Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
NIGERIAN INSTITUTE
OF MANAGEMENT
(CHARTERED)
(SMPE 203)
STUDY PACK
BUSINESS ETHICS
AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
(SMPE 203)
STAGE II
Website: www.managmentnigeria.org
E-mail: mgtedu@managementnigeria.org
This study pack covers all the topics and all the basic materials necessary for adequate grasp of the
subject for the Proficiency Certificate in Management Examination of Nigerian Institute of
Management (Chartered).
While expecting candidates, to read as widely as possible on their courses, the Institute's role in
preparing this study pack, is to treat in one publication all the topics covered by the syllabus for this
particular course.
This will enhance focused study on the part of candidate. This pack is written by an expert on the
subject. The writing is reader-friendly while the issues discussed are current with the general
treatment of topics having a contemporary feel.
The topics are treated in a way not only to provide general and theoretical knowledge but to
enhance practice.
We wish to express our utmost appreciation to our faculty of experts for their invaluable
development and writing of these study pack series.
MANAGEMENT
FOREWORD 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS 5
Appendix 39
References 42
1.20 Introduction
Business is a sequence of economic activities, involving the use and exchange of resources for
money. Firms and corporations operate in a social and natural environment and should be
accountable to the society in which they operate and grow. Irrespective of the demands and
pressures upon it, business is built to be ethical, for at least two reasons. Firstly, whatever business
does affects its stakeholders. Secondly, every business action has ethical as well as unethical paths.
We should endeavour to always follow the ethical way-the better way!
B. Business Ethics:
Ethics as practised by business organisations is called business ethics.
Specifically, they are moral rules and standards which guide business actions, decisions and
judgements.
Most business actions and choices, decisions and judgements have ethical aspects since they
specifically involve values that help or harm people and indicate character.
Sternberg (2000) argued that, hiring and firing, choosing suppliers, setting prices, establishing
objectives, allocating resources, determining dividends, disciplining workers, planning schedules,
awarding contracts, all involve ethical choices'. Even the most trivial decisions that appear to be
made on purely technical or economic criteria have ethical aspects.
b. In resource utilization.
In reporting the financial condition of the organization, information on the prospects
and difficulties of the organization should also be given. We should be prudent and
thorough in handling all transactions.
Fraud and all forms of financial mismanagement should be avoided.
TOOLS OF ETHICS
2.21 Introduction
Tools of ethics are the components or measures adopted to ensure ethical conduct in business. They
include:
1. Values
2. Right
3. Loyalty
4. Fairness
5. Principled behaviour
6. Confidentiality
2.22. Values
A. Definitions of values:
The virtues promoted by an organization.
The primary points of reference which guide the conduct of business in doing the right thing
in order to achieve business goals
Beliefs about what is right and wrong and what is important in life
Values spell out in clear terms what a group of people uphold (whether good or bad)
They are the principles, way of life and beliefs which a group of people abide by in order to
achieve an objective or set of objectives.
A set of principles or standards of behaviour acceptable among all the stakeholders in
business irrespective of the differences in ethnic background, culture, and religion.
B. Examples of values:
An organization's core values e.g. we are committed to providing superior service to our
customers'
Educational institutions are promoted on the basis of the values they espouse. Various
professional bodies espouse different values in line with their practice. For instance, the
medical profession has a set of primary values such as:
As we pursue the objectives of profit maximization, cost minimization and business continuity, it is
equally important to emphasise the values of creativity, personal satisfaction, employee- welfare
and development.
2.23 Right
A. Definitions:
Something that is morally good or correct
To have a moral claim
to get or have something/someone behave in a particular way
The authority to perform or carry out an act
The authority/ claim that people have towards the responsibility and accountability of
organizations to them
2.24. Duties: Duties are the tasks assigned to people. Duties spell out responsibilities of
individuals in the organization. Many such duties form a job.
3.20 Introduction
The manager often experiences his most uncomfortable moments when he has to deal with
differences among people.
The best possible way to deal with these differences is to build good human relations with the
employees. When good human relationships are entrenched, conflicts hardly arise, and if they do,
they do not get out of hand and are easily resolved
Douglas McGregor (1960) listed the following as the basis of human relations:
i. The loyalty and cooperation of individual in an organization must be earned, won and
supported.
ii. The individual employee with his status, rights, prospects for advancement and economic
well-being, is linked with the success of the enterprise to which he is employed
iii. The basic relationship of the individual should not be jeopardized by government, union
and management activities.
iv. Personnel policies and practices must be designed and implemented in such a manner as to
promote and safeguard the rights and well being of the workers.
