of insuring, of a prior
(Lorenzo Shipping v. Chubb and Sons, Inc, G.R. No. loss, if the information might possibly have reached him
147124, June 8, 2004). in the usual mode of transmission and at the usual rate
of communication;
Purposes of Subrogation: 3. Contingent liability e.g. Reinsurance.
1. To make the person who caused the loss legally
responsible for it; Note: Insurance for or against the drawing of any lottery,
2. To prevent the insured from receiving double recovery or for or against any chance or ticket in a lottery drawing a
from the wrongdoer and the insurer; and price is not allowed (Sec. 4, Insurance Code). It may
3. To prevent the tortfeasors from being free from result in profit which is not true in insurance which only
liability and is thus founded on considerations of public seek to indemnify the insured against losses.
policy.
Requisites for Recovery Upon Insurance (CLIP):
Rules on Subrogation: 1. The insured must have insurable interest in the
1. Applicable only to property insurance subject matter;
2. That interest is covered by the policy;
Reason: The value of human life is regarded as 3. There must be a loss; and
unlimited and therefore, no recovery from a third party 4. The loss must be proximately caused by the peril
can be deemed adequate to compensate the insureds insured against.
beneficiary.
Construction of Insurance Contract
2. The insurer can only recover from the third person 1. The terms in an insurance policy which are
what the insured could have recovered. ambiguous, equivocal, or uncertain are to be construed
Subrogation is NOT Applicable: strictly and most strongly against the insurer, and
1. Where the insured by his own act RELEASES the liberally in favor of the insured so as to effect the
wrongdoer or third party liable for the loss or damage; dominant purpose of indemnity or payment to the
insured.
Note: The insurer can only be subrogated to only such
rights as the insured may have (Manila Mahogany Mfg. Reason: The insured usually has no voice in the
Corp. v. CA, G.R. No. L-52756, October 12, 1987). selection or arrangement of the words employed and
that the language of the contract is selected with great
2. Where the insurer PAYS the insured the value of the care and deliberation by experts and legal advisers
loss without notifying the carrier who has in good faith employed by, and acting exclusively in the interest of,
settled the insureds claim for loss; the insurance company (Calanoc v. CA, et al., G.R. No.
L-8218, December 15, 1955). If the terms are clear, completed prior to the delivery of the policy depending on
there is no room for interpretation. the intention of the parties.
Provisions, conditions or exceptions in policies which Insurance contracts through correspondence follow the
tend to work a forfeiture of insurance policies should be cognition theory an acceptance made by letter shall not
construed most strictly against those for whose benefits bind the person making the offer except from the time it
they are inserted, and most favorably toward those came to his knowledge (Enriquez v. Sun Life Assurance
against whom they are intended to operate (Geagonia Co. of Canada, G.R. No. L-15774, November 29, 1920).
v. CA, G.R. No. L-114427, February 6, 1995).
Public enemy Citizen or subject of a nation at war Persons who cannot be named Beneficiaries
with the Philippines and does not include robbers Any person who is forbidden from receiving any donation
thieves and other criminals. under Art. 739 cannot be named beneficiary of a LIFE
INSURANCE POLICY by the person who cannot make
Reason: The purpose of war is to cripple the power and any donation to him (Art. 2012, NCC), to wit:
exhaust the resources of the enemy, and it is a. Those who are guilty of adultery or concubinage
inconsistent that one country should destroy its enemys with the insured at the time of designation;
property and repay in insurance the value of what has b. Those who were found guilty with the insured of
been so destroyed, or that it should in such manner the same criminal offense, committed in consideration
increase the resources of the enemy, or render it aid of the designation;
(Filipinas Cia de Seguros v. Christern Huenfeld & Co., c. A public officer or his wife, descendants and
Inc., G.R. No. L-2294, May 25, 1951). ascendants designated by reason of his office (Art. 739,
NCC).
Insurance by a minor has been rendered moot and
academic by R.A. 6809 which reduced the majority age Note: This prohibition will apply ONLY to life insurance
from 21 to 18 years of age. Hence, a person who is 18 policies (Art. 2012, NCC).
years or more may enter into any kind of insurance
contract because he is already of legal age. (Sec. 3, The designation of persons mentioned in Art. 739 is void
par. 3, Insurance Code) but the policy is binding. The estate will get the proceeds.
Illustration: A husband may take out a policy on his The beneficiary acquires a vested right in the policy. Such
wifes life, proceeds payable to their son. The husband beneficiary, to whom a policy of insurance upon life or
is the insured, the wife is the cestui que vie, and the son health has passed by transfer, will or succession, may
is the beneficiary. recover upon it whatever the insured might have
Kinds of Beneficiary: recovered (Sec. 181, Insurance Code).
a. Insured himself;
b. Third person who paid a consideration; or If the insured refuses to pay the premiums, the designated
c. Third person through mere bounty of insured. irrevocable beneficiary may continue the policy by paying
premiums that are due (Art. 1236, NCC).
In the second and third cases, the beneficiary is not a
party to the contract. Art. 1311 [2nd par.], NCC allows the Exception to the Exception:
contracting parties to include a stipulation in favor of a Under Arts. 43[4], 50 & 64 of the Family Code, the
third person not a party to the contract. innocent spouse may revoke the designation of the other
spouse who acted in bad faith as beneficiary in any
When the beneficiary dies before the insured: Insurable Interest in Life Insurance
1. Should the beneficiary predecease the insured 1. Where the insured is also the cestui que vie
and such beneficiary is irrevocable, and hence has a (Insurance upon ones life)
vested interest in the policy, the legal representatives of
such beneficiary are entitled to the proceeds of the A person has an insurable interest in his own life and
insurance as assets of his or her estate, unless the health (Sec. 10[a], Insurance Code). The insured can
proceeds were made payable to the beneficiary only if make it payable to anyone he chooses, regardless of
living. whether or not such beneficiary has an insurable
2. On the other hand, where the beneficiary is interest in his (insureds) life.
REVOCABLE and therefore does not have vested
interest in the policy at the time of his death, his estate Upon the insureds death, the beneficiary shall be
or legal representatives derive no interest from or entitled to the full face value of the policy. It is assumed
through him, but the proceeds passes to the estate of that the insured would not designate as his beneficiary
the insured. a person whom he would not trust his life.
