Deadly Spray
Deadly Spray
Deadly Spray
Acknowledgement
TELAPAK would like to express its gratitude to the
following organizations and individuals for their
assistance and time in working together and discussing
the substantial development of the report, while stressing
that the content of the report is the sole responsibility of
Telapak:
2
Contents
9 Promising Coral Reef
© Telapak
3
The Buried Pearl
.................................
These practices not only destruct the fish habitat but also serve as a breeding ground for corruption,
collusion and nepotism for several law enforcers. It is general knowledge to the fishermen that
the immorality of our law enforcers is one factor why such problem is difficult to handle.
The monitoring and enforcement operations carried out are in fact become the means to blackmail
the fishermen involved in destructive fishing, which in this case do not tackle the problem but further
stimulate such practice, because the fishermen feel that all matters are handled just by paying off
the officers.
Meanwhile, the conditions of the coral reefs are degrading. In several areas, harvests are declining and
poverty is increasing. More children are dropping out of school.
Do we want this condition to continue?
Results from several assistance activities carried out by Telapak and its partners show that government
efforts to solve the problem of destructive fishing have not yet touch the root of the problem itself. On
the contrary, they are stimulating new opportunities to increase such activities. Legal measures taken
perceive the fish catching actors as potential source of money. Even if they were arrested, only few that
would actually go to court. While on the other hand, the fishermen themselves feel there are no other
alternative livelihoods. What these fishermen need is an opportunity to an alternative source of income
by placing them as objects of reform and not as money resource or objects that must be destroyed.
Under the current system, jail is not the main solution to the problem. Community approach and
assistance that will give them opportunities to reform is the best way to solve this problem.
This book talks about lessons learned from Telapak’s field experiences from 1999 – 2004 in compiling
data and developing collaborative learning process with the fishermen who are actors in destructive
fishing in several regions in Indonesia.
M. Imran Amin
Program Coordinator
PROMOLA - TELAPAK
5
© Telapak
D
estructive Fishing is the root problem of coral
reef ecosystem destruction in Indonesia.
Five main human threats to coral reefs, i.e.:
toxic fishing, blast fishing, coral reef extraction,
sedimentation and pollution, and over fishing
although the later does not directly destruct the
coral reefs.1
Indonesia’s 17,000 islands forms the world’s largest
archipelago with more than 95,000 kilometers of coastline and
some 51,000 square kilometers of coral reefs, excluding those
not yet mapped, located in isolated places as well as those in
deeper sea. If the estimation is correct, that means Indonesia
is home to 51% of Southeast Asia’s coral reefs and 18% of the
world’s coral reefs.2
The coral reefs in western Indonesia are severely
threatened by human activities compared to those in the east.
This is supported by field facts of a 1990-1998 survey that
revealed a better condition of coral reefs from west to east.
The reefs in the western part of Indonesia with good or very
good condition (more than 50% live corals coverage) cover
only about 23%, while those in the east cover about 45%.3
Over the next 20 years, the economic loss from blast and
cyanide fishing may reach US$ 570 million and US$ 46
million respectively.4
Telapak in collaboration with several local NGOs, has
conducted field surveys that found many practices of blast and
cyanide fishing. Furthermore, Telapak working together with
the local communities tries to find better solutions to more
environmentally friendly fishing techniques.
6
© Telapak
7
8
© Telapak
Promising
Coral Reef
I
ndonesian fishermen have exploited coral
reefs for a long time. Experts stated that
every square kilometer of coral reef can
yield up to 20,000 – 35,000 tonnes of fish
annually, estimated to give livelihood to 400-
700 people.5 Indonesian coral reefs are
estimated to have a value of US$ 5,800 per
hectare.6
In tropical countries such as Indonesia, the coral reef
ecosystem is closely related to the general marine
resources. The ecosystem indirectly functions as a
buffer in coastal abrasion and is the habitat for many
economically significant marine biota and also serves as
spawning, nursery and feeding ground. Marine
products are also source of protein for many
Indonesians.
Indonesian coral reefs are potential source of
national income as export commodities through
consumption fish, ornamental fish, shell skins,
seaweeds, nature-based marine tourism and traditional
medicines. The total value can amount to US$ 466
million. Especially for ornamental fish, its export
reaches a value of US$ 32 million annually.5
9
10
© Telapak
Threats to
Coral Reefs
Destruction
E
ven with its potentials and great benefits,
the ecosystem faces serious threats. One
of them is destructive fishing such as
cyanide fishing. Several cyanide applications to
certain reef colony have proved to be
destructive to the reef survival.2
Meanwhile, there is a close relationship between
destructive fishing and the fishermen’s low economic
level. The needs to catch more fish and increase family
income are several reasons why the fishermen take
short cut of using toxics to catch more fish. There has
been a transformation in fish catching system in several
places in Indonesia from traditional means, which are
environmentally friendly, to destructive fishing.
