Educators' Perspectives About Ict Enabled Teaching
Educators' Perspectives About Ict Enabled Teaching
Educators' Perspectives About Ict Enabled Teaching
ISSN 2454-5899
Sibusisiwe Dube
Volume 3 Issue 2, pp. 2146-2158
Date of Publication: 1st November 2017
DOI- https://dx.doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.21462158
Sibusisiwe Dube
University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
sibusisiwenkonkoni@gmail.com
Abstract
The availability of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in education has not
translated to pedagogical use in Higher Education Institutions (HEI), particularly in the
developing nations context where use of ICT based paradigms like e-learning is invisible. This
study investigated the educators perspectives about ICT enabled teaching strategies by
employing quantitative and qualitative data collection instruments. Findings revealed that
despite valuing these strategies, educators have institutional and technological concerns
requiring redress. Contrary to existing literature, generation gap, ICT literacy and individual
values had no effect to the way the cohort perceives ICT based teaching. Instead, universitys
structures, management decision making and the ICT implementation culture were major themes
emerging from this study, as the source of the sporadic ICT utilization that translates to the
second order digital divide, a problem of concern both in theory and practice.
Keywords
Pedagogy, Information and Communication Technologies; Higher Education Institutions,
Educators Perspectives, Developing Country, Second Order Digital Divide.
2017 The author and GRDS Publishing. All rights reserved. 2146
Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/
PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences
ISSN 2454-5899
1. Introduction
negative environmental impacts as well as learning that is time and space independent (Chen &
Tseng, 2012). E-learning is facilitated by Learning Management Systems (LMS) (Martn-blas &
Serrano-fernndez, 2009), a computer software used for creating, managing, delivering and
retrieving course content such as Blackboard, SMILE, MOODLE, Sakai etc. These authors also
show that the LMS have the capacity to handle content in different formats, real-time
interactions, instant feedback, performance evaluation, assessment, communication, content,
administration via the internet.
E-learning system tools can complement face-to-face (f2f) traditional teaching and
learning settings in a blended paradigm form. The intention is to offer pedagogic richness,
flexibility, increased cost-effectiveness, reduction in the need for classrooms, increased
engagement, collaboration and increased higher quality learning (Carbonell, Dailey-hebert, &
Gijselaers, 2013). Pedagogically, e-learning is the art of teaching learners to learn and an active
process of knowledge production, transmission, acquisition and reproduction through activities
(Mayes & Freitas, 2004). It is these affordances that have made both e-learning and LMS
attractive ICT enabled teaching and learning strategies to higher education institutions. Despite
the attractiveness and affordances of such ICT enabled teaching and learning strategies, their
utilization in the developing African countries higher education is still at its infancy (Bhuasiri,
et al., 2012). ICTs are yet to be used for pedagogy in these contexts, nevertheless, Mbengo
(2014) the educators perspectives regarding the ICT enabled teaching are neither known nor
consistent. This is a problem of concern to both practice and theory that is requires attention as
indicated in the section that follows.
2. Problem Statement
The concerns of the developing African countries educators regarding ICT enabled
teaching strategies are scarce in literature (Mbengo, 2014), Despite the affordances of the
ICT enabled teaching strategies like e-learning to provide important tools for the
achievement of pedagogical goals (Heshmatpanah, Ali, & Neyestanak, 2011; Lonn &
Teasley, 2009), their uptake is still low and invisible in comparison to their proliferation,
hence the resultant second order digital divide problem. It is on this background that key
subsequent question is asked.
2017 The author and GRDS Publishing. All rights reserved. 2148
Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/
PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences
ISSN 2454-5899
2017 The author and GRDS Publishing. All rights reserved. 2149
Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/
PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences
ISSN 2454-5899
3. Methodology
A mixed data collection and analysis approach was employed in this study not only for
complementary purpose, but also to increase the validity of collected data. Thirty paper-based
questionnaires were distributed to the educators currently teaching one of Zimbabwes sixteen
state universities. Since three of the thirty questionnaires had missing entries and outliers, only
twenty-seven successfully completed questionnaires satisfied the data cleaning process,
achieving a 90% response rate. The educators were randomly selected from the purposively
sampled departments in six faculties. Follow up interviewees were conducted with five educators
who voluntarily participated and found no offence in having their responses recorded on a voice
recorder. The qualitative research approach enabled the capture of the educates lived
experiences with the ICT enabled teaching strategy. This was done to evaluate the validity as
well as to achieve clarity, completeness and complementarity of the data collected through
questionnaires, While the quantitative data were analyzed on a statistical package of social
sciences (SPSS), qualitative data were analyzed on an ATLAS ti, yielding the results discussed
in the subsequent section.