3. In case of an insurance policy taken out by an
original owner on the life or health of a MINOR, all 2. Where the insured is not the cestui que vie but is
rights, title and interest in the policy shall automatically the beneficiary (insurable interest in the life of
vest in the minor upon the death of the original owner, another)
unless otherwise provided for in the policy (Sec. 3, par. Where a person names himself beneficiary in a policy
5). he takes on the life of another, he must have insurable
interest in the life of the latter.
Note: In property Insurance, the beneficiary must have
insurable interest on the property. (Reviewer on Note: The purpose of the law in requiring that the
Commercial Law, Insurance Code, Sundiang, Sr., person procuring the insurance must have an insurable
Aquino, 5th ed., 2011, p. 91.) interest in the life of the insured is to take off all the
temptation to destroy the life of the insured because of
I NSURABLE I NTEREST
SAN BEDA COLLEGE OF LAW
2013 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
COMMERCIAL LAW INSURANCE LAWS
BUT if the debtor is the insured and the creditor is Insurable Interest in Property
named beneficiary, the creditor will be entitled to the An insurable interest in property may consist in:
WHOLE proceeds of the policy upon the debtors death, 1. An existing interest The existing interest in the
though his credit may be much less. property may be legal title or equitable title.
4. Business associate or employer of insured Examples of insurable interest arising from legal
title:
A person may take a policy on the life of his business a. Trustee, as in the case of the seller of
partner because the latters death may result in an property not yet delivered;
interruption of business operations which can in turn b. Mortgagor of the property mortgaged;
cause financial loss. c. Lessor of the property leased
Special Cases:
Measure of Insurable Interest in Property 1. In case of a carrier or depository
The measure of insurable interest in property is the A carrier or depository of any kind has an insurable
EXTENT to which the insured might be damnified by loss interest in a thing held by him as such, to the extent of
or injury thereof (Sec. 17, Insurance Code). his liability but not to exceed the value thereof (Sec. 15,
Insurance Code).
Insurable interest in property does not necessarily imply a
property interest in, or a lien upon, or possession of, the
a. The thing insured (Sec. 20, Insurance Code); Reason: No new party was introduced into the co-
b. The policy itself (Sec. 58, Insurance Code); ownership. It is the alienation to a stranger that will
c. The claim itself (Sec. 83, Insurance Code). suspend the policy not to a co-owner because the
former was not originally a party to the contract.
1. Change of Interest
f. When a policy is so
General Rule: framed that it will inure to the benefit of
A change of interest in any part of the thing insured, whomsoever, during the continuance of the risk,
unaccompanied by a corresponding change of interest may become the owner of the interest insured (Sec.
in the insurance, SUSPENDS the insurance to an 57, Insurance Code).
equivalent extent, until the interest in the thing and the
interest in the insurance are vested in the same person Reason: Art. 1306 of the NCC (Autonomy of
(Sec. 20, Insurance Code). Contracts)
Reason: After the loss has happened, the liability of Exception: When notice to an insurer of a transfer is
the insurer becomes fixed. Therefore, the insured has expressly required in the policy (Sec. 182, Insurance
the right to assign his claim against the insurer as any Code).
other money claim.
In Property Insurance the policy may NOT be
c. Change in interest in transferred without the consent of the insurer.
one or more of several distinct things separately
insured by one policy (Sec. 22, Insurance Code). Reason: The insurer approved the policy based on the
personal qualification and the insurable interest of the
Reason: The contract is divisible. insured.
4. To be guilty of concealment, a party must have 1. Affirmative An affirmation of fact existing when the
knowledge of the fact concealed at the time of the contract begins;
effectivity of the policy. 2. Promissory Statement by the insured concerning
5. Failure to communicate information acquired AFTER what is to happen during the term of the insurance;
the effectivity of the policy will NOT be a ground to 3. Oral or Written
rescind the contract.
Requisites of a False Representation
Reason: Information is no longer material as it will no (Misrepresentation):
longer influence the other party to enter into such contract. 1. The insured stated a fact which is untrue.
2. Such fact was stated with knowledge that it is untrue
Matters that need not be disclosed: and with intent to deceive or which he states positively
Neither party to a contract of insurance is bound to as true without knowing it to be true and which has a
communicate information of the following matters, tendency to mislead.
EXCEPT in answer to inquiries of the other: (KOWEE) 3. Such fact in either case is material to the risk.
1. Those which the other knows;
2. Those which, in the exercise of ordinary care, the Although false, a representation of the expectation,
other ought to know and of which, the former has no intention, belief, opinion, or judgment of the insured will
reason to suppose him ignorant; not avoid the policy if there is no actual fraud in
3. Those of which the other waives communication; inducing the acceptance of the risk, or its acceptance
4. Those which prove or tend to prove the existence of a at a lower rate of premium, and this is likewise the rule
risk excluded by a warranty, and which are not although the statement is material to the risk, if the
otherwise material; statement is obviously of the foregoing character, since in
5. Those which relate to a risk excepted from the policy such case the insurer is not justified in relying upon
and which are not otherwise material (Sec. 30, such statement, but is obligated to make further
Insurance Code). inquiry (Philamcare Health Systems, Inc. v. CA, G.R. No.
125678, March 18, 2002).
