Employee Satisfaction
Employee Satisfaction
Employee Satisfaction
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted to the
FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES
In partial fulfillment of the requirements
For the award of the degree
Of
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
June - 2011
1
Declaration
2
DECLARATION
Place:
Date: Signature
(S.RAJESHKUM
AR)
3
ACKNOWLEDGEME
NT
4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I express my sincere thanks to, Principal, A.V.C. College of
Engineering, for having promoted strict discipline and hard work
during the period of my study in this course.
I express my sincere gratitude to,
MR.S.RAJENDRAN ,Director, Department of management studies,
for his valuable services of conducting project work.
I express my hearty thanks to my project advisor
Mr.J.SWAMINATHAN, Professor, Department of Management
Studies for his valuable guidance.
I am grateful
MR.MADHANKUMAR(DEPUTYMANAGER)who has-
permitted me to done my project work in the company.
I express my sincere gratitude to Mr.H.M
RAMESH( MANAGER HR CIRCLE HEAD TNM,
KERALA ) ,Mr. K.S RAMANI (Sr.off.HR)and staff members of
the company for their kind help in providing pertinent data during the
course of project work.
I thank all other faculty members of the Department for their
support and Librarian for the timely help during the course of project
work.
5
ABSTRACT
Employee satisfaction is a set of favourable or unfavourable
feelings and emotions with which employees view their work. Employee
satisfaction is an affective attitude a feeling of relative like or dislike something (for
example, a satisfied employee may comment that “I enjoy having a variety of tasks
to do”) There is an important difference between the job related feelings of
satisfaction and two other elements of employee attitudes
The same employee may have an intellectual response to her work,
stating the objective thought (belief) that “my work is quite complex” on another
occasion, the employee may voice her behavioural intentions to a coworker.(I plan to
quit this job in three months).
6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONTENTS PAGE
NO.
List of tables 08
List of charts 09
I Introduction 11
II Company profile 17
Bibliography 73
7
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF TABLES
8
SLNO TITLE OF THE TABLE PAGE NO
4.3 EXPERIENCE
4.4 DESIGNATION
4.5 QUALIFICATION
4.6 TENURE
4.7 MARITAL STATUS
4.8 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT
COMMUNICATION AMONG STAFF IN
THIS STORE IS EFFECTIVE
4.9 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THEY
WERE FEEL VALUED PART OF THIS
STORE
4.1.1 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THE
STORE ATMOSPHERE IS GENERALLY
FRIENDLY.
4.1.2 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THE
PROMOTING RESPECT AND FAIR
TREATMENT AMONG ALL THE STAFF
IS HIGH PRIORITY IN THIS STORE
4.1.3 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THE
STORE HAS POLICIES THAT ARE
SUPPORTIVE TO ITS STAFF.
9
4.1.6 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THE
WORKLOAD IN THIS STORE IS
DISTRIBUTED EUITABLY.
4.1.7 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THEY
KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IS EXPECTED
OF THEM AS AN EMPLOYEE.
4.1.8 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT HOW
THEIR JOB PERFORMANCE IS
MEASURED
4.1.9 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THEIR
STORE LEADER HAS A CLEAR
UNDERSTANDING OF THEM WORK
THEIR DO
4.2.1 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT
CONFLICT AMONG STAFF IN STORE IS
MANAGED EFFECTIVELY.
4.2.2 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT
PROBLEMS ARE EFFECTIVELY
MANAGED IN THIS STORE WHEN THEY
ARISE.
4.2.3 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT
OVERALL IN THIS STORE IS RUN
EFFECIENTLY
4.2.4 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT OTHERS
IN THIS STORE TRUST ME TO PERFORM
THEIR JOB.
10
4.3.1 CHI-SUARE TEST –NO-1
11
LIST OF CHARTS
12
LIST OF CHARTS
4.3 EXPERIENCE
4.4 DESIGNATION
4.5 QUALIFICATION
4.6 TENURE
4.7 MARITAL STATUS
4.8 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT
COMMUNICATION AMONG STAFF IN
THIS STORE IS EFFECTIVE
4.9 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THEY
WERE FEEL VALUED PART OF THIS
STORE
4.1.1 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THE
STORE ATMOSPHERE IS GENERALLY
FRIENDLY.
