Hydrocarbon Refrigerants Comparision
Hydrocarbon Refrigerants Comparision
Hydrocarbon Refrigerants Comparision
Performance of
Hydrocarbon Refrigerants1
I. L. Maclaine-crossE. Leonardi
School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
The University of New South Wales
Sydney NSW, Australia 2052
Internet: ian@ilm.mech.unsw.edu.au e.leonardi@unsw.edu.au
Fax: (02) 663 1222
Summary
1 Refrigerant History
Table
Thomas Midgley Jr proposed the use of chlorofluorocarbons
(CFCs) as refrigerants in 1930. CFCs have two important
advantages as refrigerants, 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
2 Environmental Impacts
3 Refrigerant requirements
4 Performance of HC refrigerants
predict that R290 models with the same capacity as R22 will still
have a COP advantage.
Abboud (1994) and Parmar (1995) measured the performance
of natural HC refrigerants relative to R12 on ten typical
Australian cars. The cars were stationary with engines idling and
in a shaded and sheltered outdoor position. The superheats
measured were smaller for HC as low as 1 K and for some
grades the condenser pressure was 8% higher. The relative
cooling capacity of the HC mixture to R12 was calculated from
the return and supply air states in the passenger compartment
and from the compressor speed, pressures and temperatures in
the refrigerant circuit. The two measures of 4: Capacity and
coefficient of performance increase on substituting R290 for R22
in typical German heat pumps (Frehn 1993).
than all these but its vapour pressure, corrosion and toxicity
are higher. The toxicity is especially a disadvantage in
domestic applications.
HC refrigerants are completely soluble in and compatible
with hydrocarbon lubricants. HC liquid absorbs only trace
amounts of water, like R12, so HC refrigerants are completely
compatible with R12 driers. HC refrigerants with appropriate
vapour pressures are drop-in replacements for CFCs on
equipment using thermostatic expansion valves. Other
expansion devices may require adjustment or replacement.
6 Conclusion
7 Acknowledgement
8 References