Note: Neither party is bound to communicate, even upon
inquiry, information of his own judgment. Test of materiality The same as concealment (Sec. 31,
Insurance Code).
The parties are bound to know all the general causes
which are open to his inquiry, equally with the other, and Effect of Misrepresentation:
all general usages of trade. 1. The injured party entitled to rescind from the TIME
when the representation becomes false (Sec. 45,
The right to information of material facts may be Insurance Code).
WAIVED: 2. When the insurer accepted the payment of premium
1. By the terms of the contract; with the knowledge of the ground for rescission, there is
2. By failure to make an inquiry as to such facts, a waiver of such right.
where they are distinctly implied in other facts from 3. There is no waiver of the right of rescission if the
which information is communicated. insurer had no knowledge of the ground therefor at the
time of acceptance of premium payment (Stokes v.
Matters that must be disclosed even in the absence of Malayan Insurance Co., Inc. G.R. No. L-34768,
inquiry: (M-No means-No war) February 24, 1984).
1. Those material to the
contract (Sec. 31, 34, 35, Insurance Code); Characteristics of misrepresentation:
2. Those which the other has 1. Not a part of the contract but merely a collateral
no means of ascertaining (Sec. 30, 32, 33, Insurance inducement to it;
Code); 2. Oral or written;
3. Those as to which the 3. Made at the time of, or before issuing the policy and
party with the duty to communicate makes no warranty. not after;
(Secs. 67-76, Insurance Code).
Exception: The insured wants the insurer to make a
REPRESENTATIONS modification of the policy.
Kinds of Representation: 4. Altered or withdrawn before the insurance is effected
but not afterwards;
5. Refers to the date the contract goes into effect. a. Loss occurs before the time arrives for the
performance of the warranty;
Concealment Misrepresentation b. The performance becomes unlawful at the place of
Act involved the contract; and
c. Performance becomes impossible (Sec. 73,
The insured withholds The insured makes Insurance Code).
information of material erroneous statements of
facts from the insurer. facts with the intent of 2. Immaterial (e.g. Other insurance clause)
inducing the insurer to General Rule:
enter into the insurance It will not avoid the policy.
contract.
Materiality Exception:
Same rules apply to determine materiality When the policy expressly provides or declares that a
violation thereof will avoid it (Sec. 75, Insurance Code).
Effect
Same effect and gives the insurer the right to rescind Warranty Representation
the contract, whether the concealment or
misrepresentation be intentional or not Nature
Part of the contract Mere collateral inducement
Note: Where the insurer merely signed the application Form
form and made the agent of the insured file the same for Written on the policy, May be written in the policy
her, it was held by doing so, the insured made the agent actually or by reference or may be oral.
of the insurer her own agent.
Materiality
Warranties Presumed material Must be proved to be
Purpose: To eliminate potentially increasing hazards material
which may either be due to the acts of the insured or to Compliance
the change of the condition of the property.
Must be strictly Requires only substantial
complied with truth and compliance
Basis: The insurer took into consideration the condition of
the property at the time of effectivity of the policy. Effect of falsity/ non-fulfillment
Falsity or non-fulfillment Falsity renders the policy
Kinds: operates as a breach of void on the ground of fraud
1. Express An agreement expressed in a policy contract
whereby the insured stipulates that certain facts relating
to the risk are or shall be true, or certain acts relating to Conditions
the same subject have been or shall be done. Effects of Breach:
2. Implied It is deemed included in the contract 1. Condition precedent Prevents the accrual of
although not expressly mentioned. cause of action
2. Condition subsequent Avoids the policy or entitles
Example: In marine insurance, seaworthiness of the the insurer to rescind
vessel, non-deviation from the agreed voyage or non-
indulgence in illegal ventures. The insurer may also protect himself against fraudulent
claims of loss by inserting in the policy various conditions
Effects of breach of warranty: which take the form of conditions precedent. For
1. Material instance, there are conditions requiring immediate notice
General Rule: Violation of material warranty or of a of loss or injury and detailed proofs of loss within a limited
material provision of a policy will entitle the other party period.
to rescind the contract (Sec. 74, Insurance Code).
Exception:
Condition Warranty
Exceptions: Provisions that may specify excepted perils. Purpose of Incontestability Clause
It makes more definite the coverage indicated by the To assure that after the specified period, the policy owner
general description of the risk by excluding certain may rely upon the insurance company to carry out the
specified risks that otherwise would be included under the terms of the contract, regardless of irregularities in
general language describing the risk assumed. connection with the application which may later be
discovered.
An insurer seeking to defeat a claim because of an
exception or limitation in the policy has the burden of Requisites (LiP-2):
proving that the loss comes within the purview of the 1. It must be a Life insurance policy;
exception or limitation. If a proof is made of a loss 2. It must be Payable on the death of the insured; and
apparently within a contract of insurance, the burden is 3. It must be in force during the lifetime of the insured
upon the insurer to prove that the loss arose from a cause for at least 2 years from its date of issue or of its last
of loss which is excepted or for which it is not liable, or reinstatement.
from a cause which limits its liability (DBP Pool of
Accredited Insurance Companies v. Mindanao Network, The period of two years may be shortened but it cannot
G.R. No. 147039, January 27, 2006). be extended by stipulation.