© Telapak
11
Development of Cyanide Fishing in Indonesia
Cyanide fishing was introduced as one method of catching reef fish since early
1980s. At that time, the Philippine fishermen started to enter Indonesian waters to
look for ornamental fish not found in their country. They began their operation in
North Sulawesi by introducing and teaching the local fishermen about using cyanide.
From here, this method of destructive fishing has spread to other parts of Indonesia
in line with declining harvest and increasing international market demands
especially from Europe and the US. Furthermore, at the end of 1980s, this
technique has also been used on consumption fish due to increasing demands from
China and Taiwan.
Introduction to Cyanide
Reef fishing using toxics such as organo-phosphate insectice, quinaldine,
ichtyocide rotenone and cyanide has long been known.7
Sodium cyanide —one kind of cyanide used—is a kind of toxic in the form
of salt that has been used world wide, especially in fumigation, electroplating
and mining. The misuse of this chemical in fisheries started around 1960s in
the Philippine, where at the time, there was an increase demand for ornamental
fish from European and American markets.7
Among the toxic chemicals, cyanide is the most popular in live coral fish
catching. Cyanide is mixed with seawater and poured into plastic spray bottle.
When the fish are inside the holes between the corals or coral branch, cyanide
is then sprayed on the target fish. Cyanide causes fast anesthetization leading
to dizziness causing the fish to swim out from its hiding places, thus they can
easily be caught.8
Cyanide fishing causes the break down of the fish enzyme system as
oxygen metabolizer (cytochrome oxidase) and psychological function of the
fish and invertebrates. Cyanide also causes damages in liver network, spleen,
heart and brain of fish.9 Cyanide fishing is believed to have caused the death of
more than 80% of exported ornamental fish.
12
© Telapak
Cyanide is easily found at local stores such as at dealer shops and chemical stores,
with local average price of Rp 40,000 – Rp 50,000 per kilogram.
Telapak’s investigation in 1998-2002
revealed that there are at least 80% of
ornamental fish and 50% of consumption
fish experience death at the collection site
and during transportation.
Other than having direct impact on
target fish, sprayed cyanide has destructive
impact on the surrounding ecosystem and
kills many juvenile fishes and other
smaller marine biota. This results in mass
bleaching of coral reefs resulting in death.
Coral’s death due to cyanide spray is very
different from those due to drastic water
temperature change. One spray of cyanide
(about 20 cc) can kill a total of 5 x 5 square
meters of coral reefs within 3 – 6
months.10
13
© Telapak - FDC
The Toxic Sea of
the Island
of the Gods
© YBN - Telapak
1Location
4 : Les Beach - Bali
B
ali is nationally and internationally well recognized in the
tourism industry. In fact the international world is more
familiar with Bali than Indonesia itself. Bali is also famous as
the Island of the Gods due to its beautiful scenery and unique
traditions. However, Telapak with the local NGOs recognized that the
high number of tourists and the good accessibility of the island are not
able to compensate for the coral reef destruction rate in the
surrounding waters. Bali, in fact, is well known as an island producing
ornamental and consumption fish.
15
Photographer : M. Taufik Wahab/Telapak
1 6Location : Les Beach - Bali
© Telapak
17
© Telapak
25
Photographer : Ridzki R. Sigit/Telapak
2Location
6 : Sembilan Island - South Sulawesi
Toxic on
the Eastern Sea
T
he waters of eastern Indonesia are heaven for fish. The Islands of Maluku
are well known as an area with abundant marine resources, as well as a
recognized marine tourism destination. Through collaboration with the
local NGOs and fishermen communities in Maluku, Telapak has conducted several
investigations on cyanide fishing on several islands in the Southeast Maluku – now
known as West Southeast Maluku. This group of at least 24 islands has long been
known as one of the producing sites for fish and other marine products in Maluku.
Together with a local NGO in Tual, Telapak focus their investigation and
monitoring activities in Kei Island and Luang Island in the southwest of Southeast
Maluku.
27
The high biodiversity along with a the local traditional fishermen. Most of
number of reef islands in Southeast the fishing companies practice fishing
Maluku, have become very attractive for techniques that are not environmentally
the local as well as overseas investors. friendly. Trawl, bomb and cyanide are
The existence of many big fisheries used in customary fishing ground of the
companies and the operations of foreign local fishermen. For the fishermen,
fishing ships are very common in cyanide fishing has direct impacts on the
Southeast Maluku. Unfortunately, the quantity and quality of sea harvest, such
presence of these investors brings some as coral reef destruction and death of
negative impacts on the marine seaweeds and shells, while for most of
conservation and the economy of the women, sea products are beyond fish.