4.1.2 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THE
PROMOTING RESPECT AND FAIR
TREATMENT AMONG ALL THE STAFF
IS HIGH PRIORITY IN THIS STORE
4.1.3 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THE
STORE HAS POLICIES THAT ARE
SUPPORTIVE TO ITS STAFF.
13
COMPLETION TIMES ARE REASONABLE.
4.1.6 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THE
WORKLOAD IN THIS STORE IS
DISTRIBUTED EUITABLY.
4.1.7 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THEY
KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IS EXPECTED OF
THEM AS AN EMPLOYEE.
4.1.8 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT HOW THEIR
JOB PERFORMANCE IS MEASURED
4.1.9 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THEIR
STORE LEADER HAS A CLEAR
UNDERSTANDING OF THEM WORK THEIR
DO
4.2.1 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT CONFLICT
AMONG STAFF IN STORE IS MANAGED
EFFECTIVELY.
4.2.2 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT
PROBLEMS ARE EFFECTIVELY MANAGED
IN THIS STORE WHEN THEY ARISE.
4.2.3 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT OVERALL
IN THIS STORE IS RUN EFFECIENTLY
4.2.4 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT OTHERS IN
THIS STORE TRUST ME TO PERFORM
THEIR JOB.
14
CHAPTER 1
15
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
16
Employee satisfaction is the essential part of the employee engagement.
today employee engagement encompasses training, development and carrer,
immediate management, cooperation, work environment, equal opportunity and fair
treatment, leadership,performance management,health and safety,job satisfaction,
worklife balance, communication, compensation, benefits ,commitment ,family
friendliness,fun and social activities.these are the important drivers that make feel
good and involved,leading to an increase engagement.
17
Improvement programs of employee satisfaction
Employers by themselves.
REVIEW OF
LITERATURE
18
19
Prabhi G and Roja Rani Tegala,Employee Engagement, A Mantra for HR
Managers,(HRM Review The Icfai University Aug 2009)p.p.no 49 to 53
20
PV Raveendra,UM premalatha ,Making ‘Gems’ Through Employee
Engagement (HRM Review june 2008, The Icfai University Press),p.p.no30
Employee engagement is the extent to which employees feel a sense of
commitment to their organization, to its values, goals and objectives and consciously
and conscientiously work toward achieving those goals and objectives.Employee
engagement is the extent to which employees choose to invest their physical,mental
and emotional energy in their work and their organization.
21
CHAPTER 2
Company profile
22
COMPANY PROFILE
ADITYA BIRLA RETAIL LTD
Aditya Birla Retail Limited is the retail arm of Aditya Birla Group, a
USD Corporation.The Company ventured into food and grocery retail sector in
2007was acquisition of a south based supermarket chain. Subsequently Aditya Birla
Retail Ltd
Expanded its presence across the country under the brand “more.” With 2 functions
of Supermarket &Hypermarket
Supermarket
More.for you- Conveniently located in neighbourhoods, more.supermarkets
catered dialy,weekly and monthly shopping needs of consumers.The product offerings
includes wide range of fresh fruits&vegetables,groceries ,personal care ,home care,
global merchandise & a basic range of apparels. Currently,there are 6000
supermarkets across the country.
Hyper market.
More.MEGASTORE- is a one-top shopping destination for the entire
family. Best large range of products across fruits & vegetables ,groceries,FMCG
products
23
More.MEGASTORE also has a strong emphasis on general
merchandise apparels CDIT.
Currently ten hypermarkets operate under the brand more. Mega store for example
vadodara, Mumbai, Hyderabad, indore, rohininagar in new delhi.
VISION: “To consistently provide the Indian consumer complete and difference
shopping experience and be amongst India’s Top retailers, while delivering stock
return to all stakeholders”.
VALUES:
Integrity
Commitment
Passion
Seamlessness
Speed
24
AT a glance
With a vision is to be among the leading retail players in India. Aditya birla retil
limited launched its first supermarket, more.for you in may,2007. since its
launch,the
More. for you has an aggressive roll out,reaching a total count of 640 stores
across today.
25
Women’s Accessories
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
26
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES
To determine the satisfaction level of employees towards working
environment
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES
To analyse the satisfaction of employees towards work.
In this study I am used the descriptive method I find the current situation
of the company.
SAMPLE DESIGN
Non-probability sampling
Non-probability sampling is that sampling procedure which
does not afford any basis for estimating the probability that each item in the
population has of being included in the sample.