Note: Breach of warranty or of a condition renders the The incontestability clause precludes the insurer from
contract defeasible at the option of the insurer; but if he so raising the defense of false representations or
elects, he may waive his privilege and power to rescind by concealment of material facts insofar as health and
the mere expression of an intention so to do. In that event previous diseases are concerned if the insurance has
his liability under the policy continues as before been in force for at least two years during the insureds
(Prudential v. Trans-Asia, G.R. 151890, June 20, 2006). lifetime (Tan v. CA, G.R. No. 48049, June 29, 1989).
insurance company concerned that the risk involved, trust, express or implied, between the insured and third
the values of such risks and/ or the premiums person (Bonifacio Bros., Inc. v. Mora, G.R. No. L-
therefor has not yet been determined or 20853, May 29, 1967).
established, or such extension or renewal is not 3. Where the contract insurance provides for indemnity
contrary to and is not for the purpose of violating against liability to third persons, then third persons, to
any provisions of the Insurance Code, or of any whom the insured is liable, can sue the insurer
rulings, instructions, or circulars of the Insurance (Guingon v. del Monte, et al., G.R. No. L-21806, August
Commissioner (Ins. Memo Cir. No. 3-75, dated 17, 1967).
September 29, 1975, effective Oct. 21, 1976).
Insurance Procured by an Agent
3. No separate premiums are intended or required to be The insurance inures to the benefit of the principal.
paid on a cover note because cover notes do not
contain particulars of the property insured that would Requisites:
serve as basis for the computation of premiums. Thus, 1. Agent must be authorized;
no premium could be fixed and paid on the cover note 2. Must act within the scope of his authority;
(Pacific Timber Export Corporation v. CA, G.R. No. L- 3. Must disclose his principal;
38613, February 25, 1982). 4. Indicate by appropriate words that he is acting in a
4. Cover notes should not be treated as separate representative capacity.
policies but should be integrated to the regular policies
subsequently issued so that the premiums on the Test to determine whether a Third Person may directly
regular policies include the consideration for the cover Sue the Insurer of the Wrongdoer
notes (Pacific Timber Export Corporation v. CA, G.R. Where the contract provides for INDEMNITY AGAINST
No. L-38613, February 25, 1982). LIABILITY to third persons, then the latter to whom the
insured is liable, can directly sue the insurer.
Kinds of Insurance Policies:
1. Open Policy One in which the value of the thing On the other hand, where the insurance is for INDEMNITY
insured is not agreed upon, but is left to be ascertained AGAINST ACTUAL LOSS OR PAYMENT, then third
in case of loss (Sec. 60, Insurance Code). persons cannot proceed against the insurer, the contract
2. Valued Policy One which expresses on its face being solely to reimburse the insured for liability actually
agreement that the thing insured shall be valued at a discharged by him through payment to third persons, said
specified sum (Sec. 61, Insurance Code). third persons recourse being, thus limited to the insured
3. Running Policy One which contemplates alone (Guingon v. Del Monte, Ibid).
successive insurances and which provides that the
object of the policy may be from time to time defined, Cancellation of Non-life Policy
especially as to the subjects of insurance, by additional The right of the insurer to cancellation of a policy of
statements or endorsements (Sec. 62, Insurance insurance other than life is covered by Secs. 64 and 65 of
Code). the Insurance Code.
e. When rescission is granted due to the insurers premiums had been paid by the insured from funds
breach of contract (Sec. 74, Insurance Code). derived from other sources.
6. Reinstatement Provision that the holder of the
2. Pro rata policy shall be entitled to reinstatement of the contract
a. When the insurance is for a definite period and at any time within three years from the date of default in
the insured surrenders his policy before the the payment of premium, unless the cash surrender
termination thereof; value has been paid, or the extension period expired,
upon production of evidence of insurability satisfactory
Exceptions: to the company and the payment of all overdue
i. Policy not made for a definite period of time; premiums and any indebtedness to the company upon
ii. Short period rate is agreed upon; said policy (Perez, Reviewer on Insurance, Insolvency
iii. Life insurance policy and Code of Commerce, 2000 ed).
7. Estoppel Bars insurer from taking refuge under
b. When there is over-insurance Sec. 77, since respondent relied in good faith on such
i. In case of over-insurance by double practice.
insurance, the insurer is not liable for the total
amount of the insurance taken, his liability being
limited to the property insured. Hence, the insurer D OUBLE I NSURANCE
is not entitled to that portion of the premium
corresponding to the excess of the insurance over Double insurance exists where the same person is
the insurable interest of the insured. insured by several insurers separately, in respect to the
ii. In case of over-insurance by several same subject and interest (Sec. 93, Insurance Code).
insurers, the insured is entitled to a ratable return of
the premium, proportioned to the amount by which Requisites (TIRIS):
the aggregate sum insured in all the policies 1. Same insured person;
exceeds the insurable value of the thing at risk 2. Same subject matter;
(Sec. 82, Insurance Code). 3. Same interest insured;
4. Same risk or peril insured against; and
Devices Used to Prevent the Forfeiture of a Life 5. Two or more insurers insuring separately.
Insurance after the Payment of the First Premium:
1. Grace period After the payment of the first Over-Insurance
premium, the insured is entitled to a grace period of Exists when the insured insures the same property for an
thirty days within which to pay the succeeding amount GREATER than the value of that property.
premiums.
2. Cash Surrender Value The amount the insurer Effect in case of loss:
agrees to pay to the holder of the policy if he surrenders 1. The insurer is bound only to pay the extent of the
it and releases his claim upon it. real value of the property lost;
3. Extended Insurance Where the insurance 2. The insured is entitled to recover the amount of
originally contracted for is continued for such period as premium corresponding to the excess in value of the
the amount available therefor will pay when it will property.
terminate. In such a case, the insurance will be for the
same amount as the original policy but for a period Effects of over insurance by double insurance (Sec.
