456740
456740
456740
Review Article
Developments of Mindlin-Reissner Plate Elements
Copyright © 2015 S. Cen and Y. Shang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Since 1960s, how to develop high-performance plate bending finite elements based on different plate theories has attracted a great
deal of attention from finite element researchers, and numerous models have been successfully constructed. Among these elements,
the most popular models are usually formulated by two theoretical bases: the Kirchhoff plate theory and the Mindlin-Reissener plate
theory. Due to the advantages that only 𝐶0 continuity is required and the effect of transverse shear strain can be included, the latter
one seems more rational and has obtained more attention. Through abundant works, different types of Mindlin-Reissener plate
models emerged in many literatures and have been applied to solve various engineering problems. However, it also brings FEM
users a puzzle of how to choose a “right” one. The main purpose of this paper is to present an overview of the development history
of the Mindlin-Reissner plate elements, exhibiting the state-of-art in this research field. At the end of the paper, a promising method
for developing “shape-free” plate elements is recommended.
[10, 11] and the selected reduced integration [12, 13]. In addi- In 1971, in order to eliminate the shear locking problem
tion to the shear locking problem, there are two other great existing in the Mindlin-Reissner plate elements, Zienkiewicz
numerical challenges in Mindlin-Reissner plate theory, that et al. [10] introduced the famous reduced integration scheme
is, the singularity caused by the plate obtuse corners and the which can drastically improve the element performance
edge effect caused by certain boundary conditions [14, 15]. by reducing the integration order for all stiffness matrix
Although these two do not pose great effects on the entire components. This work [10] was based on the element given
structure, they do complicate the numerical analysis. But, no by [17]. Almost at the same time, an analogous work was
enough attention has been paid to them. proposed by Pawsey and Clough [24]. Although the reduced
Through substantial attempts from scholars, various Min- integration method did not have theoretical explanations,
dlin-Reissner plate bending elements [137–188] are available it indeed was a significant improvement for plate bending
in numerous literatures. Furthermore, by using the higher- elements [25]. Another effective approach was the selective
order elasticity theories, some models based on the nonclas- reduced integration, whose validity had been subsequently
sical Mindlin-Reissner plate theories are proposed [189–191], demonstrated by Hughes and other scholars [12, 13, 19, 26]. Its
such as the modified couple stress theory [192, 193]. However, main idea was to split the strain energy into two parts: bend-
no one has been treated as the so-called “best” one. Thus, ing part and shear part. Lower order integration was used
how to choose a “right” one is quite puzzling to the FEM for the troublesome shear strain energy, while full integration
users. At the present stage, the major drawback in Mindlin- was employed for the bending energy. The applications of
Reissner plate elements is that the element’s performance is selective reduced integration may need some modifications in
highly sensitive to mesh distortion. How to develop a “shape- code procedures [27], so that the computational cost will be
free” element is still an open topic. The expression “shape- increased. Since then, these two reduced integration schemes
free” means that the element can always perform well regard- have been widely applied, helping eliminate or alleviate the
less of the mesh quality. In this paper, a review on the devel- shear locking phenomenon. Prathap and Somashekar [28]
opment of the Mindlin-Reissner plate elements is firstly proposed a vagarious strategy with (2 × 1) and (1 × 2)
proposed. Then, a promising “shape-free” Mindlin-Reissner Gauss integration, respectively, for the terms 𝛾𝑥𝑧 and 𝛾𝑦𝑧 . The
plate element method is briefly recommended. derived element QUAD4-CC was free of locking and had a
proper rank in rectangular forms. Unfortunately, this advan-
tage deteriorated when the element was not rectangular.
2. Developments of Mindlin-Reissner Although improved results can been obtained by using
Plate Elements reduced or selective reduced integration in most cases, these
methods cannot always ensure the absence of shear locking.
The first attempt to employ the Mindlin-Reissner plate theory Belytschko et al. [31] proposed a so-called mode decompo-
in finite element method was the 8-node isoparametric ele- sition approach combined with one-point quadrature, which
ment derived from the degenerated shell approach [17]. In can show improved performances compared to a straightfor-
early time, most Mindlin-Reissner plate elements were the ward application of reduced integration. However, it was still
displacement-based models. A common problem encoun- found to shear lock with certain mesh patterns. Furthermore,
tered was that these elements often gave poor results in thin there were even some cases that elements cannot be improved
plate limit if their element stiffness matrices were evaluated by them at all [29]. Moreover, the most noteworthy and fatal
using full integration schemes. This phenomenon is the well- problem was that reduced or selective reduced integration
known “shear locking” problem. The first explanation on often brought about spurious zero energy modes [32], which
the shear locking was presented by Zienkiewicz and Hinton will yield unreliable results under certain boundary condi-
[18]. They found that, with the use of a penalty function tions. An exception that possessed a correct rank and did not
formulation, the product of the shear stiffness matrix and the lock was the so-called “heterosis” element [26] which utilized
displacement vector should be zero when the thickness-span an 8-node interpolation for rotations and 9-node interpola-
ratio was sufficiently small. This discovery led to the develop- tion for deflections. In order to eliminate the rank deficiency,
ment of so-called “locking indicator” [11], which measured the stabilization method was proposed by Belytschko et al.
the singularity of an element stiffness matrix. Also based [33–36]. The essential ingredient of this method was to super-
on this work [18], Hughes et al. [12, 19] gave an alterna- impose a “stabilizing” stiffness matrix to the stiffness matrix
tive concept, “constraint index,” to predict locking behavior obtained by reduced integration. The most well-known one
in different finite element meshes. However, this index was the 𝛾-method initiated by Flanagan and Belytschko
often deduced an overly pessimistic assessment. Afterwards, [37], in which a vector 𝛾 orthogonal to displacement fields
Spilker and Munir [20, 21] proposed a modified version, was introduced. From the view of computational cost, this
called “rotational constraint index,” which can achieve better procedure seemed attractive and economical for constructing
correlations. In order to gain more complete understanding simple elements. However, additional researches were still
and better estimation of the shear locking, Averill and Reddy needed for understanding the physical meanings of the
[23] proposed another analytical technique verifying the roles stabilizing parameters more clearly [27].
