Vessel Traffic Services (VTS) and Local Port Services (LPS) in The United Kingdom
Vessel Traffic Services (VTS) and Local Port Services (LPS) in The United Kingdom
Vessel Traffic Services (VTS) and Local Port Services (LPS) in The United Kingdom
Summary
The purpose of this guidance note is to amplify the international definitions of VTS in the
UK national context and assist Statutory Harbour Authorities in the implementation of a
new VTS or the review of an existing VTS. They will also be used by the Maritime and
Coastguard Agency (MCA), as competent authority for VTS, when implementing a coastal
VTS.
Key Points
It defines the UKs interpretation of VTS
Provides guidance for determining the need to establish a VTS
Defines the responsibilities of those authorities concerned with VTS
It complements the Port Marine Safety Code (PMSC) and the Guide To Good Practice
(GTGP) on the port marine operations
Note
Although this MGN is aimed essentially at shore-based establishments, there is merit in its
distribution to a wider audience. To promote awareness of the important contribution that
VTS and LPS make to the maritime industry and to indicate the approach to VTS adopted in
the UK, it is appropriate that all participants of VTS and LPS receive and understand this
information.
1
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 The term VTS is used in this document in the same specific sense as in the IMO
and the IALA documentation referenced.and is used to describe systems that have the
functionality specified and are operated by people trained to the V-103 standard.
1.2 This note provides guidance for those harbour authorities with or proposing all
types of VTS, which necessarily require operators to be trained to the V-103 standard and
the provision of, at least, an Information Service. It also identifies the need within the UK for a
type of service where a VTS is assessed as excessive. It defines the concept of LPS for
national use and gives guidance on when such a type of service may be considered
appropriate.
1.3 Two categories of VTS are recognised; port/harbour and coastal. A port/harbour VTS
is mainly concerned with vessel traffic to and from or within a port or harbour(s), while a
coastal VTS is mainly concerned with vessel traffic passing through a VTS area and where
usually only an Information Service is provided.
1.4 In implementing a VTS a Statutory Harbour Authority (SHA) needs to consider which
of the three service types Information Service (INS), Traffic Organisation Service (TOS)
and Navigational Assistance Service (NAS) - it will provide, as this will dictate the manning
and equipment requirements. Similar considerations should be taken into account when
implementing provision of a Local Port Service (LPS) (see section 8 of the Note).
1.5 The EU Traffic Monitoring Directive 2002/59/EC addresses the establishing of a
community monitoring and information system for maritime traffic. The MCA, as the
Competent Authority, is responsible for ensuring UK compliance with the Directive and thus
needs to ensure that future developments in VTS are consistent with UK policy. In this
respect, it is recommended that SHAs should consult the MCA about their future plans.
2 OBJECTIVES
2.1 It is important to consider the objectives that the provision of a VTS or LPS is
intended to achieve. These need to be clearly defined and be subject to regular review.
They also need to be reflected in the type of service provided.
2.2 In setting objectives, it may be helpful to recall that the purpose of VTS is to enhance:
safety of life at sea;
safety of navigation;
efficiency of vessel traffic movement;
protection of the marine environment;
protection of the adjacent communities and infrastructure, and;
contribute to efficiency of related activities and supporting maritime security.
2.3 The precise objectives of any VTS will flow from a Formal Risk Assessment and will
depend upon the particular circumstances in the VTS area and the volume and character of
maritime traffic. They will also need to take into account the capability of expertise and
technology available.
2
3 DETERMINING THE NEED FOR VTS
3.1 It is strongly recommended that before considering the establishment of a new VTS,
or the enhancement of an existing VTS, a Competent Authority should conduct a formal
study to define clearly the need, the functional requirements and to identify the costs of
implementation. This will determine whether a VTS is an appropriate mechanism to maintain
or improve maritime safety and, if so, whether the Competent Authority has the requisite
capability and resources to implement one.