shorter than the period in the original contract. 94, Insurance Code):
4. Paid Up Insurance No more payments are 1. The insured, unless the policy otherwise
required, and consist of insurance for life in such an provides, may claim payment from the insurers in such
amount as the sum available therefore, considered as a order as he may select, up to the amount for which the
single and final premium, will purchase. It results to a insurers are severally liable under their respective
reduction of the original amount of insurance, but for the contracts;
same period originally stipulated. 2. Where the policy under which the
5. Automatic Loan Clause A stipulation in the policy insured claims is a valued policy, the insured must give
providing that upon default in payment of premium, the credit as against the valuation for any sum received by
same shall be paid from the loan value of the policy until him under any other policy without regard to the actual
that value is consumed. In such a case, the policy is value of the subject matter insured;
continued in force as fully and effectively as though the
3. Where the policy under which the insurable interest policies issued does not
insured claims is an unvalued policy, he must give exceed the insurable
credit, as against the full insurable value, for any sum interest of the insured
received by him under any policy;
Number of insurers
4. Where the insured receives any sum in
excess of the valuation in the case of valued policies, or There may only be one There are always several
of the insurable value in the case of unvalued policies, insurer involved insurers
he must hold such sum in trust for the insurers,
according to their right of contribution among The ratable contribution of each insurer will be determined
themselves; based on the following formula:
5. Each insurer is bound, as between
himself and the other insurers, to contribute ratably to Amount of policy
the loss in proportion to the amount for which he is X loss = liability of insurer
liable under his contract. Total insurance taken
Additional or Other Insurance Clause In every reinsurance, the original contract of insurance
A condition in the policy requiring the insured to inform the and the contract of reinsurance are covered by separate
insurer of any other insurance coverage of the property policies.
insured. It is lawful and specifically allowed under Sec. 75
which provides that (a) policy may declare that a violation Limit of Single Risk
of a specified provision thereof shall avoid it, otherwise No insurance company other than life, shall retain any risk
the breach of an immaterial provision does not avoid it. on any one subject of insurance in an amount exceeding
20% of its net worth (Sec. 215, Insurance Code).
Purpose
Double Insurance is not prohibited by law. The reasons Double Insurance Reinsurance
why it may be required that its existence be disclosed are: Interest
1. To prevent an increase in the moral hazard; and
2. To prevent over-insurance and fraud. Involves the same interest Involves different interest
Subject
x x x the prohibition applies only in case of double Subject of insurance is Subject of insurance is the
insurance. The Court ruled that in order to constitute a property original insurers risk
violation of the clause, the other insurance must be upon
Insurer
the same subject matter, the same interest therein, and
the same risk. Thus, even though the multiple insurance Insurer remains in such Insurer becomes the
policies involved were all issued in the name of the same capacity insured in relation to
assured, over the same subject matter and covering the reinsurer
same risk, it was ruled that there was no violation of the Insured
other insurance clause since there was no double Insured is the party in Original insured has no
insurance (Malayan Insurance Co., Inc. v. Philippine First interest in the 2 contracts interest in the reinsurance
Insurance Co., G.R. No. 184300, July 11, 2012). contract (Sec. 98,
Insurance Code)
Over-Insurance Double Insurance
Insureds consent
Amount of insurance
Insured has to give his Insureds consent not
When the amount of the There may be no over- consent necessary
insurance is beyond the insurance as when the sum Other Terms:
value of the insureds total of the amounts of the
Loss is Satisfied (PaReRe) Defects in the notice or proof of loss are waived when
1. Payment of loss; the insurer:
2. Reinstatement (repair or restoration) of the property 1. Writes to the insured that he considers
lost or damaged; the policy null and void as the furnishing of notice or
3. Replacement (substitution) with another or similar proof of loss would be useless;
property. 2. Recognizes his liability to pay the claim;
3. Denies all liability under the policy;
When Insurer is Liable for Loss (PIN-RP) 4. Joins in the proceedings for determining the amount
1. Loss the proximate cause of which is the peril insured of the loss by arbitration, making no objections on
against (Sec. 84, Insurance Code); account of notice and preliminary proof; or
2. Loss the immediate cause of which is the peril 5. Makes objection on any ground other than formal
insured against except where the proximate cause is an defect in the preliminary proof.
excepted peril (Sec. 86, Insurance Code);
3. Loss through the negligence of the insured except Claims Settlement
where there was gross negligence amounting to willful The indemnification of the loss of the insured
act (Sec. 87, Insurance Code);
4. Loss caused by efforts to rescue the thing insured In case of an unreasonable delay/denial in the payment of
from a peril insured against (Sec. 85, Insurance Code); the insureds claim by the insurer, the insured can recover:
5. Loss caused by a peril NOT insured against to which 1. Attorneys fees;
the thing insured was exposed in the course of rescuing 2. Expenses
the same from the peril insured against (Sec. 85, incurred by reason of the unreasonable withholding;
Insurance Code).
3. Interest at double refusal or failure to pay is based on the ground that the
the legal interest rate fixed by the monetary board; and claim is fraudulent (Ibid; Secs. 242, 243, Insurance Code).
4. Amount of the
claim (Zenith Insurance Corp. v. CA, G.R. No. 85296,
May 14, 1990; Sec. 244). P RESCRIPTIVE P ERIOD
S PECIAL K INDS OF I NSURANCE Cargo can be the subject of marine insurance, and once it
is entered into, the implied warranty of seaworthiness
M ARINE I NSURANCE immediately attaches to whoever is insuring the cargo,
whether he be the ship owner or not (Roque v. IAC, G.R.
No. L-66935, November 11, 1985).
