Rule 1-10 Civil Procedure
Rule 1-10 Civil Procedure
Rule 1-10 Civil Procedure
1. Civil action one by which a party sues another for the enforcement or protection of a right,
or the prevention or redress of a wrong; may be ordinary or special
Criminal action one by which the state prosecutes a person for an act or omission
punishable by law
Special proceeding remedy by which a party seeks to establish a status, a right, or a
particular fact
2. Rules of Court shall NOT be applicable to the following, except by analogy or in a suppletory
character, and whenever practicable and convenient
1. Election cases;
2. Land registration;
3. Cadastral proceedings;
4. Naturalization proceedings; and
5. Insolvency proceedings
Rule 2 Cause of Action
1. Cause of action an act or omission by which a party violates the right of another
1. The party joining the causes of action shall comply with the rules on joinder of parties;
2. The joinder shall NOT include special civil action or actions governed by special rules;
3. Where the causes of action are between the same parties but pertain to different venues or
jurisdiction, the joinder may be allowed in the RTC provided one of the causes of action falls
within the jurisdiction of the RTC and the venue lies therein;
3. Where the claims in all the causes of action are principally for recovery of money, the
aggregate amount claimed shall be the test of jurisdiction.
4. Misjoinder of causes of action NOT a ground for dismissal; the action may, on motion or motu
proprio, be severed and proceeded with separately.
Rule 3 Parties to Civil Actions
2. Death of defendant in action on contractual money claims before judgment of RTC NOT ground
for dismissal. Action continues until entry of final judgment. Any judgment against estate of
deceased will be enforced as money claim. Writ of preliminary attachment, if any, not dissolved.
1. Subject matter of the controversy is one of common or general interest to many persons;
2. Parties affected are so numerous that it is impracticable to bring them all to the court;
3. Parties bringing the class suit are sufficiently numerous or representative of the class and have
the legal capacity to file the action.
5. Transfer of Interest
Action may be continued by or against the original party, unless the court, on motion,
directs the transferee to be substituted in the action or joined with the original party; however, if
transfer is made before commencement of the action, the transferee must necessarily be the
party, since only he is the real party in interest.
1. Action Affects the Plaintiffs Personal Status in the court of the place where the plaintiff
resides.
2. Action Affects Any Property of the Defendant in the Philippines where the property or any
portion thereof is situated or found.
1. In those case where a specific rule or law provides otherwise (e.g., civil case for damages in
cases of libel, where Article 360 of RPC provides specific rules on venue); OR
2. Where the parties have validly agreed IN WRITING before the filing of the action on the
EXCLUSIVE venue thereof.
In this instance, the action can only be filed in the place agreed upon even if the other place is
the place of residence of the parties or the location of the real property involved.
1. The procedure in the MTCs shall be the same as that in the RTC.
1. Where a particular provision expressly or impliedly applies only to either of said courts.
2. In civil cases governed by the Rule on Summary Procedure.
Rule 6 Kinds of Pleadings
1. Negative Defense specific denial of the material fact or facts alleged in the pleading of the
claimant essential to his cause of action.
2. Affirmative defense an allegation of a new matter which, while hypothetically admitting the
material allegations in the pleading of the claimant, would nevertheless prevent or bar recovery
by him. Includes:
1. Fraud
2. Statute of limitations
3. Release
4. Payment
5. Illegality
6. Statue of frauds
7. Estoppel
8. Former recovery
9. Discharge in bankruptcy
10. Any other matter by way of confession or avoidance.
3. Compulsory counterclaim Requisites:
1. Arises out of or is necessarily connected with the transaction or occurrence which is the
subject matter of the opposing partys claim;
2. Does not require for its adjudication the presence of 3rd parties of whom the court cannot
acquire jurisdiction; and
3. Must be within the jurisdiction of the court both as to the nature and the amount, except that
in an ORIGINAL action in the RTC, the counterclaim may be considered regardless of the amount.
