2.republic V Valencia - Tolentino

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

REPUBLIC vs.

VALENCIA
G.R. No. L-32181, March 5, 1986
Entries in the Civil Register
Gutierrez, Jr., J.
FACTS:
1. Leonor Valencia in behalf of her minor children Bernardo and Jessica Go filed a petition
for the cancellation and/or correction of entries of their birth in the Civil Registry in the
City of Cebu.
2. The Trial Court issued an order directing the publication of the petition and the date of
hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and province of Cebu once a
week for three consecutive weeks. A notice was duly served to the Solicitor General, the
Local Civil Registrar and Go Eng.
3. The petition seeks to change the nationality or citizenship of Bernardo and Jessica from
Chinese to Filipino and their status from Legitimate to Illegitimate and changing also the
status of the mother from married to single.
4. The Local Civil Registrar avers that the corrections sought are not merely clerical but
substantial because it involves the citizenship and status of the minors as well as the
status of the mother.
5. The Trial Court granted the petition
ISSUE: WON the proceedings that took place could be regarded as proper suit or appropriate
action for cancellation and/or correction of entries in the civil register.
HELD/RATIO:
YES. The persons who must be made parties to a proceeding concerning the cancellation or
correction of an entry in the civil register are-(1) the civil registrar, and (2) all persons who
have or claim any interest which would be affected thereby. Upon the filing of the petition, it
becomes the duty of the court to-(l) issue an order fixing the time and place for the hearing of the
petition, and (2) cause the order for hearing to be published once a week for three (3) consecutive
weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the province. The following are likewise entitled to
oppose the petition: (I) the civil registrar, and (2) any person having or claiming any interest under
the entry whose cancellation or correction is sought.
If all these procedural requirements have been followed, a petition for correction and/or
cancellation of entries in the record of birth even if filed and conducted under Rule 108 of
the Revised Rules of Court can no longer be described as "summary". There can be no
doubt that when an opposition to the petition is filed either by the Civil Registrar or any person
having or claiming any interest in the entries sought to be cancelled and/or corrected and the
opposition is actively prosecuted, the proceedings thereon become adversary proceedings.
However, the petition is denied because it would be a denial of substantive justice if two
children proved by the facts to be Philippine citizens, and whose five sisters and brother
born of the same mother and father enjoy all the rights of citizens, are denied the same
rights on the simple argument that the "correct procedure" not specified or even intimated
has not been followed.

You might also like