3.2 The needs analysis process includes the following key steps:
Preliminary Assessment (Inception);
Feasibility and Design;
Formal Risk Assessment
Cost / Benefit Analysis;
3.2.1 Preliminary Assessment (Inception)
The purpose of the Preliminary Assessment phase is to decide the suitability of VTS as an
appropriate traffic management option. Where this is confirmed, the information collected will
provide the basis for undertaking the Feasibility and Design Study.
3.2.2. Feasibility and Design
The Feasibility and Design phase is intended to identify the functional requirements needed
to achieve the desired level of safety and efficiency of the maritime traffic. The foundation for
proceeding with this phase is the information compiled in the Preliminary Assessment
(Inception) phase and the expected functions and benefits of a future VTS. This input may
also give an indication of the desired type of service to be provided by the VTS.
3.2.3 .The Formal Risk Assessment phase is intended to confirm that the measures being
designed and introduced will reduce the risk of collisions and groundings in the area to a
level considered by the Competent Authority to be satisfactory.
The IALA Guideline 1018 Risk Management contains further details on risk assessment.
4 AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY
4.1 The MCA is the Competent Authority for VTS within UK territorial waters. This
includes the assessment of the need and type of coastal VTS within those waters but
excluding the areas of jurisdication of individual harbour authorities. The Competent Authority
for VTS may also be a VTS authority in its own right for waters outside the limits of individual
harbour authorities.
4.1.1 Responsibilities of the MCA, as the Competent Authority for VTS, are as follows:
1. Leading on national policy for UK VTS;
3
2. Providing advice to government on legislation with respect to the operation of a VTS
within UK territorial waters;
3. Establishing and reviewing the national standards and definitions for the three service
types of VTS;
4. Establishing and reviewing the national standards and definitions for provision of
LPS;
5. Assessing the need for coastal VTS within territorial waters but outside the areas of
jurisdiction of SHAs;
6. Establishing VTS Authorities for coastal VTSs, ensuring that necessary arrangements
are in place and setting the objectives and types of service offered by them;
7. Establishing and reviewing training standards for all VTS personnel and those who
provide LPS;
8. Providing accreditation of training colleges involved in VTS training and conducting a
regular review of training and training standards;
9. Developing guidelines for VTS manning and equipment standards;
10. Ensuring that any reporting requirement for incidents involving VTS aligns with the
national reporting requirements for navigational incidents;
11. Providing guidance to assist VTS authorities in evaluating the performance of their
VTS;
12. Maintaining a database of declared UK VTS and their capabilities;
13. Audit and review the performance of coastal and port VTSs, recommending and
facilitating improvements, where necessary.
4.2 A SHA is responsible for assessing the need and type of VTS, or the need for for LPS,
within its own port limits in accordance with the PMSC. Where it is decided to that a VTS is
required, the SHA becomes the VTS authority within its own port limits.
4.2.1. The powers of individual SHAs have been established by or under an Act of
Parliament. They have powers and duties within defined geographical areas. In the context
of VTS their responsibilities include the requirement to:
1. Establish the need for a VTS or provision of a LPS by means of a Formal Risk
Assessment into the safety of navigation, as required by the PMSC and taking into
account the standards established by the Competent Authority for VTS;
2. Establish the service type of VTS or whether a LPS is to be provided, based on the
outcome of a Formal Risk Assessment;
3. Ensure that a legal basis for the operation of a VTS is provided for;
4. Ensure the VTS has been delegated the appropriate authority to fulfil its duties;
5. Where a VTS is established, act as a VTS authority as indicated below;
6. Publish details and the types of service that are to be provided in the appropriate
nautical publications;
4
7. Provide information on all published services, including the details of radio watches,
designated frequencies, hours of operation and the defined type(s) of service offered.
4.3 The VTS authority is responsible for the operation of the service type(s) prescribed
within the area designated for each individual VTS. A VTS authority may initiate the
exchange of information with vesssels approaching its service area, in order to ensure the
smooth integration of traffic into the VTS area.