Sec. 99. Marine Insurance includes:
Insurance against loss of or damage to: MARINE PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY INSURANCE
Vessels, craft, aircraft, vehicles, goods, freights,
cargoes, merchandise, effects, disbursements, Measure of Indemnity:
profits, moneys, securities, choses in action, Valued policy The parties are bound by the valuation, if
evidences of debts, valuable papers, bottomry, and the insured had some interest at risk and there is no
respondentia interests and all other kinds of property fraud.
and interests therein, in respect to, appertaining to or
in connection with any and all risks or perils of Exception: When a thing has been hypothecated by
navigation, transit or transportation, or while being bottomry or respondentia, before its insurance, and
assembled, packed, crated, baled, compressed or without the knowledge of the person actually procuring
similarly prepared for shipment or while awaiting the insurance, he may show the real value (Sec. 156,
shipment, or during any delays, storage, Insurance Code).
transshipment, or reshipment incident thereto,
including war risks, marine builder's risks, and all Open policy The following rules shall apply in
personal property floater risks; estimating a loss:
Person or property in connection with or appertaining to a. Value of the ship value at the beginning of the risk;
a marine, inland marine, transit or transportation b. Value of the cargo actual cost when laden on board
insurance, including liability for loss of or damage or market value at the time and place of lading;
arising out of or in connection with the construction, c. Value of freightage gross freightage exclusive of
repair, operation, maintenance or use of the subject primage;
matter of such insurance (but not including life d. Cost of insurance in each case, to be added to the
insurance or surety bonds nor insurance against loss estimated value (Sec. 161, Insurance Code).
by reason of bodily injury to any person arising out of
ownership, maintenance, or use of automobiles); Major divisions of transportation insurance:
Precious stones, jewels, jewelry, precious metals, 1. Ocean Marine Insurance
whether in course of transportation or otherwise; Scope:
Bridges, tunnels and other instrumentalities of a. Ships Or Hulls
transportation and communication (excluding b. Goods Or Cargoes
buildings, their furniture and furnishings, fixed c. Earnings Such As Freight
contents and supplies held in storage); piers, d. Liability Incurred By Reason Of Maritime Perils
wharves, docks and slips, and other aids to
navigation and transportation, including dry docks 2. Inland Marine Insurance
and marine railways, dams and appurtenant facilities Classes:
for the control of waterways. a. Property in transit provides
protection to property frequently exposed to loss
"Marine protection and indemnity insurance," meaning while it is being transported from one location to
insurance against, or against legal liability of the insured another.
for loss, damage, or expense incident to ownership, b. Bailee liability insurance for
operation, chartering, maintenance, use, repair, or those who have temporary custody of the goods.
construction of any vessel, craft or instrumentality in use c. Fixed transportation property
of ocean or inland waterways, including liability of the they are so insured because they are held to be an
insured for personal injury, illness or death or for loss of essential part of the transportation system such as
or damage to the property of another person. bridges, tunnels, etc.
d. Floater provides insurance to
Note: Marine Insurance is not limited to insurance that follow the insured property wherever it may be
secures vessels and its cargoes against the perils of
navigation.
have come to the hands of the insured (Sec. 154, caused by any fault of
Insurance Code). the party asking the
contribution;
Average 6. It must be
Any extraordinary or accidental expense incurred during successful, i.e.
the voyage for the preservation of the vessel, cargo, or resulted in the saving
both, and all damages to the vessel and cargo from the of the vessel or
time it is loaded and the voyage commenced until it ends cargo; and
and the cargo unloaded. 7. It must be
necessary.
Kinds of Averages:
Simple or Particular Average Includes all expenses Right of the Insured in case of General Average
and damages caused to the vessel or cargo which have General Rule:
not inured to the common benefit of all persons When the parties agree that the insurance shall be free
interested in the vessel or cargo. Insurer has no liability from a particular average, the insurer is liable only for a
if the parties stipulated that his liability is for general general average loss, unless such particular average loss
average only. Unless such particular average loss has has the effect of depriving the insured of possession at the
the effect of depriving the insured of the possession at port of destination of the whole of the thing insured (Sec.
the port of destination of the whole of the thing insured. 136, Insurance Code)
General or Gross Average Includes all the damage
and expenses which are deliberately caused in order to The insured may either hold the insurer directly liable for
save the vessel, its cargo or both, from real and known the whole of the insured value of the property sacrificed
risks. Liability of insurer is his portion. for the general benefit, subrogating him to his own right of
contribution, or demand contribution from the other
General Average v. Particular Average interested parties as soon as the vessel arrives at her
General Particular destination (Sec 165, Insurance Code).
To whom inures
Has inured to the Limit of Liability
Has not inured to the
common benefit and The insurers liability for the general average loss is
common benefit and profit
profit of all persons limited to the proportion of contribution attaching to his
of all persons interested in
interested in the vessel policy value where this is less than the contributing value
the vessel and her cargo.
and cargo of the thing insured (Sec. 164, Insurance Code).
By whom borne
To be borne equally by The liability of the insurer shall be less than the amount of
To be borne alone by the
all of the interests the insurance. In case the required contributory value
owner of the cargo or the
concerned in the exceeds that policy value, the insured is liable to
vessel, as the case may be.
venture. contribute ratably with the insurer to the indemnity of the
Requisites general average (De Leon, supra.).
Requisites for the right
to claim contribution: The insurer is liable for any general average loss (Sec.
1. Common danger to 136, Insurance Code) where it is payable or has been
the vessel or cargo; paid by the insured in consequence of a peril insured
2. Part of the vessel or against, as fixed in the policy.
cargo was sacrificed
deliberately; The insurer shall be liable upon a partial loss, only for
3. Sacrifice must be such proportion of the amount insured by him as the loss
for the common bears to the value of the whole interest of the insured on
safety or for the the property insured (Sec. 157, Insurance Code).
benefit of all;
4. Sacrifice must be The valuation in the policy is conclusive between the
made by the master parties thereto in the adjustment of either a partial or total
or upon his authority; loss, if the insured has some interest at risk and there is
5. It must be not be no fraud on his part (Sec. 156, Insurance Code).
Extra Expense Insurance Covers extraordinary Clause in a fire insurance policy that if the building or any
expenses that may be incurred in an effort to avoid any part thereof falls, except as a result of fire, the policy shall
interruption of service immediately cease.