Building or creating good interpersonal relationship should not be limited to management and
employees, but spread through all the persons the organization carries out transactions with and
those who have interest in the organization such as the customers, suppliers, competitors and the
general public.
B. Other issues that border on human relations effectiveness are motivation, leadership and
empathy. Kossen, (1978) gave the following rules on the use of words in promoting human
relations:
1. The least important word is I
2. the most important word is we
3. The two most important words are thank you
4. The three most important words are if you please
5. The four most important words are what is your opinion
6. The five most important words are you did a good job
7. The six most important words are I admit I made a mistake
2. Honesty
Stop the spiral of lies and denials
Implement full and immediate disclosure of relevant information
Facilitate access to information and persons.
Respond openly and promptly to all queries
4. Auditing
Establish formal framework for monitoring ethical orientation
Report ethical progress alongside financial progress
Report progress of plans to employees, industry association, and the community.
5 Updating
Begin planning for ethical mandate beyond resolution of the present issue
Report ethical progress and plans to the community, employees and industry
association.
Thus for example, in the case of the angry man with the cutlass, one could reason that one should
tell no lie, because (i). Telling lies is a way of harming the people one deceives, and (ii) it tends to
undermine mutual trust among people. If these were the complete justification of the rule against
telling lies (which is not the case), it would follow that the rule did not apply in this case. By telling
the madman that your sister was not at home, you would not be harming him in anyway. On the
contrary, you would be preventing him from doing something that, once he recovers his sanity, he
would greatly regret. In addition you will not undermine trust among people by lying to him.
4.20 Introduction.
Ethical issues vary from person to person, from time to time and from organization to organization.
The method of tackling them should also vary.
The fact that so many notable corporate bodies and individuals in Nigeria are repeat offenders is
due to the fact that ethics is viewed narrowly as a one time problem rather than in the context of the
national psyche. Many organizations hire sound individuals to manage their affairs without giving
them the required training and exposure. Managers need to understand the dynamics that
contribute to an error of ethical judgement. One of them is the situational factor in ethical
behaviour.
You have to choose. How will you determine what topics to include or whether to start with a
small subset? Will you keep to auditing compliance with the rule book or attitudes towards
corporate environmental impact, or understanding of health hazards? Or do you w a n t t o
explore in depth the values of your people relative to all major categories of stakeholders?
3. Context: In what managerial context is the audit being carried out? Is the organization
accustomed to audits for other purposes? Is there commitment from the top to act on the
findings? What pressures are there and will there be, to do so?
4. Process: What process will you use? Will it be paper based questionnaires? If so, do you
have access to expert questionnaire design skills? Will it include technical assessments, and
do you have access to the skills and equipment needed? Will it include face-to-face
interviews? Do you have experienced interviewers for sensitive topics and areas?
5. People: Be careful not to use only specialists in ethics. You need people who can
communicate intelligently with the people they are working with.
6. Analysis and reporting: Do you have the capacity to process the data yourselves? Or will
you use an outside agency? How will the various levels of report be produced, approved and
published?
7. Follow-Up: What follow-up do you intend? Clearly, you can't know exactly what will be
required, but do you have at least outline plans for discussion and developing action
programmes? To conduct an audit raises expectations. If you have accepted people's
cooperation in the conduct of the audit you will be betraying a trust if you subsequently do
nothing about the findings.
5.21 Introduction
A code of conduct is
A list of ethical principles and moral rules for members of an organisation
The set of dos and don'ts of workers\professionals
A set of guiding principles which puts a manager's action in a moral perspective.
A brake, a control that prevents employees from unethical behaviour.
i. What is a code of conduct? Why do you think all professional bodies should have a
code of conduct for members?
ii. List 5 features of a good code of conduct.
Iii Why do you think managers should consult with employees when designing a code of
conduct?
In Friedman's view, it is certainly a responsibility of organizations to respect all the laws which
protect the public interest. But going beyond this would amount to having socially responsible
executives functioning as redistributors who would take other people's money and spend it on what
these executives themselves defined as the general social interest, as if they were some sort of self
appointed tax collectors.
It is Friedman's contention that it will be better for everybody if business executives concentrated on
maximizing profit, for in this way, they will more effectively be led by an invisible hand to promote
the good of the society.
In fairness to Friedman, it should be emphasized that he was in no way against charity and giving to
the needy. He was against giving other people's money to the needy. His view was that if an
organization spent money supporting worthy causes instead of redistributing that money among its
shareholders, it would prevent the latter from supporting the causes they prefer.
