1-019

6? DEIGN F O-DISCRETE DIRPIMG PRESSE GABE FOR 1/

EAST PRESSME IERSUlRENENTS(U) RMY BALLISTIC RESERMC
LO ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD H J OODMN ET U..
LWXMSIFIED O 87 M-TR-2793 F/G 14/2 U.

EhEEEEEEEmhohE
EomhEEmhomEEI-
 U-

II1.25 1111.4
-
EM
iW,
3

40 3
 AD
AD-A179 670

TECHNICAL REPORT BRL-TR-2783

DESIGN OF NON-DISCRETE DIAPHRAGM

PRESSURE GAGE FOR BLAST PRESSURE
MEASUREMENTS

HENRY J. GOODMAN
DTIC
-LECTE
EVAN H. WALKER AR998
EMMETT L. BELL
D)
MARCH 1987

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED.

US ARMY BALLISTIC RESEARCH LABORATORY

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND

874
Destroy this report when it is no longer needed.
Do not return it to the originator.

Additional copies of this report may be.obtained

from the National Technical Information Service,
U. S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, Virginia
22161.

The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official

Department of the Army position, unless so designated by otheT
authorized documents.

The use of trade names or manufacturers' names in this report

does not constitute indorsement of any commercial product.
 UNCLASS IFIED .07
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE/4- / /
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OBN 740"-
____________________________________________Exp.Date. Jun 30, l986
I&. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION lb. RESTRICTIVE MARKING
UNCLASSIFIED_______________________
2&. SECURITY CLASAFICATI0N AUTHORITY 3. DISTRIBUTION /AVAILABIUITY OF REPORT ~
Approved for public release; distribution
2b. DECLASSIFICATION/I OWNGRADING SCHEDULEisulmtd

4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) S. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S)

BRL-TR-2 783

6a. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 6b. OFFICE SYMBOL 7&. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION
USA Ballistic Research (I ~ ~ ____

Laboratory SLCBR-VL-S ________________________

6c. ADDRESS (City, State. and ZIP Code) State, and ZIP Code)
7b. ADORESS (City,
USA Ballistic Research Laboratory
Aberdeen Proving Ground, NO 21005-5066
$8. NAME OF FUNDING /SPONSORING Sb. OFFICE SYMBO0L 9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
ORGANIZATION Of SAPpIcable) ~
8C. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 10. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS
PROGRAM IPROJECT ITASK WORK UNIT
ELEMENT NO. NO. NO. ~ ACCESSION NO

11. TITLE (Include Security Classification)

Design of Non-Discrete Diaphragm Pressure Gage for Blast Pressure Measurements

I
12. PERSONAL AUTHOR(S)
Henry J. Goodman, Evan HI.Walker, Emmnett L. Bell
113s. TYPE OF REPORT 13b. TIME COVERED 14. Of& j (Year, Month, Day) IS. Pff COUNT
TehiclFROM -____TO

16. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION

17. COSATI CODES 18. SUBJECT TERMS (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number)
FIELD GROUP SUB-ROUP Diaphragm Gage Blast Measurement
Foil Gage Quasi-Static Pressure
Blast Overpressure
19. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number)%
A diaphragm peak pressure gage iihit$~rovides a convenient and inexpensive method to
measure the peak overpressure due to explosion in air, or other forms of pressure tran-
sients, occurring too rapidly to be recorded by a static pressure measuring device. a,
- designed-. A diaphragm pressure gage to measure the maximum quasi-static overpressure
inside an enclosure has also been designed.
The overall sizes of these gages are convenient and practical, and provide a distinc-
tive mechanism whereby the peak overpressure can be read directly from a graduated scale or
continuous readings can be obtained with a depth gage.
These gages are ideally suited to yield accurate and reliable peak overpressure read-
is over a wide pressure range in hazardous environments presented by explosives where ,

eletroicpressure transducers are not available, the environment is not conducive to the
20. DISTRIBUTION /AVAILABILITY OF ,ABSTRACT 21 ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
C3 UNCLASSIFIEDflJNLIMITED SAME AS RPT. 03 OTIC USERS UNCLASSIFIED
22a. NAME OP: RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL 22b TELIPH4ONE (I Iud Area Code) 22c OFF1CE SYMBOL .

HENRY J. GOODMAN (301)278-6290 SLCBR-VL-S

DO FORM 1473, BA MAR 83 APR edition may be used until exh'austed SECkURITY CLASSIFICATION OF TIS PAGE P.
All other edition%are obsolete UCASIFIE

- ~qUNCLASSIFIED.. . .. '

N V* N N 1%
use of electronic devices or where back-up measuring device is desired to ensure a
reading in the event of electronic device failure.

The transient diaphragm pressure gage can be calibrated to yield overpressure readings
so that spurious effects such as voltage surges or fragment impacts on the gages, effects
that are not caused by the pressure pulse itself, cannot yield false readings. This gage
when calibrated is less sensitive to the pulse shape than prior diaphragm gages and can be
calibrated to measure side-on or face-on peak shock overpressures. l if

. ..
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS .............................. . ........ . iv

3
I INTRODUCTION ................................ *........... . 0...... 1

II OBJECT IVE ....................... ...... .. *

........... ....
... 4

III GAGE CHARACTERISTICS ...o........ ........... ....... . 4

IV CAL IBRA T ION .................. ........ ... . ..
.. ...
.. ..oo
.... ..o
9
V RESULT S.............o.......... ... ...... .. . ............. . .1
VI CONCLUSION ........... ....... *............
. . . . . .......... 32 b
RE FERENC ES .. . . . ............
.......... ..........
*....... ...37

APPENDIX - EQUATIONS... ....o........................... o....... 39

LIST OF SYMBOLS .....o............ .. .. .. .. ..............
....49 .
DISTRIBUTION LIST . .................. .... ............ ..o...... 51 ?

e4

Accesloi) For

1LT NTIS CRA&I

~~DTIC TAG ]]'

.stifCJ t~ol
J ,

... .. .. ...... .. .. ......................

.. .. .. .. .. .. . ,
.... jt ...... .. I

D D t*c, - I
t~c,
JI (,T
dI 1i, i0
DIJ
..,
iBy
 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

1 Plan view of the Combat Systems Testing Activity gage and its

2 Plan view of the Surface Mounted Discrete Diaphragm Pressure Gage

(SMDDPG) and its construction ..................................... 5

3a Plan and. end view of the Non-Discrete Diaphragm Pressure Gage %

(NDDPG) ........... .. . ............................. 7 .

3b Construction of the (NDDPG) ..... o.... ..... ................. 7

4a Plan and end view of the Quasi-Static Diaphragm Pressure Gage

4b Construction of QA-DPG ............. .............. . ..... . ..... 8

5 Typical side-on pressure-time profile measured with electronic
transducer in the 24 inch shock tube ........
o .................. 10

6 Calibration curves for the NDDPG with .0005 inch aluminum foil
oriented face-on to the propagating shock... .....................12

7 Calibration curves for NDDPG with .001 inch aluminum foil oriented
face-on to the propagating chock........ o................ . ....... 13

8 Calibration curves for NDDPG with .003 inch aluminum foil oriented
side-on, face-on, 10 degree incident and 30 degree incident to the
propagating shock ................... ... ... ... . .. .. ....
o... . 15

9 Calibration curves for NDDPG with .005 inch aluminum foil oriented
face-on and side-on to the propagating shock..................... 16

10 Calibration curves for the SMDDPG and the CSTA gage with .0005
inch foil oriented side-on and face-on to the propagating shock...17

11 Calibration curves for SMDDPG 1 1/2 inch diameter and 3/4 inch
diameter diaphragms oriented face-on to propagating shock ......... 20

12a Pressure-time history for 8 pounds of pentolite with a Pmax of

3.7 psi ................. . . .......................... . 22

12b Pressure-time history for 8 pounds of pentolite with a Pmax of

19.4 psi .......... . ........................................ 22
13a Pressure-time history for 8 pounds of pentolite with a Pmax of
14.2 psi............ ................................ 23