Rent Insurance Protects the insured from loss of rental
income Option to Rebuild Clause
Clause giving the insurer the option to reinstate or replace
Prerequisites to Recovery: the property damaged or destroyed or any part thereof,
1. Notice of loss Must be immediately given, unless instead of paying the amount of the loss or the damage.
delay is waived expressly or impliedly by the insurer;
and The insurer, after electing to rebuild, cannot be compelled
2. Proof of loss According to best evidence to perform this undertaking by specific performance
obtainable. Delay may also be waived expressly or because this is an obligation to do, not to give.
impliedly by the insurer.
Remedy: Art. 1167, NCC.
Measure of Indemnity
1. Open policy Only the expense necessary to
replace the thing lost or injured in the condition it was at
the time of the injury C ASU ALTY AND A CCIDENT
2. Valued policy The parties are bound by the I NSURANCE
valuation, in the absence of fraud or mistake
Note: It is VERY CRUCIAL to determine whether a Insurance covering loss or liability arising from accident or
marine vessel is covered by a marine insurance or fire mishap, excluding those falling under other types of
insurance. The determination is important for 3 reasons: insurance such as fire or marine (Sec. 174, Insurance
1. Rules on constructive total loss and Code).
abandonment Applies only to marine insurance;
2. Rule on co-insurance Applies Classifications:
primarily to marine insurance; 1. Accident or health insurance Insurance against
specified perils which may affect the person and/or
3. Rule on co-insurance Applies to fire
property of the insured.
insurance ONLY if expressly agreed upon
(Commentaries and Jurisprudence on the Commercial
Examples: Personal accident, Robbery/Theft insurance
Laws of the Philippines Agbayani, 1988ed).
2. Third party liability insurance Insurance against
Alteration as a special ground for rescission by
specified perils which may give rise to liability on the
insurer
part of the insured for claims for injuries to or damage to
Requisites:
property of others.
1. The use or condition of the thing is specifically limited
a. Insurable interest is based on the interest of the
or stipulated in the policy;
insured in the safety of persons, and their property,
2. Such use or condition as limited by the policy is
who may maintain an action against him in case of
altered;
their injury or destruction, respectively.
3. The alteration is made without the consent of the
b. In a third party liability (TPL) insurance contract,
insurer;
the insurer assumes the obligation by paying the
4. The alteration is made by means within the control of
injured third party to whom the insured is liable. Prior
the insured;
payment by the insured to the third person is not
5. The alteration increases the risk (Sec. 168, Insurance
necessary in order that the obligation may arise. The
Code); and
moment the insured becomes liable to third persons,
6. There must be a violation of a policy provision (Sec.
the insured acquires an interest in the insurance
170, Insurance Code).
contract which may be garnished like any other credit
(Perla Compania de Seguros, Inc v. Ramolete, G.R.
Fall-of-Building Clause
No. L-60887, November 13, 1991).
c. Aside from compulsory motor vehicle liability intentional act of the third person, the insurer is relieved
insurance, casualty insurance are governed by the from liability as stipulated (Biagtan v. the Insular Life
general provisions applicable to all types of Assurance Co. Ltd., supra).
insurance, and outside of such statutory provisions, 2. Accidental That which happens by chance or
the rights and obligations of the parties must be fortuitously, without intention or design, which is
determined by their contract, taking into consideration unexpected, unusual and unforeseen.
its purpose and always in accordance with the
general principles of insurance law. No Action Clause
d. In burglary, robbery and theft insurance, the Requirement in a policy of liability insurance which
opportunity to defraud the insurer the moral hazard provides that suit and final judgment be first obtained
is so great that insurer have found it necessary to against the insured; that only thereafter can the person
fill up the policies with many restrictions designed to injured recover on the policy (Guingon v. Del Monte, G.R.
reduce the hazard. Persons frequently excluded are No. L-21806, August 17, 1967).
those in the insureds service and employment. The
purpose of the exception is to guard against liability A no action clause must yield to the provisions of the
should theft be committed by one having unrestricted Rules of Court regarding multiplicity of suits (Shafer v.
access to the property (Fortune Insurance v. CA, RTC, G.R. No. 78848, November 14, 1988).
G.R. 115278, May 23, 1995).
e. Right of a third party injured to sue the insurer of
party at fault depends on whether the contract of
insurance is intended to benefit third persons also or C OM PULSORY M OTOR V EHICLE
only the insured. L IABILITY I NSURANCE (CMVLI)
Tests applied:
1. Indemnity against third party liability A species of compulsory insurance that provides for
Injured third party can directly sue the insurer. protection coverage that will answer for legal liability for
losses and damages for bodily injuries or property
Purpose: To protect injured person against the damage that may be sustained by another arising from the
insolvency of the insured who causes such injury. use and operation of motor vehicle by its owner
for compensation, including persons expressly authorized b. In any other case: Insurer of the directly
by law or by the vehicles operator or his agents to ride offending vehicle (Sec. 378);
without fare (Sec. 373[b]). 5. In all cases, the right of the party paying
the claim to recover against the owner of the vehicle
Third Party responsible for the accident shall be maintained.
Any person other than the passenger, excluding a
member of the household or a member of the family within Note: The claimant is not free to choose from which
the second degree of consanguinity or affinity, of a motor insurer he will claim the no fault indemnity as the law
vehicle owner or land transportation operator, or his makes it mandatory that the claim shall lie against the
employee in respect of death or bodily injury arising out of insurer of the vehicle in which the occupant is riding,
and in the course of employment (Sec. 373[c]). mounting or dismounting from. That said vehicle might not
be the one that caused the accident is of no moment since
Coverage the law itself provides that the party paying may recover
In accordance with Sec. 377 of the Insurance Code, IMC against the owner of the vehicle responsible for the
No.4-2006, dated July 26, 2006 provides for third party accident (Perla Compania de Seguros, Inc. v. Ancheta,
liability coverage of P100,000 with an additional P100,000 G.R. No. L-49699, August 8, 1988).
coverage for passenger liability for public utility vehicle.