that shear constraints play in thin plate. These constraints Another alternative approach to alleviate shear locking,
were expressed in terms of the nodal DOFs and then were named by “assumed natural strain (ANS)” method, was pro-
judged to be the proper Kirchhoff constraints or spurious posed by Hughes and Tezduyar [38] and MacNeal [39]. In
locking constraints. [38], Hughes and Tezduyar were the first to find that shear
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 3
locking can be avoided without losing important energy improve the approximated deflection fields by the rotational
modes. The main idea of ANS method was to define the trou- DOFs. In this method, one order higher polynomials can be
blesome shear strains independent of the approximation used for the deflection than rotations without adding addi-
of displacements. Then, these independent assumed strains tional element parameters. Thus, it can help meet the require-
were connected with the nodal displacements through the ments in thin plate limit that the rotations were equal to
strain-displacement relation calculated at certain discrete derivatives of the deflections. It is known that the linked
points. Finally, they were interpolated over the element by interpolation on its own cannot ensure free of shear locking,
using specific shape functions. This method had been proved unless some other techniques were simultaneously employed,
to be mathematically valid by Brezzi et al. [40], and the key such as bubble modes, selective/reduced integration, or oth-
to the success was related to the choices of these preselected ers. Even so, many elements were still developed based on the
points. After then, based on this concept, many models linked interpolation techniques [25, 75–84]. Besides, some
were successfully developed [41–45]. For instance, Tessler researchers started to study the relation between the linked
and Hughes [42, 43] proposed the quadrilateral and trian- interpolation elements and other models. For example, T3BL
gular plate elements, named as MIN4 and MIN3, in which was proved to be essentially the same as the MIN3 [87].
“anisoparametric” representations were used together with Recently, inspired by the higher-order linked interpolation
continuous transverse shear edge constraints. In their work, functions developed for the Timoshenko beam, Ribarić and
a concept of “finite-element-appropriate” shear correction Jelenić [80] found a distinct basis for developing plate ele-
factor, derived through multiplying the classical shear factor ments. Later, they [81] proposed two higher-order 9-node
with a factor relating to the element’s geometrical and mate- quadrilateral plate finite elements in which the interpolation
rial properties, was also proposed. Sze et al. [44] developed functions were expended with three bubble parameters for
a triangular element AST6, which had a favorable constraint keeping the polynomial completeness. Although the higher-
index of shear locking and optimized strains with respect to a order linked interpolation can make elements perform well in
linear pure bending field. Afterwards, they gave an improved distorted mesh, it indeed led to vast computational cost owing
model [45] in where the matrix inversion in original formu- to additional bubble degrees of freedom.
lations can be avoided. The hybrid/mixed approach was another way which can
Some variations of the ANS method were then presented, effectively and thoroughly eliminate the shear locking prob-
including the well-known mixed interpolated tensorial com- lem (see [20, 21, 32, 75–77, 88–118] and the references herein).
ponents (MITC) method proposed by Bathe et al. [40, 46– Lee and Pian [88] explained why shear locking appears in
49]. Their method consisted in interpolating the covariant the thin limit case and gave some solutions in hybrid/mixed
shear strain components 𝛾𝑥𝑧 and 𝛾𝑦𝑧 in a particular manner. models. To develop hybrid/mixed elements, various vari-
A series of MITC plate/shell elements were constructed for ational principles were available, including the principle
linear/nonlinear analysis [50–56], among which the 4-node of minimum complementary energy, the Hellinger-Reissner
element MITC4 [47] may be the most widely used one in variational principle, the Hu-Washizu variational principle,
commercial codes [51], although it experienced some slight and their modified forms. In the hybrid/mixed method,
locking and shear oscillation in distorted meshes. Based displacements or boundary displacement and stresses/strains
on MITC4, Kebari [57] proposed the one point integrated within the element were independently assumed. Thus, per-
version, in which the Taylor series expansion approach [52] formances of these hybrid/mixed elements were largely based
was employed to accommodate the linear variation of stress on the appropriate choice of parameters. However, the lack
within the element. of specific rules in a priori choosing the “best” stress com-
The discrete shear gap (DSG) method [58] was another bination may be a major drawback. A significant work was
scheme analogous to the ANS approach. The difference proposed by Malkus and Hughes [13]. They showed that there
between these two methods was that the lack of collocation was equivalence between mixed models and displacement
points makes the application of the DSG method indepen- models with reduced integration. After this work, a series
dent of the element’s order [59]. Thus, the DSG method was of effective hybrid/mixed elements were proposed, including
employed by many elements to eliminate the shear locking some models mentioned above. Spilker and Munir [20] devel-
[60–63]. oped a high-order hybrid-stress element with use of the 12-
Batoz et al. proposed the discrete Kirchhoff technique [29, node cubic serendipity shape functions and 36 stress param-
64, 65] for constructing thin plate elements. This “discrete” eters. This element had a favorable “rotational constraint
concept was subsequently extended to the thick plate ele- index” [21]. Saleeb and Chang [27] proposed a HMPL5 ele-
ments, and different types of models were proposed, such as ment with three bubble functions represented by a fifth inter-
the DRM element [66], the discrete Mindlin triangle (DMT) nal node. However, the use of internal node brought inconve-
element [67], the discrete shear triangular (DST) and discrete nience and seemed unpopular. Simo and Rifai [117] presented
shear quadrilateral (DSQ) elements [68–72], and the discrete a three-field mixed formulation in terms of displacements,
Kirchhoff–Mindlin elements [73, 74]. These “discrete” thick stresses, and an enhanced strain field. Since the stress inter-
plate elements can model thick plate well, while coinciding polation was assumed L2-orthogonal to the enhanced strain
with the DKT/DKQ element for the thin plate. interpolation, the stress field can be eliminated from the
In 1993, Zeinkiewicz et al. proposed the linked interpola- final formulations. Thus, it collapsed into a two-field mixed
tion method [75, 76], which has also been applied by other method. This method can be used to develop low-order
researchers later. The main thought of this concept was to elements with enhanced accuracy in coarse meshes. Ayad and
4 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
his cooperators proposed the mixed shear projected (MiSP) in form of area coordinates will not deteriorate in distorted
elements, including the stand bilinear models [99] and the meshes. Hence, the resulting element AC-MQ4 was quite ins-
high-order ones [113, 114]. This approach represented the ensitive to mesh distortion. When constructing the element,
transversal shear forces and shear strains in a particular man- the locking-free Timoshenko’s beam formulas were employed
ner: the shear forces were derived from the bending moments to help eliminate the shear-locking problem. Recently, this
using the equilibrium equations and the shear strains were technique has also been widely used in developing Mindlin-
defined in terms of the edge tangential strains. Brasile [25] Reissner plate elements [131–136].