27
CONVENIENCE SAMPLING
SAMPLE SIZE
Percentage analysis
Chi-square
Correlation
28
CHAPTER 4
29
CHAPTER-4
NO OF
AGE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
18 to 25 46 92.0
26to35 4 8.0
Total
50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 92% of the respondents were 18 to 25
Age group, 08% of the respondents were 26 to 35 age group..
30
4.2 GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS
NO OF
GENDER RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
Male 12 24.0
Female 38 76.0
Total 50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 76% of the respondents were females, 24% of
the respondents were male.
31
4.3 EXPERIENCE
YEAR OF NO OF
EXPERIENCE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
BELOW 1 YEAR 33 66.0
1-2 YEARS 15 30.0
ABOVE 2 YEARS 2 4.0
Total
50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 66% of the respondents were below 1
year,30% of the respondents were 1-2 yrs , 4% of the respondents were above 2yrs
4.3 EXPERIENCE
32
4.4 DESIGNATION
NO OF PERCENTAG
DESIGNATION RESPONDENTS E
CSA 42 84.0
SENIOR CSA OR L1 GRADE
SUPERVISOR 8 16.0
Total 50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 84% of the respondents were in the
designation of CSA, 16% of the respondents were senior CSA i.e L1 Grade .
4.4 DESIGNATION
4.5 QUALIFICATION
33
NO OF
QUALIFICATION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
SSLC 20 40.0
HSC 20 40.0
DEGREE 10 20.0
Total 50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table 40% 0f the respondents were in sslc qualified ,40% of the
respondents were hsc qualified,20% of the respondents were degree qualified.
4.5 QUALIFICATION
34
4.6 TENURE
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 86% of the respondents were permanent
employees,14% were temporary employees.
4.6 TENURE
35
NO OF
MARITAL STATUS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
MARRIED
8 16.0
UNMARRIED
42 84.0
Total
50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 84% of the respondents were unmarried,
16%of the respondents were married.
36
4.8 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT COMMUNICATION AMONG
STAFF
IN THIS STORE IS EFFECTIVE
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
NEUTRAL 02 4.0
DISAGREE 0 0.0
STRONGLY 0 0.0
DISAGREE
TOTAL 50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 94%of the respondents were
strongly agree, 2% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 4% of the
respondents were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents
were strongly disagree.
37
4.9 EMPLOYEES OPION ABOUT THEY FEEL
THEY WERE VALUED PART OF THIS STORE
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
41 82.0
STRONGLY AGREE
04
SOMEWHAT AGREE
8.0
10.0
NEUTRAL 05
DISAGREE 0 0.0
0
STRONGLY DISAGREE 0.0
50 100.0
TOTAL
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 82%of the respondents were
strongly agree, 8% of the respondents were somewhat agree ,10 % of the respondents
were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents were
strongly disagree.
38
4.1.1 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT
THE STORE ATMOSPHERE IS GENERALLY FRIENDLY
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
NEUTRAL 04 8.0
DISAGREE 0 0.0
50
TOTAL 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 66%of the respondents were
strongly agree, 26% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 8% of the respondents
were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents were
strongly disagree.
39
4.1.2 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT PROMOTING RESPECT
AND
FAIR TREATMENT AMONG ALL STAFF IS HIGH PRIORITY OF THIS
STORE
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
NEUTRAL 08 16.0
DISAGREE 0 0.0
50 100.0
TOTAL
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 60 %of the respondents were
strongly agree, 24% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 16% of the
respondents were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the
respondents were strongly disagree
.
4.1.2 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT PROMOTING RESPECT AND
FAIR TREATMENT AMONG ALL STAFF IS HIGH PRIORITY IN THIS
STORE
40
4.1.3 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THE STORE HAS POLICIES THAT
ARE SUPPORTIVE TO ITS STAFF
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
NEUTRAL 05 10.0
DISAGREE 0 0.0
0
STRONGLY DISAGREE 0.0
TOTAL 50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 56 %of the respondents were
strongly agree, 34% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 10% of the
respondents were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the
respondents were strongly disagree.
41
4.1.4 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THE DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES
IN THIS STORES ARE CONSISTENTLY ENFORCED
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
NEUTRAL 11 22.0
DISAGREE 0 0.0
STRONGLY 0
DISAGREE 0.0
TOTAL 50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 62 %of the respondents were
strongly agree, 16% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 22% of the
respondents were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the
respondents were strongly disagree.
