2010 Harriet Fetal-Adult Cognition

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

NIH Public Access

Author Manuscript
Biol Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 July 1.
Published in final edited form as:
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

Biol Psychiatry. 2010 July 1; 68(1): 108–111. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.02.021.

Fetal Irradiation Interferes with Adult Cognition in the Nonhuman


Primate

Harriet R. Friedman and Lynn D. Selemon


Department of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven., CT 06520-80001

Abstract
Background—Exposure to x-irradiation in early gestation has been shown to disrupt normal
thalamo-cortical development in the monkey and thereby model one key feature of the
neuropathology of schizophrenia. However, the effect of fetal irradiation on cognitive functions that
are vulnerable in schizophrenia, e.g., working memory, has not been examined.
Methods—Four fetally irradiated macaque monkeys (FIMs) and 4 age-matched controls (CONs)
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

were tested as juveniles (12–30 mo) and again as adults (~5 yrs) on Delayed Spatial Response (DR),
a working memory task that is dependent on intact prefrontal cortical circuitry.
Results—As juveniles, 7 of 8 monkeys learned DR; one FIM refused to test. Performance in the
two groups was not different. As adults, only one FIM achieved criterion on DR. Three of 4 FIMs
did not reach criterion at the 0-sec delay interval of the DR task whereas all 4 CONs mastered DR
at the maximum tested delay of 10 secs. FIMs completed fewer DR test sessions compared to CONs.
In contrast, all FIMs and 3 of 4 CONs learned an associative memory task, Visual Pattern
Discrimination.
Conclusions—Fetal exposure to irradiation resulted in an adult-onset cognitive impairment in the
working memory domain that is relevant to understanding the developmental etiology of
schizophrenia.

Keywords
thalamus; prefrontal cortex; working memory; schizophrenia; neurodevelopment; attention

Mounting epidemiologic evidence suggests that schizophrenia is a disease with origins in


NIH-PA Author Manuscript

neurodevelopment (1–4). Despite the likely prenatal origin of schizophrenia, symptom onset
generally is not observed until late adolescence or early adulthood (5), suggesting an interaction
between latent brain pathology and developmental processes that unmasks cognitive and
behavioral disturbances of the disease (6). Prefrontal cortical dysfunction is a core feature of
schizophrenia as patients exhibit thought disorder and are impaired on cognitive tests of
working memory (7–9).

Corresponding Author: Lynn D. Selemon, Ph.D. Department of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208001,
New Haven, CT 06520-8001, Phone: (508) 540-5306, ldselemon@aol.com.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting
proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could
affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Friedman and Selemon Page 2

We disrupted neurogenesis in early gestation by exposing the developing brain to x-irradiation.


We then performed longitudinal cognitive assessment to determine if fetal exposure to
irradiation produces a working memory deficit, and if so, whether this deficit is present at
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

young ages or instead emerges with maturation to adulthood.

METHODS AND MATERIALS


Subjects
Eight rhesus monkeys, four exposed in utero to x-irradiation (FIMs) as described previously
(10) and four sham-irradiated (N=3) or non-irradiated (N=1) controls (CONs), were subjects
(Table 1). All animal protocols were approved by Yale’s Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee. The monkeys were born naturally at term (~E165), stayed with their mothers until
6 months of age, and then were pair-housed (6) or singly-housed (CON-Vf, FIM-Sf) in the
adult colony.

Behavioral Testing
Delayed Spatial Response (DR) task—Monkeys were tested on manual DR (described
in 11) as juveniles (12–30 mo) and as adults (~5 yrs). DR is a working memory task because
the position of the bait must remembered through the delay interval and must be updated on a
trial-to-trial basis to obtain the reward. Every attempt was made to promote accurate
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

performance. For example, the particular reward used as bait was tailored to the individual
monkey’s preference, and baiting of the well was accentuated to ensure that the monkey was
watching.