constructed element TIP3, whose stress fields were assumed The smoothed finite element method (S-FEM), proposed
from a moment-shear uncoupled polynomial approximation by Liu et al. [137, 138], was also extended to Mindlin-Reissner
and then forced to satisfy some equilibrium conditions so plate elements. This method utilized the strain smoothing
that the minimum number of the stress parameters can be technique of mesh-free methods [139] to improve the accu-
obtained. de Miranda and Ubertini [100] also proposed a racy of standard FEM. When developing smoothed Mindlin-
self-equilibrium hybrid element. Particularly, its stresses were Reissner plate models, the locking-free curvature smoothing
expressed by uncoupled polynomial expansions in terms of formulation is mainly used. In S-FEM models, smoothing
skew coordinates [119]. Pereira and Freitas [115, 116] employed domains can be located inside the elements or cover parts
Legendre polynomials to express the resultants within the ele- of adjacent elements. Thus, based on different smoothing
ment domain and the deflections along boundaries. Because procedures, different types of S-FEM elements were derived,
of the orthogonality of the Legendre approximation, a highly including CS-FEM [51, 140], NS-FEM [61], and ES-FEM
sparse finite element solving system was derived. By com- [62, 141–143]. Nguyen-Thoi et al. [140] applied the cell-
bination of one-point integration and a stabilization matrix, based strain smoothing technique to modify the well-known
Gruttmann and Wagner [111] proposed a model whose stiff- element MIN3 [87] to formulate a new element CS-MIN3.
ness matrix can be analytically integrated, so that some com- In CS-FEM, the number of supporting nodes was the same
putational costs can be saved. Even though there were some as those in elements. Therefore, the bandwidth of stiffness
inherent drawbacks existing in hybrid/mixed method, such matrix in the CS-FEM was similar to the standard FEM. Ngu-
as the need of matrices inversion, it still inspired researchers yen-Xuan et al. [61] proposed a node-based smoothed model
to develop new types of novel hybrid/mixed models. (NS-FEM), in which the strain smoothing was associated
Recently, some scholars, mostly among mathematicians, with the nodes of the elements. This NS-FEM can provide
began to employ the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) finite ele- an upper bound solution in energy norm for the elasticity
ment methods [17] to design plate elements [120–126]. This problem [144]. By introducing the curvatures smoothing
DG method admitted the discontinuities in the element dis- technique into the well-known MITC4 [47] and incorporat-
crete space, leading to new types of conforming or noncon- ing stabilized conforming nodal integration, Nguyen-Xuan
forming elements. Brezzi and Marini [121] used nonconform- et al. [141] proposed the MISC models. These elements can
ing piecewise linear functions for both rotations and transver- provide more accurate results, especially in distorted meshes.
sal displacements and added internal degrees of freedom Furthermore, also based on the concept of S-FEM, Liu et al.
to make the element perform better. Later, Lovadina [123] [60, 145–147] proposed the alpha finite element method
proposed a simplified version by using piecewise constant (𝛼FEM), in which the element was enhanced by the addi-
shear stress approximation functions. Arnold et al. [120] tional averaged nodal strain terms with an adjustable param-
developed two DG Mindlin-Reissner plate element families: eter 𝛼, resulting in a properly softer stiffness formulation.
one was the fully discontinuous case and the other was the Based on the mechanism of shear locking phenomenon
case of continuous rotations and nonconforming deflections. and the potential functional of Mindlin-Reissner plate, Cai
Hansbo et al. [126, 127] also proposed a quadrilateral element et al. [150] extended the generalized mixed variational prin-
model with continuous displacements and discontinuous ciple (GMVP) [151], which was a type of parameterized vari-
rotations. In this model, the rotations had the same order as ational principles, to Mindlin-Reissner plate. In their models,
the parametric derivatives of the displacements in the para- splitting factors were introduced to adjust the shear potential
metric reference plane, and they obeyed the same transfor- and complementary energy components. Through this way,
mation law. Boesing et al. [125] developed an interior penalty the element stiffness matrix can be artificially changed, which
DG model. In their work, the a priori error analysis of DG can make the element free of shear locking and possess higher
methods was also presented. Although the discontinuous accuracy.
Galerkin method seems somewhat unfamiliar to traditional The so-called free formulation method, introduced in
FEM, it was clear that the DG technique can offer a different 1975 by Bergan and Hanssen [152], was a radically differ-
way to these problems difficult for a classical approach [120]. ent approach. Instead of various variational principles, this
Unlike that most quadrilateral elements were constructed method [152–157] was directly derived from the conditions
in Cartesian or isoparametric coordinates, Cen et al. [128] that the elements satisfy the requirements of the patch test
extended the quadrilateral area coordinate method [129, 130] and the rigid body motions. Such requirements can be
to formulate a new element AC-MQ4 by employing the greatly relaxed by slight modification of the coupling stiffness
general conforming theory [148, 149]. A distinct feature of between fundamental and higher-order displacement modes
this method was that the transformation relations between [152]. Thus, the shear deformations were only associated with
the area coordinates and Cartesian coordinates were always the higher modes and can be tackled in a special way [153,
linear, so that the order of the displacement fields expressed 154].
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 5
In addition to the methods mentioned above, there are alleviated at the expense of mathematical complexity or high
still many other models and methods proposed by numerous computational cost and no effective and succinct solutions
literatures [158–184]. But among them only a fraction of typ- are available. For this problem, a promising solution was
ical models can be briefly introduced here. Through an adap- proposed recently, that is, the hybrid displacement function
tive mesh-refinement method, Holzer et al. [160] proposed a (HDF) method [194] for Mindlin-Reissner plate element. The
model employing the enough higher-order interpolation for main characteristic of this method is to assume the stress
shape functions. Similar to the model given by [151], Arnold fields within element through the assumption of the dis-
and Brezzi [177] also developed a model containing a shear placement function 𝐹 [195], rather than directly assuming
energy splitting parameter. What is different was that this themselves. All variables of Mindlin-Reissner plate theory
parameter was used to determine how much shear energy will can be expressed by such displacement function 𝐹, and the
be exactly integrated. Suggestions for appropriately choosing derived resultants can satisfy all the governing equations.
such parameter were also presented by [178]. Similarly, Wang Furthermore, these solutions can degenerate into the ones of
et al. [171, 172] applied the combined hybrid method to design thin plate when the thickness is sufficiently small. The HDF
quadrilateral elements, which can make the system’s energy elements are free of shear locking and can perform well in the
optimal by adjusting the combined parameter. Polit et al. [179] severely distorted mesh, even when the mesh contains degen-
proposed an 8-node quadrilateral element, in which each erated triangle or concave quadrilateral. Here, the outline of
monomial term of the interpolation functions for the normal this method is introduced.
rotations was matched by the derivatives of its counterpart For a Mindlin-Reissner plate, the deflection 𝑤 and rota-
deflection. Zhou [176] took the linear combination of the tions 𝜓𝑥 , 𝜓𝑦 can be expressed by the displacement function 𝐹
mixed and displacement-based formulations to present a [195] as follows:
new variational formulation. Cheung and Chen extended
the refined nonconforming element method [161] to develop 𝐷 2
𝑤=𝐹− ∇ 𝐹,
Mindlin-Reissner plate elements [162, 163]. Duan and Liang 𝐶
[174] reformulated the classical mixed variational principle by 𝜕𝐹
relaxing the continuity of the transverse displacement while 𝜓𝑥 = , (1)
strengthening the normal continuity of the shear stresses. 𝜕𝑥
Pontaza and Reddy [175] proposed a formulation based on 𝜕𝐹
the least-squares variational principle, in which the high- 𝜓𝑦 = ,
𝜕𝑦
order nodal expansions and the full integration were used.