42
EXPECTED COMPLETION TIMES ARE REASONABLE
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
NEUTRAL 08 16.0
DISAGREE 01 2.0
STRONGLY 0 0.0
DISAGREE
TOTAL 50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 68%of the respondents were
strongly agree, 14% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 16% of the
respondents were neutral, 2% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents
were strongly disagree.
NO OF
43
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
NEUTRAL 04 8.0
DISAGREE 0 0.0
STRONGLY 02 4.0
DISAGREE
TOTAL 50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 68%of the respondents were
strongly agree, 20% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 8% of the respondents
were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 4% of the respondents were
strongly disagree.
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
44
STRONGLY AGREE 35 70.0
NEUTRAL 03 6.0
DISAGREE 0 0.0
STRONGLY 0 0.0
DISAGREE
TOTAL 50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 70% of the respondents were
strongly agree, 24% of the respondents were somewhat agree ,6% of the respondents
were neutral,0% of the respondents were disagree,0% of the respondents were
strongly disagree.
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
45
NEUTRAL 04 8.0
DISAGREE 0 0.0
TOTAL
50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 66%of the respondents were
strongly agree, 26% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 8% of the respondents
were neutral,0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents were
strongly disagree.
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
NEUTRAL 01 2.0
46
DISAGREE 0 0.0
STRONGLY 0 0.0
DISAGREE
50 100.0
TOTAL
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 86%of the respondents were
strongly agree, 12% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 2% of the
respondents were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the
respondents were strongly disagree.
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
NEUTRAL 01 2.0
47
DISAGREE 0 0.0
TOTAL 50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 78%of the respondents were
strongly agree, 20% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 2% of the respondents
were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents were
strongly disagree.
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
NEUTRAL 01 2.0
DISAGREE 0 0.0
48
TOTAL 50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 84%of the respondents were
strongly agree, 14% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 2% of the respondents
were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents were
strongly disagree.
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
STRONGLY AGREE 35 70 .0
NEUTRAL 02 4.0
DISAGREE 0 0.0
TOTAL 50 100.0
49
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 70 %of the respondents were
strongly agree, 26% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 4% of the
respondents were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the
respondents were strongly disagree.
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
NEUTRAL 03 6.0
DISAGREE 0 0.0
TOTAL 50 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 76 %of the respondents were
strongly agree, 18% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 6% of the
50
respondents were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the
respondents were strongly disagree.
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
84.0
STRONGLY AGREE 42
14.0
SOMEWHAT AGREE 07
2.0
NEUTRAL 01
0.0
DISAGREE 0
100.0
50
TOTAL
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 84 %of the respondents were
strongly agree, 14% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 2% of the respondents
were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents were
strongly disagree.
51
WHEN THEY COMMUNICATE WITH OTHERS IN THIS
STORE
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
NEUTRAL 16 32.0
DISAGREE 01 2.0
50 100.0
TOTAL
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 58%of the respondents were
strongly agree, 8% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 32% of the respondents
were neutral, 2% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents were
strongly disagree
.
52
4.2.7 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT LIKE THEIR
JOB
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
STRONGLY AGREE
37 74.0
NEUTRAL 03 6.0
DISAGREE 0 0.0
0
STRONGLY DISAGREE 0.0
50 100.0
TOTAL
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 74%of the respondents were
strongly agree, 20% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 6% of the respondents
were neutral,0% of the respondents were disagree,0% of the respondents were
strongly disagree.
53
4.2.8 EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THEY LIKE WORK WITH
PEOPLE
NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
NEUTRAL 01 2.0
DISAGREE 0 0.0
STRONGLY DISAGREE 0
0.0
50 100.0
TOTAL
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 86 %of the respondents were
strongly agree, 12% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 2% of the respondents
were neutral, 0% of the respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents were
strongly disagree.
54
4.3.1 Chi-square test no : 1
Chi-Square Tests
Likelihood Ratio
5.164 2 .076
Linear-by-Linear
Association 5.500 1 .019
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that the chi-square value is less than
0.05 .
55
Reject Ho .there is a relationship between age and employees feel that they were
valued part of this store.
Chi-Square Tests
a 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .
08.