7.21 Introduction
Social audit as a term was first used in the 1950s. Social audit is similar to financial audit in many
ways except that it is about everything else that an organization does apart from money.
In our own case we are dealing with auditing a social 'system' which survives in the long term only
through being alive to feedback from both the internal (sub-system) and external (super-system)
environments.
8.20 Introduction
Transparency International Standards of Conduct reflect the conviction that large scale corruption
subverts economic and social development. Transparency International is a coalition of
governments, private sector participants and international aid and financing agencies, designed to
counter corruption in international business transactions. Their standards apply to the coalition
partners and take account of past initiatives by such organizations as the International Chamber of
Commerce and the United Nations. The issues discussed here though from Transparency
International (TI) are very relevant to Nigeria, one of its coalition partners.
Corruption could also be seen as various offences by public officials or corporate executives,
such as receiving gifts from suppliers or any other form of gratification before or after
carrying out assigned task and responsibility, sale of office equipment or granting of
contracts to favoured firms and individuals and granting of land or franchise in return for
monetary reward.
Corruption also entails diversion of funds and resources to other personal uses outside the
original purpose for which such funds are allocated.
A Global Financial Integrity (GFI) report revealed that Africa lost $854bn. ( N128.27trn) to
illicit financial outflows during the last 38 years.
The report further showed that illicit capital outflows, including proceeds from bribery, theft,
human trafficking, drugs and tax evasion grew at an average of 11.9 percent between 1970
and 2008.
It also showed that illicit financial outflows from the entire region outpaced official
development assistance going into the region at a ratio of at least 2:1. The hundreds of
billions lost through the process, according to G.F.I., could have been used for poverty
alleviation and economic development.
More recently, corrupt practices bordering on crime have been uncovered in large
corporations like Enron, World Com. and Halliburton.
In 2003, Nigeria was rated the second most corrupt country after Bangladesh, while Finland
was the most incorrupt country followed by Singapore, Britain, Hong-Kong, Germany and
United States.
Between 1998 and 2001, TICI, focusing on African countries showed that corruption
tended to be less in Botswana, Namibia and South Africa while it was consistently high in
Nigeria, Uganda, Kenya and Cameroon (Umo J.U. 2007).
Uganda
Kenya
Cameroon
Tanzania
Cote dIvoire
Zimbabwe
Senegal
Ghana
Egypt
Mauritius
South Africa
Namibia
Botswana
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Sm
P
Price Sc
Pm M1
P0 M0
Pe M2 e
Dm
Q
Qc Qe (Stockfish)
A rational corrupt official will, therefore, assess the potential punishment, if and when
apprehended, on the following bases
i. The severity
ii. The probability
Thus, the higher the severity and probability of punishment, the lower the incentive to be corrupt.
For example, financial corruption including tax illegal deals is punishable by death in China. This
does not absolutely eliminate this type of corruption but the probability of its occurrence has
reduced drastically. The implication of the above hypothesis is that corrupt officials are often
tempted to carry out other illegal acts as a means to cover up and eliminate the probability of
punishment or at least minimize its severity. Such illegal acts include attempts to bribe law
enforcement agents.
A weak law enforcement agency in a state promotes corruption because the severity and
probability of punishment are low. There is serious need to fight against unethical business practices
in Nigeria- the giant of Africa.
According to Solomon
When one willingly joins an organization, agrees to act on its behalf and in its
interests, and agrees with its aims and values, obedience and loyalty are part and
parcel of integrity.
i. any job already done or omitted to be done, or for any favour or disfavour already
shown to any person by himself in the discharge of his official duties, in relation to
any matter connected with the functions, affairs or business of a government
department, public body or other organization or institution in which he is serving as
a public officer, or
ii. anything to be afterwards done or omitted to be done, or any favour or disfavour
to be afterwards shown to any person, by himself in the discharge of his duties or in
relation to any such matter aforesaid, is guilty of the felony of official
corruption and is liable to imprisonment for seven years.
2. If in any proceedings for an offence under this section, it is proved that any property or
benefit of any kind, or any promised thereof, was received by a public officer, or by some
3. In any proceedings for an offence to which subsection (1) (b) is relevant, it shall not be a
defence to show that the accused;
a. Did not subsequently do, make the act, omission; favour or disfavour in question; or
b. never intended to do, make or show the act, omission, favour or disfavour
4. Without prejudice to section (3), where a Police Officer or other public officers whose official
duties include the prosecution, detection or punishment of offenders is charged with an
offence under this section arising from
a. the arrest, detention or prosecution of any person for an alleged offence; or
b. an omission to arrest, detain or prosecute a person for an alleged offence or
c. the investigation of an alleged offence.