Maunder and de Almeida [170] proposed equilibrium models in which 𝐷 and 𝐶 are the bending and shear stiffness and
in which the stress fields were divided into hyperstatic part
and spurious kinematic part. Ming and Shi [173] provided a 𝐷∇2 ∇2 𝐹 = 𝑞. (2)
unified variational formulation for three different elements,
MIN4 [42], Q9 [183], and FMIN4 [184], and proved their 𝑞 in (2) denotes the transversely distributed load. Then,
optimal error bounds. Castellazzi and Krysl [164] proposed a by substituting (1) into the related governing equations of
new assumed-strain technique with use of the nodal integra- Mindlin-Reissner plate, the resultants R expressed as the
tion, in which the weighted residual method was employed to functional of displacement function 𝐹 are derived as follows:
weakly enforce the equilibrium equation and the kinematic
equation. Later, they [167] verified the insensitivity of this 𝑛
method to geometrical distortion in a variety of distorted ̃ (𝐹) ,
R = ∑R𝑖0 𝛽𝑖 + R∗ = D (3)
meshes. 𝑖=1
[18] O. C. Zienkiewicz and E. Hinton, “Reduced integration, func- [35] T. Belytschko, J. S. J. Ong, and W. K. Liu, “A consistent control
tion smoothing and non-conformity in finite element analysis of spurious singular modes in the 9-node Lagrange element for
(with special reference to thick plates),” Journal of the Franklin the laplace and mindlin plate equations,” Computer Methods in
Institute, vol. 302, no. 5-6, pp. 443–461, 1976. Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 269–295,
[19] T. J. R. Hughes, R. L. Taylor, and W. Kanoknukulchai, “Simple 1984.
and efficient finite element for plate bending,” International [36] W. K. Liu, J. S. Ong, and R. A. Uras, “Finite element stabiliza-
Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. tion matrices—a unification approach,” Computer Methods in
1529–1543, 1977. Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 13–46,
[20] R. L. Spilker and N. I. Munir, “The hybrid-stress model for 1985.
thin plates,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in [37] D. P. Flanagan and T. Belytschko, “A uniform strain hexahedron
Engineering, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1239–1260, 1980. and quadrilateral with orthogonal hourglass control,” Interna-
[21] R. L. Spilker and N. I. Munir, “A hybrid-stress quadratic tional Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 17, no.
serendipity displacement mindlin plate bending element,” Com- 5, pp. 679–706, 1981.
puters and Structures, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 1980. [38] T. J. R. Hughes and T. E. Tezduyar, “Finite elements based upon
[22] G. Prathap and G. R. Bhashyam, “Reduced integration and Mindlin plate theory with particular reference to the four-node
the shear-flexible beam element,” International Journal for bilinear isoparametric element,” Transactions ASME—Journal
Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 195–210, of Applied Mechanics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 587–596, 1981.
1982. [39] R. H. MacNeal, “Derivation of element stiffness matrices by
[23] R. C. Averill and J. N. Reddy, “Behaviour of plate elements assumed strain distributions,” Nuclear Engineering and Design,
based on the first-order shear deformation theory,” Engineering vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 1982.
Computations, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 57–74, 1990. [40] F. Brezzi, K.-J. Bathe, and M. Fortin, “Mixed-interpolated
[24] S. F. Pawsey and R. W. Clough, “Improved numerical integration elements for Reissner-Mindlin plates,” International Journal for
of thick shell finite elements,” International Journal for Numeri- Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1787–1801,
cal Methods in Engineering, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 575–586, 1971. 1989.
[25] S. Brasile, “An isostatic assumed stress triangular element for [41] T. J. R. Hughes, The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and
the Reissner-Mindlin plate-bending problem,” International Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood
Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1987.
971–995, 2008. [42] A. Tessler and T. J. R. Hughes, “An improved treatment of
[26] T. J. R. Hughes and M. Cohen, “The ‘heterosis’ finite element for transverse shear in the mindlin-type four-node quadrilateral
plate bending,” Computers & Structures, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 445– element,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engi-
450, 1978. neering, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 311–335, 1983.
[27] A. F. Saleeb and T. Y. Chang, “An efficient quadrilateral element [43] A. Tessler and T. J. R. Hughes, “A three-node mindlin plate
for plate bending analysis,” International Journal for Numerical element with improved transverse shear,” Computer Methods in
Methods in Engineering, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1123–1155, 1987. Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 71–101,
[28] G. Prathap and B. R. Somashekar, “Field- and edge-consistency 1985.
synthesis of a 4-noded quadrilateral plate bending element,” [44] K. Y. Sze, D. Zhu, and D.-P. Chen, “Quadratic triangular 𝐶0 plate
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. bending element,” International Journal for Numerical Methods
26, no. 8, pp. 1693–1708, 1988. in Engineering, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 937–951, 1997.
[29] J. L. Batoz, K. J. Bathe, and L. W. Ho, “A study of 3-node [45] K. Y. Sze and D. Zhu, “A quadratic assumed natural strain
triangular plate bending elements,” International Journal for triangular element for plate bending analysis,” Communications
Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1771–1812, in Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1013–
1980. 1025, 1998.
[30] G. Prathap and S. Viswanath, “An optimally integrated 4-node [46] K. J. Bathe and F. Brezzi, “On the convergence of a four-node
quadrilateral plate bending element,” International Journal for plate bending element based on Mindlin/Reissner plate theory
Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 831–840, and a mixed interpolation,” in Proceedings of the 5th Conference
1983. on Mathematics of Finite Elements and Applications, New York,
[31] T. Belytschko, H. Stolarski, and N. Carpenter, “A C0 triangular NY, USA, 1985.
plate element with one-point quadrature,” International Journal [47] K.-J. Bathe and E. N. Dvorkin, “A four-node plate bending
for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 787– element based on Mindlin/Reissner plate theory and a mixed
802, 1984. interpolation,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in
[32] R. L. Spilker, “Invariant 8-node hybrid-stress elements for Engineering, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 367–383, 1985.
thin and moderately thick plates,” International Journal for [48] E. N. Dvorkin and K.-J. Bathe, “A continuum mechanics
Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1153–1178, based four-node shell element for general non-linear analysis,”
1982. Engineering computations, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 77–88, 1984.
[33] T. Belytschko, C. S. Tsay, and W. K. Liu, “A stabilization matrix [49] K.-J. Bathe and E. N. Dvorkin, “A formulation of general
for the bilinear Mindlin plate element,” Computer Methods in shell elements—the use of mixed interpolation of tensorial
Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 313–327, components,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in
1981. Engineering, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 697–722, 1986.
[34] T. Belytschko and C. S. Tsay, “A stabilization procedure for [50] F. Brezzi, M. Fortin, and R. Stenberg, “Error analysis of mixed-
the quadrilateral plate element with one point quadrature,” interpolated elements for Reissner-Mindlin plates,” Mathemat-
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. ical Models & Methods in Applied Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 125–
19, no. 3, pp. 405–419, 1983. 151, 1991.