Ho : Null hypothesis i.e There is no relationship between age and Problems are
managed effectively in this store.
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that the chi-square value is less than
0.05. .
56
Reject Ho .there is a relationship between age and problems are managed effectively
in this store.
Chi-Square Tests
a 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
1.28.
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that the chi-square value is not greater
than 0.05.
57
Reject Ho .there is a relationship between Designation and disciplinary procedures in
this store are consistently enforced.
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.787(a) 4 .044
Likelihood Ratio 8.567 4 .073
Linear-by-Linear
5.147 1 .023
Association
N of Valid Cases
50
a 6 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .
20.
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that the chi-square value is less than
0.05.
58
4.3.5 ANOVA TEST NO: 1
Oneway
Descriptives
4.3.6 ANOVA
Sum of Mean
Squares Df Square F Sig.
Between
Groups 2.254 1 2.254 6.069 .017
Within Groups
17.826 48 .371
Total
20.080 49
INFERENCE
59
From the above table it is inferred that the anova significant value is less
than 0.05.
Reject Ho , not only that the mean value is high in the 18 to 25 age group they were
more feel that valued part of this store.
Oneway
Descriptives
4.3.8 ANOVA
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that the anova significant value is less
than 0.05.
Reject Ho , not only that the mean value is high in the 18 to 25 age group they were
more accept problems are managed effectively in this store..
60
ANOVA TEST NO -3
Oneway
4.3.9 Descriptives
61
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Std. Std. Lower Upper Mini
N Mean Deviation Error Bound Bound m
CSA 42 4.29 .864 .133 4.02 4.55
SENIOR CSA OR
L1 GRADE 8 5.00 .000 .000 5.00 5.00
SUPERVISOR
Total 50 4.40 .833 .118 4.16 4.64
4.4.1 ANOVA
Sum of Mean
Squares Df Square F Sig.
Between
3.429 1 3.429 5.383 .025
Groups
Within Groups 30.571 48 .637
Total 34.000 49
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that the anova significant value is less
than 0.05.
Reject Ho , not only that the mean value is high in the designation of senior CSA .
they were more follow the disciplinary procedures in this store..
ANOVA TEST NO :4
Oneway
4.4.2 Descriptives
62
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Std. Std. Lower Upper Minimu Maxi
N Mean Deviation Error Bound Bound m m
SSLC 20 5.00 .000 .000 5.00 5.00 5
HSC 20 4.95 .224 .050 4.85 5.05 4
DEGRE
10 4.60 .843 .267 4.00 5.20 3
E
Total 50 4.90 .416 .059 4.78 5.02 3
4.4.3 ANOVA
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that the anova significant value is less
than 0.05.
Reject Ho , not only that mean value is high in the sslc qualified workers ,they were
more priority to the communication among staff in this store.
I FEEL I AM
A VALUED
PART OF
THIS
AGE STORE
AGE Pearson
1 -.335(*)
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .017
N 50 50
63
I FEEL I AM A Pearson
-.335(*) 1
VALUED PART OF Correlation
THIS STORE Sig. (2-tailed) .017
N 50 50
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
INFERENCE
Since the correlation value is negative and smaller(-.335) which infers though
there is a less impact between the age and employees feel they were valued part of
this store.
PROBLEMS
ARE
MANAGED
EFFECTIVELY
IN THIS STORE
WHEN THEY
AGE ARISE
AGE Pearson Correlation 1 -.388(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) .005
N 50 50
PROBLEMS ARE Pearson Correlation -.388(**) 1
MANAGED EFFECTIVELY Sig. (2-tailed) .005
IN THIS STORE WHEN N
THEY ARISE 50 50
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
INFERENCE
Since the correlation value is negative and smaller(-.388) which infers though
there is a less impact between the age and problems are managed effectively in this
store.
DISCIPLINARY
PROCEDURES IN
THIS STORES ARE
DESIGNATIO CONSISTENTLY
N ENFORCED
DESIGNATION Pearson Correlation 1 .318(*)
Sig. (2-tailed) .025
N 50 50
DISCIPLINARY Pearson Correlation .318(*) 1
64
PROCEDURES IN THIS Sig. (2-tailed) .025
STORES ARE N
CONSISTENTLY 50 50
ENFORCED
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
INFERENCE
Since the correlation value is positive(.318) which infers though there is less
relation between the designation and disciplinary procedures are follow in the store.