14a Pressure-time history for 8 pounds of pentolite with a Pmax of

26.7 psi ................................... ...................... 24

iv

U.PI~ %~.9
. ..Y v%
-. -..-% * . .
 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (continued)

14b Pressure-time history for 8 pounds of pentilite with a Pmax of

45.1 psi ................................................ 24

15 Pressure-time history for 8 pounds of pentolite with a Pmax of

64.0 psi .................. .. ........... ......................... 25

16 Calibration curves for QS-DPG .................................... 26

17 Reflected overpressure versus side-on overpressure ............... 28

18 Side-on overpressure versus side-on impulse for 8 pounds of

pentol te ........................................................ 2

20 Side-on overpressure versus side-on duration for 8 pounds of

pentol ite ........................................................ 30

20 Side-on impulse versus side-on duration for 8 pounds of

pentol ite ........................................................ 31

21 Diaphragm pressure gages after compartment test ............... 33

22 Diaphragm pressure gages after compartment test ............ 33

D . .I) ., . . . . . . . . . t
 I. INTRODUCTION

Diaphragm pressure gages provide a convenient and inexpensive method to

measure peak blast overpressure. These devices are frequently employed where
electronic transducers are not available, the environment is not conducive to
the use of electronic transducers, or where a backup system to measure peak
overpressure is desirable.

As with all types of pressure gages, there exists the problem of achiev-
ing repeatability and rel~ability. The requirements for achieving repeatabil-
ity and relitbility with diaphragm or foil gages were established through the
work of Read at Princeton. These tests were conducted with Ballistic
Research Laboratories (BRL) type blast gages. Figure 1 shows a Combat Systems
Testing Activity (CSTA) gage, which is an example of the diaphram gage. For
the proper use of this gage it is necessary to determine the following:

1. selection of diaphragm material

2. calibration procedures
3. dependence of critical or rupture pressure on wave form
4. dynamic reloading effects
5. static load effects
6. apparatus procedure.

The BRL type gage contained a series of circular diaphragms. Pres-

sure readings with this gage were indicated by the largest diaphragm
ruptured, and the smallest diaphragm that failed to rupture. A discrete
rupture pressure or critical pressure exists for each diaphragm diame-
ter. A ruptured diaphragm records a pressure interval, the lower limit
being the rupture pressure of the diaphragm under consideration and the
upper limit, the discrete rupture pressure of the next smaller
diaphragm. Hence, instead of continuous pressure readings, the actual
pressure is only bracketed. The pressure range bracketed depends on the
diameters and the number of diaphragms in the gage housing. As a conse-
quence, this type of pressure gage is quite limited in its utility.

BRL has developed a new diaphragm gage that retains the simplicity
and repeatability of previous diaphragm type gages, but provides a con-
tinuous scale for pressure readings. This gage called "Non-Discrete
Diaphragm Pressure Gage (NDDPG)," has not only the advantages, simpli-
city, and ruggedness of the old gages developed at BRL and refined at
Princeton, but also, these gages avoid such problems as artificial

IRead, W.T.; "Calibration and Use of Diaphragm Blast Meters," NDRC

Report No. A392 (OSRD Report No. 6363), Division 2, National Defense
Research Committee, Washington, D.C., 1945.

V W e V- -- - -.
 00

0o
4J

4J.

4O4A
a 4-
4-)

4-
N

ini

ft
c4 ig

C- 3-
IM'UU LU2MUM MZWJ ifg :v n ; - r ,,, .- ] :. , *~i,
,*J- . i i

pressure readings (spurious electronic spikes) or loss of signal due to

broken lead-in wires to electronic devices. When the central question
to be answered is "what is the peak effective pressure (i.e., ignoring
exceedingly brief transients that do not produce effects on men or
equipment) exerted in the test environment?" the gage can provide
dependable information.

Unlike prior mechanical gages, this NDDPG has proved to give accu-
rate peak overpressure readings that appear to be less dependent on the
incident pressure pulse shape.

To explain the operations of these new continuous reading diaphragm

pressure gages, we need to consider, in detail, how the conventional
gages work. The tests at Princeton showed that a metallic diaphragm of
pure annealed aluminum foil is best for providing uniform test results,
and the initial pressure pulse produces the maximum deformation or
causes the diaphragm to rupture. Small subsequent shock pressure wave
reflections have an insignificant effect. The effect requiring signifi-
cantly higher reflected pressures to increase permanent deformation to a
diaphragm, concave to the direction in which the wave propagates, is due
to the fat that the diaphragm is strengthened when the initial shock
deforms it.

The Princeton study also showed that the maximum deformation or

rupture pressure depends on wave form. When step waves generated by a
shock tube were used to calibrate the gages, pressures recorded from
small charges having wave forms that could be expressed with an exponen-
tial function or waves that decayed rapidly, had to be 10% to 20% higher
in order to rupture the same size diameter diaphragms. The diaphragm
surface was recessed in its housing and the wave front direction of pro-
pagation was normal to the diaphragm surface. Hence, face-on pressures
or normally reflected pressures were measured. At Operation Greenhouse
(a nuclear blast trial), a surface mount discrete diaphragm pressure
gage (SMDDPG) with foil at the surface rather than being recessed was
used to measure side-on pressure. The direction of travel of the blast
wave was parallel to the foil surface, hence side-on pressure. There
were no significant differences in the maximum pressure measurements by
the foil gages and those measured by electronic transducers.

2Dresner, Lawrence; "Motion Of Elasto-Plastic Membranes Under Shock

Loading," Journal of Applied Physics, Volume 41, No. 5, 1970.
3
Meszaros, Julius; "Determination of Mach Region Blast Pressure with
Foil Meters," Operation Greenhouse, Scientific Director Report WT-55,
Annex 1.6, Part III, Section 2, Ballistic Research Laboratories,
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 1951 (C).

L3
 A non-rupturing diaphragm gage has also been devZloped that deter-
mines the peak overpressure to an accuracy of 10%. Even though this
gage has circular diaphragms, it gives a continuous pressure reading
from the correlation of maximum deformation and pressure as long as the
diaphragm does not rupture. However, the total continuous peak over-
pressure range of this gage is less than that of the new NDDPG.

II. OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work was to develop an inexpensive diaphragm

type gage, requiring minimal time for set-up in test situations, with
reliable, repeatable, continuous (non-discrete) overpressure readings
with or without rupture of the diaphragm.

III. GAGE CHARACTERISTICS

The size of all gages discussed in this work is constrained to

approximate the size of the foil gage used by the CSTA at Aberdeen Prov-
ing Ground, MD. Figure 1 depicts the CSTA type gage. A rupture type
gage (discrete pressure measurements), with the diaphragm mounted at the
gage housing surface, instead of being recessed was fabricated and is
shown in Figure 2. This gage which was called the surface mounted
discrete diaphragm pressure gage (SMDDPG) had more diaphragms than the
CSTA gage, thus increasing the number of pressure intervals and decreas-
ing the range of each pressure interval.

The final permanent shape of the ductile diaphragm material after

blast loading is well defined, and when rupture occurs several varia-
tions of ,6 single crack without branches occur for circular
diaphragms. 6 For the NDDPG, a diaphragm material of pure annealed
aluminum, 99.4% pure, with negligible elastic effects (elastic limit
occurs at negligibly small strain) was selected. This material is such.

4 Manweiler, R.W.; Chester, C.V.; and Kearney, C H.; "Measurements of

Shock Over-Pressures in Air by a Yielding Foil Membrane Blast Gage,"
ORNL Report 4863, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
September 1973.
5
Hudson, G.E.; "A Theory of the Dynamic Deformation of a Thin
Diaphragm," Journal Of Applied Physics, Volume 22, No. 1, January 1951.
6
Sachs, George; Epsey, George; and Kasik, G.P.; "Circular Bulging of
Aluminum-Alloy Sheets at Room and Elevated Temperature," ASME,
January-December 1946.