4.3.1. VTS contributes to safety of life at sea, safety and efficiency of navigation and
protection of the marine environment, adjacent shore areas, worksites and offshore
installations from possible adverse effects of maritime traffic. In pursuance of these
objectives, VTS authorities should:
1. Operate the VTS within national and international guidelines and legislation;
2. Ensure that operators are trained to the appropriate national standards and that their
qualifications are kept current and valid;
3. Establish operating procedures for VTS and for the implementation of emergency
contingency plans;
4. Carry out regular training and exercises for VTS staff in operating and emergency
response procedures;
5. Regularly review VTS operations to ensure that the service is harmonised with ship
reporting, routeing instructions, aids to navigation, pilotage and port operations as
appropriate;
6. Report any apparent infringement of byelaws and directions to the appropriate
authority;
7. Maintain appropriate standards of communications on channels assigned for VTS
purposes;
8. Ensure that appropriate manning is available to provide the type of service declared
taking into account the guidance issued by the Competent Authority for VTS;
9. Ensure that equipment appropriate to the type of service declared is available, taking
into account the guidance issued by the Competent Authority for VTS;
10. Ensure that VTS personnel are vested with the appropriate authority and / or
delegations required to fulfil their duties;
11. Audit and review the performance of port VTSs in accordance with the PMSC,
recommending and facilitating improvements where necessary.
5 LEGAL FRAMEWORK
5.1 The International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Regulation 12
Chapter V (Safety of Navigation) requires contracting governments to arrange for the
establishment of VTS where, in their opinion, the volume of traffic or the degree of risk
justifies such services. The regulation also requires that:
contracting governments planning and implementing VTS wherever possible follow the
guidelines developed by the IMO. In relation to the UK, the MCA is the competent
authority for VTS for the purposes of those guidelines.
5
the use of VTS may only be made mandatory within the territorial waters of a coastal
state.
5.2 The European Union Directive on Community Vessel Traffic Monitoring and
Information Systems has been implemented in the UK through Statutory Instrument (SI)
Vessel Traffic Monitoring and Reporting Regulations 2004 2110 (as amended) and forms the
legal framework for VTS.
5.3 Under local Acts of Parliament, harbour authorities usually have duties to protect their
harbours and regulate the approaches to them. It will be for each harbour authority to
consider what is required as regards the provision of VTS or LPS under its statutory duties.
6.0 LIABILITY
6.1 Liability arising from an incident following compliance with VTS guidance can only be
decided on a case-by-case basis in accordance with national law. Consequently, a Statutory
Harbour Authority / Competent Authority for VTS should take into account the legal
implications in the event of a shipping incident where VTS Operators may have failed to carry
out their duty competently. Similar considerations should be taken into account in the
provision of LPS.
7.1 A clear understanding of the distinction between the different service types is
fundamental in the choice of service to be provided, its implementation, maintenance and
periodic review.
7.2 The purpose of this section, therefore, is to document the different service types, as
adopted by the United Kingdom. Furthermore it amplifies the relationship between each
service type and explains the level of interaction, between VTS and vessel, appropriate in
each case.
7.3 The following is an explanation of each service type as recognised by the UK
Competent Authority for VTS;
VTS
interacts with traffic;
responds to traffic situations;
authorised by the Competent Authority;
staffed by V-103/1 certificated personnel;
equipped as appropriate to provide INS/TOS/NAS.
LPS
equipped appropriate to task;
staffed and trained appropriate to task;
6
does not require to be authorised by the Competent Authority.
7.5.1 Defined by IMO as a service to ensure that essential information becomes available
in time for on-board navigational decision-making.
7.5.2 The information service comprises broadcasts of information at fixed times or when
deemed necessary by the VTS authority or at the request of a vessel, and may include for
example :
waterway conditions;
weather;
navigational hazards;
any other factors that may influence the vessels transit;
reports on the position, identity and intentions of other traffic.