8 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
[51] C. T. Wu and H. P. Wang, “An enhanced cell-based smoothed [68] J.-L. Batoz and P. Lardeur, “A discrete shear triangular nine
finite element method for the analysis of Reissner-Mindlin D.O.F. element for the analysis of thick to very thin plates,”
plate bending problems involving distorted mesh,” International International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol.
Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 28, no. 3, pp. 533–560, 1989.
288–312, 2013. [69] J.-L. Batoz and I. Katili, “On a simple triangular reissner/mind-
[52] W. K. Liu, E. S. Law, D. Lam, and T. Belytschko, “Resultant- lin plate element based on incompatible modes and discrete
stress degenerated-shell element,” Computer Methods in Applied constraints,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in
Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 259–300, 1986. Engineering, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1603–1632, 1992.
[53] Y. Lee, P.-S. Lee, and K.-J. Bathe, “The MITC3+ shell element [70] Y. C. Cai, L. G. Tian, and S. N. Atluri, “A simple locking-free
and its performance,” Computers and Structures, vol. 138, pp. 12– discrete shear triangular plate element,” Computer Modeling in
23, 2014. Engineering & Sciences, vol. 77, no. 3-4, pp. 221–238, 2011.
[54] H.-M. Jeon, P.-S. Lee, and K.-J. Bathe, “The MITC3 shell [71] P. Lardeur, Développement et Évaluation de Deux Nouveaux
finite element enriched by interpolation covers,” Computers and Éléments Finis de Plaques et Coques Composites Avec Influence
Structures, vol. 134, pp. 128–142, 2014. Du Cisaillement Transversal, UTC, Compiègne, France, 1990.
[55] K. J. Bathe, F. Brezzi, and L. D. Marini, “The MITC9 shell [72] J. L. Batoz and G. Dhatt, Modélisation des Structures Par Élé-
element in plate bending: mathematical analysis of a simplified ments Finis: Solides Élastiques, Université Laval, Paris, France,
case,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 617–626, 2011. 1990.
[56] P.-S. Lee and K.-J. Bathe, “The quadratic MITC plate and [73] I. Katili, “New discrete Kirchhoff-Mindlin element based on
MITC shell elements in plate bending,” Advances in Engineering Mindlin-Reissner plate theory and assumed shear strain fields.
Software, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 712–728, 2010. Part II. An extended DKQ element for thick-plate bending
[57] H. Kebari, “A one point integrated assumed strain 4-node analysis,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engi-
Mindlin plate element,” Engineering Computations, vol. 7, no. 4, neering, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1885–1908, 1993.
pp. 284–290, 1990.
[74] I. Katili, “New discrete Kirchhoff-Mindlin element based on
[58] K.-U. Bletzinger, M. Bischoff, and E. Ramm, “A unified Mindlin-Reissner plate theory and assumed shear strain fields.
approach for shear-locking-free triangular and rectangular shell Part I: an extended DKT element for thick-plate bending analy-
finite elements,” Computers & Structures, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 321– sis,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering,
334, 2000. vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1859–1883, 1993.
[59] G. Falsone and D. Settineri, “A Kirchhoff-like solution for the [75] O. C. Zeinkiewicz, Z. N. Xu, L. F. Zeng, A. Samuelsson, and
Mindlin plate model: a new finite element approach,” Mechanics N.-E. Wiberg, “Linked interpolation for Ressiner-Mindlin plate
Research Communications, vol. 40, pp. 1–10, 2012. element: part I—a simple quadrilateral,” International Journal
[60] N. Nguyen-Thanh, T. Rabczuk, H. Nguyen-Xuan, and S. Bordas, for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 36, no. 18, pp. 3043–
“An alternative alpha finite element method with discrete shear 3056, 1993.
gap technique for analysis of isotropic Mindlin-Reissner plates,”
[76] R. L. Taylor and F. Auricchio, “Linked interpolation for
Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 519–535,
Reissner-Mindlin plate elements: part II—a simple triangle,”
2011.
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol.
[61] H. Nguyen-Xuan, T. Rabczuk, N. Nguyen-Thanh, T. Nguyen- 36, no. 18, pp. 3057–3066, 1993.
Thoi, and S. Bordas, “A node-based smoothed finite element
[77] F. Auricchio and R. L. Taylor, “A shear deformable plate
method with stabilized discrete shear gap technique for analysis
element with an exact thin limit,” Computer Methods in Applied
of Reissner-Mindlin plates,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 46,
Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 118, no. 3-4, pp. 393–412, 1994.
no. 5, pp. 679–701, 2010.
[62] X. Cui, G. R. Liu, G. Y. Li, G. Zhang, and G. Zheng, “Analysis of [78] X. Zhongnian, “A thick-thin triangular plate element,” Interna-
plates and shells using an edge-based smoothed finite element tional Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 33, no.
method,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 45, no. 2-3, pp. 141–156, 5, pp. 963–973, 1992.
2010. [79] R. G. Durán and E. Liberman, “On the convergence of a
[63] C. V. Le, “A stabilized discrete shear gap finite element for adap- triangular mixed finite element method for Reissner-Mindlin
tive limit analysis of Mindlin-Reissner plates,” International plates,” Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences,
Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 339–352, 1996.
231–246, 2013. [80] D. Ribarić and G. Jelenić, “Higher-order linked interpolation
[64] J. L. Batoz and M. B. Bentahar, “Evaluation of a new quadri- in quadrilateral thick plate finite elements,” Finite Elements in
lateral thin plate bending element,” International Journal for Analysis and Design, vol. 51, pp. 67–80, 2012.
Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1655–1677, [81] D. Ribarić and G. Jelenić, “Distortion-immune nine-node
1982. displacement-based quadrilateral thick plate finite elements
[65] J. L. Batoz, “An explicit formulation for an efficient triangular that satisfy constant-bending patch test,” International Journal
plate-bending element,” International Journal for Numerical for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 98, no. 7, pp. 492–
Methods in Engineering, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1077–1089, 1982. 517, 2014.
[66] O. C. Zienkiewicz, R. L. Taylor, P. Papadopoulos, and E. [82] F. Auricchio and R. L. Taylor, “A triangular thick plate finite
Oñate, “Plate bending elements with discrete constraints: new element with an exact thin limit,” Finite Elements in Analysis and
triangular elements,” Computers & Structures, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. Design, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 57–68, 1995.