It shall not be necessary to prove that the accused believed that the offence mention in
paragraph (a), (b) or (c), or any other offences had been committed.
8. Any person who receives anything which has been obtained by means of any felony or
misdemeanour, or by means of any act done at a place outside Nigeria, which if it had been
done in Nigeria would have constituted a felony or misdemeanour, and which is an offence
under the laws in force in the place where it was done, knowing the same to have been so
obtained, is guilty of felony.
9. If the offence by means of which the thing was obtained is a felony, the offender shall on
conviction be liable to imprisonment for three (3) years, except the thing so obtained was
a postal matter, or any chattel, money or valuable security contained therein, in which case
the offender shall on conviction be liable to imprisonment for seven (7) years.
10. Any person who, with intent to defraud or conceal a crime or frustrate the commission in its
investigation of any suspected crime of corruption under this Act or under any other law;
a. destroys, alters. mutilates, or falsifies any book document,
valuable security, account, computer system, diskette, computer printout or other
electronic device, or is privy to any such act; or
b. Omits, or is privy to omitting, any material particular from any such book,
document, account or electronic record; is guilty of felony, and shall on
conviction be liable to seven (7) years imprisonment.
11. Any person who, being an officer charged with the receipt, custody or use of money or
property received by him or entrusted to his care, or of any balance of money or property in
his possession or under his control, misapplies, misuses or steals it, is guilty of an offence, and
shall on conviction be liable to two (2) years imprisonment.
For the purposes of this section, the expression "consideration" includes valuable consideration of
any kind; the expression -"principal" includes an employer.
14 (i) Any person who makes or causes any other person to make to an officer of the
commission or to any other Public Officer, in the course of the exercise by such Public
officer of the duties of his office, any statement which to the knowledge of the person
making the statement, or causing the statement to be made.
a. is false, or intended to mislead or is untrue in any material particularly; or
b. is not consistent with any other statement previously made by
such person to any other person having authority or power under any law to receive,
or require to be made such other statement is not under any legal or other obligation
to tell the truth, shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be liable
to fine not exceeding one hundred thousand naira or to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding two (2) years or to both such fine and imprisonment.
ii. When any person who has made a statement to an officer of the Commission or to the
Attorney-General exercising any power conferred by this Act, subsequently thereto makes
any other statement to any person having authority or power under any law to receive or
require to be made such other statement, regardless of whether or not the person making
the statement under a legal or other obligation to tell the truth: he shall if such other
statement is inconsistent with any statement previously made to an officer of the
commission or such other public officer, he is guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be
liable to a fine not exceeding ten thousand naira or to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding two years or both
iii. For the avoidance of any doubt, it is declared that for the purpose of
subsection (i) and (ii), any statement made in the course of any legal proceedings before any
court, whether civil or criminal, or any statement made by any person in the course of any
disciplinary proceedings, whether such legal proceedings or disciplinary proceedings are
against the person making the statement or against any other person having authority or
power under the law to receive the statement so made.
15. (1) Any person who
a. attempts to commit any offence under this act;
b. does any act preparatory to or in furtherance of the commission of any offence under this
act or
c. abets or is engaged in a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence under this Act
d. commits any offence under this Act shall be guilty of an offence and shall, on conviction, be
liable to the punishment provided for such offence.
3. A prosecution for an offence shall be concluded and judgement delivered within ninety
(90) working days of its commencement save that the jurisdiction of the court to continue to
hear and determine the case shall not be affected where good grounds exist for the delay.
3. Attempt to calculate the financial and non financial effect of corruption in any
organisation you are familiar with.
i. What is corruption?
ii. List four elements of corrupt practices in Nigeria
iii. What is integrity? How can you tell if your boss has integrity?
iv. Why should we strive to be people of integrity?
v. State and explain five causes of corruption in universities.
vi. How is Nigeria suffering from the corruption of some public officials?
vii. What creative strategies can eliminate corruption in the country?
B. Marking Guide.
1. Values could be defined as primary points of reference which guide the conduct of
management and employees of a particular firm, profession or organization. Values could
also be defined as principles, ways of life and beliefs which a group of people abide by in
order to achieve an objective or a set of objectives.