4
 X~ 4

CLC

IO + I J+4

K4.

z N N -CY

CFO 4- a

C 4CL
be~.

w0. M

w ij

X ci
that strain rate does not affect the flow for the finite deformation and
strains considered. A cone-shaped gage design was selected to control
the direction of the crack when the foil ruptured (see Figures 3a and
3b). This gage combines the features of a yielding diaphragm gage
without rupture, and a gage where pressures were determined by the rup-
ture length in the diaphragm. In the case of non-rupture, the peak
overpressure is determined from the maximum depth of the diaphragm
deformation. For rupture, the crack or ruptured area propagated in the
direction of the cones axis and the length of the crack or rupture area
is used to determine the peak overpressure. These peak overpressures
are read off a calibrated scale on the front of the gage housing, for
the rupture case. In the case of non-rupture, the accuracy is dependent
upon the accuracy with which one measures the maximum foil deformation.
If the foil ruptures, the pressure measurements are not as accurate
because of the scatter in the length measurements of the rupture crack
or rupture area that are read from the scale on the gage housing.
Nevertheless, good peak overpressure measurements can be obtained. In
both cases, rupture or non-rupture, the readings are non-discrete; thus
providing a NDDPG or continuous reading diaphragm pressure gage.

International Foil of Alliance, Ohio supplied the diaphragm materi-

als for the NDDPG which was 1145-0 annealed aluminum foil, 99.4% pure in
thicknesses of .0005 inch, .001 inch, .003 inch, and .005 inch. Initial
tests showed that a knife located behind the foil, at the center of the
maximum diameter of the cavity, shown in Figure 3a, caused rupture to
occur after a small deformation. The length could be read directly from
a scale on the housing. The foil puncture knife had two sharp edges
aligned along the cone axis and came to a point at its upper end.
Because of the gage size constraint, the pressure range of this version
of the NDDPG gage was short and not adequate for mcst of the field tests
for which it was designed.

The gage shown in Figures 3a and 3b without a knife, utilizing

deformation, and rupture characteristics was adopted as the most reli-
able and accurate gage for measuring the face-on peak overpressure of a
fast rising transient pulse with blast or shock wave characteristics. A
3/4 inch cavity behind the foil was used so that natural rupture could
occur before the deforming foil reached the bottom of the cavity. In
order to keep the foil from being cut along the cavity edge at high
pressures, the edge of the cavity adjacent to the foil had a 1/32 inch
by 45 degree chamfer.

Figures 4a & 4b show a variation of the NDDPG gage, the quasi-

static diaphragm pressure gage (QS-DPG) designed to measure the peak
overpressure of a slow rising pulse generated due to some source of heat
energy in an enclosure. This quasi-static pressure was measured by
creating two cavities separated by the foil, and allowing the hot gases
to enter the front cavity through a shock attenuation tube, located at
the small end of the cavity. The entrance to the front cavity of the

6
 4.5.
L15

F 1.__7__I. LFOIL-4 O71 O15

toI
CQUAL
3.5*75

A A-A

Figure 3a. Plan and end view of the Non-Discrete Diaphrag,

Pressure Gage (NDDPG)

1/6' M.S
34 *MS. BACK PL.
CHAMBEIR
ALUM.
FOIL
A
i/S M.S.
CALISNATEO PL.

Figure 3b. Construction of the (NDDPG)

7
 4.63'_

- .- ~ -- '

4.813"
\ /I

py-
y- - Y -Y

Figure 4a. Plan and end view of the Quasi-Static Diaphragm

Pressure Gage (QS-DPG)

0 I/8" 0I.S.

C REARM.3.
3/4 BACK PL.
ALUM. CHAMBER
A 1/80 M.S FOIL
I 8" M.S. FRONT
INLET PL. CHAMBER

Figure 4b. Construction of QS-DPG

8
gage was positioned so that if shocks entered, the foil deformation at
this point would be minimal and the maximum deformation would occur at
the large diameter, because of the high pressure gas or quasi-static
pressure buildup. Plates A and B, of Figure 4b are welded together to
form the entrance cavity and plates D and E were welded together to form
the rear cavity of the gage. The foil C, in Figure 4b was placed over
the cavity in plate D with an adhesive sealant (Silastic 722RTV). Fig-
ure 4a shows the front and side views of the assembled gage.

IV. CALIBRATION

The 99.4% pure annealed aluminum metallic diaphragm material was

calibrated in the BRL 24 inch open end shock tube (ST) and later in
field experiments using eight pound spherical pentolite charges fired
near the ground so that measurements could be made in the Mach stem
region. For the shock tube tests, the foil in the NDDPG gage housing
was mounted in the center of the ST tube and oriented so that the shock
wave impacted side-on (90 degree incident angle), 30 degree incident
angle, 10 degree incident angle, and face-on or normally reflected (0
degree incident angle). The angle of incidence is defined as the angle
between the shock front normal and the normal to an impacted surface.
Hence, side-on orientation is that in which the plane of the foil in the
gage housing is parallel to the direction of propagation of the shock,
and the shock travels across the face of the gage with a finite velo-
city. Face-on or normally reflected measurements were made when the
orientation of the foil in the gage was such that its plane was perpen-
dicular to the direction in which the shock propagated, and the shock
impacted the foil surface at all points simultaneously.

In order to keep the enveloping shock from affecting the foil from
the rear of the gage cavity, the cavity behind the foil was closed. A
small hole was placed in plate D of Figure 3b so that the barometric
pressure and temperature changes would not change the maximum permanent
deformation for a given pressure level. In these tests it was found
that the maximum deformation depth was the same at the shock pressure
levels tested with or without the hole. However, for .0005 inch foil
the permanent maximum deformation depth was not smooth with the hole in
the cavity.

The peak side-on overpressure at the NDDPG gage location in the

shock tube was measured with a Piezotronic PCB type 1134A24 quartz
piezoelectric electronic transducer. Figure 5 is a typical pressure
time trace. The side-on and face-on pressures were also computed from

VV9
 0~r an-

0 C

4)

P L

0-
C4i co

100
the gas properties in the shock tube. The recorded pressures,
corresponding to the deformation or rupture experienced by the foil,
were the average values of the side-on pressures measured by the PCB
gage and those computed from the gas properties in the shock tube.

Maximum permanent deformation depth occurred in the large diameter

of the NDDPG foil gage, and this depth was measured with a depth microm-
eter gage having a base and measuring rod with .001 inch graduations.
The zero of the rupture scale on the gage housing was the mark at max-
imum diameter. This mark represents the minimum pressure needed to
cause rupture and at this point rupture begins. It should be noted that
it was impossible to determine a single rupture pressure and there is a
discontinuity or transition region in the immediate vicinity of the rup-
ture point. A similar condition occurs for electronically measured
shock pressures when the ratio of local flow velocity and local sound
velocity behind the shock is one. The scale on the gage housing is read
from the initial scale mark at the maximum opening (cone base) toward
the vertex of the cone. The length of the rupture was defined as the
rupture length in the direction of the cone axis beginning at the ini-
tial scale mark. In many instances the ruptures were elliptical and the
lengths were along the major axis beginning at the initial mark of the
rupture scale.

V. RESULTS

LSPLOT-CDC VERSION, an interactive data plotting and analysis pro-

gram for use with the Tektronix graphic terminals, has been used to plot
and analyze the experimental data. Computer drawn curves are presented
in Figures 6 through 11, and Figures 16 thru 20 showing the data points,
together with least square fitted polynomial curves, to serve as pres-
sure calibration curves.

Even though the gage may or may not have been oriented side-on, the
pressure data was converted to peak side-on overpressures because this
was the pressure of interest in the project. These side-on overpres-
sures were those measured electronically or computed for the calibration
orientation. Figures 6 and 7 give the overpressure versus permanent
deformation, and overpressure versus rupture length for .0005 and .001
inch foil mounted in the NDDPG when impacted face-on by a shock. In
these tests each scale mark shown on plate A of Figure 3b is a unit of
length measurement and the mark at maximum diameter is the initial

7 Goodman,
Henry J.; "Aerodynamic and Frequency Dependent Errors in Air
Blast Gages," BRL Report 1345, Ballistic Research Laboratories,
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, October 1966.