Agustin vs. Bacalang
A court (if MTC) has no jurisdiction to hear and determine a set-off or counterclaim in excess of its
jurisdiction. A counterclaim beyond the courts jurisdiction may only be pleaded by way of
defense, the purpose of which is to defeat or weaken the plaintiffs claim, but NOT to obtain
affirmative relief. MOREOVER, the amount of judgment obtained by the defendant on
appeal cannot exceed the jurisdiction of the court in which the action began. Since the trial
court did not acquire jurisdiction over the counterclaim in excess of the jurisdictional amount, the
appellate court likewise did not have jurisdiction over the same. In such a case, the award in
excess of the jurisdiction of the trial court is void.
Calo vs. Ajax
A counterclaim, even if otherwise compulsory, but amount exceeds the jurisdiction of the inferior
court, will only be considered permissive. Hence, fact that it is not set-up in the inferior court
will not bar plaintiff from instituting a separate action to prosecute it.
7. Certification against Forum-Shopping: Plaintiff or principal party shall certify under oath in
the complaint or other initiatory pleading or in a sworn certification annexed and filed therewith:
1. That he has not commenced any action or filed any claim involving the same issues in any
court, tribunal or quasi-judicial agency; to the best of his knowledge no such other claim or
action pending;
2. If there is such other pending action, a complete statement of the present status thereof;
3. If he should thereafter learn that same or similar action or claim is filed or pending, he shall
report the same within 5 days therefrom to the court where he filed his complaint.
NOTE: FAILURE TO COMPLY NOT CURABLE BY MERE AMENDMENT OF THE COMPLAINT OR PLEADING
BUT SHALL BE CAUSE FOR DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE; IF THE ACTS OF PARTY OR
COUNSEL CLEARLY CONSTITUTE WILLFUL & DELIBERATE FORUM SHOPPING, GROUND FOR SUMMARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND CONSTITUTE DIRECT CONTEMPT.
1. Allegations of capacity
The following defenses are cut-off by admission of genuineness and due execution of the
document:
1. Signature is a forgery
2. Signature is unauthorized
3. Corporation is not authorized under its charter to sign the instrument
1. Party charged signed the instrument in some other capacity than that alleged in the
pleading setting it out
2. Document was never delivered.
3. 4. Specific Denial
1. Defendant must specify each material allegation of fact the truth of which he does not admit;
2. Defendant must set forth the substance of the matters upon which he relies to support his
denial, whenever practicable;
3. If denying only part of an averment, he shall specify so much of it as is true and material and
shall deny the remainder;
4. If defendant does not have knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
of a material averment, he shall so state and this has effect of denial.
Negative pregnant a denial which at the same time involves an admission of the substantial
facts in the pleading responded to.
5. Allegations not specifically denied, other than those as to amount of unliquidated damages
deemed admitted.
1. General Rule: Defenses and objections not pleaded in answer or motion to dismiss are deemed
waived (Omnibus Motion Rule).
Exception: Court shall dismiss the claim, even without allegation in answer or motion to dismiss, if
any of the following appear from the pleadings or the evidence on record:
1. Lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter;
2. Litis pendentia between same parties for the same cause;
3. Res judicata
4. Action barred by statute of limitations.
1. 2. Declaration of Default
1. Defendant entitled to notice of motion to declare him in default and of order of default;
2. Motion to set aside order of default may be filed after notice and before judgment;
3. Party may make motion, under oath, to set aside order of default upon proper showing that
failure to answer was due to FAME;
4. Effect of order of default party in default entitled to notice of subsequent proceedings but
not to take part in trial;
5. Partial default if several defending parties and not all in default, the court shall try the case
against all upon the answers thus filed and evidence presented;
6. After declaration of default, court may render judgment on the basis of the complaint or
require claimant to submit evidence;
7. Judgment against party in default shall not exceed the amount or differ in kind from that
prayed for nor award unliquidated damages;
8. No defaults in action for annulment or declaration of nullity of marriage or for legal separation.
Rule 10 Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
Plaintiff may amend complaint as a matter of right even after defendant files a Motion to
Dismiss, since the same is not a responsive pleading.
1. 2. Substantial amendments may be made only with leave of court, except as provided above.
