Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 216 views

    4.1 Grading Rubric

    Uploaded by

    melynnduh
    This evaluation rubric measures student performance in ministry level courses across four categories: communication skills, presentation, teamwork, and overall comments. It establishes five levels of achievement from below expectations to beyond expectations. For each category, specific criteria are provided to describe the characteristics of a student's work or participation at each level, from inadequate to outstanding. Scores range from 0 to 5, with descriptors given for a 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, and 5. Higher scores require more advanced language skills, thorough preparation, contribution to group work, and leadership abilities.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    4.1 Grading Rubric

    Uploaded by

    melynnduh
    216 views1 page
    This evaluation rubric measures student performance in ministry level courses across four categories: communication skills, presentation, teamwork, and overall comments. It establishes five levels of achievement from below expectations to beyond expectations. For each category, specific criteria are provided to describe the characteristics of a student's work or participation at each level, from inadequate to outstanding. Scores range from 0 to 5, with descriptors given for a 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, and 5. Higher scores require more advanced language skills, thorough preparation, contribution to group work, and leadership abilities.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This evaluation rubric measures student performance in ministry level courses across four categories: communication skills, presentation, teamwork, and overall comments. It establishes five levels of achievement from below expectations to beyond expectations. For each category, specific criteria are provided to describe the characteristics of a student's work or participation at each level, from inadequate to outstanding. Scores range from 0 to 5, with descriptors given for a 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, and 5. Higher scores require more advanced language skills, thorough preparation, contribution to group work, and leadership abilities.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    216 views1 page

    4.1 Grading Rubric

    Uploaded by

    melynnduh
    This evaluation rubric measures student performance in ministry level courses across four categories: communication skills, presentation, teamwork, and overall comments. It establishes five levels of achievement from below expectations to beyond expectations. For each category, specific criteria are provided to describe the characteristics of a student's work or participation at each level, from inadequate to outstanding. Scores range from 0 to 5, with descriptors given for a 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, and 5. Higher scores require more advanced language skills, thorough preparation, contribution to group work, and leadership abilities.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Evaluation
Rubric


 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 


    Ministry
Level
 Below
Expectations
 Meets
Expectations
 
 Beyond
Expectations



    One
 Two
 Three
 Four
 Five

    Marking
Scheme
 0/1
(Inadequate/Poor)
 2.5
(Adequate/Marginal)
 3.5
(Good)
 4.5
(Very
Good)
 5
(Excellent/Outstanding)

    
 
 
 
 
 

    Communication
Skills
 o Did
not
verbally
participate.
 o Terminology
and
 o Adequate
use
of
the
 o Proper
and
effective
 o Command
of
language,

    1. 
Showed
confidence
 o Did
not
meaningfully
 vocabulary
lacking
or
 language
and
 use
of
language,
 vocabulary,
and

    in
role.
 contribute
to
discussion.
 confused.
 appropriate
 vocabulary,
and
 terminology
superior.

    2. Spoke
well/
had
 o Was
not
confident
in
 vocabulary.
 terminology.
 o Clearly
confident
in

    superior
command
 speaking.
 o Some
confidence
 o Clearly
confident
in
 speaking
skills

    of
language.
 shown.
 speaking
skills.

    Presentation

 o Some
information
 o Minor
details
were
 o Information
was
 o Dressed
the
part
for
 o Dressed
the
part
for
the

    1. Created
handouts
or
 inaccurate.
 missing
or
inaccurate.
 complete
and
accurate.
 the
role.
 role.

    a
presentation.
 o No
preparation
was
 o Handouts
/
Presentation
 o Handouts
/
 o Information
 o Information
beyond
level

    2. Made
an
effort
to
 evident.
 were
relevant
but
 Presentation
was
 complete,
accurate,
 4
in
completeness
and

    accurately
assume
 o Handouts
/
Presentation
 incomplete.
 helpful
but
lacking
key
 and
well
summarized.
 accuracy.

    role.
 did
not
meaningfully
 points.
 o Handouts
/
 o Handouts
/
Presentation

    3. Clear
evidence
of
 contribute
to
the
 Presentation
was
well
 was
well
written
and

    background
 discussion.
 written
and
 meaningful.

    research.
 meaningful.

    Teamwork
 o 
Did
not
contribute
within
 o 
Did
not
follow‐through
 o Followed‐through
and
 o Followed‐through
and
 o Works
excellently
with

    1. Clear
evidence
of
 groups
and
in
charrette.
 fully
with
assigned
 contributed
to
the
 fully
contributed
with
 team
members.

    contribution.
 o 
Was
not
cooperative
 duties.
 group
by
completing
 assigned
tasks.
 o Went
above
and
beyond

    2. Cooperates
well
 and/or
started
conflicts
 o Contributed
a
small
 assigned
tasks.
 o Works
excellently
 assigned
tasks.

    with
others.
 within
the
group.

 amount
to
the
group.
 o Works
excellently
with
 with
team
members.
 o Delegated
tasks
and/or

    team
members.
 o Assisted
team
 assisted
team
members.

    members.
 o Was
able
to
address
and

    solve
group
problems.

    

    Comments/Observations/Conference
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    

    Student
Signature
______________________________________________________
Teacher
Signature
____________________________________________________

    


    











 
 
 
 
 
 Based
on
evaluation
scheme
found
in
Creating
Integrated
Curriculum
(1998)
by
Susan
Drake


    You might also like