DR was administered in 3 phases. In phase 1, monkeys were habituated to the transport cage
and the Wisconsin General Testing Apparatus (WGTA) and were trained to displace identical
plaques covering baited wells. In phase 2, the screen was introduced to institute a memory/
delay interval of “0 sec.” However, even the “0 sec” delay produces a momentary gap in which
working memory is required to bridge the interval between seeing the baited well and executing
the correct response. In phase 3, the delay was incremented by 1-sec intervals to 10 sec as
monkeys achieved criterion performance at each interval. Monkeys were required to perform
≥ 90% correct across 100 consecutive trials for 1–5 sec delay intervals and ≥90% correct in 1
session (~30 trials) for 6–10 sec delay intervals. Due to an animal technician’s impending leave
of absence; 2 juvenile CONs were more quickly promoted (> 90% correct in 1 session at all
intervals), and CON-Jf was tested only to the 4-sec delay. When retested as adults, the 7
monkeys that had successfully performed DR as infants (4 CONs, 3 FIMs) were given 500
consecutive trials to meet criterion in phase 2 (0 sec delay); FIM-Bm, who not perform DR as
a juvenile, was allowed 1000 trials to meet the phase 2 criterion.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

Visual Pattern Discrimination. (VPD)—All adult monkeys were tested on VPD (as
described in 11). VPD is an associative memory task wherein one stimulus (a white “plus sign”
on a black background) invariantly signals the availability of the bait/reward and a second
stimulus (a white “square” on a black background) is never associated with the reward. Wells
were baited and covered with the screen down, out of view of the monkey. The right/left
position of the bait was irrelevant and was predetermined by a modified Gellerman series. An
intertrial interval of ~10–20 secs was used to approximate the intertrial interval in DR. Monkeys
were tested until they met criterion (≥90% across 100 trials).

Statistical analyses
Between-group differences on juvenile DR performance (number of trials to criterion) were
tested using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test (SPSS v. 14.0) at each of 5 delay intervals
(0, 1–2, 3–4, 5–6, and 7–8 secs). Group differences in performance on VPD (trials to criterion)

Biol Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 July 1.


Friedman and Selemon Page 3

were examined using a non-parametric, chi-square approach (SAS PROC NPAR1WAY SAS
v. 9.1).
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

RESULTS
Juvenile DR performance
All 4 juvenile CONs and 3 juvenile FIMs met criterion on DR at the “0 sec” delay in phase 2.
FIM-Bm would not engage in the task. All monkeys who mastered phase 2 also successfully
completed phase 3 through at least the 8-sec delay interval, except CON-Jf who completed DR
at the 4-sec delay interval (see above). The number of trials required for FIMs and CONs to
reach criterion on DR did not differ (all p≥ 0.289) at any delay.

Adult DR performance
As adults, all 4 CONs mastered DR at all delays (0–10 secs) whereas of the 4 FIMs, only FIM-
Tm achieved this goal (Fig. 1). In fact, with the exception of FIM-Tm, the FIM cohort failed
DR at its most basic level, i.e., 0-sec delay. Thus, all of the CONs who learned the task as
juveniles also learned the task as adults. However, 2 of 3 FIMs who learned the task as juveniles
could no longer perform the task as adults. FIM-Bm did not master the task as an adult despite
being allowed 1000 trials to meet criterion. FIM-Bm engaged in the task but performed
inconsistently even at the 0-sec delay (Fig. 1). It is noteworthy that although FIM-Tm’s
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

performance was indistinguishable from adult CONs, this monkey used positional cueing to
perform the task, i.e., he moved his body to the side of the cage corresponding to the position
of the baited well. Therefore, this FIM may have been using a motor-based strategy rather than
working memory to retain the location of the reward. Statistical comparison of the groups was
not possible because only one FIM performed DR as an adult.

Adult VPD performance


All FIMs mastered VPD in <1000 trials. Surprisingly, FIM-Bm, who would not perform DR
as a juvenile and failed DR an adult, achieved the discrimination in only 320 trials. Three CONs
acquired VPD in ~200–400 trials. Testing of CON-Jf was stopped after 690 trials when the
monkey had attained 60% accuracy. In the 3 CONs and 4 FIMs that reached criterion, the
number of trials required did not differ between groups (c2= 0.1250, p= 0.7237).

DISCUSSION
Early gestational irradiation produced a profound cognitive deficit in adulthood in 3 of 4 FIMs.
Performance of these monkeys on DR did not reach criterion even at the shortest possible delay,
a deficit comparable to that of juvenile monkeys given large prefrontal lobectomies and more
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

severe than deficits in adult monkeys with dlPFC lesions given that FIMs often did not complete
testing sessions (12,13). Notably, these same FIMs did not exhibit working memory deficits
as juveniles. Of the 3 FIMs that failed to perform DR as adults, 2 had been competent on DR
as juveniles at much longer delays (8–9 secs). Failure of the adult FIMs to perform DR even
at the most minimal delay is indicative of a severe cognitive deficit since this is an easy task
for normal adult monkeys, especially those with prior experience performing the task.