2. 3. An amended pleading supersedes the pleading that it amends but admissions in superseded
pleadings may be received in evidence against the pleader. (NOT judicial admissions anymore;
thus, must be formally offered)
3. 4. Claims and defenses alleged in original but not incorporated in the amended pleading shall
be deemed waived.
Amended Supplemental
Refers to facts existing at the time of the Refers to facts arising after the filing of the
commencement of the action original pleading
Results in the withdrawal of the original Merely an addition, and does NOT result in
pleading the withdrawal of, the original pleading
Can sometimes be made as a matter of right Always filed with leave of court
If amended not as a matter of right, 10 days from notice of order admitting the same
Answer earlier filed may be answer to amended complaint, if no new answer is filed
Motion for Bill of Particulars may NOT call for matters which form part of the proof of the
complaint. Thus, motion should not be granted if the complaint, while not very definite,
nonetheless already states a sufficient cause of action.
Mere filing of an answer per se should not be automatically treated as a voluntary appearance
by the defendant for the purpose of sumons. It should be noted that when the appearance of the
defendant is precisely to object to the jurisdiction of the court over his person, it cannot be
considered as an appearance in court.
Rule 15 Motions
1. 1. All motions must be in writing except:
2. 2. Exceptions to the three-day notice rule:
1. Those made in open court; OR
2. Those made in the course of a hearing or trial.
1. Ex parte motion
2. Urgent motion
3. When court sets hearing on shorter notice for good cause
4. Motion for summary judgment (must be served at least 10 days before the hearing)
A prudent judge would, in the absence of the opposing party in the hearing of a motion,
inquire from the other party or inquire from the records the proof of the service of notice rather
than proceed with the hearing. He should not rely on a partys undertaking to notify the adverse
party of a scheduled hearing. The judge must demand what the rule requires, i.e., proof of such
notice on the adverse party. Otherwise, a contentious motion should be considered a mere scrap
of paper which should not have even been received for filing.
Subsequent service of the motion on the adverse party may be considered substantial
compliance with the Rule 15, 6. Failure to attach to the motion proof of service thereof to the
adverse party is not fatal when the adverse party had actually received a copy of the motion and
was in fact present in court when the motion was heard.
The court shall not defer the resolution of the motion for the reason that the ground relied
upon is not indubitable.
4. If denied, defendant must file answer within the balance of the 15-day period, but not less
than 5 days from the time he received notice of the denial;
5. Subject to the right to appeal, dismissal based on the following grounds will be bar to refiling:
1. a. Res judicata
2. Extinguishment of claim or demand
3. Prescription
4. Unenforceability under the Statute of Frauds
6. The dismissal of the complaint shall be without prejudice to the prosecution in the same or
separate action of a counterclaim pleaded in the answer.
A motion to dismiss on the ground of failure to state a cause of action in the complaint must
hypothetically admit the truth of the facts alleged in the complaint. The admission, however, is
limited only to all material and relevant facts which are well pleaded in the complaint. The
demurrer does not admit the truth of mere epithets charging fraud; nor allegations of legal
conclusions; nor an erroneous statement of law; nor matters of evidence; nor to legally impossible
facts.
If counterclaim has been pleaded by a defendant prior to the service upon him of plaintiffs
motion to dismiss, dismissal is limited to the complaint; dismissal is without prejudice to
defendants right to prosecute counterclaim in a separate action or, if he makes a manifestation
within 15 days from notice of the motion, to prosecute CC in same action.
1. 2. Dismissal due to plaintiffs fault the following must be without justifiable cause
1. If plaintiff fails to appear on the date of presentation of his evidence in chief;
2. Plaintiff fails to prosecute claim for an unreasonable length of time
3. Plaintiff fails to comply with the Rules of Court or any order of the court
Complaint may be dismissed upon defendants motion or motu proprio.
Unless otherwise declared by the court, dismissal has effect of adjudication upon the merits.