COMMUNICAT
ION AMONG
STAFF IN THIS
QUALIFIC STORE IS
ATION EFFECTIVE
QUALIFICATION Pearson Correlation 1 -.324(*)
Sig. (2-tailed) .022
N 50 50
COMMUNICATION Pearson Correlation -.324(*) 1
AMONG STAFF IN Sig. (2-tailed) .022
THIS STORE IS
EFFECTIVE N 50 50
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Since the correlation value is negative and smaller(-.324) which infers though
there is a less impact between the qualification and communication among staff in
this store.
CHAPTER -5
65
FINDINGS AND
SUGGESTIONS
CHAPTER 5
66
There is a negative correlation between age and problems are managed
effectively in this store , it shows that the increasing age of the employees
affect the effectively managed problems in this store.
96% of the employees were good opinion about the communication among
the staff
90% of the employees were feel that they were valued part of this store
92% of the employees were good opinion about the store atmosphere is
convenient and likely to work.
74% of the employees were satisfied about the promoting respect and fair
treatment among all staff is high priority in this store.
90% of the respondents were good opinion about the store has policies
supportive to its staff.
78% of the respondets were follow the disciplinary procedures.
82% of the respondents were opinion about workload and expected time
completions are reasonable.
96% of the respondents were opinion about the workload in this store
distributed equitably .
94% of the respondents opinion about they know exactly what is expected of
them as an employee.
92% of the employees were highly satisfied about their job performance is
measured.
67
98% of the employees satisfied about conflict among staff in store is managed
effectively when they arise.
96% of the employees opinion about the store run effectively.
94% of the employees were good opinion about others in this store trust me to
perform their job.
98% of the respondents says communication with others in this store is good.
66% of the emloyees were opinion about the store training is more effective.
94% of the employees are very like their job
98% of the employees opinion about they like wok with people.
SUGGESTIONS
In order to improve the skills , and performance of workers a training
programme may be planned and implemented, specifically to the newcomers.
To promote respect and fair treatment among all staff in this store.
Overall employee satisfaction in this ABRL ltd is more satisfied but some
areas only to improved and concentrate.from my point of view in this study.
CONCLUSION
In this study the ABRL company (more) Employees are highly satisfaction
in the working environment.Employees feel that the store atmosphere i.e working
environment is more satisfaction to the employees.Most of the employees like their
job.so the employee satisfaction towads work is good.
68
Finally I conclude that the employee satisfaction on working
environment in ABRL company is good. and comfortable.
ANNEXURE
1.Personal Details
Name :
Age :
Gender :
Total Year of Experience :
Joining Date :
Designation :
Permanent /Temporary :
From Where they coming from :
………………km Distance
69
Married / unmarried
Spouse Work?
No.of.children
70
d)Disagree e)Strongly Disagree
12. My store’s Leader has a clear understanding of how my job performance is
measured?
a)Strongly agree b)SomeWhat agree c)neutral
d)Disagree e)Strongly Disagree
13. Conflict among staff in store is managed effectively?
a)Strongly agree b)SomeWhat agree c)neutral
d)Disagree e)Strongly Disagree
14. Problems are managed effectively in the store when they arise?
a)Strongly agree b)SomeWhat agree c)neutral
d)Disagree e)Strongly Disagree
15. Overall this store is run effectively?
a)Strongly agree b)SomeWhat agree c)neutral
d)Disagree e)Strongly Disagree
16. Others in this store trust me to perform my job?
a)Strongly agree b)SomeWhat agree c)neutral
d)Disagree e)Strongly Disagree
17. I feel heard when I communicate with others in my store?
a)Strongly agree b)SomeWhat agree c)neutral
d)Disagree e)Strongly Disagree
18. In this store training is more effective?
a)Strongly agree b)SomeWhat agree c)neutral
d)Disagree e)Strongly Disagree
19. I like my job?
a)Strongly agree b)SomeWhat agree c)neutral
d)Disagree e)Strongly Disagree
20. I like the people I work with?
a)Strongly agree b)SomeWhat agree c)neutral
d)Disagree e)Strongly Disagree
71
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS REFERRED
1. Prabhi G and Roja Rani Tegala Employee Engagement
(HRM Review The Icfai University aug 2009).
WEBSITE
www.google.com
72
xx xxxxx
73