The Honorable Speaker

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

MALACAÑAN PALACE

MANILA

17 January 2013

THE HONORABLE SPEAKER


and Members of the House of Representatives
House of Representatives
Quezon City

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Sec. 27(1), Article VI of the Constitution, I am returning herewith


the enrolled House Bill No. 3759, entitled:

“AN ACT REVISING THE CHARTER OF BAGUIO CITY,”

without my signature.

While the objectives of the bill relating to local governmental powers are
laudable, the same provisions are all covered by the present Local
Government Code of 1991.

It is unusual however, for the city’s charter to contain provisions relating to


the disposition of alienable and disposable lands.

The proposed measure contains provisions that impinge on the Department


of Environment and Natural Resources’ (DENR) exclusive mandate over
control and supervision of alienable and disposable public lands and run
counter to the laws governing the disposition of townsite reservations.
Particularly, Section 35 of the proposed measure is ambiguous as to the
entity that may dispose of alienable and disposable lands which are
part of the townsite reservation. Disposition of alienable and disposable
lands is the exclusive province of a national agency, specifically the DENR.
When the provision governing the disposition of such lands is unclear as to
who initiates the selling, the measure may be interpreted as empowering the
local government of Baguio City to dispose of alienable and disposable lands.
Thus, the provision conflicts with the DENR’s mandate under the Revised
Administrative Code, thereby making implementation of the enrolled bill
difficult. Moreover, Section 36 of the proposed measure states that the
proceeds from the sale of lands through miscellaneous sales applications
shall accrue to the city. Section 80 of the Public Land Act (C.A. 141)
mandates that proceeds from the sale of lands including townsite
reservations shall accrue to the National Treasury and form part of the
government’s general funds instead of the city’s treasury.

Further, Sections 35 and 36 may directly conflict with the provisions of the
Bases Conversion and Development Act of 1992 (RA 7227) insofar as they
pertain to disposition of properties already transferred to BCDA by law. All
proceeds from the disposition of alienable and disposable properties under
the jurisdicition of the BCDA should accrue to the BCDA. Depriving BCDA of
these proceeds would adversely impact the thrust of the Conversion
Authority and deprive the bases conversion program and BCDA stakeholders
including Baguio, La Trinidad, Itogon, Sablan, Tuba, and Tublay (BLISTT)
Projects of necessary funding.

In view of these considerations, I am constrained to veto the


abovementioned enrolled bill.

Very truly yours,


(Sgd.) BENIGNO S. AQUINO III

You might also like