11|
 - .rs V5 Iro!U
u l 7 W -W

13

CD.

06

ao

.4

4-'

L.
~0

CY ~ c.4-

% -3

a L.

asc Nom- Nws8cm

12a
 E3E
E3

LiiL

M' L. 0.

I~IV

CC

\E3J

z
0 0

a;i. i a; Li: w ; 4 ; ; r ,

aIScD 3MS3J&I3AO NO-30IS

13

' ' ' ;6

point. The plots show a transition region between the maximum point of
foil deformation and the minimum point of rupture on the rupture scale
and an extrapolation should not be made in this transition region.

The steel mounting shaft used to insert the gage housing into the
shock tube was not adequate to withstand pressures required to determine
the rupture scale presures for .003 and .005 inch aluminum foil. How-
ever, the range of pressures determined from the maximum deformation
depths were sufficient for the field tests in which the gage was to be
used. Attempts to extend the range of pressures into the rupture region
for these two thicknesses were discontinued, because the mounting shaft
began to bend at the high pressures.

Figure 8 is the pressure versus maximum deformation for .003 inch

foil mounted in the NDDPG when oriented side-on (90 degree incident
angle), at 10 degree incident angle, at 30 degree incident angle, and
face-on (0 degree incident angle). The solid line is for face-on (ST),
long dash for face-on (EXPL), dot for 10 degree, short dash for 30
degree, and dash for side-on (ST and EXPL). This Figure shows that at
10 degrees and 30 degrees the pressure deviation is not significantly
different from face-on pressure measurements. For side-on pressure, an
order of magnitude increase in pressure is needed to produce the same
permanent deformation as a wave impacting face-on. This Figure can be
used to determine the peak overpressure when side-on pressures are
desired. For a small angle of misalignment, the gage will give good
face-on pressure measurements.

Figure 9 is the pressure versus maximum deformation for the .005

inch foil mounted in the NDDPG when oriented face-on and side-on. The
solid line is for face-on (ST) and the dotted line is for face-on
(EXPL).

Figure 10 is a plot of the rupture pressures for the CSTA type gage
and the SMDDPG. The SMDDPG measurements were made at face-on and side-
on orientation. This figure shows that an order of magnitude increase
in side-on overpressure must exist in order to have similar diameter
diaphragms that ruptured face-on to rupture side-on. These gages give
discrete pressure ranges for ruptured diaphragms and these values are
given in Table 1 for the CSTA type gage and Table 2 for the SMDDPG.

14
 ka 0 c
o f

S_ IV

~~~+ 0 .

CD0 4)

0
HY
'4 )
X Iw X + H; W
_ 4U 4-)

+z I4- 4

w 0

0L J~ 0+4 0

II W W I I N ;"
00 in a,

0
U.la. .- p C C L O wl)
II IZ IUI
;

ci~sd) 38flSS38&AO NO-301S

15
 U 4-) y

%j L.

cm0

.44.

0.1 H0

I I . '

0.
 In '0
+m

-iINW

00

a--

W OE

00

0
III 1 11 .. *1il 0il
6 %

CISd) flSS~i&I3AO NO-WIS

17
TABLE 1. Rupture Overpressure for Combat Systems Testing Activity
(CSTA) Diaphragm Pressure Gage with .0005 Inch Foil

I Diaphragm Pressure
Ruptured

I I
inch psi

none P < 3.3

1 1/2 3.3< P < 6.2
1/2 6.2< P < 8.0
1/4 8.0< P <17.1
1/8 17.1< P

Gage orientation is face-on with corresponding side-on overpressure

recorded.

TABLE 2. Rupture Overpressure for Surface Mounted Discrete

Diaphragm Pressure Gage (SMDDPG) with .0005 Inch Foil

Diaphragm Pressure
Ruptured

inch psi

none P < 3.0

1 1/2 3.0< P < 5.0
3/4 5.0< P < 7.6
3/8 7.6< P <11.5
1/4 11.5< P <16.9
3/16 16.9< P <22.0
1/8 22.0< P

Gage orientation is face-on with corresponding side-on overpressure

recorded.

18
 The SMDDPG was also oriented face-on and tests were conducted to
determine the maximum, permanent, deformation in the 1 1/2 inch and 3/4
inch diameter diaphragm for .001 inch and .003 inch foil. These test
values are plotted in Figure 11 and show the effects of foil diameter on
permanent, maximum, deformation. The face-on orientation produces a
more accurate gage and if the individual chambers are isolated, the
range could be extended by using the rupture intervals whenever the 3/4
inch and 1 1/2 inch or large diaphragms rupture. Several shots against
this gage oriented side-on without diaphragm rupture gave a deformed
shape that was asymmetrical with the maximum permanent deformation depth
being shifted from the diaphragm center. This condition also occurred
for the NDDPG, shifting the maximum permanent deformation depth off the
diaphragm axis of symmetry for side-on measurements. Since this shift
in position of the depression is always in the direction of the shock
velocity vector, one could use this characteristic to determine the
direction from which a shock wave propagates when the direction is unk-
nown.

Subsequent to the calibration in the ST, some field tests were con-
ducted with eight pound spheres of pentolite to determine the effects of
wave shape on these mechanical diaphragm gages (NDDPG's and SMDDPG's).
Side-on pressure-time histories generated with explosive charges were
measured with PCB type electronic gages. Typical examples of these his-
tories are given in Figures 12a through 15 for shock strengths ranging
from 3.7 psi to 64 psi. There is a decrease in positive duration as the
pressure increases, hence, the impulsive load is delivered at shorter
times as the pressure increases. These explosive shock data have been
plotted together with the data generated from the shock tube experi-
ments. Figures 8 and 9 show that the NDDPG is not sensitive to wave
shape in the pressur.e range under study for face-on and side-on measure-
ments when .003 and .005 inch foils are used. Figure 10 shows that
when pressures are determined by using the r'?pture pressure of
diaphragms, the shape of the wave and duration must be taken into
account when calibrating the gage. This is not the case using foil
deformation as the basis of pressure measurement, as shown in Figures 8
and 9.

No adequate apparatus was available for calibrating the quasi-

static diaphragm pressure gage (QS-DPG) so the shock tube was used to
approximate the peak overpressure of the long duration slow rising pres-
sure that is generated when blast expands within enclosures. The QS-DPG
was oriented such that the shock attenuating tube faced the on-coming
shock, then rotated 180 degrees to determine the pressure for the same
strength wave. Figure 16 shows that deformation was the same at both
orientations for .005 inch foil. Since the shock was attenuated and did
not affect the foil appreciably in the entrance area because of the
small size, it was assumed that the high pressure gases behind the shock
front that entered the front cavity of the gage deformed the foil. The
fact that there was was no change in deformation at both orientations

p 19
* 06

o 1

C;D

20
substantiate this assumption. Only one orientation for .001 and .003
inch foil was used. In order to measure the maximum deformation in some
tests, air had to be let into the rear chamber after the test. This was
done by making a needle hole in the foil at the entrance (smallest diam-
eter) or by placing a razor blade under a portion of the sealed side of
the foil to relieve pressure buildup in the sealed cavity after deforma-
tion.

A large number of clean out shots were required to remove the accu-
mulation of debris generated by the shock tube diaphragms during shock
tube calibration. Provisions also had to be made to ensure debris did
not impact the gages when field tests, with the eight pound Pentolite
charges, were conducted.

The traditional method of assessing the effects of overpressure on

exposed personnel requires estimates of the peak side-on overpressure
and duration of the positive phase of the overpressure event. From the
theory based on the Rankine-Hugoniot relationships, peak face-on or nor-
mally reflected pressure (Pr can be calculated according to these rela-
tionships by:

(2 + 1)[
( (Pi P + Po) 1]

- P o r" i1 o ) . +o
()
Pr Pi Po0
2 P
0

Where

Cp - specific heat at constant pressure

Cv - specific heat at constant volume

Pi " total peak side-on pressure

Pr- total peak face-on or peak reflected pressure

P - ambient pressure

C
c
Y C
v
1 _ y+I
2 y - 1

2
21 I
 SHOT 5 GRGE 4

Tstart(ms)- 0.000
Pmax- 3. ?
20e Impulse(psl-ms)- 9
Time at Pmax (MS)= 20.470

LOi
LO)
Li

C C3.0P, 31.? 35.?

TIME(ms)
U)I to- 12a.
Figure Pressure-time history for 8 pounds of pentolite
with a Pmax of 3.7 psi.
SHOT 6 GAGE I

Tstart(ms)- 0.000
Pmax- 10.4
20 Impuls;(psi-ms)= 12
aTime ISt op
at Pmax (MS)= 8.000

L 15-

U)
LLi
SHOT BGFIGE
0 -'iVV i**5.~%%...~-. 'V.V. V.*

..0 1. 16 . 2.0
TIME(ms)

Figure 12b. Pressure-time history for 8 pounds of pentolite

with a Pmax of 10.4 psi.

22
 SHOT 9 GAGE 5

Tstart(ms)- 0.000
Pmax- 14.2
40 Impulse(ps -ms= B
V/ Time at Pmax (MS)= 6.545
0.

Ln
LI
Ln

0LI
0 Istop ^
a1 i . 7.5 IB15 I

TIME (ms)
Figure 13a. Pressure-time history for 8 pounds of pentolite
with a Pmax of 14.2 psi.
SHOT 9 GAGE 4

Tstart(ms)- 0.000
Pmax- 8. 8
V) 40 Impulse(psl- ms)=
Time at Pmax (MS)= 21
6.050
L

) 20.
.. . 1
LLJ
UO
LI
00-

." .51 1.5 15.5 19.8

TIME (ms)
Figure 13b. Pressure-time history for 8 pounds of pentolite
with a Pmax of 18.8 psi.
23
 SHOT 8 GAGE 2

Tstart(ms)- 0.000
Pmax- 26. 7
4 Impulse(ps1-ms)- 23
* Time at Pmax (MS) = 4.600
C-
LI, 3 e-

in
L e

SIstop=
- . . 7.5 lIt5 q .a51 19.

TIME (ms)
Figure 14a. Pressure-time history for 8 pounds of pentolite
with a Pmax of 26.7 psi.

SHOT II GAGE 4
ise
Tstart(ms)- 0.000
.- Pmax- 45. 1
I Impulse(psi-ms)= 37
Time at Pmax (MS)= 2.9G5
CL
LU

in
Un
LUJ
W
CL

0 o ! Istop=^
-a .0., 4.8 75I 581

TIME(ms)
Figure 14b. Pressure-time history for 8 pounds of pentolite
with a Pmax of 45.1 psi.

24
- ~~~~ r. f ~ - ~
--.---
- - -WWMv - -pop - -~. n, i,- r wrIww W
9 onw.t