7.6.5 Instructions given as part of a TOS shall be result orientated, leaving the details of the
execution to the vessel.
7.7.2 The beginning and end of navigational assistance should be clearly stated by the
VTS or the vessel and acknowledged by the other party.
7
7.7.3 NAS may include information on:
proximity to navigational hazards;
course and speed made good by a vessel;
positions relative to fairway axis, navigational features and/or waypoints;
positions, identities, intentions and any restrictions of surrounding traffic.
7.7.4 Any advice or instruction from the VTS must be result orientated only and must not
include specific instructions on courses to steer or speed through the water.
Dependent on the complexity of the situation and the level of risk mitigation required,
consideration should be given to the following:
use of a discrete frequency;
increased traffic restrictions;
the requirements of the Pilotage Act 1987;
the need to reflect this service type in the on the job training of VTS Operators;
use of the IMO Standard Marine Communication Phrases (SMCP) where practicable;
authorisations of operators providing the service and recording of such authorisations;
operator work load during NAS, including other responsibilities and activities, and the
number of vessels being monitored or advised.
8.1 Some ports will identify from their risk assessment the need to provide a VTS as
specified in the IMO and IALA documentation. To accommodate all other ports, the UK has
chosen to introduce LPS. This service is applicable to those ports where it has been
assessed that a VTS, as described above, is excessive or inappropriate and does not imply a
lower standard, or a poorer service to customers.. They will not, therefore, require to train
their operators to the V-103 standard.
8.2 Identification of the threshold between LPS and VTS may be difficult to determine. It
is likely to be port specific and will only become clear following the Formal Risk Assessment
process, when all mitigating factors have been considered.
8.3 The main difference arising from the provision of LPS is that it does not interact with
traffic, nor is it required to have the ability and / or the resources to respond to developing
traffic situations and there is no requirement for a vessel traffic image to be maintained. As
such, the training requirement for its operators is less comprehensive and the operators are
unlikely to be certified to the V-103 standard.
8.4 Provision of LPS is designed to improve port safety and co-ordination of port services
within the port community by dissemination of port information to vessels and berth or
terminal operators. It is mainly concerned with the management of the port, by the supply of
information on berth and port conditions. Provision of LPS can also act as a medium for
liaison between vessels and stevedores or allied services, as well as providing a basis for
implementing port emergency plans.
8.5 Key considerations will be:
the equipment deemed necessary;
the level of operator competence required;
the complexity of the advice and information required to be exchanged.
8
availability of port services;
details of shipping movements;
meteorological and hydrological data;
8.7 Training for the provision of LPS shall be based on the selection of appropriate
modules, or elements thereof, from the V-103 syllabus, depending on the equipment and
capabilities used. The table at Annex 1 contains details of equipment and capabilities
considered to be the minimum requirement for each service type.
9 SERVICE STRUCTURE
9.1 The structure consists of three elements, namely: Operational; Technical and
Administrative. Whilst the following text relates specifically to the development of a VTS
some of the aspects addressed may also be applicable when considering the provision of
LPS.
A determination needs to be made as to whether the VTS should be provided from one or
more centres. Technical, financial and environmental aspects will need to be taken into
account, although the final decision may be dependent on other factors, such as jurisdictional
boundaries.
The major technical factor is likely to be an assessment of the coverage of the VTS area,
which is likely to be obtained by radar and / or AIS. This may indicate that two or more
radars or base-stations are necessary to provide complete coverage of the VTS area. The
information detected by several base-stations or radars can be transmitted to one VTS
centre if required. Other technical aspects of the infrastructure relate mainly to the full
integration of sensors with the means provided for analysing the resulting data and the
consequent transmission of any resulting analysis.
