Chapter 1 N 5 Shah-Edited
Chapter 1 N 5 Shah-Edited
Chapter 1 N 5 Shah-Edited
INTRODUCTION
Generally, oil recovery occurs through two main processes, which are
primary recovery and secondary recovery. Primary recovery commonly comes from
natural drives; which are rock and liquid expansion drive, depletion drive, gas cap
drive, water drive, and gravity drainage drive. Meanwhile, secondary recovery refers
to the introduction of additional energy into the reservoir. One of most common
technique in secondary recovery is water injection or waterflooding. Briefly, the
purpose of waterflooding is to maintain the reservoir pressure and displace the
remaining oil in the reservoir. Satter et al., (2008) mentioned that waterflooding
technique has been widely used mainly due to wide availability of water , and lower
capital investment and operating costs. Ordinarily, maximum total oil recovery after
primarily and secondary stage is 40% to 60% (Farouq and Thomas, 1996). The
remaining oil is trapped mostly because of the heterogeneity of reservoir,
unfavorable wettability and capillary trapping. To recover this remaining oil,
advanced methods, which have become known as enhanced oil recovery (EOR)
method is necessary.
About more than 60% worlds oil reserves are held in carbonate reservoirs
(Sheng et al., 2010). It is noted that oil recovery in these reservoirs is lower ascribed
by two leading factors that are fractured reservoir and oil-wet rock. Therefore, many
researches conducted have been focusing on wettability alteration of the rock and
apparently, there is an increasing interest in using chemical for this purpose. Adding
chemical agents such as surfactants can modify the wettability of carbonate rock
system from oil-wet to more water-wet condition (Mohammadi et al., 2014).
Wettability alteration of rock by surfactants was studied and the usage of ionic
surfactants has been considered as feasible method for the recovery of oil reservoirs
by modifying the wettability of rock surface from oil-wet to water-wet.
Current world oil production mostly comes from mature fields and over the
past decades, oil-based companies are maximizing the oil production from these
fields. However, stagnant oil production and unimpressive recovery by primary and
secondary recovery caused the situation to be more precarious (Roustaei et al, 2012).
Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technologies are necessary to meet the energy demand
in many more years to come.
There is a huge interest to enhance recovery from the carbonate rock system
by considering the remaining amount of oil in place. The addition of some chemical
agents such as surfactants and nanoparticles into the injecting water can modify the
wettability of the rock surface. In spite of all reported studies, the performance of
aluminium oxide nanoparticles and zirconium oxide nanoparticles in cationic
surfactant to alter wettability of oil-wet dolomite to more oil-wet condition has not
yet well studied.
Therefore, this research is carried out to investigate and identify the types of
nanoparticles that are effective as wettability modifiers. The challenging part in this
study is to understand the mechanisms involved in this alteration. Parameters such as
the nanofluids concentrations and the stability of the colloids are very important and
are investigated in order to achieve optimized conditions in this study.
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION AND RECOMENDATION
5.1 Conclusion