Kei Island,
communities opposition
to cyanide
Cyanide fishing has been practiced in then, when the local NGOs together
Kei Island since the establishment of with the communities opposed to such
Mina Sanega Company in 1990, which practices through the traditional
was then followed by the establishment institutions, got the attention from local
of local companies. It was a big issue government. Unfortunately, the issue of
© Telapak
28
cyanide fishing was
forgotten when there was a
mass riot at the end of
1999.
In Dulla Laut Island or
also known as Duroa,
cyanide fishing has resulted
in the horizontal conflict
between the traditional
fishermen. The declining
© Telapak
sea harvest due to this kind
of fishing technique has
made them enter the petuanan1 belong The local government has taken
to other fishermen community. The some measures to combat destructive
local fishermen who use this destructive fishing through enforcement operations.
method confessed that they were Unfortunately, the necessary
expelled or captured by other fishermen prosecutions rarely follow such
community whose petuanan has been operations. While on field, divers using
trespassed. cyanide have changed their method of
diving to prevent the
© Telapak - FDC arrest during
enforcement
operation. Those using
compressor for
breathing aid, now
turn to traditional
diving technique, i.e.
without compressor.
This method is
especially applied on
areas that can still be
reached by diving
without breathing aids
equipments.
1
Petuanan is a natural resources management area ruled by the local customary law, which includes both
land and sea
29
Adjacent to Dulla Laut, is Kei Kecil suspected to work for a live fish boss
Island, where cyanide fishing has also named Hans Sitaneli. This
experienced some transformation. transformation of fish catching is due to
Previously the activity took place in the an increasing community awareness to
afternoon but currently it occurs at night protect the surrounding coral reefs by
with the help of speedboat, compressor applying sasi 2with secure control and
and diving torch. These night divers are monitoring.
© Telapak - FDC
Location : Thousand Island National Park
30
Luang Island,
institutional change for a toxic live fish industry
Luang Island is located at the tip of CV. Rimraya Indah. However, the
southwest of Southeast Maluku. Its damage done could not stop the local
remote location makes it and other opposition, which again forced the new
surrounding smaller islands almost free company to get out from Luang Island.
from control. Because this cluster of Currently, a local named Jack Miru
islands produces the greatest sea harvest carries out live fish company in Luang
in Southeast Maluku, therefore it is Island. In carrying out his business, he
not surprising that Luang Island was works together with fish trader from
once used as operating area from two Tual named Riky Tamnge. Based on the
fishery companies that collect fish from confession of the local communities, this
cyanide fishing. One of the industries local company offers a higher price than
even manages to rename its industry the previous three companies.
under the same operation control. Nevertheless, this cannot be regarded as
These two fishery companies are PT. better condition. Even until now, it is
Dinamika Bahari Sejahtera (DBS) and difficult to detect whether a fishery
CV. Sari Manis. They were driven out company uses cyanide or not in its
of the island due to a conflict with the operation. Therefore monitoring and
local communities, although they had control are still necessary because this
approached the local village institutions marine area is very vulnerable to
and traditional chiefs when they first destructive fishing industries.
arrived. Coral reef destruction in the
traditional fishing ground and the
promise of village infrastructure
development that never been granted,
have caused an opposition from the local
communities together with some local
NGOs and students from Luang Island
to drive both companies out of the
island. Although CV. Sari Manis tried
to make a come back under a new name,
© Telapak
2
Sasi is a customary law in Maluku, which regulate the management of natural resources, especially marine
products and coconuts. A person found violating Sasi would be punished.
31
Ponggawa,
Juragan and Sawi in
Sembilan Island
32
... found a connection between the practice of cyanide fishing and
the local social structure. Generally, the social structure consists of
Ponggawa, Juragan and Sawi ...
Juragan is a name for the captain of the fishing boat. He has full responsibility to
carry the fishermen to reach target location and bringing home fish harvest to the
collection site. After arrival in the collection site, juragan is also responsible for writing
down his catch.
Sawi is a name for fihermen labour. Generally, sawi are also part of diver team. Inside
a fishing boat, there are about 4-5 sawis.
For overall catch, there is usually a simple mechanism for profit distribution as follows:
! 25% of overall catch will go to the investors to replace operational costs.
! 75% of overall catch will be evenly divided among ponggawa, juragam and sawi.
3
Sembilan Archipelago consists of Kantidoang, Larea-rea, La Poi-Poi, Kanalo, Batanglampe, Kodingare,
Kambuno, Leang-Leang and Burung Loe Islands.
36
In Kambuno
Island, Telapak with
its local NGO partner
found a connection
between the practice
of cyanide fishing and
the local social
structure. Generally,
the social structure
consists of Ponggawa,
Juragan and Sawi.
From the three
structural positions,
Ponggawa holds a
significant role in
every catching activity
in Kambuno.