505–522, 1990. [83] P. Papadopoulos and R. L. Taylor, “A triangular element based
[67] J. Aalto, “From Kirchhoff to Mindlin plate elements,” Communi- on Reissner-Mindlin plate theory,” International Journal for
cations in Applied Numerical Methods, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 231–241, Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1029–1049,
1988. 1990.
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 9
[84] Z. Xu, O. C. Zienkiewicz, and L. F. Zeng, “Linked interpolation [101] H.-Y. Duan and G.-P. Liang, “Analysis of some stabilized
for Reissner-Mindlin plate elements: Part III. An alternative low-order mixed finite element methods for Reissner-Mindlin
quadrilateral,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in plates,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineer-
Engineering, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1437–1443, 1994. ing, vol. 191, no. 3–5, pp. 157–179, 2001.
[85] F. Auricchio and C. Lovadina, “Analysis of kinematic linked [102] G. Y. Shi and P. Tong, “Assumed stress C0 quadrilateral
interpolation methods for Reissner-Mindlin plate problems,” triangular plate elements by interrelated edge displacements,”
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol.
190, no. 18-19, pp. 2465–2482, 2001. 39, no. 6, pp. 1041–1051, 1996.
[86] C. Lovadina, “Analysis of a mixed finite element method for [103] K. J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall, Upper
the Reissner-Mindlin plate problems,” Computer Methods in Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1996.
Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 163, no. 1–4, pp. 71–85, [104] M. A. Aminpour, “Direct formulation of a hybrid 4-node shell
1998.
element with drilling degrees of freedom,” International Journal
[87] M. Lyly, “On the connection between some linear triangular for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 997–
Reissner-Mindlin plate bending elements,” Numerische Math- 1013, 1992.
ematik, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 77–107, 2000.
[105] J. Jirousek, A. Wroblewski, and B. Szybinski, “New 12 DOF
[88] S. W. Lee and T. H. H. Pian, “Improvement of plate and shell quadrilateral element for analysis of thick and thin plates,”
finite elements by mixed formulations,” AIAA Journal, vol. 16, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol.
no. 1, pp. 29–34, 1978. 38, no. 15, pp. 2619–2638, 1995.
[89] S. W. Lee and J. C. Zhang, “A 6-node finite element for [106] F. S. Jin and Q. H. Qin, “A variational principle and hybrid Tre-
plate bending,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in fftz finite element for the analysis of Reissner plates,” Computers
Engineering, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 131–143, 1985. & Structures, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 697–701, 1995.
[90] S. W. Lee and S. C. Wong, “Mixed formulation finite elements
[107] Y. F. Dong and J. A. T. Defreitas, “A quadrilateral hybrid
for Mindlin theory plate bending,” International Journal for
stress element for mindlin plates based on incompatible dis-
Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1297–1311,
placements,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in
1982.
Engineering, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 279–296, 1994.
[91] T. H. H. Pian and K. Sumihara, “Hybrid SemiLoof elements for
[108] T. H. H. Pian and D. P. Chen, “Alternative ways for formulation
plates and shells based upon a modified Hu-Washizu principle,”
of hybrid stress elements,” International Journal for Numerical
Computers & Structures, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 165–173, 1984.
Methods in Engineering, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1679–1684, 1982.
[92] S. L. Weissman and R. L. Taylor, “Resultant fields for mixed plate
bending elements,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics [109] G. Shi and G. Z. Voyiadjis, “Efficient and accurate four-node
and Engineering, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 321–355, 1990. quadrilateral 𝐶0 plate bending element based on assumed
strain fields,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in
[93] R. D. Cook, “Two hybrid elements for analysis of thick, thin and
Engineering, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1041–1055, 1991.
sandwich plates,” International Journal for Numerical Methods
in Engineering, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 277–288, 1972. [110] G. Shi and G. Z. Voyiadjis, “Simple and efficient shear flexible
two-node arch/beam and four-node cylindrical shell/plate finite
[94] J. Robinson and G. W. Haggenmacher, “LORA-an accurate four
elements,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engi-
node stress plate bending element,” International Journal for
neering, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 759–776, 1991.
Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 296–306,
1979. [111] F. Gruttmann and W. Wagner, “A stabilized one-point integrated
[95] A. F. Saleeb, T. Y. Chang, and S. Yingyeunyong, “A mixed quadrilateral Reissner-Mindlin plate element,” International
formulation of C0 -linear triangular plate/shell element-the role Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 61, no. 13, pp.
of edge shear constraints,” International Journal for Numerical 2273–2295, 2004.
Methods in Engineering, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1101–1128, 1988. [112] A. K. Noor and C. M. Andersen, “Mixed models and reduced
[96] M. Gellert, “A new method for derivation of locking-free selective integration displacement models for non-linear shell
plate bending finite elements via mixed hybrid formulation,” analysis,” International Journal for Numerical Methods In Engi-
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. neering, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1429–1454, 1982.
26, no. 5, pp. 1185–1200, 1988. [113] R. Ayad and A. Rigolot, “An improved four-node hybrid-
[97] O. C. Zienkiewicz and D. Lefebvre, “A robust triangular plate mixed element based upon Mindlin’s plate theory,” International
bending element of the Reissner–Mindlin type,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 55, no. 6, pp.
Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 705–731, 2002.
1169–1184, 1988. [114] R. Ayad, A. Rigolot, and N. Talbi, “An improved three-node
[98] P. M. Pinsky and R. V. Jasti, “A mixed finite element for- hybrid-mixed element for Mindlin/Reissner plates,” Interna-
mulation for Reissner-Mindlin plates based on the use of tional Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 51, no.
bubble functions,” International Journal for Numerical Methods 8, pp. 919–942, 2001.
in Engineering, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1677–1702, 1989. [115] E. M. B. R. Pereira and J. A. T. Freitas, “Numerical implemen-
[99] R. Ayad, G. Dhatt, and J. L. Batoz, “A new hybrid-mixed varia- tation of a hybrid-mixed finite element model for Reissner-
tional approach for Reissner-Mindlin plates. The MISP model,” Mindlin plates,” Computers & Structures, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 323–
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 334, 2000.
42, no. 7, pp. 1149–1179, 1998. [116] E. M. B. R. Pereira and J. A. T. Freitas, “A hybrid-mixed finite
[100] S. de Miranda and F. Ubertini, “A simple hybrid stress element element model based on Legendre polynomials for Reissner-
for shear deformable plates,” International Journal for Numerical Mindlin plates,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and
Methods in Engineering, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 808–833, 2006. Engineering, vol. 136, no. 1-2, pp. 111–126, 1996.