SHOT It GAGE I

Tstart(ms)- 0.000
Pmaxm 64
37
WTimeIImpulSe(psl-ns)= at Pmax (MS)= 1.625
L

LJ
U)

Fiuestop=' o 64 Z.

1.
Pessre-imehisoryfor8
Figue pounds of pentolite
with a Pmax of 64.0 psi.

25

~'Sp' ~ .~*% A
 Cy~

44

00

264
The peak face-on overpressures, (P -Po), computed from the peak side-on
overpressures, (Pi-Po), in equation 1 are tabulated in reference 8 and
these face-on peak overpressures versus peak side-on overpressures,
along with peak overpressures determined during calibration, are plotted
in Figure 17; data are given for gages where the propagating shocks
impact the foil face-on, 10 degree incident angle and at 30 degree
incident angle. The long dash is for 0 degree (BRL RPT), the dot is for
10 degree, the short dash is for 30 degree, and the solid line is for 0
degree (ST). The pressures from reference 8 in this figure agree with
those that were determined experimentally. The pressures for oblique
reflections also agree. Hence, this Figure will be used to relate
side-on pressure to face-on pressure in this work. One must be aware,
however, that pressures for oblique impact of the shock may not always
be less than those from a similar wave impinging face-on and may actu-
ally be greater. This is especially in evidence for sufficiently small
angles of attack and where Mach reflection occurs.

Other important shock parameter relationships in incapacitation

studies are pressure versus positive impulse, pressure versus positive
duration and positive impulse versus positive duration. These relation-
ships were obtained in the measurements made with the electronic gages
when the eight pound spherical pentolite charges were used to calibrate
the foil gages. These data are plotted in Figures 18, 19, and 20.

The expected pressures should determine the thickness of foil to be

used in an experimental environment for the NDDPG and the QS-DPG. The
NDDPG is not calibrated for multiple shocks or slow rising pressure
pulses. For slow rising pressure pulses, the QS-DPG should be used.

In an environment where multiple shocks occur the NT)DPG may be used

if a thickness of foil is used that precludes rupture and the gage is
oriented face-on to the initial shock. A small reflected shock which
would not increase permanent deformation may increase the rupture length
(especially for thin foil such as .0005 inch) if rupture occurs. For
thicker foil (.001 to .005 inch) the rupture length should not increase
significantly, if at all, for weak reflections. Therefore, one should
still read the pressure from the gage if rupture occurs. It is assumed
that the initial shock causes the maximum permanent deformation. If the
NDDPG is mounted flush with the interior of an enclosure where shocks
propagate, gage orientation is not a factor if the gage has been cali-
brated to measure side-on pressure.

8
Kingery, C.N. and Pannill, B.F.; "Parametric Analysis of the Regular
Reflection of Air Blast," BRL Report No. 1249, Ballistic Research
Laboratories, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 1964.

27
- ~- -- - - - W s- rr p - S % 1 fSnA YS S- IW ~

0n
CL C,

-Wi 4A

00 0
qr In
CH

zz zzS3d3O
sd 331-3

28,
 00
00
(L-

W, -

0
r) S

00

Tc1 I I

CISd) 3blSS38d83AO NO-301S

29
~U~IW
~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~~-2r
mr "X ,WX ~ WW w .vuWV.. -. -~~y: r~;U
P -'aPFW '~'v ~ -

00

00

4-
00

00
P%.. V

00

(ISd) 3MflSS38&dGAO NO-301S

30
 0

0
0 0

IIA

0 0 z
0 ~
I-

00

H 0
c,
0 0
CJ

0 C'j

CSW ISd) 3SlfldWI NO-30IS

31
 Even though only the QS-DPG was designed to measure p:essures
inside an enclosure, all gages have been used inside troop compartments
to measure the pressures generated when a shaped charge impacts the com-
partment. The NDDPG was used for shocks and the QS-DPG was used for
quasi-static pressure. In an enclosure impacted by shaped charges, usu-
ally there is no definitive evidence on the obliquity of the blast wave
that propagates inside. In the absence of knowledge of the obliquity of
the blast wave, it was assumed that foil gages oriented to face the
impact point, when located inside an enclosure, were measuring face-on
pressures and the initial shock causes the maximum deformation. Elec-
tronic transducers, when used, are mounted flush with the exposed inte-
rior. The NDDPG was placed inside the enclosure and correct orientation
was impossible because the shock wave direction could only be assumed.
Figure 17, however, shows that small deviations in the orientation angle
causes insignificant changes in the pressure measured. Figures 21 and
22 show the deformed or ruptured foil when the gages were mounted in an
enclosure impacted by a shaped charge. Several NDDPG oriented similarly
to electronic transducers had measurements that were 5 to 15 percent
below those measured electronically and in the range predicted by the
SMDDPG and the CSTA gage. This is considered good agreement since the
peaks of electronically determined pressure time histories of measure-
ments in an enclosure impacted by a shape charge are not always clearly
determined. The quasi-static pressure was approximated with the QS-DPG.
The maximum pressures measured with the QS-DPG were in good agreement
with the quasi-static pressure taken from the long time pressure-time
curves produced by electronic transducers.