© Telapak
Ponggawa is the
investor for every
fishing activity, such as positions because they The biggest portion of
boat/ship, compressor, are only field operators. the profit obviously goes
diving equipments and Juragan is the ship’s to Ponggawa, while Sawi
operational capital. captain and Sawi is has the least profit. Very
While Juragan and Sawi someone who works in often Sawis must bear the
are regarded as lower the ship/diver. direct impact of this
fishing activity.
© Telapak Generally, Sawis are
often in overdue debts to
Ponggawa and suffer the
direct risks of diving.
Information collected by
Telapak and its local
NGO partner found that
there were at least 200
sawi divers who suffered
illness due to diving using
compressor.
37
........ main activities carried out by Telapak, which is a
translation of its vision to crease a just natural resources
management.....
39
T
he problems of Indonesian coral reef ecosystem degradation and
their direct impacts on the livelihood of the local fishermen, has
stimulate Telapak, as a Non Government Organization in
environment, to do some improvement efforts. Since it was first
established, Telapak has carried out many improvement efforts for
Indonesian marine and coasts beginning with the monitoring of cyanide
fishing in several places across Indonesia in 1998. These monitoring
activities are carried out in collaboration with the local NGOs. In
practice, Telapak uses the method of investigation in carrying out its
monitoring activities on cyanide fishing. This collaborative monitoring
initiative developed by Telapak has resulted in a coordinated network
of NGOs for marine and coastal issues (PELA Net). Telapak itself
develops a monitoring program in destructive fishing known as
ProMOLA (Marine Monitoring Program).
© Telapak
PT. Bahtera LEStari integrates several objectives and interests of the stakeholders of ornamental fishing
industry. Its main concern is to facilitate the needs and interests of Les Village communities that are involved
in the industry, represented by the fishermen group of ornamental fish, Mina Bhakti Soansari . The
objectives of PT. Bahtera Lestari in line with the objectives of the fishermen group are as follows:
1. To improve the welfare of the local ornamental fish fishermen
2. To provide a legal basis for community-based ornamental fish business, and
3. To preserve the marine ecosystem especially coral reefs.
PT Bahtera LEStari offers a unique position because it supports the involvement of all the stakeholders
between fishermen communities and the local leaders in Les Village. The establishment of this company was
done through several meetings and social works among the fishermen, fish collectors (juragan), village
chiefs, local leaders, village administrators, NGOs activists, business experts and consultants. As a result, it
was then decided to establish an ornamental fish exporter company, the company holdings as well as its
business plan. The legal process took place in December 2002 through a notary public, John K. Mulya, in
Denpasar (Notarial Document No.: 105, dated 19 December 2002). This company is also complemented
with Tax Obligatory Number (NPWP:02.217.737.2-903.000) on January 27, 2003.
PT Bahtera LEStari works in three different fields: ornamental fish exporter, marine ecotourism, and
management consultant for coastal and marine management. These three fields were developed based on
the strength of the company in managing coast and marine resources, as well as its strength of being a
community-based company.
44
that produces cyanide-free ornamental fish, which have not been followed by other companies. It has a
mission of producing only environmental friendly products, fish from areas that are well managed, according
to international standard of fishing. PT. Bahtera LEStari achieved this objective after two years of research,
planning, training, and business development. This initiative was taken based on the fact that cyanide
fishing- which obviously has negative impacts on the environment - still dominating fish catching techniques
in Indonesia and other areas in Asia-Pacific. The system developed by PT. Bahtera LEStari has contributed
to lessen the pressure on the marine ecosystem and make better profits economically.
photos : © Telapak
... the establishment of strong fishermen organizations is
expected to broaden fishermen participation in local and
national coastal and marine policies ...
S
ince it was first established, for a just and sustainable management.
Telapak has been active in doing This has long become the main concerns
concerted efforts towards a just and focus of Telapak’s work in policy
marine resource management. The advocacy.
current unjust management of marine Together with government and other
resources occurs due to lack of integrated NGOs in Indonesia, Telapak rolled out
policies, which should be built on the the discourse to set up governance that
involvement of all the stakeholders will place marine issues as crucial issues.
especially the local communities who rely The presence of a specific department
on the presence of the resources. The in charge of marine affairs and fisheries
present policies are only concerned with is one of its concrete suggestions. This
gaining biggest profits for certain groups. was taken into action by the
There is no overarching policy for government when Abdurrahman
coastal and marine resources Wahid (Gus Dur) was the president,
management in Indonesia. As a result, through the establishment of the
marine resources exploitation has gone Department for Marine Affairs and
very intensively without consideration Fisheries.
© Telapak
48
© Telapak
© Telapak
50
© Telapak
© Telapak
© Telapak
© Telapak
© Telapak
54
© Telapak
55
56