10 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
[117] J. C. Simo and M. S. Rifai, “A class of mixed assumed strain [134] A.-K. Soh, S. Cen, Y.-Q. Long, and Z.-F. Long, “A new twelve
methods and the method of incompatible modes,” International DOF quadrilateral element for analysis of thick and thin plates,”
Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. European Journal of Mechanics. A. Solids, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 299–
1595–1638, 1990. 326, 2001.
[118] Y. S. Choo, N. Choi, and B. C. Lee, “A new hybrid-Trefftz trian- [135] C. S. Wang, P. Hu, and Y. Xia, “A 4-node quasi-conforming
gular and quadrilateral plate elements,” Applied Mathematical Reissner-Mindlin shell element by using Timoshenko’s beam
Modelling, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2010. function,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, vol. 61, pp. 12–
[119] K.-Y. Yuan, Y.-S. Huang, and T. H. H. Pian, “New strategy for 22, 2012.
assumed stresses for 4-node hybrid stress membrane element,” [136] H. X. Zhang and J. S. Kuang, “Eight-node Reissner-Mindlin
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. plate element based on boundary interpolation using Timo-
36, no. 10, pp. 1747–1763, 1993. shenko beam function,” International Journal for Numerical
Methods in Engineering, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 1345–1373, 2007.
[120] D. N. Arnold, F. Brezzi, and L. D. Marini, “A family of discontin-
uous Galerkin finite elements for the Reissner-Mindlin plate,” [137] G. R. Liu, K. Y. Dai, and T. T. Nguyen, “A smoothed finite
Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 22-23, no. 1, pp. 25–45, 2005. element method for mechanics problems,” Computational
Mechanics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 859–877, 2007.
[121] F. Brezzi and L. D. Marini, “A nonconforming element for the
Reissner-Mindlin plate,” Computers and Structures, vol. 81, no. [138] G. R. Liu, “A generalized gradient smoothing technique and
8-11, pp. 515–522, 2003. the smoothed bilinear form for Galerkin formulation of a
wide class of computational methods,” International Journal of
[122] C. Chinosi, C. Lovadina, and L. D. Marini, “Nonconforming Computational Methods, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 199–236, 2008.
locking-free finite elements for Reissner-Mindlin plates,” Com-
[139] J. S. Chen, C. T. Wu, S. Yoon, and Y. You, “A stabilized con-
puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 195,
forming nodal integration for Galerkin mesh-free methods,”
no. 25–28, pp. 3448–3460, 2006.
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol.
[123] C. Lovadina, “A low-order nonconforming finite element for 50, no. 2, pp. 435–466, 2001.
Reissner-Mindlin plates,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, [140] T. Nguyen-Thoi, P. Phung-Van, H. Luong-Van, H. Nguyen-
vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 2688–2705, 2005. Van, and H. Nguyen-Xuan, “A cell-based smoothed three-node
[124] D. N. Arnold, F. Brezzi, R. S. Falk, and L. D. Marini, “Locking- Mindlin plate element (CS-MIN3) for static and free vibration
free Reissner-Mindlin elements without reduced integration,” analyses of plates,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp.
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 65–81, 2013.
196, no. 37–40, pp. 3660–3671, 2007. [141] H. Nguyen-Xuan, T. Rabczuk, S. Bordas, and J. F. Debongnie, “A
[125] P. R. Boesing, A. L. Madureira, and I. Mozolevski, “A new inte- smoothed finite element method for plate analysis,” Computer
rior penalty discontinuous Galerkin method for the Reissner- Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 197, no. 13–
Mindlin model,” Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied 16, pp. 1184–1203, 2008.
Sciences, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1343–1361, 2010. [142] C. M. Shin and B. C. Lee, “Development of a strain-smoothed
[126] P. Hansbo and M. G. Larson, “Locking free quadrilateral con- three-node triangular flat shell element with drilling degrees of
tinuous/discontinuous finite element methods for the Reissner- freedom,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, vol. 86, pp. 71–
Mindlin plate,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and 80, 2014.
Engineering, vol. 269, pp. 381–393, 2014. [143] H. Nguyen-Xuan, G. R. Liu, C. Thai-Hoang, and T. Nguyen-
[127] P. Hansbo, D. Heintz, and M. G. Larson, “A finite element Thoi, “An edge-based smoothed finite element method (ES-
method with discontinuous rotations for the Mindlin-Reissner FEM) with stabilized discrete shear gap technique for analysis
plate model,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and of Reissner-Mindlin plates,” Computer Methods in Applied
Engineering, vol. 200, no. 5–8, pp. 638–648, 2011. Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 199, no. 9–12, pp. 471–489, 2010.
[128] S. Cen, Y.-Q. Long, Z.-H. Yao, and S.-P. Chiew, “Application [144] G. R. Liu and G. Y. Zhang, “Upper bound solution to elas-
of the quadrilateral area co-ordinate method: a new element ticity problems: a unique property of the linearly conforming
for Mindlin-Reissner plate,” International Journal for Numerical point interpolation method (LC-PIM),” International Journal
Methods in Engineering, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 1–45, 2006. for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 1128–
1161, 2008.
[129] Y. Q. Long, J. X. Li, Z. F. Long, and S. Cen, “Area co-ordinates
used in quadrilateral elements,” Communications in Numerical [145] G. R. Liu, T. Nguyen-Thoi, and K. Y. Lam, “A novel alpha
Methods in Engineering, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 533–545, 1999. finite element method (𝛼FEM) for exact solution to mechanics
problems using triangular and tetrahedral elements,” Computer
[130] Z. F. Long, J. X. Li, S. Cen, and Y. Q. Long, “Some basic formulae Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 197, no. 45–
for area co-ordinates in quadrilateral elements,” Communica- 48, pp. 3883–3897, 2008.
tions in Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 15, no. 12, pp.
[146] G. R. Liu, H. Nguyen-Xuan, T. Nguyen-Thoi, and X. Xu, “A
841–852, 1999.
novel Galerkin-like weakform and a superconvergent alpha
[131] A. Ibrahimbegović, “Plate quadrilateral finite element with finite element method (S𝛼FEM) for mechanics problems using
incompatible modes,” Communications in Applied Numerical triangular meshes,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 228,
Methods, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 497–504, 1992. no. 11, pp. 4055–4087, 2009.
[132] A. Ibrahimbegović, “Quadrilateral finite elements for analysis of [147] G. R. Liu, T. Nguyen-Thoi, and K. Y. Lam, “A novel FEM by
thick and thin plates,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics scaling the gradient of strains with factor 𝛼 (𝛼FEM),” Computa-
and Engineering, vol. 110, no. 3-4, pp. 195–209, 1993. tional Mechanics, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 369–391, 2009.
