Complaint Against Kansas Judge Edward Bouker
Complaint Against Kansas Judge Edward Bouker
Complaint Against Kansas Judge Edward Bouker
THIS COMPLAINT FOR JUDGE EDWARD BOUKER IS FOR FAILING TO REPORT ATTORNEY
VERBALLY CAUTION ATTORNEY RHODES ON THE RECORD DURING THE HEARING) EVEN
THOUGH BERNARD RHODES REGRETS ON THE TRANSCRIPT FOR HIS COMMENTS JUST
LIKE JUDGE AJ. WACHTER DID IN DOCKET NUMBER 1114 WHERE JUDGE WACHTER
RECEIVED A CAUTION.
On January 16, 2018 in case number 17CV72P Kasey King vs. Lori Fleming et. al on page 27
of the court transcript on page 4 Bernard Rhodes is speaking to Judge Edward Bouker and
he states right on the record "THIS IS A LAWYER, WHO I REGRET TO SAY, SIMPLY CANNOT
BE TRUSTED." This is after Bernard Rhodes and Dennis Depew had already insulted,
humiliated, and embarrassed my attorney Prince Ogemeno which the court transcript
Attorney Dennis Depew thought that he would join and participate in Bernard Rhodes
inappropriate word choices and disrespect for myself, my attorney and the court by stating
on page 19 lines 14-19 "He's just trying to do his job. And yet he is constantly under attack,
and this case is just yet another example of somebody that now basically had three bites at
the apple at the Federal Court level with the initial ruling, the motion to clarify, and then
the motion to alter or amend". Dennis Depew not only shows disrespect to myself as a third
party and my attorney by talking about biting apples but he actually refers to Mr.
Ogunmeno and myself as "SOMEBODY"when he says another example of somebody that
now had three bites at the apple. Dennis Depew is giving insults and continues by acting
like a member of the BAR is just a somebody and that Mr. Ogunmeno is not an attorney and
does not have a name. Dennis Depew continues his inappropriate word choices and
unethical statements by saying on page 19 lines 20-21 "now with the filing of this case, they
want a fourth bite, and my client deserves to be left alone".
Mr. Rhodes also compared Mr. Ogunmeno's court answers to "MIXING APPLES AND
ORANGES" on page 271inelO of the court transcript. Bernard Rhodes also insults my son
and his attorney again on page 27 lines 21 to 25 and page 28 lines 1-2 of the court
transcript when Mr. Rhodes says "so he's mixing apples and oranges. I know we keep
talking about bites at the apples. Ihad two bites, somebody over here had four bites and
now I'm talking about oranges. But unfortunately with the opposition we are dealinp with,
that is the level we have to go to, is talking about fruit. because that's what we are dealing
here with, your Honor"!
On Page 30 line 18 attorney Ogunmeno acknowledges the disrespect that Bernard Rhodes
had given him when he says "Let me just - I don't want to be passionate here but Mr.
Honorable Edward Bouker was not prepared when he arrived in court which is required
under RULE 2.5 Competence, Diligence, and Cooperation.
[1] Competence in the performance of judicial duties requires the legal knowledge, skill,
thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary to perform a judge'sresponsibilities
of judicial office.
Honorable Bouker did not even know the name of the case that he drove down to Crawford
County District Court from all the way out to Hays, Kansas over 5-1/2 hours and he forgot
the name of the case and didn't know what was going on so he asked for someone to read
the case and to asked someone to fill him in on what was going on which is on page 3, line 4
through Page 4 line 1 of the court transcript. He also was late getting to the hearing which
was supposed to start at 1:30 but did not start until later. He didn't even apologize for
being late but instead he apologized for "suffering from the maladies of the season". I'm
sorry, but everyone is getting the flu and people are going ahead and exposing others to
their sickness and I certainly do not appreciate Judge Bouker arriving to court LATE and
SICK.
Sincerely,
Eric Muathe,
P. O. Box 224,
Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762
1
2 KASEY KING, )
)
3 )
Plaintiff, )
4 )
vs. ) CASE NO.
5 ) 2017CV72-P
MY TOWN MEDIA, INC., et al,)
6 )
)
7 )
Defendants. )
8
10 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
11
16
17 APPEARANCES;
1 APPEARANCES: (Continued)
2 teleconference.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1 PROCEEDINGS
7 do this.
14 very unclear.
17 sir.
19 A-D-E-B-A-Y-O O-G-U-N-M-E-N-O.
20 THE COURT: All right. Thank you,
21 sir. And what is your bar number, sir?
2 For defense?
5 Loy.
8 Judge Fleming.
10 that's my fault.
16 that motion?
2 25.
5 that.
19 in Pittsburg.
6 counsel.
10 there?
12 response. )
7 November 1st
8 that?
13 the 19th.
16 court.
18 calendar.
14 plaintiff there?
1 back.
4 respond.
20 problem.
11 breaking up.
19 should be ready.
3 Crawford County.)
11 got to do.
2 Honor.
1 CERTIFICATE
2 STATE OF KANSAS.
SS.
3 ALLEN COUNTY.
I, April O. Hudson, a Certified Shorthand