RULE ON SEVERANCE OF COMPULSORY CC: Dismissal of principal action upon plaintiffs motion or
due to plaintiffs fault does not necessarily carry with it the dismissal of the compulsory CC;
defendant is also given option to prosecute the same in same or separate action.
1. 3. Dismissal of counterclaim, cross-claim, or 3rd-party complaint must be made by claimant
before a responsive pleading or a motion for summary judgment is served, or if there is none,
before the introduction of evidence.
Rule 18 Pre-Trial
1. Calendar of cases to be kept by clerk of court for cases set for pre-trial, trial, those whose
trials adjourned or postponed and those with motions set for hearings.
1. 2. Preference given to habeas corpus, election cases, special civil actions and those so
required by law.
Rule 21 Subpoena
2. No prisoner sentenced to death, reclusion perpetua, or life imprisonment and who is confined
in any penal institution shall be brought outside said institution for appearance or attendance in
any court unless authorized by the SC.
This is known as the viatory right of the witness; NOTE, however, that the right is available
only in CIVIL cases
2. Witness fees and kilometrage allowed by rules not tendered when subpoena served.
1. 5. Service of subpoena made in the same manner as personal or substituted service of
summons.
2. 6. Person present in court before a judicial officer may be required to testify as if he were in
attendance upon a subpoena.
3. 7. Failure by any person without adequate cause to obey a subpoena served upon him shall
be deemed a contempt of the court from which subpoena issued.
Depositions Affidavits
Written testimony of witness in course of
judicial proceedings, in advance of trial and
hearing Mere sworn written statements
1. 5. Use of depositions
Any part or all of a deposition which is admissible in evidence may be used against any party
who was present or represented during the taking of the deposition or who had notice thereof as
follows:
May be used
Deposition of by
Purpose
To contradict or impeach the
A witness Any party deponents testimony as a witness
1. Witness is dead;
2. b. Witness resides at a
distance more than 100 km from
place of trial, UNLESS absence
procured by party offering the
deposition
3. c. Witness is unable to
testify because of age, sickness,
infirmity, or imprisonment;
4. d. Party offering the
deposition has been unable to
procure the attendance of the
witness by subpoena; OR
5. e. Other exceptional
Of any witness, whether a
circumstances make it desirable
party or not Any party
to allow deposition to be used.
If only part of the deposition is introduced, adverse party may require that all of it which is
relevant to the part introduced be introduced.
1. Judge
2. Notary public
3. Any person authorized to administer oaths if the parties so stipulate in writing
b. In foreign countries
1. On notice, before a secretary of any embassy or legation, consul-general, consul, vice-consul,
consular agent of the Phils
1. Before such person or officer as may be appointed by commission or under letters-
rogatories
2. Any person authorized to administer oaths if the parties so stipulate.
Commission addressed to any authority in a foreign country authorized therein to take down
depositions; the taking of such depositions is subject to the rules laid down by the court issuing
the commission
Letters Rogatory addressed to judicial authority in the foreign country; the taking of the
depositions is subject to the rules laid down by such foreign judicial authority.
Party desiring to take such deposition shall serve them upon every other party with a notice
stating the name and address of the person who is to answer them and the name and descriptive
title of the officer before whom the deposition is to be taken;
Party so served may serve cross-interrogatories upon the proponent within 10 days thereafter
1. As to notice waived unless written objection is promptly served upon the party giving the
notice
2. As to disqualification of officer waived unless made before the taking of the deposition begins
or as soon thereafter as the disqualification becomes known or could be discovered with
reasonable diligence
3. As to competency or relevancy of evidence NOT waived by failure to make them before or
during the taking of the deposition, unless ground is one which might have been obviated or
removed if presented at that time
4. As to oral exam and other particulars Errors occurring at the oral exam in the manner of
taking the deposition, in the form of questions and answers, in oath or affirmation, or in conduct
of parties, and errors of any kind which might be obviated, removed, cured if promptly
prosecuted are waived unless reasonable objection is made at the taking of the deposition.
5. As to form of written interrogatories waived unless served in writing upon party propounding
them within the time allowed for serving succeeding cross or other interrogatories and within 3
days after the service of the last interrogatories authorized.