All equations generated from the LSPLOT program are given in the
appendix. These equations can be used to compute the pressure wlenever
the deformation or rupture is known.

VI. CONCLUSION

Even though the calibration shots indicate the NDDPG is less sensi-
tive to the pulse shape than previous diaphragm gages, we feel that the
calibration pressure pulse should be similar to the pressure pulse
existing in the test environment in which the gage will be used. If the
initial impulsive loads delivered are similar (calibration and actual
tests), it might be possible to approximate a shock duration for the
NDDPG by comparison with the electronically measured pressure time his-
tories. For CSTA type foil gages, the calibration pressure pulse should
be similar to the test environment pulse. Otherwise, when a shock tube
is used to calibrate the CSTA type gage and the gage is used to measure
pressure pulses similar to those generated by small explosive charges,
the pressure may be greatly underestimated.The importance of this factor
is vitiated when the NDDPG is used to measure the pressure.

32

Il
 Figure.
22 Di .rg
prssr gae ....
afe coprmn test....

.. * -5 ~ - . -. .~'~*
*. ** ** . ~ %.~~ . %* ** ~ * - . - . . . -. . . . . . . .. . . . . .

Fiur ~*5
22 p. * *.*hag pre sur gae af e com arten test.
EU W . i -- ; .. i - 'i i - , -- ~ ' , C. - - - RU -w
.E ,Z;U[ vw U _WYWTWVVVWVWWYWV

The NDDPG is a self contained, inexpensive, non-electronic gage

that gives an accurate peak overpressure measure of shocks without mul-
tiple reflections that appears to be independent of the shape of the
shock pressure pulse. Within the limits of the gage range, the NDDPG
provides a continuous scale for the measurement of shock pressures.
Moreover, the gage can still be read even if the foil ruptures, although
with reduced accuracy.

The NDDPG is designed to measure fast rising pressure pilses

(shocks) without multiple steps or reflections. However, if it is
understood that it is the initial shock peak pressure that makes the
maximum deformation or rupture used to determine the peak overpressure,
the NDDPG should provide good pressure measurements in an enclosure even
in the presence of such multiple pulses. The effects of orientation can
be eliminated, if the gage is calibrated for side-on pressures with the
gage in its test environment mounted in the walls, ceiling, or floor of
the enclosure.

Experience with electronic gages has often shown that it is diffi-

cult to sort out the many peaks and spikes in pressure time histories
that are produced. It's often difficult to know which represents
genuine peak overpressures. Because of such difficulty in determining
the actual peak overpressures from the pressure-time records of the
electronic gages, located in an enclosure, the NDDPG may prove to be a
valuable tool in determining the effective peak overpressure on the
pressure-time record.

In the characteristic response tiWe of 2.23 ms as set forth in

Richmond's Partial Impulse Criteria, Figure 19 shows that 8 pounds of
jentolite delivers an impulse of 20 psi ms. This is below the lung dam-
age threshold of 34 psi ms. A side-on impulse of of 20 psi ms
corresponding to 22 psi on Figure 18 is related to a deformation of .38
inches on Figure 8 for .003 inch foil oriented side on. This analysis
shows that the gage can be calibrated to give incapacitation levels
without recourse to relating the deformation to pressure. This would
eliminate the interpretation of peaks on suspect records.

The QS-DPG shows promise as an invaluable device for measuring

quasi-static pressures. It provides accurate values of the peak over-
pressure for slow rising pressures in a chamber. Such pulses cause con-
siderable damage to structures because of the high impulsive loads gen-
erated.

9 Richmond, D.R., et.al.; "The Relationship Between Selected Blast Wave

Parameters and the Response of Mammals Exposed to Air Blast," DASA
1860, Lovelace Foundation, NM, August 1966.

34

."%-%- % % %-%-.o
 The gage should be used in a non rupturing mode whenever possible,
because of the ease in calibration and the repeatability of the calibra-
tion measurements.

These inexpensive, easy to use gages should always be used as back-

ups when electronic transducers are used to measure pressure in a hazar-
dous environment, thus, damage to the transducer will not result in com-
plete failure to obtaining peak overpressure readings.

We should caution that the aluminum foil from different sources may
differ in specific metal properties, and foil quality and any new batch
of foil should be calibrated before using.

35
 REFERENCES

1. Read, W.T.; "Calibration and Use of Diaphragm Blast Meters," NDRC Report
No. A392 (OSRD Report No. 6363), Division 2, National Defense Research
Committee, Washington, D.C., 1945.

2. Dresner, Lawrence; "Motion of Elasto-Plastic Membranes Under Shock

Loading," Journal Of Applied Physics, Volume 41, No 5, 1970.

3. Meszaros, Julius; "Determination of Mach Region Blast Pressure with

Foil Meters," Operation Greenhouse, Scientific Director Report WT-55 Annex
1.6, Part III, Section 2, Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen
Proving Ground, MD, 1951 (C).

4. Manweiler, R.W.; Chester, C.V.; and Kearney, C.H.; "Measurements of Shock

Over-Pressures in Air by a Yielding Foil Membrane Blast Gage," ORNL
Report 4863, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Sep-
tember
1973.

5. Hudson, G.E.; "A Theory of the Dynamic Deformation of a Thin Diaphragm,"

Journal of Applied Physics, Volume 22, Number 1, January 1951.

6. Sachs, George; Epsey, George; and Kasik, G.P.; "Circular Bulging of

Aluminum-Alloy Sheets at Room and Elevated Temperature," ASME,
January-December 1946.

7. Goodman, Henry J.; "Aerodynamic and Frequency Dependent Errors in Air

Blast Gages," BRL Report 1345, Ballistic Research Laboratories, APG,
MD, October 1966.

8. Kingery, C.N. and Pannill, B.F.; "Parametric Analysis of the Regular

Reflection of Air Blast," BRL Report No. 1249, Ballistic Research
Laboratories, APG, MD, 1964.

9. Richardson, D.R., et. al.; "The Relationship Between Selected Blast Wave
Parameters and the Response of Mammals Exposed to Air Blast," DASA
1860, Lovelace Foundation, Albuquerque, NM, August 1966.

37
APPENDIX - EQUATIONS

39

lk-% - ... N k
 APPENDIX - EQUATIONS
No - is
Gage Type - NDDPG
Foil Thickness - .0005 inch
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Shock Tube
See Figure 6.

Pi=.402+6.84DM psi (A-I)

No - lb
Gage Type - NDDPG
Foil Thickness - .0005 inch
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Rupture (A-R) / Shock Tube
See Figure 6.

Pi=2.80+.243DR psi (A-2)

No - 2a
Gage Type - NDDPG
Foil Thickness - .001 inch
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Shock Tube
See Figure 7.

Pi=-.355+13.2DM psi (A-3)

No - 2b
Gage Type - NDDPG
Foil Thickness - .001 inch
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Rupture (A-R) / Shock Tube
See Figure 7.

Pi=3.34+.598DR psi (A-4)

41
No - 3
Gage Type - NDDPG
Foil Thickness - .003 inch
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Shock Tube
See Figure 8.

Pi=-1.64+.346DM psi (A-5)

No - 3b
Foil Thickness - .003 inch
Orientation - Side-on
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Shock Tube
See Figure 8.

P =-2.81+61.2DM psi (A-6)

No- 3c
Foil Thickness - .003 inch
Orientation - 10 Degree Incident
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Explosive
See Figure 8.

Pi=-1.46+32.8DM psi (A-7)

No - 3d
Gage Type - NDDPG
Foil Thickness .003 inch
Orientation - 30 Degree Incident
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Shock Tube
See Figure 8.

Pi=-1.76+38.1DM psi (A-8)

42
 No -3e
Gage Type - NDDPG
Foil Thickness - .003 inch
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Explosive
See Figure 8.