This means that the maximum liability per accident is now This no-fault claim does NOT apply to property damage. If
P100,000 (plus another P100,000 if a common carrier) the total indemnity claim exceeds P15,000.00 and there is
irrespective of the number of victims. The parties may controversy in respect thereto, the finding of fault may be
however enter into an insurance contract which provides availed of by the insurer only as to the excess. The first
for a bigger coverage. P15,000.00 shall be paid without regard to fault.
The essence of the no-fault indemnity insurance is to
The circular likewise provides a schedule of indemnity for provide victims of vehicular accidents or their heirs
death and bodily injuries. Death indemnity is P70,000 immediate compensation although in limited amount,
while the indemnity for burial and funeral expenses is pending final determination of who is responsible for the
P30,000. accident and liable for the victims injuries or death.
S URETYSHIP
Although the contract of a surety is in essence secondary b. If committed in a state of insanity regardless of
only to a valid principal obligation, the surety becomes the date of the commission unless suicide is an
liable for the debt or duty of another although it possesses excepted peril (Sec. 180-A, Insurance Code);
no direct or personal interest over the obligations nor does c. If committed after a shorter period provided in the
it receive any benefit therefrom. And notwithstanding the policy.
fact that the surety contract is secondary to the principal
obligation, the surety assumes liability as a regular party Note: Any stipulation extending the 2-year period is
to the undertaking (First Lepanto-Taisho Insurance null and void.
Corporation v. Chevron Philippines, Inc., G.R. No.
177839, January 18, 2012). 2. At the hands of the
law (e.g. by legal execution)
It is one of the risks assumed by the insurer under a life
L IFE I NSURANCE insurance policy in the absence of a valid policy
exception (Vance, p.572 cited in De Leon, supra).
Insurance on human lives and insurance appertaining
thereto or connected therewith which includes every Miravite also opines that the beneficiary of an insured
contract or pledge for the payment of endowments or who is executed for a crime he committed cannot
annuities (Sec. 179). recover from the insurer for 2 reasons:
His death is caused through his connivance, and
Kinds: Any stipulation to render the insurer liable under these
1. Ordinary Life, General Life or Old Line Policy circumstances would be contrary to public policy (Miravite,
Insured pays a fixed premium every year until he dies. supra).
Surrender value after 3 years.
2. Limited Payment Policy Insured pays premium for 3. Killing by the
a limited period. If he dies within the period, his beneficiary
beneficiary is paid; if he outlives the period, he does not General Rule:
get anything. The interest of a beneficiary in a life insurance policy
3. Endowment Policy Insured pays premium for shall be forfeited when the beneficiary is the principal,
specified period. If he outlives the period, the face accomplice or accessory in willfully bringing about the
value of the policy is paid to him; if not, his beneficiaries death of the insured, in which event, the nearest relative
receive the benefit. of the insured shall receive the proceeds of said
4. Term Insurance Insurer pays once only, and he is insurance, if not otherwise disqualified (Sec. 12,
insured for a specified period. If he dies within the Insurance Code).
period, his beneficiaries benefit. If he outlives the
period, no person benefits from the insurance. Exceptions:
5. Industrial Life Life insurance entitling the insured a. Accidental killing;
to pay premiums weekly, or where premiums are b. Self-defense;
payable monthly or more often (but not less than c. Insanity of the beneficiary at the time he killed the
weekly), if the face value is P2,000 or less, and the insured
words industrial policy printed upon the policy.
6. Variable Contract Policy or contract on either If the premiums paid came from conjugal funds, the
group/ individual basis issued by an insurance company proceeds are considered conjugal. If the beneficiary is
providing for benefits or other contractual payments or other than the insureds estate, the source of premiums
values thereunder to vary so as to reflect investment would not be relevant (Del Val v. Del Val, G.R. No. L-
results of any segregated portfolio of investment 9374, February 16, 1915).
(Miravete, supra.).
The proceeds of life insurance policy payable to the
Liability of Insurer in Certain Causes of Death of insured persons estate, on which the premiums were paid
Insured by the conjugal partnership, constitute community
1. Suicide property, and belong one-half to the husband exclusively
Insurer is liable in the following cases: and the other half to the wife, exclusively. If the premiums
a. If committed after two years from the date of the were paid partly with paraphernal and partly conjugal
policys issue or its last reinstatement; funds, the proceeds are in like proportion paraphernal in
part and conjugal in par (Bank of the Philippine Islands v. which in no case shall be less than Two Hundred Million
Posadas, G.R. No. L-9374, February 16, 1915). (P200,000,000.00)
Reason: A natural person cannot be placed in the same Reinsurance Companies Capitalization of Two
footing as a juridical person. Billion (P2,000,000,000.00) paid in cash, of which at
least 50% consists of paid up capital and the remaining
Accidental Death Benefit Clause portion thereof as contributed surplus which in no case
Gives the beneficiaries additional benefits if the death of shall be less than Four Hundred Million
the insured is through accidental means (P400,000,000.00)
3. Life or Non-life Insurance Companies Security deposits shall be (1) answerable for all the
Capitalization of One Billion (P1,000,000,000.00) paid in obligations of the depositing insurer under its
cash, of which at least 50% consists of paid up capital insurance contracts; (2) at all times free from any
and the remaining portion thereof as contributed surplus liens or encumbrance; and (3) exempt from levy by
I NSURANCE C OMMISSIONER