The design of the experiment, i.e. requiring >5 years between experimental manipulation in
utero and testing of the animals as adults, precluded having larger numbers of subjects.
However, an N ≤4/group has been used in behavioral studies of primates (e.g., 11–14).
Moreover, pilot data in one monkey with similar prenatal irradiation exposure buttresses our
result as this FIM also showed an age-dependent impairment on DR(15).

Biol Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 July 1.


Friedman and Selemon Page 4

Specificity of the cognitive deficit


It is noteworthy that FIMs were proficient on VPD, a task that requires memory for a general
association and is comparable in difficulty to mastery of the 0-sec delay of DR but does not
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

tap into the working memory functions of the dlPFC (16). Since FIMs were not impaired on
VPD, their impairment cannot be attributed to a generalized deficit in cognition or performance.
Indeed, dissociation in performance on the two tasks strongly indicates that cognitive
impairment of adult FIMs involved the working memory domain.

Neuroanatomic findings in FIMs


MR neuroimaging of the subjects in this study at 6 mos, 12 mos, 3 yrs, and 5–6 yrs has
uncovered widespread brain volume deficits encompassing the thalamus, basal ganglia and
cortical gray matter (17). Non-human primate studies have established that the dlPFC mediates
mnemonic function as part of a circuit involving other brain structures, including the
mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus and the neostriatum (16,18,19). Fronto-striatal-thalamo-
cortical circuitry also has been implicated in impairment of attention and executive processing
in schizophrenia subjects (20).

Relevance to the developmental hypothesis of schizophrenia


Prenatal stressors, including fetal exposure to diagnostic x-rays, have been linked to the
manifestation of schizophrenia in later life (1–4; R. Gross, Myers-JDC Brookdale Institute,
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

Israel, personal communication). Our findings show that fetal exposure to x-irradiation leads
to age-dependent cognitive impairment manifesting only in adulthood. These results are
pertinent to the etiopathology of schizophrenia because they demonstrate that disruption of
brain development can produce a silent lesion, i.e. one that is not functionally expressed until
adulthood.

Acknowledgments
We thank Ms. Heidi Voegeli for testing of the infant monkeys, Ms. Voegeli and Ms. Heather Findlay for assistance
in performing the prenatal irradiation exposure, and Dr. Paul Thompson, currently Director of the Methodology and
Data Anlaysis Center, Sanford Research, Sioux Falls, SD, for statistical consultation. This work was supported by
National Institutes of Health grant MH59329 (LS) and the Washington University Conte Center grant MH071616
(John G. Csernansky, M.D., Program Director).

References
1. Mednick SA, Machon RA, Huttunen MO, Bonett D. Adult schizophrenia following prenatal exposure
to an influenza epidemic. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:189–192. [PubMed: 3337616]
2. Susser ES, Lin SP. Schizophrenia after prenatal exposure to the Dutch Hunger Winter of 1944–1945.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:983–988. [PubMed: 1449385]


3. Hollister JM, Laing P, Mednick SA. Rhesus incompatibility as a risk factor for schizophrenia in male
adults. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996;53:19–24. [PubMed: 8540773]
4. Brown AS, Schaefer CA, Wyatt RJ, Geotz R, Begg MD, Gorman JM, Susser ES. Maternal exposure
to respiratory infections and adult schizophrenia spectrum disorders. A prospective birth cohort study.
Schizophr Bull 2000;26:287–295. [PubMed: 10885631]
5. Mancevski B, Keilp J, Kurzon M, Berman RM, Ortakov V, Harkary-Friedman J, Rosoklija F, et al.
Lifelong course of positive and negative symptoms in chronically institutionalized patients with
schizophrenia. Psychopathology 2007;40:83–92. [PubMed: 17215594]
6. Weinberger DR. Implications of normal brain development for the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Arch
Gen Psychiatry 1987;44:660–669. [PubMed: 3606332]
7. Flaum M, Schultz SK. The core symptoms of schizophrenia. Ann Med 1996;28:525–531. [PubMed:
9017111]

Biol Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 July 1.