[133] A. K. Soh, Z. F. Long, and S. Cen, “A new nine dof triangular [148] L. Yu-Qiu and X. Ke-Gui, “Generalized conforming element
element for analysis of thick and thin plates,” Computational for bending and buckling analysis of plates,” Finite Elements in
Mechanics, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 408–417, 1999. Analysis and Design, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15–30, 1989.
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 11
[149] Y. L. Chen, S. Cen, Z. H. Yao, Y. Q. Long, and Z. F. Long, [166] E. Hinton and N. Bićanić, “A comparison of lagrangian and
“Development of triangular flat-shell element using a new thin- serendipity mindlin plate elements for free vibration analysis,”
thick plate bending element based on semiLoof constrains,” Computers and Structures, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 483–493, 1979.
Structural Engineering and Mechanics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 83–114, [167] G. Castellazzi and P. Krysl, “A nine-node displacement-
2003. based finite element for Reissner-Mindlin plates based on an
[150] L. Cai, T. Rong, and D. Chen, “Generalized mixed variational improved formulation of the NIPE approach,” Finite Elements
methods for Reissner plate and its applications,” Computational in Analysis and Design, vol. 58, pp. 31–43, 2012.
Mechanics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2002. [168] X. Y. Zhuang, R. Q. Huang, H. H. Zhu, H. Askes, and K.
[151] T.-Y. Rong, “Generalized mixed variational principles and new Mathisen, “A new and simple locking-free triangular thick plate
FEM models in solid mechanics,” International Journal of Solids element using independent shear degrees of freedom,” Finite
and Structures, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1131–1140, 1988. Elements in Analysis and Design, vol. 75, pp. 1–7, 2013.
[152] P. G. Bergan and L. Hanssen, “A new approach for deriving [169] C. Carstensen, X. P. Xie, G. Z. Yu, and T. X. Zhou, “A priori and
‘good’ finite elements,” The Mathematics of Finite Elements and a posteriori analysis for a locking-free low order quadrilateral
Applications, vol. 2, pp. 483–498, 1975. hybrid finite element for Reissner-Mindlin plates,” Computer
[153] P. G. Bergan and X. Wang, “Quadrilateral plate bending ele- Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 200, no. 9–
ments with shear deformations,” Computers and Structures, vol. 12, pp. 1161–1175, 2011.
19, no. 1-2, pp. 25–34, 1984. [170] E. A. W. Maunder and J. P. M. de Almeida, “A triangular hybrid
equilibrium plate element of general degree,” International
[154] P. G. Bergan and M. K. Nygard, “Finite elements with increased
Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 63, no. 3, pp.
freedom in choosing shape functions,” International Journal for
315–350, 2005.
Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 643–663,
1984. [171] B. Hu, Z. Wang, and Y. Xu, “Combined hybrid method applied
in the Reissner-Mindlin plate model,” Finite Elements in Analy-
[155] I. W. Liu, T. Kerh, and C. C. Lin, “A conforming quadrilateral
sis and Design, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 428–437, 2010.
plate bending element with shear deformations,” Computers &
Structures, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 93–100, 1995. [172] Z. Wang and B. Hu, “Research of combined hybrid method
applied in the Reissner-Mindlin plate model,” Applied Mathe-
[156] C. A. Felippa and P. G. Bergan, “A triangular bending element
matics and Computation, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 49–66, 2006.
based on an energy-orthogonal free formulation,” Computer
Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 61, no. 2, [173] P. Ming and Z.-C. Shi, “Analysis of some low order quadrilateral
pp. 129–160, 1987. Reissner-Mindlin plate elements,” Mathematics of Computation,
vol. 75, no. 255, pp. 1043–1065, 2006.
[157] P. G. Bergan, “Finite elements based on energy orthogonal
functions,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in [174] H.-Y. Duan and G.-P. Liang, “Mixed and nonconforming finite
Engineering, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1541–1555, 1980. element approximations of Reissner-Mindlin plates,” Computer
Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 192, no. 49-
[158] E. Hinton and H. C. Huang, “A family of quadrilateral Mindlin 50, pp. 5265–5281, 2003.
plate elements with substitute shear strain fields,” Computers
[175] J. P. Pontaza and J. N. Reddy, “Mixed plate bending elements
and Structures, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 409–431, 1986.
based on least-squares formulation,” International Journal for
[159] O. L. Roufaeil, “A new four-node quadrilateral plate bending Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 891–922,
element,” Computers & Structures, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 871–879, 2004.
1995.
[176] T. X. Zhou, “The partial projection method in the finite element
[160] S. Holzer, E. Rank, and H. Werner, “An implementation of the discretization of the Reissner-Mindlin plate model,” Journal of
hp-version of the finite element method for Reissner-Mindlin Computational Mathematics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 172–191, 1995.
plate problems,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in
[177] D. N. Arnold and F. Brezzi, “Some new elements for the
Engineering, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 459–471, 1990.
Reissner-Mindlin plate model,” in Boundary Value Problems
[161] Y. K. Cheung and W. J. Chen, “Refined nine-parameter tri- for Partial Differential Equations and Applications, pp. 287–292,
angular thin plate bending element by using refined direct 1993.
stiffness method,” International Journal for Numerical Methods [178] C. Chinosi and C. Lovadina, “Numerical analysis of some
in Engineering, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 283–298, 1995. mixed finite element methods for Reissner-Mindlin plates,”
[162] W. J. Chen and Y. K. Cheung, “Refined quadrilateral element Computational Mechanics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 1995.
based on Mindlin/Reissner plate theory,” International Journal [179] O. Polit, M. Touratier, and P. Lory, “A new 8-node quadrilateral
for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 47, no. 1–3, pp. 605– shear-bending plate finite element,” International Journal for
627, 2000. Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 387–411,
[163] C. Wanji and Y. K. Cheung, “Refined 9-Dof triangular Mindlin 1994.
plate elements,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in [180] H. R. Dhananjaya, J. Nagabhushanam, P. C. Pandey, and M.
Engineering, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1259–1282, 2001. Z. Jumaat, “New twelve node serendipity quadrilateral plate
[164] G. Castellazzi and P. Krysl, “Displacement-based finite elements bending element based on Mindlin-Reissner theory using
with nodal integration for Reissner-Mindlin plates,” Interna- integrated force method,” Structural Engineering and Mechanics,
tional Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 80, no. vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 625–642, 2010.
2, pp. 135–162, 2009. [181] H. R. Dhananjaya, P. C. Pandey, and J. Nagabhushanam, “New
[165] C.-K. Choi and S.-H. Kim, “Coupled use of reduced integra- eight node serendipity quadrilateral plate bending element for
tion and non-conforming modes in quadratic Mindlin plate thin and moderately thick plates using integrated force method,”
element,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engi- Structural Engineering and Mechanics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 485–
neering, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1909–1928, 1989. 502, 2009.
12 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
International
Journal of Journal of
Mathematics and
Mathematical
Discrete Mathematics
Sciences