Pi=-I.28+32.8DM psi (A-9)

No - 3f
Gage Type - NDDPG
Foil Thickness - .003 inch
Orientation - Side-on
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Explosive
See Figure 8.

P=-3.Q2+68.gDM psi (A-10)

No - 4a
Gage Type - NDDPG
Foil Thickness - .005 inch
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Shock Tube
See Figure 9.

P-=-2.37+49.4DM psi (A-11)

No - 4b
Gage Type - NDDPG
Foil Thickness .005 inch
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Explosive
See Figure 9.

Pi=-I.74+48DM psi (A-12)

43

,'---U * -. .--.
 - -.
WT -v -'.
V-W- -V WTIrWM "-j
-M _'r- - rip 7
vm -7

No - 4c
Gage Type - NDDPG
Foil Thickness - .005 inch
Orientation - Side-on
Measurement Type -SlDc kDeformation (A-M) /Shock Tube
See Figure g.

Pi=-5 .30+gg.8DM psi (A-13)

No - 5a
Gage Type - CSTA
Foil Thickness - .0005 inch
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Rupture (A-R) / Shock Tube
See Figure 10.

Pj=39DR-443("-'*00'psi(A- 14)

No Sb
-
Gage Type - SMDDPG
Foil Thickness - .0005 inch
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Rupture (A-R) / Shock Tube
See Figure 10.

Pj39D-I~(4Id2 psi (A-i15)

No.-Sc
Gage Type.- SMDDPG
Foil Thickness - .0005 inch
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Rupture (A-R) / Shock Tube
See Figure 10.

Pj=4.1D eA-ft0 ps (A-16)

44

-------- Li~'~.-~r-~~-
No - 5d
Gage Type - SMDDPG
Foil Thickness - .0005 inch
Orientation - Side-on
Measurement Type -Shock Rupture (A-R) / Shock Tube
See Figure 10.

Pi=8.03DR-"' psi (A-17)

No - 6a
Gage Type - SMDDPG (A-ithout rupture)
Foil T hickness - .001 inch in 1 1/2 inch diameter
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Shock Tube
See Figure 11.

Pi=-.832+42.ODM psi (A-18)

No - Ob
Gage Type - SMDDPG (A-ithout rupture)
Foil Thickness - .001 inch in 3/4 inch diameter
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Shock Tube
See Figure 11.

Pi=-4.26+115DM psi (A- 19)

No - 6c
Gage Type - SMDDPG (A-ithout rupture)
Foil Thickness - .003 inch in 1 1/2 inch diameter
Orientation - Face-on
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Shock Tube
See Figure 11.

Pi=-2.57+ 122DM psi (A-20)

45
W. W-W-- IN -4 -i WP 10 UTY WiP,- ~ ~ 4W

No- 7.
Gage Type - QS-DPG
Foil Thickness - .001 inch
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Quasi-Static Pressure
See Figure 16.

Pqs=-. 28+47DM psi (A-22)

No - 7b
Gage Type - QS-DPG
Foil Thickness - .003 inch
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Quasi- Static Pressure
See Figure 18.

P s-. 84+88.5DM psi (A-23)

No - 7c
Gage Type - QS-DPG
Foil Thickness - .005 inch
Measurement Type -Shock Deformation (A-M) / Quasi- Static Pressure
See Figure 18.

Pq3=-.6 4 2+ 122DM psi (A-24)

No - 8a,
Gage Type - Electronic
Orientation - Face-on and Side-on
Measurement Type - Shock Pressure-Time Histories (A-BRL Report 1249
See Figure 17.

Pr=-1.43+2.44Pj+.313Pj2 psi (A-25)

46
NO -8bI
Gage Type - Electronic
Orientation - Face-on and Side-on
Measurement Type - Shock Pressure-Time Histories (A-BRL Report 1249)
See Figure 17.

Pr=-1.54+2.47P+O3Pj 2 psi (A-26)

No - 8c
Gage type - ElectronicI
Orientation - Face-on and Side-on
Measurement Type - Shock Pressure-Time Histories (A-BRL Report 1249)
See Figure 17.

Pr=-1*O4+239P+O25p 12 psi (A-27)

No - 8d

Gage Type - ElectronicI

Measurement Type - Shock Pressure-Time Histories and Computed Shock Pressures
See Figure 17.

Pr -.297+2. 19p 1+.034P 12 pSi (A-28)

No -9
Gage Type - Electronic
Orientation - Side-on
Measurement Type - Shock Pressure-Time Histories / Explosive
See Figure 19.

Pi=. 0 6 2 11.92 psi (A-29)I

47
-' ww
VTJ'
. VV iw . . " '-- Lw ' ': -

No- 10
Gage Type - Electronic
Orientation - Side-on
Measurement Type - Shock Pressure-Time Histories / Explosive
See Figure 20.

Pi=125T - 2 psi (A-30)

No - 11
Gage Type - Electronic
Orientation - Side-on
Measurement Type - Shock Pressure-Time Histories / Explosive
See Figure 21.

li-34.OT - ' I psi ms (A-31)

'I

I
 LIST OF SYMBOLS

CSTA - Combat Systems Testing Activity

C -specific heat at constant pressure
Cv -specific heat at constant volume
DG - degree
DIAM - diameter (inch)
DM - deformation depth (inch)
DR - rupture length (graduations) beginning with graduation at
maximum diameter on gage housing
s - millisecond
NDDPG - non-discrete diaphragm pressure gage
P - overpressure of the SMDDPG or CSTA gage (psi)
Pi - total side-on peak pressure (psi)
Pmax - electronically measured side-on peak overpressure (psi)
PO - ambient pressure (psi)
Pr - total face-on or normally reflected pressure (psi)
psi - pounds per square inch
QS-DPG - quasi-static diaphragm overpressure gage
RPT - report
SCALE - graduations on front of gage housing that are used to measure
the rupture length
SMDDPG - surface mounted discrete diaphragm pressure gage
ST - shock tube
THK - thick
CP
Cv
2 -I
'+1

49
ffi|
 DISTRIBUTION LIST

No. of No. of
Copies Organization Copies Organization

12 Administrator I Director
Air Mobility Research
Defense Technical Info Center
ATTN: DTIC-DDA andArmy
U.S. Development command
Cameron Station Ames Research Center
Alexandria, VA 22304-6145 Moffett Field, CA 94035

I HQDA I Commander
ATTN: DAMA-ART-M U.S. Army Communications -
Washington, DC 20310 Electronics Command
ATTN: AMSEL-ED
1 Commander Fort Monmouth, NJ 07703
U.S. Army Materiel Command
ATTN: AMCDE-DW 1 Commander
5001 Eisenhower Avenue U.S. Army Electronics Research
Alexandria, VA 22333 and Development Command
Technical Support Activity
Commander ATTN: DELSD-L
Armament R&D Center Fort Monmouth, NJ 07703-5301
U.S. Army AMCCOM
ATTN: SMCAR-TSS 1 Commander
Dover, NJ 07801-5001 U.S. Army Missile Command
ATTN: AMSMI-R
Commander Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5241
Armament R&D Center
U.S. Army AMCCOM 1 Commander
ATTN: SMCAR-TDC U.S. Army Missile Command
Dover, NJ 07801-5001 ATTN: AMSMI-YDL
Director' Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5241

Benet Weapons Laboratory 1 Commander

Armament R&D Center U.S. Army Mobility Equipment
U.S. Army AMCCOM Research & Development Command
ATTN: SMCAR-LCB-TL ATTN: DRDME-WC
Watervliet, NY 12189 Fort Belvoir, VA 22060

Commander 1 Commander
U.S. Army Armament Munitions U.S. Army Mobility Equipment Command
& Chemical Command 4300 Goodfellow Blvd
ATTN: SMCAR-ESP-L St. Louis, MO 63120
Rock Island, IL 61299
1 Commander
Commander U.S. Army Tank Automotive
U.S. Army Aviation Research Command
and Development Command ATTN: AMSTA-TSL
ATTN: AMSAV-E Warren, MI 48397-5000
4300 Goodfellow Blvd
St. Louis, MO 63120
51
 DISTRIBUTION LIST