6. As to manner of preparation errors as to manner in which the testimony is transcribed or the
deposition is prepared, signed, certified, sealed, indorsed, transmitted, filed or otherwise dealt
with by the officer are waived unless a motion to suppress the deposition or some part of it is
made with reasonable promptness after such defect is, or with due diligence might have been,
ascertained.
A deposition, in keeping with its nature as a mode of discovery, should be taken before and not
during trial. IN fact, the rules on criminal practice particularly on the defense of alibi states
that when a person intends to rely on such a defense, that person must move for the taking of the
deposition of his witness within the time provided for filing a pre-trial motion.
A person desiring to perpetuate his own testimony or that of another person regarding any matter
that may be cognizable in any court of the Phils may file a verified petition in the court of the
place of the residence of any expected adverse party, which petition shall be entitled in the name
of the petitioner and shall show:
1. That petitioner expects to be a party to an action in a court of the Phils but is presently unable
to bring it or cause it to be brought;
2. The subject matter of the expected action and his interest therein;
3. The facts which he desires to establish by the proposed testimony and his reasons for desiring
to perpetuate it;
4. The names or description of the persons he expects will be the adverse parties and their
addresses so far as known;
5. The name and addresses of the persons to be examined and the substance of the testimony
which he expects to elicit from each.
1. 2. Use of deposition
If deposition to perpetuate testimony is taken under this rule or if not so taken is still admissible
in evidence may be used in any action involving the same subject matter subsequent brought in
accordance with the provisions of Rule 23.
1. Interrogatories and the answers thereto should be filed in court and served on adverse parties,
so that the answers may constitute judicial admissions.
2. Effect of failure to serve written interrogatories a party not served with such may NOT be
compelled by the adverse party to give testimony in open court or deposition pending appeal.
A written request for the admission of the other party of the genuineness of any material or
document or request for the truth of any material and relevant matter of fact set forth in the
request may be filed and served upon the other party at any time after issues have been joined.
1. 2. Implied admission
Each of the matter requested to be admitted shall be deemed admitted within a period
designated in the request, which shall not be less than 15 days after service thereof or within such
further time as the court may allow on motion, UNLESS, party requested serves upon the party
requesting a sworn statement either specifically denying or setting forth in detail the reasons why
he cannot truthfully either admit or deny those matters.
1. 3. Effect of admission
Admission is only for the purpose of the pending action and shall NOT constitute an admission for
any other person nor may it be used against him in any other proceeding.
1. 4. A party who fails to file and serve a request for admission on the adverse party of material
facts within the personal knowledge of the latter shall not be permitted to present evidence
thereon,
1. If the mental or physical condition of a party is in controversy, the court may order him to
submit to a physical or mental examination by a physician.
2. The party examined waives any privilege he may have in that action regarding the testimony of
the person who has examined or may examine him with respect to that same mental or physical
examination by:
1. Requesting and obtaining a report of the examination so ordered OR
2. Taking the deposition of the examiner.
1. The refusing party or his counsel to pay the expenses incurred in obtaining the order, including
the attorneys fees (if it finds the refusal to answer without substantial justification)
2. The proponent or his counsel to pay the expenses incurred in opposing the application,
including attorneys fees (if it finds the application to be without substantial justification)
1. That the matters regarding which the questions were asked, or the character of the land or the
thing, or the physical and mental condition of the party be taken to be established.
2. The disallowance of the disobedient partys claims
3. The prohibition of the disobedient party to present evidence
4. The striking out of the pleadings or parts thereof
5. The dismissal of the action or parts thereof
6. Rendering judgment by default against the disobedient party OR
7. The arrest of any party or agent EXCEPT in disobeying an order to submit to a physical or
mental examination.
5. The Republic of the Philippines cannot be required to pay expenses and attorneys fees under
this Rule.
Rule 30 Trial
1. 1. Order of trial
Trial shall be limited to the issues stated in the pre-trial order and shall proceed as follows:
https://lawphilreviewer.wordpress.com/tag/civil-procedure-rules-1-10/