The research findings denote the several educators concerns regarding both the choice
and implementation of the institutional e-learning system. The findings show that these concerns
are because of the interplay between institutional structures and educators the focal intended e-
learning system users. This is contrary to the upward conflation theories with a belief in
voluntarism where educators are considered the major players in the underutilization of e-
learning systems through their negative attitude and low efficacy towards the technology. This
also contradicts the deterministic school of thought, which believes that the underutilization of
ICTs like e-learning systems is determined by solely the learning institution structures.
From the findings, it is neither the institutional structures nor individual educators alone
who are the source of e-learning systems pedagogically concerns. It is however the relationship
between these two structures which are of concern since their separate properties condition the
2017 The author and GRDS Publishing. All rights reserved. 2150
Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/
PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences
ISSN 2454-5899
continued use or the abandonment of the e-learning system tools. In this regard, we found that
the case study institution, a university of science and technology has made all necessary efforts
to make sure that the e-learning system tools and the compatible devices are available for use in
pedagogy. This is in addition to the affordability of both the computing devices and the e-
learning systems technology that have reduced costs and open source respectively. The main
issue of concern then is usability, which is also neither emanating from self-efficacy nor negative
attitude as depicted in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1 Educators attitude towards e-learning system
Attitude Number of Educators Valid percent
Positive attitude to ICT 24 88.9
enabled teaching
Negative attitude to ICT 3 11.1
enabled teaching
Total 27 100.0
Table 1.1 depicts that the surveyed educators value e-learning system in pedagogy. What
is puzzling being the contradiction between e-learning system availability and usability as
revealed in Dube & Scott (2014)s findings that an insignificant number of the educators
frequently integrate the e-learning system tools into the teaching practice contrary to the verified
pedagogical benefits of ICT enabled teaching, which is well documented in literature (Soong,
Chuan, & Chai, 2001).
When asked if the educators were ICT literate, they resoundingly professed both
computer and digital literacy. Of the twenty-seen respondents, 95% were confident of the ICT
literacy while only 5% confessed to their computer and digital illiteracy since they lacked the
skills required for the effective use of ICTs teaching. Figure 1 shows the ICT skills level of the
educators on a scale from Excellent ICT skills to no ICT skills.
2017 The author and GRDS Publishing. All rights reserved. 2151
Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/
PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences
ISSN 2454-5899
2017 The author and GRDS Publishing. All rights reserved. 2152
Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/
PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences
ISSN 2454-5899
Table 1.2 Age versus the use of the e-learning system in teaching
Age related use of the e-learning system Sakai Use Total
Yes No
Count 5 4 9
26-35
% within Sakai Use 33.3% 36.4% 34.6%
Count 4 5 9
36-45
% within Sakai Use 26.7% 45.5% 34.6%
Age
Count 5 2 7
46-55
% within Sakai Use 33.3% 18.2% 26.9%
Count 1 0 1
56-65
% within Sakai Use 6.7% 0.0% 3.8%
Count 15 11 26
Total
% within Sakai Use 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Table 1.2 shows that of the twenty-seven respondents, fifteen have tried to integrate the
institutional e-learning system in their teaching practice. However, although equipped with ICT
skills, these educators; have since stopped integrating the ICTs in their teaching practice, an
indication that something is not right. Whatever the issue is, it does not affect the so called
digital immigrants alone but also the digital natives since in Table 1.2, only 33.3% of the
educators who attempted the e-learning system are the presumed digital natives while 66.7% are
the digital immigrants. This is evidence of that no correlation exists between age and the positive
attitude towards the ICT enabled teaching.
