Response by The Stakeholders To A Code of Conduct
Response by The Stakeholders To A Code of Conduct
Response by The Stakeholders To A Code of Conduct
79
80
in teaching far exceed what may be inscribed in any code, and to restrict
ones view of ethics in teaching to the concept of codes, laws, and standards
is severely limiting.
Ward (2007) concludes from her work on code of ethics development
in an education union that there is a focus on ethics as central to teachers and
teaching but little consideration [is] given to the ethical expectations of those
involved in the education process who are not qualified teachers. Active
members in an education union regard their organization as both a union and
a professional association and realize that a code is needed. Others, outside
of the union, and from a different political paradigm, ridicule the idea. Ward
presupposed that a unions code of ethics would mirror the unions membership
and the values it holds. Her work is in its research stage.
Impact of codes
There is a natural assumption that a code of conduct has a positive impact
on the behaviour of the individuals in professions. An individuals behaviour
is significantly affected by the culture in which one works (Raiborn and
Payne, 1990)
Ethics education was found to have an impact on accounting students
as they solved their problems and dilemmas (Dellaportas, 2006). Similar
results occurred with teacher education candidates who used Ontarios Ethical
Standards for the Teaching Professions as the basis for discussion of four
case studies that presented progressively more complex situations or dilemmas
in diverse settings. The use of standards of ethics permitted teacher candidates
to juxtapose the knowledge learned from their studies with their
preconceptions of teaching and learning (Cherubini, 2008: 10). Candidates
responses from the first to the fourth case were markedly different. The
candidates realized the standards of ethics and their own teaching practices
were inextricably linked and the ethical statements profoundly influence
their social and emotional self-identities as prospective teachers . The teacher
candidates found that walking in the teachers shoes was more challenging
than anticipated.
81
82
objectives) based on the code should be available for discussion within the
profession. Practitioners and the public should be encouraged to report
colleagues/practitioners who violate the code and the process should be made
easier. A telephone hotline or easy website access allows for easier reporting.
The disciplinary procedure requires both punishment and rehabilitation of
members where necessary. In addition, Frankel recommends that those
professionals unfairly harried by employers petition the profession for both
support and defence. When professionals know that statutory protection exists
for good faith reporting of colleagues, there will be a greater impact of the
code.
In the review of the literature on teacher codes of conduct that was
available at the time of this research, there is no objective evidence about the
extent to which codes of conduct have an impact on an individual teachers
behaviour.
83
To promote the code and provide information about the code, organizations
have undertaken the following activities:
distribution of newsletters approximately every four months to teachers,
school council presidents, school board chairpersons, faculties and
schools of education, principals and professional associations, teachers
unions, and interstate and international equivalent bodies (King and
Associates, 2008: 86); the newsletter must be relevant, of value and
useful to teachers;
a solid communication plan and distribution of information: (1) if you
want to take it down to the teacher level, brochures should contain just
the basic elements; (2) realise that not all teachers are highly educated
people so it must be kept simple; (3) compose it in the language of the
teacher (Dresscher, 2008: 33); understand the cultural differences;
an up-to-date public website;
a teachers hotline to respond to teachers concerns and issues;
a principals hotline responding to teachers concerns and issues;
presentations at university faculties and schools of education outlining
the code;
e-mail box to receive and respond to requests;
seminars for teachers, representatives from education unions, and teacher
and professional associations, teacher educators, teacher employers,
parents, and school council groups.
Any organization that may be developed to support teacher codes of
conduct must also be an advocate of teachers and raise the profile of the
teaching profession effectively or satisfactorily (King and Associates,
85
2008: 88); an advocacy role, however, may be in conflict with the function
of such an organization.
Development of resources that support teachers understanding of the
code is required. The case study model which identifies ways of thinking
and acting that will have a high likelihood of enhancing their members
capacity to address the characteristic problems in their field (Condliffe, 2004)
immerses teachers in the activity of teaching. Condliffe further contends that
ethics must be inherent in the characteristic ways of thinking and acting that
are distinctive to educators.
In-depth discussion opportunities assist in explanation and clarification
of the code, for instance: development of a resource kit that outlines the
elements of the code of ethics for self-study, small and large group discussion,
dialogue, and activities; printing and distribution of posters on the updated
version of the code of ethics, these are sent to schools via a teacher
supplement which is enclosed in copies of the Mail and Guardian (South
Africa); developmental workshops on a national basis; ad hoc workshops
held where the need for workshops was determined on a case-by-case basis;
mentoring programme workshops using the standards to help teachers
recognize best classroom practices (Squire and Browne, 2000: 28).
The thorough communications plan is essential to ensure that teachers
and all stakeholders become aware of the code, its implications, and sanctions.
Training for facilitators and presenters for workshops must be complete since
the messages presented will guide teachers in their activities.
86
87
88