Brecht A Short Organum For The Theatre PDF
Brecht A Short Organum For The Theatre PDF
Brecht A Short Organum For The Theatre PDF
Bertolt Brecht
(1948)
50 52
There needs to be yet a further change in the actors We shall find that this has meant scrapping yet an-
communication of these images, and it too makes other illusion: that everyone behaves like the char-
the process more matter-on-fact. Just as the ac- acter concerned. I am doing this has become I
tor no longer has to persuade the audience that it is did this, and now he did this has got to become
the authors character and not himself that is stand- he did this, when he might have done something
ing on the stage, so also he need not pretend that else. It is too great a simplification if we make ac-
the events taking place on the stage have never been tions fit the character and the character fit the ac-
rehearsed, and are now happening for the first and tions: the inconsistenies which are to be found in
only time. Schillers distinction is no longer valid: the actions and characters of real people cannot be
that the rhapsodist has to treat his material as wholly shown like this. The laws of motion of a society
in the past: the mime his, as wholly here and now.1 are not to be demonstrated by perfect examples,
It should be apparent all through his performance for imperfection (inconsistency) is an initial part
that even at the start and in the middle he knows of motion and of the thing moved. It is only neces-
how it ends and he must thus maintain a calm inde- sary but absolutely necessary that there should
pendence throughout. He narrates the story of his be something approaching experimental conditions,
character by vivid portrayal, always knowing more i.e. that a counter-experiment should now and then
than it does and treating its now and here not as be conceivable. Altogether this is a way of treating
1 Letter to Goethe, 26.12.1797 [quoted on p. 210].
2 Mao Tse-tung: On Contradiction. One of the two sides of a contradiction is bound to be the principal one.
3 Lenin: On the Question of Dialectics