Scribd
Upload
16 views2 pages

Project Profile: Project Name Developer No. of Lots: Project Classification: Location Development Standards

Uploaded by

Junar Plaga

This project involves developing a residential subdivision with [NUMBER] lots. It is classified as [CLASSIFICATION]. The proposed development standards for parks, community facilities, minimum lot areas, and roads are outlined and compared to the standards set by HLURB and BP 220. An evaluation of the project will cover zoning, permits, development status, and other factors. Recommendations will also be provided.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt

Project Profile: Project Name Developer No. of Lots: Project Classification: Location Development Standards

Uploaded by

Junar Plaga
16 views2 pages
This project involves developing a residential subdivision with [NUMBER] lots. It is classified as [CLASSIFICATION]. The proposed development standards for parks, community facilities, minimum lot areas, and roads are outlined and compared to the standards set by HLURB and BP 220. An evaluation of the project will cover zoning, permits, development status, and other factors. Recommendations will also be provided.

Original Description:

profile

Original Title

Rectified Profileform

Copyright

© © All Rights Reserved

Available Formats

DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

This project involves developing a residential subdivision with [NUMBER] lots. It is classified as [CLASSIFICATION]. The proposed development standards for parks, community facilities, minimum lot areas, and roads are outlined and compared to the standards set by HLURB and BP 220. An evaluation of the project will cover zoning, permits, development status, and other factors. Recommendations will also be provided.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
16 views2 pages

Project Profile: Project Name Developer No. of Lots: Project Classification: Location Development Standards

Uploaded by

Junar Plaga
This project involves developing a residential subdivision with [NUMBER] lots. It is classified as [CLASSIFICATION]. The proposed development standards for parks, community facilities, minimum lot areas, and roads are outlined and compared to the standards set by HLURB and BP 220. An evaluation of the project will cover zoning, permits, development status, and other factors. Recommendations will also be provided.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2

PROJECT PROFILE

Project Name : : Project Area (Has):


Developer :
No. of Lots :
Project Classification: : Selling Price :
Location :
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

HLURB PROPOSED
PARAMETERS PLANNING STANDARDS
STANDARDS OF PROJECT
PD 957 BP PD 957 BP
OM MC 220 SH OM MC 220 SH
Parks & Playground Allocation: (No. of lots/ha) % of gross area for PP:
BP 220 PD 957 .
 150 % below 20 & below 3.5 % 3.5%
 161-175 21 - 25 4.0 5.0
 176-200 26 - 35 5.0 6.0
 201-225 36 - 50 6.0 7.0
 Above 225 51-65 7.0 9.0
Above 65 9.0 -
Community Facilities Allocation (No. of lots/ha) % of gross area for CF:
 150 & below Mandatory 1.0%
 151-225 regardless of 1.5%
density
 Above 225 2.0%
Minimum Lot Area (sq,m)
 Single Detached 120 100 72 64
 Duplex/Single Attached 96 80 54 48
 Row house 60 50 36 28
Roads-right-of-Way:
 Major 10-15 8-15 8-12
 Collector 10-12- 8-10 8-10
 Minor 8-10 6.5 6.5
 Motor Court 6
 Alley 2
 Pathway - - - 3
Planting Strip (PS)
 15 m ROW 1.30
 12.0 m ROW 0.80
 10.0 m ROW 0.80
 8.0 m ROW 0.40
 6.5 m ROW Optional
Side Walk (SW)
 15 m ROW 1.20
 12.0 m ROW 1.20
 10.0 m ROW 1.20
 8.0 m ROW 0.4 0.60
 6.5 m ROW (6 m service road for Optional 0.50 .
PD 957
Evaluation (in bullet statements):

 Site Zoning Classification:


 Other Permits/Clearances from other Agencies:
 Status of Development:
 Other findings & evaluation (e.g. drainage outfall, terrain of location, complaints, etc.)

Recommendations (in bullet statements):

Prepared By: Reviewed By: Noted By:

You might also like