Due Deligency Gideline
Due Deligency Gideline
Due Deligency Gideline
March, 2008
Table of Contents
Page
I. Introduction 2
1.1 Definition 2
1.2 Objective of Due diligence 2
1.3 Focus areas of Due diligence 3
1.1 Definition
Another common definition of due diligence is also known as due care, meaning the effort
made by an ordinarily prudent or reasonable party to avoid harm to another party or
himself.
In many ways, a business is like an individual, it has a past, a culture and interaction with
many others each day. But like some people, what you see may not represent what that
business is really all about. Many businesses have hidden liabilities and hidden histories or
illicit behavior. Therefore, knowledge and experience in business background investigation
of the client is the crucial factor in staying ahead of the competition, meaning what you
dont know can hurt you more.
Due to failure to make proper due diligence more and more people are forced to facilitating
a business deal end-up in court over.
There are many reasons for conducting due diligence, some of these are:
Confirmation that the business is what it appears to be in order to make the
purchase decision, to establish credit relation or considering a merger.
Identify potential deal killer defects in the target and avoid a bad business
transaction.
Gain information that will be useful for valuing assets, defining representations
and warrants, and /or negotiating price concessions.
Verification that the transaction complies with investment or acquisition criteria
Searching for undisclosed litigation or regulatory problem verifying transactions and terms
with vendors, interviewing former employees about the true condition of the company and
the roles of key staff in the business, verifying receivables are from non-related and
legitimate sources, capable and willing to make payment and verifying ownership of
property, plant and equipments.
Supervisors around the world are increasingly recognizing the importance of ensuring that
their banks have adequate controls and procedures in place so that they have to know the
customers with whom they are dealing. Therefore, due diligence on new and existing
customers is a key part of these controls. Without this due diligence, banks can become
subject to reputation, operational, legal and concentration risks, which can result in
significant financial cost. Such as withdrawal of funds by depositors, the inter-bank
facilities termination, claims against the bank, investigation costs, asset seizures &
freezers, and loan losses.
In reviewing the findings of an internal survey cross-border banking in 1999, the Basel
Committee identified deficiencies in a large number of countries know-your-customer
(KYC) policies for banks. When countries were judged from a supervisory perspective,
KYC policies in some countries have significant gaps and in others they are non-
existent. Even among countries with well-developed financial markets, the extent of KYC
robustness varies. Consequently, the Basel Committee asked the working group on cross-
border banking (Group of Banking Supervisors) to examine the KYC procedures currently
in place and to draw up recommended standards applicable to Banks in all
countries.
Following a review of the comments received, the working group has revised the paper
and Basel Committee is now distributing it worldwide in the expectation that the KYC
framework presented here will become the benchmark for supervisors to establish national
practices and for banks to design their own programs.
KYC is most closely associated with the fight against money-laundering at beginning,
but lately the Committees interested to wider it to prudential perspective. Sound KYC
policies and procedures are critical in protecting the safety and soundness of Banks
and the integrity of banking systems. Sound KYC procedures must be seen as a
critical element in the effective management of banking risks.
The Basel Committee interests in sound KYC standards originates from its concerns for
market integrity and has been heightened by the direct and indirect losses incurred by
banks due to their lack of diligence in applying appropriate procedures. These losses could
probably have been avoided and damage to the banks reputation significantly diminished in
the banks that had maintained effective KYC programs. The KYC standards may need to
be supplemented and / or strengthened by additional measures tailored to the risks of
particular institutions and risks in the banking system of individual countries.
Sound KYC procedures have particular relevance to the safety and soundness of banks, in
that:
They help to protect banks from becoming a vehicle for or a victim of financial
crime and suffering consequential reputation damage.
They constitute an essential part of sound risk management by providing the
basis for identifying, limiting and controlling risk exposures in assets and
liabilities.
The absence of KYC standards can subject banks to serious customer and
counterparty risks, especially reputation, operational, legal and concentration risks.