Per the results in Table 1.2, 71.4% and 100% of the educators in the age categories 46-55
years and 56-65 years respectively actively engage the e-learning tools into the teaching practice
while 55.6% and 44.4% in the 26-35 years and 36-45 years age groups are using the e-learning
system tools in teaching. The analysis of the collected quantitative data demonstrates that the
educators neither fear nor despise the effectiveness of the e-learning system tools in education.
Nonetheless the qualitative data has evidence of the concerns emanating from the interplay
between individual educators and the institutional structures which appears to be an influential
factor of concern as it has the capacity to enable or constrain the use of the available institutional
e-learning system. For example, the respondents indicated that they preferred MOODLE to the
Sakai, LMS, the current choice of the institution. the respondents were concerned about the
rigidness of the Sakai as opposed to the flexible features of the MOODLE LMS. Sakai, an LMS
that was implemented without prior consultation with the concerned educators, the LMS was not
2017 The author and GRDS Publishing. All rights reserved. 2153
Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/
PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences
ISSN 2454-5899
properly customized and crushes frequently due to its failure to handle multi users. This disrupts
teaching and learning, mainly the online tests and quizzes. The LMS was also criticized for
missing a feature to stream audio and video lessons. All these problems are attributed to the
managements top down approach in both the choice and implementation of the institutional
Sakai LMS, without consultation, hence the conflict leading to the refrained usage of the
technological investment.
Another issue of concern regarded the quality and adequacy training on how to use the
institutional e-learning system. While the institution schedules training program for the educators
on how to use the institutional choice of e-learning system in pedagogy, the respondents
indicated that this is not adequate as shown in table 1.3.
Another issue of concern regarded the quality and adequacy of training on how to use the
institutional e-learning system. While the institution schedules training program for the educators
on how to use the institutional choice of e-learning system in pedagogy, the respondents
indicated that this is not adequate as shown in table 1.3. In addition to the training is the lack of
user manual concern. Per the educators. Neither a user manual is nor online help is accessible to
educators for guiding them use the institutional e-learning system manipulation or to solve
encountered challenges. Furthermore, it takes time to get help from the department responsible
for manning the e-learning system. However, per the institution authorities, there is a training
program scheduled for once at the end of each semester during the vacation, which has always
been characterized by low turn up. Accordingly, a user manual is also available as a soft copy for
those who request for it. However, there is a shortage of staff to respond to the educators
problems with the e-learning system.
2017 The author and GRDS Publishing. All rights reserved. 2154
Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/
PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences
ISSN 2454-5899
The educators were also concerned about the lack of recognition through incentives to
motivating frequently and effective integration of the e-learning system tools in the teaching
practice. However other educators indicated that they effectively taught through the traditional
face-to-face mode than the ICT enabled one and therefore indicated that forcing the latter on
them violated their academic freedom. In this regard, one educator had this to say:
when physically present in the classroom during a lecture, I can observe each student to
identify the signs of confusion or misunderstanding and further elaborate to such ones so that
they move at the same pace with the rest of the class.
Similar sentiments were acknowledged by another educator asserting that
credibility is lost if students must operate on their own without the presence of the
educator particularly when taking assessments because you will not be sure if you are
assessing the actual student or a colleague did it on their behalf.. Although in the
research findings is evidence of the high value attached by the educators to ICT enabled
teaching, several concerns have been raised that constrain the educators successful
integration of ICTs in teaching and learning within the learning institutions of a
developing country.
5. Conclusion
The research quantitative and qualitative data revealed that despite having positive attitude
towards e-learning as a pedagogical tool, they however had concerns that needed immediate
redress. These included e-learning system selection, implementation, training, user support, lack
of incentives, user manual and academic freedom. From their perspectives, these concerns are
biased towards blaming the institutional structures. The educators sentiments are acknowledged
in Vehovar, et al., (2006) suggesting that nonusers of ICTs would be more willing to engage
with new technology if their assumptions, fears, and preconceived ideas about ICTs are properly
addressed. However, our analysis indicates that not only the institutional structures but also
agential structures (educators) have a major role to play in either promoting or resisting the
integration of e-learning system tools in pedagogy.
2017 The author and GRDS Publishing. All rights reserved. 2155
Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/
PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences
ISSN 2454-5899
5.1.Limitations;
The study was limited in scope. The sample size was too small to make valid generalizations.
