Data and Analysis: Experiment 1: Finding The Density of A Hollow Cylinder
Data and Analysis: Experiment 1: Finding The Density of A Hollow Cylinder
Data and Analysis: Experiment 1: Finding The Density of A Hollow Cylinder
In this section, I will list all the data that we had collected and calculated
during our experiment. Included in this are the diameter, height, thickness,
volume and Density. Also, I will include the calculations we did to find the
required densities in the two experiments. Since we did two different
experiments, this section is further divided into two sub-sections of
Experiment 1 and Experiment 2.
To calculate the Area, we used the formula [ = ( )2 ], because we found
2
the Diameter, not the radius, so we use r = . After that we find the External
2
and the Internal Volume by multiplying Area with Length, external volume is
found by using (V1=A1 x Length) and the internal Volume is found by using
(V1=A1 x Length) Then we subtract V1 with V2 to find the Occupied volume.
After that, we eventually found the Density by dividing the Mass with the
Occupied Volume.
Density =
Since the object didn't have a regular shape, we divided it into three sections,
and then to find the occupied volume, we subtracted its total volume with the
sum of its two unoccupied volume.
Volume of the Whole Mass:
2 2 2 2
No. of Height Diameter Cross-sectional Area Volume
repetition (mm) (mm) (2 ) (3 )
Now we find the first unoccupied volume which has a shape of a rectangle so
the data to be collected to find its volume is its length, width and height. So
the table is:
So again by using the Formula = ( 3 )2 , we find its cross-sectional area
2
Then by using the formula = ( 3 )2 H3
2
Now, to find the Total Occupied volume we will do it in the following way
=5912.4 3
50
Density =
5912.4
However, we need the density in g/3 so now we convert our density into
that form
1 3
=8.46 x 103 x 3
x
103 3
103
= 8.46 x
103
= 8.46 3
Percentage Error = x 100
8.968.46
= x 100
8.96
= 5.58 %
CONCLUSION
Based on our results, our calculated density and the actual
density were very close with an error of only 5.58%.This means that our result
matches the predictions from the physical theory. The sources of errors were
parallax error when reading the scale of the Veriner calliper, errors due to
approximation during the calculations.