Any of these risks can result in significant financial cost to banks and divert considerable
management time and energy to resolving problems that arise.
1. Reputation Risk
Reputation risk is defined as the potential that adverse publicity regarding a banks
business practices and associations, whether accurate or not, will cause a loss of
confidence in the integrity of the institution. Banks are especially vulnerable to reputation
risk because they can so easily become a vehicle for or a victim of illegal activities
perpetrated (committed) by their customers.
3. Legal Risk
Legal risk is the possibility that lawsuits, adverse judgments or contracts that turn out to be
unenforceable can disrupt or adversely affect the operations of a bank. Banks may
become subject to lawsuits resulting from the failure to observe mandatory KYC standards
or from the failure to practice due diligence. Banks will be unable to protect themselves
effectively from such legal risks if they do not engage in due diligence, in identifying their
customers and understanding their businesses.
4. Concentration Risk
Concentration risk mostly applies on the assets side of the balance sheet and it is
discussed from both credit side and liability side.
On the credit side, concentration risk is related to banks exposure to single borrower or
groups of related borrowers. As a common practice, supervisors not only require banks to
have information systems to identify credit concentration but also set prudential limits to
restrict banks exposures to single borrower or groups of related borrowers. Without
knowing precisely who the customers are, and their relationship with other customers, it will
not be possible for a bank to measure its concentration risk.
On the liabilities side, concentration risk is closely associated with funding risk, particularly
the risk of early and sudden withdrawal of funds by large depositors, with potentially
damaging consequence for the banks liquidity. Analyzing deposit concentrations requires
banks to understand the characteristics of their depositors, including not only their identities
but also the extent to which their actions may be linked with those of other depositors.
Therefore, it is essential for managers in small banks not only to know the depositors but
All banks should be required to have in place adequate policies, practices and procedures
that promote high ethical and professional standards and prevent the bank from being
used, intentionally or unintentionally, by criminal elements. Therefore, the banks have to
include the following elements when they design KYC programs.
1. Customer acceptance policy
2. Customer identification
3. On-going monitoring of high risk accounts or loans
4. Risk management
From above mentioned elements, the first two are focused for the title under discussion.
2. Customer Identification
Banks should establish a systematic procedure for identifying new customers and should
not establish a banking relationship until the identity of a new customer is satisfactorily
So, it is essential that the true relationship is understood. Banks should establish
procedure to identify whether the customer is taking the name of another customer, acting
as a front or acting on behalf of another person as trustee, nominee or other intermediary.
If so, a necessary and satisfactory evidence of the identity of an intermediary, and of the
persons upon whose behalf they are acting, as well as details of the nature of the trust or
other arrangements should be presented.
2. Corporate Vehicles
Banks need to be vigilant (careful) in preventing corporate business entities from being
used by natural persons as a method of operating with anonymous name/account.
Therefore, in the case of companies, the banks have to know or identify the beneficial
owners, structure of the company, the source of funds and those who have control over the
fund.
3. Introduced Business
The time consuming of identification process, there is a natural desire to limit any
inconvenience for new customers.
In some countries, it has therefore become customary for banks to rely on the procedures
undertaken by other banks or introducers when a business is being referred. Relying on
due diligence conducted by an introducer, however reputable, does not in any way
remove the ultimate responsibility of the recipient Bank to know its customers and
their business. The ultimate responsibility for knowing customers always lies with
the bank. Therefore, the Basel Committee recommends that banks that use introducers
should carefully assess whether the introducers are fit and proper using the following
criteria.
The customer due diligence procedures of the introducer should be as
rigorous as those which the bank would have conducted itself for the
customer.
Bank should gather sufficient information from a new customer and check publicly available
information, in order to establish whether or not the customer is a PEP. If the person is
identified as PEP, banks should investigate the source of funds before accepting a PEP. It
is recommendable to accept or not the PEP as the bank customer to be the decision of
senior management.
