SECTION 1. Extrajudicial Settlement by Agreement Between Heirs
SECTION 1. Extrajudicial Settlement by Agreement Between Heirs
SECTION 1. Extrajudicial Settlement by Agreement Between Heirs
RULE 74: SUMMARY SETTLEMENT OF ESTATES whatsoever in the division of the estate among the heirs when
they are adults and no debts against the estate.
SECTION 1. Extrajudicial settlement by agreement
between heirs. If the decedent left no will and no debts There Must Be Good Reason to Warrant Judicial
and the heirs are all of age, or the minors are represented Administration
by their judicial or legal representatives duly authorized
for the purpose, the parties may without securing letters Section 1 does not preclude heirs from instituting
of administration, divide the estate among themselves as administration proceedings if they don’t desire to resort for
they see fit by means of a public instrument filed in the good reasons to an ordinary action for partition. In other words,
office of the register of deeds, and should they disagree, such provision does not compel them to not to take a different
they may do so in an ordinary action of partition. If there is course of action.
only one heir, he may adjudicate to himself the entire
estate by means of an affidavit filled in the office of the Such administration is resorted only when heirs have good
register of deeds. The parties to an extrajudicial reasons for not resorting to an action.
settlement, whether by public instrument or by stipulation
in a pending action for partition, or the sole heir who “Good reason” depends on the Circumstances of Each
adjudicates the entire estate to himself by means of an Case
affidavit shall file, simultaneously with and as a condition
precedent to the filing of the public instrument, or The following are instances not considered by the Court as
stipulation in the action for partition, or of the affidavit in “good reasons”:
the office of the register of deeds, a bond with the said
register of deeds, in an amount equivalent to the value of 1. Dispute among heirs;
the personal property involved as certified to under oath
by the parties concerned and conditioned upon the 2. Multiplicity of suits;
payment of any just claim that may be filed under section
4 of this rule. It shall be presumed that the decedent left 3. To have legal capacity to appear is not ab good reason.
no debts if no creditor files a petition for letters of
administration within two (2) years after the death of the Validity of Oral Partition
decedent.
There is no law that requires partition among heirs to be in
The fact of the extrajudicial settlement or administration writing to be valid.
shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in
the manner provided in the nest succeeding section; but The requirement of partition to be put in a public document and
no extrajudicial settlement shall be binding upon any registered has its purpose of protecting the creditors and heirs
person who has not participated therein or had no notice themselves against tardy claims. It serves as a constructive
thereof. notice others.
GR: When a person dies, same should be judicially But when rights of creditors are not affected, it is competent for
administered and court appoints qualified administrator in the the heirs of an estate to enter in an agreement different than
order established under Section 6 Rule 78, if decedent left no that provided by law.
will (surviving spouse, next of kin and the creditors).
XPN: Reason why it is not covered within Statute of Frauds is
(1) All heirs are of lawful age; and because partition is not a conveyance of real property because
it does not involve transfer of property to another but rather a
(2) No debts are due from the estate;
confirmation or ratification of title or right of property by the heir
If satisfied, they may agree in writing to partition the property
renouncing in favor of another heir accepting and receiving the
without instituting the judicial administration or applying for the
appointment of an administrator. inheritance.
3. Other notices as court may direct. None of the defendants participated in the partition but none of
the heirs assumed to act for the absent heirs. Court ruled in
4. Hearing held within 1-3 months counted from last notice this case that defendants are not bound by such a transaction,
publication. in which they did not take part and that plaintiff cannot recover
the exclusive possession of the property.
5. Bond fixed by court if personal property.
2. Prescriptive Period to Annul Settlement
Exception