No. of No. of
Copies Organization Copies Organization

Director 1 Commander
U.S. Army TRADOC Systems U.S. Army Armor Center
Analysis Activity ATTN: ATZK-M1
ATTN: ATAA-TEM Fort Knox, KY 40121
White Sands M ssile Range,
NM 88002 1 Commander
U.S. Army Field Artillery School
Director Fort Sill, OK 73503
U.S. Army TRADOC Systems
Analysis Activity 1 Commander
ATTN: ATAA-TFB U.S. Army Development and
White Sands Missile Range, Employment Agency
NM 88002 ATTN: MODE-TED-SAB
Fort Lewis, WA 98433-5000
Director
U.S. Army TRADOC Systems 3 Commander
Analysis Activity Naval Weapons Center
ATTN: ATAA-SL ATTN: Code 3917 (Mr. Mel Keith)
White Sands Missile Range, (Mr. Rex Randolph)
NM 88002 (Mr. Jack Bates)
China Lake, CA 93555-6001
Commander
U.S. Army Training & Doctrine Cmd 2 Commander
ATTN: ATCD Marine Corps Development &
Fort Monroe, VA 23351 Education Command
ATTN: Firepower Division
Commander Plans & Studies Div
U.S. Army Training & Doctrine Cmd Quantico, VA 22134
ATTN: ATCD-M
Fort Monroe, VA 23351 1 Commander
U.S. Marine Corps
Commandant ATTN: APW
U.S. Army Infantry School Washington, DC 20380
ATTN: ATSH-CD-CSO-OR
Fort Benning, GA 31905 1 AFATL/DLYV
ATTN: James Flint
Commander Eglin AFB, FL 32542
U.S. Army Armor Center
ATTN: ATZK-CG 1 AFWL/SUL
Fort Knox, KY 40121 Ki-rtl and _AFB--IM_87 1_7

Commander 1 Air Force Armament Laboratory

U.S. Army Armor Center ATTN: AFATL/DLODL
ATTN: ATZK-CD Eglin AFB, FL 32542-5000
Fort Knox, KY 40121

52
 DISTRIBUTION LIST

No. of No. of
Copies Organization Copies Organization

1 AAI Corp. 1 Genesis Consultants LTD, Inc.

York Road & Indsutry Lane ATTN: Mr. Adwin C. Hodges
Cockeysville, MD 21030 715 Kyle Drive
Arlington, TX 76011-2360
I Abex Corp.
Research Center 1 GeneraL Dynamics
Mahwah, NJ 07430 P.O. Box 2507
Pomona, CA 91766
1 Aerojet Ordnance Co.
9236 East Hall Road 1 Honeywell Corp.
Downey, CA 90241 ATTN: G. Robinson
600 2nd Street, NE
1 AVCO systems Division Hopokins, MN 55343
201 Lowell Street
Wilmington, MA 01887 1 Honeywell Defense Systems Division
ATTN: John R. Post
1 Battelle Institute 5640 Smetona Drive
ATTN: Dr. B. Trott Minnetonka, MN 55343
505 King Avenue
Columbus, OH 43201 1 Institute for Defense Analysis
ATTN: Dr. Lowell Tonnesson
1 BMY Corp 1801 Beauregard Street
ATTN: Mike Mengelkamp Alexandria, VA 22311
P.O. Box 1512
York, PA 17405 1 Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory
1 Beoing Aerospace Co. P.O. Box 808
Seattle, WA 84124 Livermore, CA 94550

1 California Research & Tech., Inc. 1 Los Alamos National Laboratory

ATTN: D.L. Orphal P.O. Box 1663
Livermore, CA 94550 Main Station 5000
Los Alamos, NM 87544
1 Chamberlain Mfg. Corp.
Research & Development Div. 1 Martin Marietta Aerospace
550 Esther Street P.O. Box 5837
Waterloo, IA 50704 M-P-276
Orlando, FL 32805
2 Denver Research Institute
.
.. r kSioa
Pit_ 1 __Mason- & Hanger-Silas Mason, Co.,
ATTN: R. Recht Inc.
Gale W. Weeding Iowa Army Ammunition Plant
Denver, CO 80200 Middletown, IA 52638
1 Ford Aerospace Communications Corp. 2 New Mexico Institute of Mining and
Aeronutronics Division Technology
Newport Beach, CA 92663 ATTN: TERA Group (Mr. Pat Buckley)
(Mr. Phil McLain)
Socorro, NM 87801
53

-- . V %
. . *. . . .. -
 DISTRIBUTION LIST

No. of No. of
Copies Organiz&':on Copies Organization

1 Nuclear Metals, Inc. 1 Cdr, USATECOM

2229 Main MAStreet ATTN: AMSTE-TO-F
Concord, 01742 3 Cdr, CRDC, AMCCOM
ATTN: SMCCR-RSP-A

1 Olin Corp. SMCCR-M

P.O. Drawer G SMCCR-SPS-IL
Marion, IL 62959 4 Cdr, CSTA
ATTN: STECS-AS-MV
1 Physics International 4 Dir, USABRL
2700 Merced Street ATTN: SLCBR-VL (Mr. David Rigotti)
San Leandro, CA 94577 SLCBR-VL-S (Dr. Albert Rainis)
SLCBR-VL-L (Mr. Orlando
1 Raytheon Co. Johnson) 2 cy
Hartwell Road
Bedford, MA 01730

1 Sandia National Laboratories

Albuquerque, NM 87115

1 Southwest Research Institute

ATTNt Dr. William E. Baker
6220 Culebra road
P.O. Box 28510
San Antonio, TX 78284

1 Talley Defense Systems

ATTN: Tom Simcox
3322 S. Memorial Parkway
Huntsville, AL 35801

1 Tracor MBA
1911 N. Fort Myer Drive
Suite 302
Arlington, VA 22209
1 H.P. White Laboratory
3114 Scarborough Road
Street, MD 21554

Aberdeen Proving Ground

3 Dir, USAMSAA
ATTN: AMXSY-J (Mr. John
Blomquist)
(Mr. Harvey Lee)
AMXSY-C (Mr. James O'Bryon)

54

. ". e"- , -- - - - - . - , . . . . . . . .
 USER EVALUATION SHEET/CHANGE OF ADDRESS

This Laboratory undertakes a continuing effort to improve the quality of the

reports it publishes. Your comments/answers to the items/questions below will
aid us in our efforts.

1. BRL Report Number Date of Report

2. Date Report Received

3. Does this report satisfy a need? (Comment on purpose, related project, or

other area of interest for which the report will be used.)

4. How specifically, is the report being used? (Information source, design

data, procedure, source of ideas, etc.)

S. Has the information in this report led to any quantitative savings as far
as man-hours or dollars saved, operating costs avoided or efficiencies achieved,
etc? If so, please elaborate.

6. General Comments. What do you think should be changed to improve future

reports? (Indicate changes to organization, technical content, format, etc.)

Name

CURRENT Organization
ADDRESS Address

City, State, Zip

7. If indicating a Change of Address or Address Correction, please provide the
New or Correct Address in Block 6 above and the Old or Incorrect address below.

Name

OLD Organization
ADDRESS
Address

City, State, Zip

(Remove this sheet along the perforation, fold as indicated, staple or tape
closed, and mail.)
 FOLD HERE

Director
U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory
ATTN: SLCBR-DD-T
I lINO NECESSARY
IF HAILED
POSTAGE

Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5066 IN THE

UNITED STATES
OFFICIAL BUSINESS i I
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE U99. $300 BUSINESS REPLY MAIL
FIRST CLASS PERMIT NO 12062 WASHINGTONDC
POSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Director
U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory
ATTN: SLCBR-DD-T
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-9989

FOLD HERE

I
9

-~ ,.~. "... ~~ *~" , * #J. .' .~~*#~ p

y~, %'.
ILL%