Friedman and Selemon Page 5

8. Goldman-Rakic, PS. Prefrontal cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia: The relevance of working


memory. In: Caroll, BJ.; Barrett, JE., editors. Psychopathology and the Brain (American
Psychopathological Association). New York, NY: Raven Press; 1991. p. 1-23.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

9. Park S, Holzman PS. Schizophrenics show spatial working memory deficits. Arch Gen Psychiatry
1992;49:975–982. [PubMed: 1449384]
10. Algan O, Rakic P. Radiation-induced, lamina-specific deletions of neurons in the primate visual
cortex. J Comp Neurol 1997;38:355–352.
11. Friedman HR, Goldman-Rakic PS. Activation of the hippocampus and dentate gyrus by working-
memory: A 2-deoxyglucose study of behaving rhesus monkeys. J Neurosci 1988;8:4693–4706.
[PubMed: 3199202]
12. Goldman PS. Functional development of the prefrontal cortex in early life and the problem of neuronal
plasticity. Exp Neurol 1971;32:366–387. [PubMed: 4999861]
13. Battig K, Rosvold HE, Mishkin M. Comparison of the effects of frontal and caudate lesions on delayed
response and alternation in monkeys. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1960;53:400–404. [PubMed:
13797573]
14. Diamond A, Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR. Successful performance by monkeys with lesions of the
hippocampal formation on AB and object retrieval, two tasks that mark developmental changes in
human infants. Behav Neurosci 1989;103:526–537. [PubMed: 2736067]
15. Castner SA, Algan O, Rakic P, Goldman-Rakic PS. Two nonhuman primate models of psychosis:
Fetal irradiation and amphetamine sensitization. Soc Neurosci Abst 1996;22:1676.
16. Goldman-Rakic, PS. Circuitry of the prefrontal cortex and the regulation of behavior by
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

representational knowledge. In: Plum, F.; Mountcastle, V., editors. Handbook of Physiology. Vol.
5. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society; 1987. p. 373-417.
17. Aldridge K, Wang L, Harms M, Moffitt AJ, Pope K, Csernansky JG, Selemon LD. A longitudinal
study of the emergence of postnatal neuroanatomical abnormalities in non-human primates exposed
to irradiation in utero: A neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2009;35
(Suppl1):137.
18. Isseroff A, Rosvold HE, Galkin TW, Goldman-Rakic PS. Spatial memory impairments following
damage to the mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus in rhesus monkeys. Brain Res 1982;232:97–113.
[PubMed: 7034865]
19. Friedman HR, Janas J, Goldman-Rakic PS. Enhancement of metabolic activity in the diencephalon
of monkeys performing working memory tasks: A 2-deoxyglucose study in behaving rhesus
monkeys. J Cognitive Neurosci 1990;2:18–31.
20. Morey RA, Inan S, Mitchell TV, Perkins DO, Lieberman JA, Belger A. Imaging frontostriatal function
in ultra-high-risk, early, and chronic schizophrenia during executive processing. Arch Gen Psychiatry
2005;62:254–262. [PubMed: 15753238]
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

Biol Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 July 1.


Friedman and Selemon Page 6
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

Figure 1.
Plots of Individual Test Sessions for Adults Performing DR. Percent correct for each test
session of DR is plotted for CONs (left) and FIMs (right). Unshaded areas indicate phase 2 (0-
sec) delay trials. Shaded areas indicate test sessions for delays of 1–10 secs (phase 3). Filled
circles represent completed test sessions (all 30 trials performed), and open circles indicate
incomplete test sessions (< 30 trials completed). Numbers in parentheses indicate percent
correct > 50%. Note that FIMs Lf, Sf, and Bm did not meet criterion for performance on DR
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

at the 0-sec delay interval and that performance in these animals was erratic, sometimes ranging
above 90% correct but never sustaining this level of performance to reach criterion.

Biol Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 July 1.


NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript

Table 1
Irradiaton Exposure and Age of Behavioral Testing

Animal Sex DOB Time in embryonic day (E) and dose of irradiation (in cGy) Total dose (in cGy) Age at Testing (in mos)
Juvenile DR Adult DR Adult VPD

FIM-Tm M 021901 E34(50), E36(50), E38(50), E41(50) 200 15–26 54–56 57–59
FIM-Lf F 032301 E30(50), E33(50), E35(50), E37(50) 200 15–30 58–59 61–64
Friedman and Selemon

FIM-Sf F 042701 E32(50), E34(50), E36(50) 150 16–29 58–60 60–63


FIM-Bm M 052601 E35(50), E37(50), E38(50) 150 17–29 53–59 60–61
CON-Mm M 032301 4 doses ketamine –E29, E32, E34, E36 0 12–27 53–55 57–58
CON-Om M 042501 2 doses ketamine- E34, E36 0 16–25 57–58 58–59
CON-Vf F 073101 3 doses ketamine- E39, E41, E43 0 13–26 56–57 60
CON-Jf F 081401 no sham irradiation 0 18–24 55–57 59–60

Biol Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 July 1.


Page 7

You might also like