9.4.1 The administrative aspects of the infrastructure provide the means by which the
continued operation of a VTS or provision of LPS is enabled. These include but are not
limited to :
1. The preparation of procedures for operation of the service and their periodic review.
3. The maintenance, repair and cleanliness of the VTS centre and outstations / location
from where LPS is provided.
4. The provision of facilities necessary to support the operation of the VTS centre /
location from where LPS originates.
5. Financial matters, including the funding of the VTS / provision of LPS, staff payment,
contractual arrangements and other budgetary matters.
9
10 AUDITING AND REVIEWING PERFORMANCE
10.1 The evaluation of a VTS or provision of LPS should determine if the purpose it was
implemented for is still relevant and its objectives are being achieved. This requires auditing
and reviewing of performance in accordance with the SHAs Safety Management System.
The evaluation is intended to ascertain the effectiveness of the VTS in meeting its objectives,
with respect to mitigating the risks of collisions or groundings in the VTS area.
10.2 The VTS or LPS provided will depend on the result of the formal risk assessment,
which in turn will identify the standard and the performance indicators against which the VTS
or LPS will be evaluated. In order to be effective the objectives of the VTS or provision of
LPS need to be kept under continuous review, bearing in mind changes in operations,
operational methods, personnel and the availability of technology, to ensure that the
objectives set for the VTS or provision of LPS remain applicable and are being achieved.
10.3 At the request of a SHA, the Competent Authority for VTS (MCA), may assist with the
evaluation process, with a view to ensuring compliance with UK best practice and
international recommendations.
10.4 The overall evaluation of the VTS or provision of LPS should be preceded by an
assessment of the effectiveness of the equipment, manning and procedures involved.
10
EXPLANATION OF EQUIPMENT AND CAPABILITIES IN ANNEX 1
Facsimile
Indicates availability of this service, which is connected to the shore-side telecommunications
network.
Marine radar
Indicates stand alone marine radar without automatic tracking.
1-1
Dynamic Traffic Image
Indicates the use of a real-time display of the traffic image.
Meteorological sensors
Indicates the availability of the necessary sensors to provide real-time meteorological
information to stakeholders.
Hydrological sensors
Indicates the availability of the necessary hydrological sensors to provide real-time
hydrological information to stakeholders.
Redundancy
Indicates the presence of sufficient equipment to ensure continuity of the service type
declared under realistic fault conditions.
Data recording
Indicates the ability to record all operational data concerned with the compilation of the traffic
image. This will typically include radar / AIS data and all communications, and will permit the
replay of data in support of incident analysis.
Data management system
Indicates the use of a fully integrated system that effectively manages all of the information
necessary to provide the declared service type.
Data export
Indicates the capability to meet the requirements of the EU Directive on Vessel Traffic
Monitoring. In this respect, it is recommended that the MCA should be consulted about future
developments.
Indicates a means of recording all activities within the area, which may be either electronic or
manual. In more sophisticated systems this is likely to be incorporated in the data recording /
data management system.
1-2
PROMULGATION OF DETAILS AND TYPES OF SERVICE
1 Details
As a minimum, the following information should be promulgated where a VTS / LPS is
provided:
(1) category of service (LPS / VTS);
(2) service type of VTS (Information Service / Traffic Organisation Service /
Navigational Assistance Service);
(3) contact details and VTS / LPS callsign;
(4) details of service to be provided;
(5) area(s) of coverage;
(6) hours of service;
(7) categories of vessel required, expected or encouraged to participate;
(8) VHF radio frequencies;
(9) reporting points;
(10) format and content of reports required.
2 Publications
Statutory Harbour Authorities should provide the details above to the MCA on an annual
basis for compilation of the UK VTS database and to UKHO for promulgation of appropriate
details in the Admiralty List of Radio Signals Volume 6 and on Admiralty chart(s).
Ports with VTS services are encouraged to provide details to IALA for promulgation on the
World VTS Guide website.
1-3
NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES & LEGISLATION
1-4
2-1