4. The concept business ethics could be referred to as applied ethics which examine moral
problems that arise in the business environment. It could also be referred to as the
application of ethics to the conduct of individuals in business and business organizations
ii. Rights: The authority or claim that people have towards the responsibility and
accountability of the business organization to them
iii. Loyalty: This could be defined as the steadfastness or allegiance to the management of
business enterprises. It is the commitment of the employees with respect to the set objectives
of the business organization.
iv. Fairness: Avoiding preferential treatment by being objective in making decisions affecting
two parties or more. It is considering the interest of all parties concerned and treating
people or cases equally.
8. Corporate Social Responsibility is the process whereby business and other organisations
integrate the economic, social and environmental imperatives of their activities into the
communities in which they operate.
9. A manager handles difficult decision when none of the possible ways forward seems
morally ideal by structuring his thoughts and judgements so that his eventual decisions are
at the very least explicable, even if not justifiable to everyone.
C. CASE STUDIES
1. ROGBITAN MSHELIA'S DILEMMA
Mrs Rogbitan Mshelia is the Executive Director of an oil servicing company in Nigeria. There has
been such a lull in the company's business activities in the past 10 months that they had to embark
on some form of downsizing by laying off 230 employees. Without a big new contract, the
company stands the risk of winding up. There is this large prospective N50 billion naira contract
from a government agency. It was made clear to her that the contract would be awarded to the
company if she agreed to pay a commission of N2 billion naira to the brother of a former minister
who facilitated the negotiations and another N5 billion to 5 persons whose names will be given to
her when the contract papers are signed. This contract is fat enough to keep the company afloat for
years. Advise Mrs Mshelia on what to do. Give reasons for your advice.
2. AN UNTITLED CASE.
The Sunday Punch of April 18, 2010 reported an alleged case of forgery and uncompleted
contract by a Chinese National. He was said to have swindled the Federal Government of
Nigeria of billions of Naira in respect of a N3bn road contract awarded to his company in
July 6, 2001 in Niger State. The scope of the contract was reduced and yet the project cost
kept increasing annually and payments were regularly made to the company even though
the contract was not executed.
3. Tools of Ethics:
Mr Mailafia Osawe is the Human Resource Manager of a multinational company. At the
mid-year management meeting, a decision was reached to downsize the number of
employees in some departments due to structural reorganization and a fall in consumer
demand. During one of his dates with Miss Asana Buky a 'corper' in the finance department,
Mr Mailafia told her the management decision and the names of some people on the
retrenchment list.
Questions:
1. Comment on the behaviour of Mr. Mailafia Osawe.
2. How can it affect the organisation?
4. Transparency
Mr. Okoroigwe Tariere is the Chief Executive of an international construction company. His
organization won a contract for 5 NYSC projects. The company sub-contracted some of its
work to others. One of the sub contractors brought 2 hampers, a bag of rice and a live turkey
to Mr. Okoroigwe as a sign of appreciation. According to article II of the Transparency
International code of conduct no party to an international business transaction should give,
request, demand, offer, or make available a gift in a any form, or extend any other advantage
to or for the benefit of any public official or as he or she may direct (and whether directly or
indirectly) as an inducement for action or inaction by the official.
If you were Mr Okoroigwe Tariere, what would you have done? Why?
What will the ICPC Act want him to do?
Bateman, T.S. & Snell, S.A. (2002): Management Competing in the New Era, Boston: McGraw-
Hill.
Godwin O. Effiong (1999). Work Ethics: Issues and Perspectives. Lagos: Longman
Godwin O. Effiong (1997) De Investment Truth. Lagos: Way Publishers.
Murray, O. (1997). Ethics in Organizations London Kogan page.
Rittenberg, L.E. & Schweiger (2005): Auditing: Concepts for A Changing
Environment; Thomson, Ohio
Umo J.U. (2007). Economics: An African Perspective. Lagos: Millennium
Text Publishers Limited
B. JOURNAL
Aina, S. (2007). Fighting the Corruption Menace in the Nigerian Bureaucracy.
ASCON Journal of Management, Administrative Staff College of Nigeria, Topo,
Lagos, Nigeria, Vol. 27, Nos. 1 2, pages 77 87.
C. NEWSPAPER.
The Punch Newspaper, March 31, 2010. Pages 3 and 27.
D. INTERNET.
http://www.the learning initiative.com /nbio/ module./.htm
http:///www.fao.org/POCREL/006/AP3464/ad
org/eng/funding/financialguide/doc7.cfm
http://www.vsi_islc.org/eng/funding/financialguide/doc17.cfm