Twenty-seven educators are an insignificant number in comparison with the population of more
than four hundred educators. It is also possible that the random sample of educators who
participated in the study share similar perspectives of the IT based teaching that are different
from those educators who did not participate in the research. Furthermore, the perspectives and
beliefs of five educators who were interviewed are not representative of what can be called the
shared meanings of the educators lived experiences with the ICTs.
5.2.Further work
The preceding limitations would need to be addressed by conducting a study on the
perspectives of the developing African countries educators perspectives of ICT based teaching
that are drawn from not only a larger sample size, but also from multiple cases to achieve more
valid generalization.
References
Agena, M. (2013). The elearning africa report 2013: The Future of Development. Germany.
Al-Harbi, K. A.-S. (2011). e-Learning in the Saudi tertiary education: Potential and challenges.
Applied Computing and Informatics, 9, 3146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2010.03.002
Almoswai, F. R., & Rashid, B. (2017). The effectiveness of using youtube video on efl iraqi
college students performance IN. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences,
3(1), 391402.
Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Jeung, J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success
factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT
experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843855.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010
Carbonell, K. B., Dailey-hebert, A., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Internet and Higher Education
Unleashing the creative potential of faculty to create blended learning. The Internet and
Higher Education, 18, 2937.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.00
4
Chen, H., & Tseng, H. (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of web-based e-learning
2017 The author and GRDS Publishing. All rights reserved. 2156
Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/
PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences
ISSN 2454-5899
systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan.
Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(3), 398406.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan
.2011.11.007
Cilliers, E. J. (2017). The challenge of teaching generation z. PEOPLE: International Journal of
Social Sciences, 3(1), 188198.
Dube, S., & Scott, E. (2014). An Empirical Study on the Use of the Sakai Learning Management
System ( LMS ): Case of NUST, Zimbabwe. In e-Skills for Knowledge Production and
Innovation Conference 2014 (pp. 101107). Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from
http://proceedings.e-skillsconference.org/2014/e-skills101-
Heshmatpanah, J., Ali, A., & Neyestanak, L. (2011). E-Learning Effects on Teaching at
ALBORZ High School ( Iran ). Creative Education, 2(2), 7175.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.22010
Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions
and uses of Learning Management Systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 686694.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.008
Martn-blas, T., & Serrano-fernndez, A. (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning
process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Computers & Education, 52(1), 3544.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.005
Mayes, T., & Freitas, S. de. (2004). Review of e-learning theories , frameworks and models JISC
e-Learning Models Desk Study. JISC E-Learning Models Desk Study, (1), 144.
Mbengo, P. (2014). E-learning Adoption by Lecturers in Selected Zimbabwe State Universities:
An Application of Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Business Administration
and Education, 6(1), 1533.
Mcloughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical
choices with technology affordances in the Web 2 . 0 era Introduction: Social trends and
challenges. In ascilite (pp. 664675). Singapore.
Mlitwa, N. B. . (2007). Technology for teaching and learning in higher education contexts:
Activity theory and actor network theory analytical perspectives. International Journal
of Education and Development Using Communication Technology, 3(4), 5470.
2017 The author and GRDS Publishing. All rights reserved. 2157
Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/
PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences
ISSN 2454-5899
Njenga, J. K., Cyril, L., & Fourie, H. (2010). The myths about e-learning in higher education.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 199212.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00910.x
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, Part I: Do They Really Think
Differently? From On the Horizon (NCB University Press), 6(1.9), 19.
Schmid, R. F., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Surkes, M. a.,
Woods, J. (2014). The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: A meta-
analysis of classroom applications. Computers & Education, 72, 271291.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.002
Soong, M. H. B., Chuan, H., & Chai, B. (2001). Critical success factors for on-line course
resources. Computers & Education, 36, 101120.
Vehovar, V., Sicherl, P., Hsing, T., & Dolnicar, V. (2006). Methodological challenges of digital
divide measurements. Information Society, 22(5), 279290.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240600904076
Wang, J., Doll, W. J., Deng, X., Park, K., Ga, M., & Yang, M. (2013). Computers & Education
The impact of faculty perceived recon fi gurability of learning management systems on
effective teaching practices. Computers & Education, 61, 146
157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.005
2017 The author and GRDS Publishing. All rights reserved. 2158
Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/