In long years of project financing operation of the Bank, DBE more or loss had exercised
identifying of the client, especially in the back ground part of the feasibility study. The
identification of the client up to November 2005 mainly included the educational
background, business performance, experience and managerial capability of the client.
However, these back ground studies have not contributed as such more in protecting the
Bank from fraudulent customers and from immersing in high financial costs because of the
depth of the study, lacking of hard facts and weak accountability of the personals. To
overcome these drawbacks, since November 2005 the Bank has commenced due diligence
assessment and established a responsible and accountable functional work unit for this
purpose, whoever it is at its infant stage as it is evaluated from KYC standards. The
existing due diligence assessment of DBE has the following focus areas.
Under this part the officer states the legal name of the promoter and the project and the
address of the promoter and the project. The address of the promoter and the project
should clearly indicate the where about ness of the promoter and communicating means
whenever the client is required. The communicating means may include knowing of the
exact location of the promoters office and project location, telephone number of office and
cell phone, postal address, fax number, and e-mail address. Ensuring of these addresses
exactly reduce fraudulent customers by some number since such persons are not willing to
disclose their real address and location. Besides its important for due diligence, knowing
the address of the promoter as well as the project is equally important for monitoring project
progress and follow-up.
Legal status includes the legal form of the company (Sole proprietorship, company, NGO,
etc.), date of establishment, article and memorandum of association for companies,
marital status (for Sole proprietorship), Investment license, Trade license & status of
the project (whether it is new or existing).
The Need for Title Dead and Site Plan of the Land holding
To confirm the ownership of the land holding.
To define the exact location of the project.
To know the size of land holding.
To register the collateral as pledge.
This part identifies the members of the given company are natural or legal persons. As it is
discussed earlier criminal persons or defaulters can approach the Bank by using the
company as anonymous name. Identifying of each member is the crucial issue when
dealing with company. Once the members are identified and trusted, the next step should
be to make effort to know the share source of the members in order to protect the Bank
from being the victim of money laundering. These issues can be confirmed by cross
checking the ID of the members with addresses stipulated in memorandum of association
and requesting financial statement from their account holding banks. The other point need
due attention is evaluation of their personal business performance if they have any.
Because, the bankrupted individual can approach the Bank with the mask of company and
may create the same problem. The performance of the respective members, therefore,
should be evaluated by requesting the company members to offer audited report by
licensed auditor.
The human element takes the greater share in project success or failure. Organization and
Management is the main element due diligence has to focus on. Under this the officer is
expected to make a profound assessment about organization structure of the business,
the competency & characteristic of the management team and the man power
requirement of the business.
Organizational Structure:
In consideration to the form of business (Sole proprietorship, plc, sc, etc.), and the size and
type of the business, it is important to discuss the appropriateness of the organization
structure in place.
Availability of Manpower:
The existence of both skilled and unskilled labor as per the requirement of the business
also has to be checked. The wage rate and salary scale of the project proposal are also
evaluated as per the prevailing market situation.
This part looks the credit history of both the business and its owners. Identification of the
credit performance of the business and its owner protects the Bank from being accessed by
defaulters or non-credit worthy clients. Specially, this day plcs are wrongly used as mask to
non credit worthy persons, therefore, checking each of the share holders in the company is
very important. Under identification process the following points should have to get due
attention.
Type of the business by which he/she secured the loan.
The type of the loan facility.
The status and the position of the loan.
History of credit performance.
Collateral offered for previous creditor.
All information listed above can be obtained by requesting his/her previous
creditor and credit information center. One thing here to note is not to forget
that checking of credit relation with our Bank.
7. Technical Aspects
Technical documents that are important for engineering estimation and loan appraisal are
also expected to be collected at this stage.
Management
Experience
Availability of skilled labor
Others
Marketing strategy
Pricing of product
Quality of product
Destination market
Market size & preference
Delivery time issues
Technical
Technology (choice)
Technology require skill
Others
Basel Committee on Banking supervision, Customer due diligence for Banks, Internet