Review of Solid Mechanics: Appendix A
Review of Solid Mechanics: Appendix A
Review of Solid Mechanics: Appendix A
Contents
A.1 Introduction...............................................................................................
A.2 Concept of stress ......................................................................................
A.3 Equations of equilibrium in a cylindrical system ..............................
A.4 Principal stresses ......................................................................................
A.5 Strain ..........................................................................................................
A.6 Stressstrain relations ..............................................................................
A.7 Elastic plane problems ............................................................................
A.7.1 Plane strain....................................................................................
A.7.2 Plane stress....................................................................................
A.7.3 Stress function formulation ........................................................
A.8 Plasticity.....................................................................................................
A.1 Introduction
In order to understand the equations in pressure vessel design, it is
important to go over some of the basics of solid mechanics. Although it is
essential primarily to learn these concepts developed in the classical
theories of plates and shells, for the sake of completeness we shall include
the concepts of stress, strain, and constitutive relationships and move over
to the theories of elasticity and plasticity.
Before we move on it is important to realize that a body or a structure
like that of a pressure vessel is a deformable one. As such the mechanics of
such a body would involve deformations being set up as a result of a system
of applied forces. The systems of forces that may act on a body are body
forces (acting along the entire volume) and surface forces (acting along the
external surface of the body). Within the domain of body forces in pressure
vessels, we can talk about gravity (dead weight) and seismic loads. As far as
the surface forces are concerned, we can mention fluid pressure which is
what a pressure vessel is primarily designed for. Other surface forces might
fn
lim
A!0 A
fi
lim A:1
A!0 A
The shear stress may be further resolved into two in-plane components
(orthogonal to each other).
Now consider at each point O in the body of Figure A.2, three mutually
perpendicular planes, the x-plane (or x1), the y-plane (or x2), and the z-plane
(or x3). Across each plane we have a normal component, which for one
plane will be denoted as 11 and the two in-plane components of the shear
as 1,2 and 1,3. Note that the first subscript refers to the plane while the
second refers to the direction of the stress component. Note that for the face
with outward normal in the negative x1 direction (this left face) the
direction of the components 13 and 12 are reversed from that of the
The moment equilibrium leads to 1,2 2,1, 1,3 3,1, 2,3 3,2.
2 3
r r rz
4 r z 5 A:5
zr z z
@r @ z 1 @ r r
0
@r @z r @ r
@ r 1 @ r @ z 2 r
0
@r r @ @z r
@ rz 1 @ z @ z 2z rz
0 A:6
@r r @ @z @z r
@r @ zr r
0
@r @z r
@ rz @z rz
0 A:7
@r @z r
where
I, II, and III are stress invariants, because their values do not change with
the rotations of the frame of reference. If we derive the roots of the Eq. (A.8)
by 1 ; 2 ; 3 , then
I 1 2 3
II 1 2 2 3 3 1
III 1 2 3 A:10
A.5 Strain
If we consider a straight rod of length l and when a load is applied the
length is increased by l. Then the ratio of l/l is called the strain .
Looking at a two-dimensional deformation pattern, for a rectangle ABCD, is
shown in Figure A.4. The two dimensional strain components are defined
as
@u
"1;1
@x1
@v
"2;2
@x2
@u @v
1;2 2"1;2 A:11
@x2 @x1
@u 1 @u @v
"1;1 "1;2
@x1 2 @x2 @x1
@v 1 @u @w
"1;1 "1;1
@x2 2 @x3 @x1
@w 1 @v @w
"1;1 "1;1 A:12
@x3 2 @x3 @x2
@ur 1 @ur @u u
"r r
@r r @ @r r
ur @u 1 @uz
" z
r @z r @
@uz @ur @uz
"z zr A:13
@z @z @r
Similar to stresses, there are planes along which there are only normal
strains, and no shear strains. Identical relationships such as those derived
for principal stresses in Eqs. (A.8), (A.9), and (A.10) can be obtained for
principal strains.
1
"1;1 1;1 2;2 3;3
E
1
"2;2 1;1 3;3
E 2;2
1
"3;3 3;3 1;1 2;2
E
1
"1;2
E 1;2
1
"2;3
E 2;3
1
"1;2 A:15
E 3;1
@u @u @v @u
"x ; " and xy A:16
@x y @y @x @y
@x @ xy
0
@x @y
@xy @y
0 A:17
@x @y
1h i
"x x y z A:18a
E
1h i
"x y x z A:18b
E
1h i
"x x y z A:18c
E
21
xy 2"xy xy A:18d
E
21
xy 2"yz yz A:18e
E
21
zx 2"zz zx A:18f
E
1 h i
"x x x y
E
1 h i
"y y x y
E
21
xy xy A:19
E
@w
"z A:20
@z
Further analysis leads to the important result that "z is a linear function
of x and y only.
It turns out that the plane stress assumption, wherein x, y and xy are
independent of z, is good approximation for thin plates subjected to forces
that are uniformly distributed over the thickness of the boundary and are
parallel to the middle plane.
The stressstrain relations for plane stress are given by
1 9
"x y > >
>
E x >
>
>
>
>
1 >
>
>
"y y x > =
E
A:21
>>
"z x y >>
>
>
E >
>
>
>
>
>
xy x y ;
E
Eqs. (A.22) and (A.23) are known as Naviers equations. We also observe
that replacing
by
/(1
) in the plane stress, Eqs. (A.23) are obtained.
It can be rigorously shown using Eqs. (A.22) and (A.23) that for both
plane stress and plane strain problems, the following relations hold in the
absence of body forces:
r2 x y 0 A:24
If the stresses can be written down in terms of (x, y), also known as the
Airy stress function, such that
@2
x
@y2
@2
y
@x2
@2
xy A:25
@x@y
r2 r2 0
or
r4 0 A:26
A.8 Plasticity
For a bar loaded in tension the stress generally is linear with strain
representing a linear elastic behavior. When the load is removed, the bar
comes back to its original shape without any permanent deformation, thus
depicting an elastic response of the material. Beyond the linear portion of
the stressstrain curve or beyond the proportional limit (typically below the
yield point) the stressstrain relationship is generally nonlinear and the
material progressively moves to the plastic region characterized by a
permanent deformation. It is conceivable to have an elastic material having
nonlinear stressstrain behavior as long as there is no permanent deforma-
tion upon unloading.
Typically the stress for which a permanent strain of 0.002 or 0.2 percent
occurs upon the removal of load is defined as the yield strength. This is also
referred to as 0.2 percent offset yield strength. This is a standard means of
characterizing yield behavior, since quite a few materials do not have a
well-defined material yield, where a marked change from predominantly
elastic to plastic behavior takes place. As the load is progressively increased
for the bar in tension beyond the yield, some materials display strain-
hardening behavior before failure. For some brittle materials, such as cast
iron, the bar in tension breaks without any significant strain hardening. In
either case, the nominal stress at which the material breaks is known as the
ultimate tensile strength, which is the load causing fracture divided by the
original cross-section area. However, the cross-sectional area in most
materials is reduced as the applied load increases. Therefore the true stress
is often larger than the nominal stress, which is based on the original cross-
sectional area. The true stress at fracture is thus considerably higher than
the nominal ultimate tensile strength.
A typical stressstrain curve is shown in Figure A.5. The proportional
limit is indicated as Sp and the yield strength (0.2 percent offset) by Sy; Su
denotes the ultimate strength. It is clear from Figure A.5 that for
Sp ; " A:27
E
and for
1
> Sp ; " K n A:28
E
Here, E is the slope of the line shown in dotted lines in Figure A.5, and
referred to as the modulus of elasticity or Youngs modulus. The index n is